-
The New England Journal of Medicine May 2021Rifapentine-based regimens have potent antimycobacterial activity that may allow for a shorter course in patients with drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Rifapentine-based regimens have potent antimycobacterial activity that may allow for a shorter course in patients with drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis.
METHODS
In an open-label, phase 3, randomized, controlled trial involving persons with newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis from 13 countries, we compared two 4-month rifapentine-based regimens with a standard 6-month regimen consisting of rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol (control) using a noninferiority margin of 6.6 percentage points. In one 4-month regimen, rifampin was replaced with rifapentine; in the other, rifampin was replaced with rifapentine and ethambutol with moxifloxacin. The primary efficacy outcome was survival free of tuberculosis at 12 months.
RESULTS
Among 2516 participants who had undergone randomization, 2343 had a culture positive for that was not resistant to isoniazid, rifampin, or fluoroquinolones (microbiologically eligible population; 768 in the control group, 791 in the rifapentine-moxifloxacin group, and 784 in the rifapentine group), of whom 194 were coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus and 1703 had cavitation on chest radiography. A total of 2234 participants could be assessed for the primary outcome (assessable population; 726 in the control group, 756 in the rifapentine-moxifloxacin group, and 752 in the rifapentine group). Rifapentine with moxifloxacin was noninferior to the control in the microbiologically eligible population (15.5% vs. 14.6% had an unfavorable outcome; difference, 1.0 percentage point; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.6 to 4.5) and in the assessable population (11.6% vs. 9.6%; difference, 2.0 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.1 to 5.1). Noninferiority was shown in the secondary and sensitivity analyses. Rifapentine without moxifloxacin was not shown to be noninferior to the control in either population (17.7% vs. 14.6% with an unfavorable outcome in the microbiologically eligible population; difference, 3.0 percentage points [95% CI, -0.6 to 6.6]; and 14.2% vs. 9.6% in the assessable population; difference, 4.4 percentage points [95% CI, 1.2 to 7.7]). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred during the on-treatment period in 19.3% of participants in the control group, 18.8% in the rifapentine-moxifloxacin group, and 14.3% in the rifapentine group.
CONCLUSIONS
The efficacy of a 4-month rifapentine-based regimen containing moxifloxacin was noninferior to the standard 6-month regimen in the treatment of tuberculosis. (Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and others; Study 31/A5349 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02410772.).
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Antitubercular Agents; Child; Confidence Intervals; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Moxifloxacin; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Rifampin; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary; Young Adult
PubMed: 33951360
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2033400 -
Clinical Microbiology and Infection :... Jan 2022Outcomes of treatment of tuberculosis patients with regimens including pretomanid have not yet been systematically reviewed. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Outcomes of treatment of tuberculosis patients with regimens including pretomanid have not yet been systematically reviewed.
OBJECTIVES
To appraise existing evidence on efficacy and safety of pretomanid in tuberculosis.
DATA SOURCES
Pubmed, clinicaltrials.gov. and Cochrane library.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Quantitative studies presenting original data on clinical efficacy or safety of pretomanid.
PARTICIPANTS
Patients with tuberculosis.
INTERVENTIONS
Treatment with pretomanid or pretomanid-containing regimens in minimum one study group.
METHODS
Two authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Data on efficacy (early bactericidal activity, bactericidal activity, end-of-treatment outcomes and acquired resistance) and safety were summarized in tables. Mean differences in efficacy outcomes between regimens across studies were calculated.
RESULTS
Eight studies were included; four randomized controlled trials on 2-week early bactericidal activity in rifampicin-susceptible tuberculosis, three trials with randomized rifampicin-susceptible tuberculosis arms and a single rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis arm (two on 8-week bactericidal activity, one on end-of-treatment outcomes), one single-arm trial with end-of-treatment outcomes in highly resistant tuberculosis. Activity of pretomanid-moxifloxacin-pyrazinamide was superior to standard treatment on daily change in colony-forming units at days 0-2, 0-56 and 7-56 and time to culture conversion in rifampicin-susceptible tuberculosis (hazard ratio: 1.7; 95% CI 1.1-2.7), but not at end of treatment in one study. This study was stopped due to serious hepatotoxic adverse events, including three deaths, in 4% (95% CI 2-8) patients on pretomanid-moxifloxacin-pyrazinamide and none in controls. In patients with uncomplicated rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis on pretomanid-moxifloxacin-pyrazinamide treatment, 91% (95% CI 59-100) had favourable end-of-treatment outcomes. In patients with highly resistant tuberculosis, 90% (95% CI 83-95) on pretomanid-bedaquiline-linezolid had favourable outcomes six months after treatment, but linezolid-related toxicity was frequent. No acquired resistance to pretomanid was reported.
CONCLUSIONS
Evidence suggests an important role for pretomanid in rifampicin-resistant and highly resistant tuberculosis. Trials comparing pretomanid to existing core and companion drugs are needed to further define that role.
Topics: Antitubercular Agents; Humans; Linezolid; Moxifloxacin; Nitroimidazoles; Pyrazinamide; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rifampin; Tuberculosis; Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant
PubMed: 34400340
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.08.007 -
JAMA Network Open Oct 2022Although topical antibiotics are often prescribed for treating acute infective conjunctivitis in children, their efficacy is uncertain. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Although topical antibiotics are often prescribed for treating acute infective conjunctivitis in children, their efficacy is uncertain.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the efficacy of topical antibiotic therapy for acute infective conjunctivitis.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
A randomized clinical trial was conducted in primary health care in Oulu, Finland, from October 15, 2014, to February 7, 2020. Children aged 6 months to 7 years with acute infective conjunctivitis were eligible for enrollment. The participants were followed up for 14 days. A subsequent meta-analysis included the present trial and 3 previous randomized clinical trials enrolling pediatric patients aged 1 month to 18 years with acute infective conjunctivitis.
INTERVENTIONS
Participants in the present randomized clinical trial were randomized to moxifloxacin eye drops, placebo eye drops, or no intervention.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome in the present randomized clinical trial was time to clinical cure (in days); in the meta-analysis, the primary outcome was the proportion of participants with conjunctival symptoms on days 3 to 6.
RESULTS
The randomized clinical trial included 88 participants (46 [52%] girls), of whom 30 were randomized to moxifloxacin eye drops (mean [SD] age, 2.8 [1.6] years), 27 to placebo eye drops (mean [SD], age 3.0 [1.3] years), and 31 to no intervention (mean [SD] age, 3.2 [1.8] years). The time to clinical cure was significantly shorter in the moxifloxacin eye drop group than in the no intervention group (3.8 vs 5.7 days; difference, -1.9 days; 95% CI, -3.7 to -0.1 days; P = .04), while in the survival analysis both moxifloxacin and placebo eye drops significantly shortened the time to clinical cure relative to no intervention. In the meta-analysis, a total of 584 children were randomized (300 to topical antibiotics and 284 to a placebo), and the use of topical antibiotics was associated with a significant reduction in the proportion of children who had symptoms of conjunctivitis on days 3 to 6 compared with placebo eye drops (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.91).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this randomized clinical trial and systematic review and meta-analysis, topical antibiotics were associated with significantly shorter durations of conjunctival symptoms in children with acute infective conjunctivitis.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu Identifier: 2013-005623-16.
Topics: Acute Disease; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Conjunctivitis; Female; Humans; Male; Moxifloxacin; Ophthalmic Solutions; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36194412
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.34459 -
JAMA Jan 2021Antibiotics are an effective and safe alternative to appendectomy for managing uncomplicated acute appendicitis, but the optimal antibiotic regimen is not known. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
IMPORTANCE
Antibiotics are an effective and safe alternative to appendectomy for managing uncomplicated acute appendicitis, but the optimal antibiotic regimen is not known.
OBJECTIVE
To compare oral antibiotics with combined intravenous followed by oral antibiotics in the management of computed tomography-confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
The Appendicitis Acuta (APPAC) II multicenter, open-label, noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted from April 2017 until November 2018 in 9 Finnish hospitals. A total of 599 patients aged 18 to 60 years with computed tomography-confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis were enrolled in the trial. The last date of follow-up was November 29, 2019.
INTERVENTIONS
Patients randomized to receive oral monotherapy (n = 295) received oral moxifloxacin (400 mg/d) for 7 days. Patients randomized to receive intravenous antibiotics followed by oral antibiotics (n = 288) received intravenous ertapenem (1 g/d) for 2 days followed by oral levofloxacin (500 mg/d) and metronidazole (500 mg 3 times/d) for 5 days.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary end point was treatment success (≥65%) for both groups, defined as discharge from hospital without surgery and no recurrent appendicitis during 1-year follow-up, and to determine whether oral antibiotics alone were noninferior to intravenous and oral antibiotics, with a margin of 6% for difference.
RESULTS
Among 599 patients who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 36 [12] years; 263 [44%] women), 581 (99.7%) were available for the 1-year follow-up. The treatment success rate at 1 year was 70.2% (1-sided 95% CI, 65.8% to ∞) for patients treated with oral antibiotics and 73.8% (1-sided 95% CI, 69.5% to ∞) for patients treated with intravenous followed by oral antibiotics. The difference was -3.6% ([1-sided 95% CI, -9.7% to ∞]; P = .26 for noninferiority), with the confidence limit exceeding the noninferiority margin.
CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE
Among adults with uncomplicated acute appendicitis, treatment with 7 days of oral moxifloxacin compared with 2 days of intravenous ertapenem followed by 5 days of levofloxacin and metronidazole resulted in treatment success rates greater than 65% in both groups, but failed to demonstrate noninferiority for treatment success of oral antibiotics compared with intravenous followed by oral antibiotics.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03236961; EudraCT Identifier: 2015-003633-10.
Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Intravenous; Administration, Oral; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Appendectomy; Appendicitis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Ertapenem; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Levofloxacin; Male; Metronidazole; Middle Aged; Moxifloxacin; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Young Adult
PubMed: 33427870
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.23525 -
Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift Der... Jun 2021A 53-year-old female patient presented with increased light sensitivity 3 weeks after oral intake of moxifloxacin tablets for an upper respiratory tract infection. The...
A 53-year-old female patient presented with increased light sensitivity 3 weeks after oral intake of moxifloxacin tablets for an upper respiratory tract infection. The symptoms were anisocoria and the pupils did not react to light or accommodation. The examination of the anterior segment of the eye revealed extensive bilateral iris transillumination defects (ITD). We diagnosed a bilateral acute iris transillumination (BAIT) syndrome. The BAIT syndrome is a rare disorder associated with massive depigmentation of the iris and atrophy of the iris musculature. A risk factor for BAIT syndrome seems to be the oral intake of antibiotics, in particular moxifloxacin after an upper respiratory tract infection but cases of spontaneous occurrence have also been described. Middle-aged women are particularly affected. The exact cause of BAIT syndrome is so far unknown but a potential mechanism involves the concentration of the antibiotic in the vitreous body. Differential diagnoses include other causes for ITD, such as albinism, intraocular inflammation, pseudoexfoliation syndrome and pigment dispersion syndrome. To date there is no specific treatment for BAIT syndrome. Possible complications include increased light sensitivity and post-BAIT glaucoma. Knowledge of the rare BAIT syndrome can be useful in the clinical routine for the differential diagnostic classification of an anisocoria and can possibly contribute to avoidance of unnecessary diagnostic steps.
Topics: Anisocoria; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Iris; Iris Diseases; Middle Aged; Moxifloxacin
PubMed: 32588124
DOI: 10.1007/s00347-020-01153-y -
Clinical Microbiology and Infection :... Jun 2023For non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions of wild-type isolates have not been systematically evaluated despite their...
Towards clinical breakpoints for non-tuberculous mycobacteria - Determination of epidemiological cut off values for the Mycobacterium avium complex and Mycobacterium abscessus using broth microdilution.
OBJECTIVE
For non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions of wild-type isolates have not been systematically evaluated despite their importance for establishing antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) breakpoints.
METHODS
We gathered MIC distributions for drugs used against the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and Mycobacterium abscessus (MAB) obtained by commercial broth microdilution (SLOMYCOI and RAPMYCOI) from 12 laboratories. Epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) and tentative ECOFFs (TECOFFs) were determined by EUCAST methodology including quality control (QC) strains.
RESULTS
The clarithromycin ECOFF was 16 mg/L for M. avium (n = 1271) whereas TECOFFs were 8 mg/L for M. intracellulare (n = 415) and 1 mg/L for MAB (n = 1014) confirmed by analysing MAB subspecies without inducible macrolide resistance (n = 235). For amikacin, the ECOFFs were 64 mg/L for MAC and MAB. For moxifloxacin, the WT spanned >8 mg/L for both MAC and MAB. For linezolid, the ECOFF and TECOFF were 64 mg/L for M. avium and M. intracellulare, respectively. Current CLSI breakpoints for amikacin (16 mg/L), moxifloxacin (1 mg/L) and linezolid (8 mg/L) divided the corresponding WT distributions. For QC M. avium and M. peregrinum, ≥95% of MIC values were well within recommended QC ranges.
CONCLUSION
As a first step towards clinical breakpoints for NTM, (T)ECOFFs were defined for several antimicrobials against MAC and MAB. Broad wild-type MIC distributions indicate a need for further method refinement which is now under development within the EUCAST subcommittee for anti-mycobacterial drug susceptibility testing. In addition, we showed that several CLSI NTM breakpoints are not consistent in relation to the (T)ECOFFs.
Topics: Humans; Mycobacterium avium Complex; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Nontuberculous Mycobacteria; Amikacin; Mycobacterium abscessus; Moxifloxacin; Linezolid; Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare Infection; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Macrolides; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous; Mycobacterium avium
PubMed: 36813087
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.02.007 -
BMC Infectious Diseases Jul 2015Non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU), or inflammation of the urethra, is the most common treatable sexually transmitted syndrome in men, with approximately 20-50 % of cases... (Review)
Review
Non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU), or inflammation of the urethra, is the most common treatable sexually transmitted syndrome in men, with approximately 20-50 % of cases being due to infection with Chlamydia trachomatis and 10-30 % Mycoplasma genitalium. Other causes are Ureaplasma urealyticum, Trichomonas vaginalis, anaerobes, Herpes simplex virus (HSV) and adenovirus. Up to half of the cases are non-specific. Urethritis is characterized by discharge, dysuria and/or urethral discomfort but may be asymptomatic. The diagnosis of urethritis is confirmed by demonstrating an excess of polymorpho-nuclear leucocytes (PMNLs) in a stained smear. An excess of mononuclear leucocytes in the smear indicates a viral etiology. In patients presenting with symptoms of urethritis, the diagnosis should be confirmed by microscopy of a stained smear, ruling out gonorrhea. Nucleid acid amplifications tests (NAAT) for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis and for M. genitalium. If viral or protozoan aetiology is suspected, NAAT for HSV, adenovirus and T. vaginalis, if available. If marked symptoms and urethritis is confirmed, syndromic treatment should be given at the first appointment without waiting for the laboratory results. Treatment options are doxycycline 100 mg x 2 for one week or azithromycin 1 gram single dose or 1,5 gram distributed in five days. However, azithromycin as first line treatment without test of cure for M. genitalium and subsequent Moxifloxacin treatment of macrolide resistant strains will select and increase the macrolide resistant strains in the population. If positive for M. genitalium, test of cure samples should be collected no earlier than three weeks after start of treatment. If positive in test of cure, moxifloxacin 400 mg 7-14 days is indicated. Current partner(s) should be tested and treated with the same regimen. They should abstain from intercourse until both have completed treatment. Persistent or recurrent NGU must be confirmed with microscopy. Reinfection and compliance must be considered. Evidence for the following recommendations is limited, and is based on clinical experience and guidelines. If doxycycline was given as first therapy, azithromycin five days plus metronidazole 4-500 mg twice daily for 5-7 days should be given. If azithromycin was prescribed as first therapy, doxycycline 100 mg x 2 for one week plus metronidazole, or moxifloxacin 400 mg orally once daily for 7-14 days should be given.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Chlamydia trachomatis; Doxycycline; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Fluoroquinolones; Humans; Metronidazole; Moxifloxacin; Mycoplasma genitalium; Urethritis
PubMed: 26220178
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-015-1043-4 -
Paediatric Drugs Mar 2022Moxifloxacin is a fluoroquinolone that is commonly used in adults, but not children. Certain clinical situations compel pediatric clinicians to use moxifloxacin, despite...
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE
Moxifloxacin is a fluoroquinolone that is commonly used in adults, but not children. Certain clinical situations compel pediatric clinicians to use moxifloxacin, despite its potential for toxicity and limited pharmacokinetics (PK) data. Our objective was to further characterize the pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin in children.
METHODS
We performed an opportunistic, open-label population PK study of moxifloxacin in children < 18 years of age who received moxifloxacin as part of standard care. A set of structural PK models and residual error models were explored using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Covariates with known biological relationships were investigated for their influence on PK parameters.
RESULTS
We obtained 43 moxifloxacin concentrations from 14 participants who received moxifloxacin intravenously (n = 8) or orally (n = 6). The dose of moxifloxacin was 10 mg/kg daily in participants ≤ 40 kg and 400 mg daily in participants > 40 kg. The population mean clearance and mean volume of distribution were 18.2 L/h and 167 L, respectively. The oral absorption was described by a first-order process. The estimated extent of oral bioavailability was highly variable (range 20-91%). Total body weight was identified as a covariate on clearance and volume of distribution, and substantially reduced the random unexplained inter-individual variability for both parameters. No participants experienced suspected serious adverse reactions related to moxifloxacin.
CONCLUSION
These data add to the existing literature to support use of moxifloxacin in children in certain situations; however, further prospective studies on the safety and efficacy of moxifloxacin are needed.
Topics: Adult; Child; Humans; Moxifloxacin; Prospective Studies
PubMed: 35284983
DOI: 10.1007/s40272-022-00493-3 -
International Journal of Infectious... Aug 2020A standard treatment regimen against Mycobacteroides abscessus complex (MABC) infections has not yet been established, making MABC difficult to treat successfully. In...
OBJECTIVES
A standard treatment regimen against Mycobacteroides abscessus complex (MABC) infections has not yet been established, making MABC difficult to treat successfully. In this study, we sought to develop an active ingredient for the clinical treatment of MABC infections.
METHODS
We screened 102 MABC strains isolated from clinical specimens using DNA sequence analysis with the housekeeping genes hsp65 and rpoB. Drug susceptibility testing was performed against two subspecies-Mycobacteroides abscessus subsp. abscessus (M. abscessus) and Mycobacteroides abscessus subsp. massiliense (M. massiliense)-using eight antimicrobial agents (clarithromycin, amikacin, doxycycline, imipenem, linezolid, moxifloxacin, faropenem, and rifampicin). The combined efficacy of the antimicrobial agents was investigated using a checkerboard method.
RESULTS
We identified 51 isolates as M. abscessus, 46 as M. massiliense, and five as others. Most of the M. abscessus isolates (83.0 %) exhibited inducible resistance to clarithromycin via the expression of the erm(41) gene. Combinations of imipenem with linezolid, moxifloxacin, and rifampicin exhibited additive effects against 81.0 %, 40.7 %, and 26.9 % of M. abscessus, respectively, and against 54.5 %, 69.2 %, and 30.8 % of M. massiliense, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
These results demonstrated the potential efficacy of a regimen containing imipenem against M. abscessus and M. massiliense infections.
Topics: Actinomycetales Infections; Amikacin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Clarithromycin; Doxycycline; Humans; Imipenem; Linezolid; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Moxifloxacin; Mycobacteriaceae; Sequence Analysis, DNA; beta-Lactams
PubMed: 32526389
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.06.007 -
Drugs Feb 2019The inability to use powerful antituberculosis drugs in an increasing number of patients seems to be the biggest threat towards global tuberculosis (TB) elimination.... (Review)
Review
The inability to use powerful antituberculosis drugs in an increasing number of patients seems to be the biggest threat towards global tuberculosis (TB) elimination. Simplified, shorter and preferably less toxic drug regimens are being investigated for pulmonary TB to counteract emergence of drug resistance. Intensified regimens with high-dose anti-TB drugs during the first weeks of treatment are being investigated for TB meningitis to increase the survival rate among these patients. Moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin and levofloxacin are seen as core agents in case of resistance or intolerance against first-line anti-TB drugs. However, based on their pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), these drugs are also promising for TB meningitis and might perhaps have the potential to shorten pulmonary TB treatment if dosing could be optimized. We prepared a comprehensive summary of clinical trials investigating the outcome of TB regimens based on moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin and levofloxacin in recent years. In the majority of clinical trials, treatment success was not in favour of these drugs compared to standard regimens. By discussing these results, we propose that incorporation of extended PK/PD analysis into the armamentarium of drug-development tools is needed to clarify the role of moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin and levofloxacin for TB, using the right dose. In addition, to prevent failure of treatment or emergence of drug-resistance, PK and PD variability advocates for concentration-guided dosing in patients at risk for too low a drug-exposure.
Topics: Antitubercular Agents; Fluoroquinolones; Gatifloxacin; Humans; Levofloxacin; Moxifloxacin; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
PubMed: 30617959
DOI: 10.1007/s40265-018-1043-y