-
JAMA Oncology Jun 2020Nausea and vomiting, unrelated to chemotherapy, can be substantial symptoms in patients with advanced cancer. (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
IMPORTANCE
Nausea and vomiting, unrelated to chemotherapy, can be substantial symptoms in patients with advanced cancer.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the utility of olanzapine for treating chronic nausea/vomiting, unrelated to chemotherapy, in patients with advanced cancer.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This study is a double-line, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial conducted from July 2017 through April 2019, with analysis conducted in 2019. Eligible participants were outpatients with advanced cancer who had persistent nausea/vomiting without having had chemotherapy or radiotherapy in the prior 14 days. Chronic nausea was present for at least 1 week (worst daily nausea numeric rating scores needed to be greater than 3 on a 0-10 scale).
INTERVENTIONS
Patients received olanzapine (5 mg) or a placebo, orally, daily for 7 days.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Patient-reported outcomes were used for study end points. Data were collected at baseline and daily for 7 more days. The primary study end point (the change in nausea numeric rating scores from baseline to the last treatment day) and the study hypothesis were both identified prior to data collection.
RESULTS
A total of 30 patients (15 per arm) were enrolled; these included 16 women and 14 men who had a mean (range) age of 63 (39-79) years. Baseline median nausea scores, in all patients, were 9 out of 10 (range, 8-10). After 1 day and 1 week, the median nausea scores in the placebo arm were 9 out of 10 (range, 8-10) on both days, compared with the olanzapine arm scores of 2 out of 10 (range, 2-3) after day 1 and 1 out of 10 (range, 0-3) after 1 week. After 1 week of treatment, the reduction in nausea scores in the olanzapine arm was 8 points (95% CI, 7-8) higher than that of the placebo arm. The primary 2-sided end point P value was <.001. Correspondingly, patients in the olanzapine arm reported less emesis, less use of other antiemetic drugs, better appetite, less sedation, less fatigue, and better well-being. One patient, on the placebo, stopped treatment early owing to lack of perceived benefit. No patients receiving olanzapine reported excess sedation or any other adverse event.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Olanzapine, at 5 mg/d, appeared to be effective in controlling nausea and emesis and in improving other symptoms and quality-of-life parameters in the study population.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03137121.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoplasms; Olanzapine; Pilot Projects; Vomiting
PubMed: 32379269
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1052 -
Schizophrenia Bulletin Dec 2020
Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Delusions; Hallucinations; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders
PubMed: 31355406
DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbz083 -
BMJ Open Jan 2023Clozapine and olanzapine are some of the most effective antipsychotics, but both are associated with weight gain and relevant metabolic disturbances, including...
Effect of the GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide on metabolic disturbances in clozapine-treated or olanzapine-treated patients with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder: study protocol of a placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial (SemaPsychiatry).
INTRODUCTION
Clozapine and olanzapine are some of the most effective antipsychotics, but both are associated with weight gain and relevant metabolic disturbances, including pre-diabetes and diabetes. Non-pharmacological/behavioural interventions have had limited effects counteracting these adverse effects. Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, is approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. We will investigate the long-term effects of add-on treatment with semaglutide once a week versus placebo once a week on the metabolic status in pre-diabetic (glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 35-47 mmol/mol (5.4%-6.4%) and diabetic (HbA1c 48-57 mmol/mol (6.5%-7.4%)) patients diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder who initiated clozapine or olanzapine treatment within the last 60 months.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS
This is a 26-week, double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Altogether, 104 patients diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder, aged 18-65 years, with pre-diabetes or diabetes will be randomised to injections of 1.0 mg semaglutide once a week or placebo for 26 weeks. The primary endpoint is change from baseline in HbA1c. Secondary endpoints include changes in body weight, hip and waist circumference and plasma levels of insulin, glucagon, glucose, and C-peptide, insulin sensitivity, beta cell function, hepatic function, fibrosis-4 score, lipid profile, incretin hormones, bone markers, body composition, bone density, proteomic analyses and oxidative stress markers. Together with alcohol, tobacco and drug use, potential effects on the reward value of a sweet-fat stimulus, psychopathology, level of activity and quality of life will also be assessed.
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION
This study is approved by the Danish Medicines Agency and the regional scientific ethics committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (committee C, #H-20019008) and will be carried out in accordance with International Council for Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice guidelines and the Helsinki Declaration. The results will be disseminated through peer-review publications and conference presentations.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
NCT04892199.
Topics: Humans; Schizophrenia; Clozapine; Olanzapine; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Prediabetic State; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Proteomics; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36720576
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068652 -
The Primary Care Companion For CNS... Aug 2023
Topics: Humans; Bradycardia; Olanzapine
PubMed: 37595163
DOI: 10.4088/PCC.22cr03453 -
Aging Cell Nov 2023The lifespan of schizophrenia patients is significantly shorter than the general population. Olanzapine is one of the most commonly used antipsychotic drugs (APDs) for...
The lifespan of schizophrenia patients is significantly shorter than the general population. Olanzapine is one of the most commonly used antipsychotic drugs (APDs) for treating patients with psychosis, including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Despite their effectiveness in treating positive and negative symptoms, prolonged exposure to APDs may lead to accelerated aging and cognitive decline, among other side effects. Here we report that dysfunctional mitophagy is a fundamental mechanism underlying accelerated aging induced by olanzapine, using in vitro and in vivo (Caenorhabditis elegans) models. We showed that the aberrant mitophagy caused by olanzapine was via blocking mitophagosome-lysosome fusion. Furthermore, olanzapine can induce mitochondrial damage and hyperfragmentation of the mitochondrial network. The mitophagosome-lysosome fusion in olanzapine-induced aging models can be restored by a mitophagy inducer, urolithin A, which alleviates defective mitophagy, mitochondrial damage, and fragmentation of the mitochondrial network. Moreover, the mitophagy inducer ameliorated behavioral changes induced by olanzapine, including shortened lifespan, and impaired health span, learning, and memory. These data indicate that olanzapine impairs mitophagy, leading to the shortened lifespan, impaired health span, and cognitive deficits. Furthermore, this study suggests the potential application of mitophagy inducers as therapeutic strategies to reverse APD-induced adverse effects associated with accelerated aging.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Olanzapine; Antipsychotic Agents; Aging; Mitophagy; Mitochondria; Caenorhabditis elegans
PubMed: 37828862
DOI: 10.1111/acel.14003 -
Ugeskrift For Laeger May 2023Treatment with olanzapine depot is associated with a rare but potentially adverse reaction, namely post-injection delirium/sedation syndrome (PDSS), characterized by...
Treatment with olanzapine depot is associated with a rare but potentially adverse reaction, namely post-injection delirium/sedation syndrome (PDSS), characterized by delirium and/or sedation. This is a case report of a 38-year-old male patient who developed symptoms consistent with PDSS shortly after receiving intramuscular injection of olanzapine depot. Clinicians should be aware of PDSS and observe patients for three hours after receiving the injection, measuring vitals and referring to medical care if necessary.
Topics: Male; Humans; Adult; Olanzapine; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Schizophrenia; Delayed-Action Preparations; Syndrome; Delirium; Injections, Intramuscular
PubMed: 37170738
DOI: No ID Found -
Military Medical Research Jun 2023Choosing the appropriate antipsychotic drug (APD) treatment for patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) can be challenging, as the treatment response to APD is highly variable...
BACKGROUND
Choosing the appropriate antipsychotic drug (APD) treatment for patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) can be challenging, as the treatment response to APD is highly variable and difficult to predict due to the lack of effective biomarkers. Previous studies have indicated the association between treatment response and genetic and epigenetic factors, but no effective biomarkers have been identified. Hence, further research is imperative to enhance precision medicine in SCZ treatment.
METHODS
Participants with SCZ were recruited from two randomized trials. The discovery cohort was recruited from the CAPOC trial (n = 2307) involved 6 weeks of treatment and equally randomized the participants to the Olanzapine, Risperidone, Quetiapine, Aripiprazole, Ziprasidone, and Haloperidol/Perphenazine (subsequently equally assigned to one or the other) groups. The external validation cohort was recruited from the CAPEC trial (n = 1379), which involved 8 weeks of treatment and equally randomized the participants to the Olanzapine, Risperidone, and Aripiprazole groups. Additionally, healthy controls (n = 275) from the local community were utilized as a genetic/epigenetic reference. The genetic and epigenetic (DNA methylation) risks of SCZ were assessed using the polygenic risk score (PRS) and polymethylation score, respectively. The study also examined the genetic-epigenetic interactions with treatment response through differential methylation analysis, methylation quantitative trait loci, colocalization, and promoter-anchored chromatin interaction. Machine learning was used to develop a prediction model for treatment response, which was evaluated for accuracy and clinical benefit using the area under curve (AUC) for classification, R for regression, and decision curve analysis.
RESULTS
Six risk genes for SCZ (LINC01795, DDHD2, SBNO1, KCNG2, SEMA7A, and RUFY1) involved in cortical morphology were identified as having a genetic-epigenetic interaction associated with treatment response. The developed and externally validated prediction model, which incorporated clinical information, PRS, genetic risk score (GRS), and proxy methylation level (proxyDNAm), demonstrated positive benefits for a wide range of patients receiving different APDs, regardless of sex [discovery cohort: AUC = 0.874 (95% CI 0.867-0.881), R = 0.478; external validation cohort: AUC = 0.851 (95% CI 0.841-0.861), R = 0.507].
CONCLUSIONS
This study presents a promising precision medicine approach to evaluate treatment response, which has the potential to aid clinicians in making informed decisions about APD treatment for patients with SCZ. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/ ), 18. Aug 2009 retrospectively registered: CAPOC-ChiCTR-RNC-09000521 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=9014 ), CAPEC-ChiCTR-RNC-09000522 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=9013 ).
Topics: Humans; Antipsychotic Agents; Schizophrenia; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Aripiprazole; Precision Medicine; Multiomics; Benzodiazepines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Phospholipases
PubMed: 37269009
DOI: 10.1186/s40779-023-00459-7 -
Molecular Psychiatry Jan 2023People with mood disorders have increased risk of comorbid medical diseases versus the general population. It is paramount to identify interventions to improve physical...
The impact of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on physical health outcomes in people with mood disorders across the lifespan: An umbrella review of the evidence from randomised controlled trials.
OBJECTIVE
People with mood disorders have increased risk of comorbid medical diseases versus the general population. It is paramount to identify interventions to improve physical health in this population.
METHODS
Umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on pharmacological/non-pharmacological interventions for physical health outcomes/intolerability-related discontinuation in mood disorders (any age).
RESULTS
Ninety-seven meta-analyses were included. Among youths, against placebo, in depression, antidepressants/antipsychotics had higher discontinuation rates; in bipolar depression, olanzapine+fluoxetine worsened total cholesterol (TC)/triglycerides/weight gain (WG) (large ES). In adults with bipolar disorder, olanzapine worsened HbA1c/TC/WG (moderate/large ES); asenapine increased fasting glucose (small ES); quetiapine/cariprazine/risperidone induced WG (small/moderate ES). In bipolar depression, lurasidone was metabolically neutral. In depression, psychological interventions improved physical health-related quality of life (PHQoL) (small ES), fasting glucose/HbA1c (medium/large ES); SSRIs improved fasting glucose/HbA1c, readmission for coronary disease, pain (small ES); quetiapine/aripiprazole/olanzapine induced WG (small to large ES). Exercise improved cardiorespiratory fitness (moderate ES). In the elderly, fluoxetine yielded more detrimental cardiovascular effects than sertraline/escitalopram (large ES); antidepressants were neutral on exercise tolerance and PHQoL. In mixed age groups, in bipolar disorder aripiprazole was metabolically neutral; in depression, SSRIs lowered blood pressure versus placebo and serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (small ES); brexpiprazole augmentation caused WG and was less tolerated (small ES); exercise improved PHQoL (moderate ES).
CONCLUSIONS
Some interventions (psychological therapies, exercise and SSRIs) improve certain physical health outcomes in mood disorders, few are neutral, but various pharmacological interventions are associated with negative effects. Evidence from this umbrella review has limitations, should consider evidence from other disorders and should be integrated with recent evidence from individual RCTs, and observational evidence. Effective treatments with either beneficial or physically neutral profiles should be prioritized.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Aged; Adolescent; Fluoxetine; Olanzapine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Aripiprazole; Longevity; Glycated Hemoglobin; Antipsychotic Agents; Antidepressive Agents; Bipolar Disorder; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36138129
DOI: 10.1038/s41380-022-01770-w -
JAMA Psychiatry Jul 2020Prescriptions for antipsychotic medications continue to increase across many brain disorders, including off-label use in children and elderly individuals. Concerning... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Effects of Antipsychotic Medication on Brain Structure in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and Psychotic Features: Neuroimaging Findings in the Context of a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.
IMPORTANCE
Prescriptions for antipsychotic medications continue to increase across many brain disorders, including off-label use in children and elderly individuals. Concerning animal and uncontrolled human data suggest antipsychotics are associated with change in brain structure, but to our knowledge, there are no controlled human studies that have yet addressed this question.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the effects of antipsychotics on brain structure in humans.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
Prespecified secondary analysis of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial over a 36-week period at 5 academic centers. All participants, aged 18 to 85 years, were recruited from the multicenter Study of the Pharmacotherapy of Psychotic Depression II (STOP-PD II). All participants had major depressive disorder with psychotic features (psychotic depression) and were prescribed olanzapine and sertraline for a period of 12 to 20 weeks, which included 8 weeks of remission of psychosis and remission/near remission of depression. Participants were then were randomized to continue receiving this regimen or to be switched to placebo and sertraline for a subsequent 36-week period. Data were analyzed between October 2018 and February 2019.
INTERVENTIONS
Those who consented to the imaging study completed a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan at the time of randomization and a second MRI scan at the end of the 36-week period or at time of relapse.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome measure was cortical thickness in gray matter and the secondary outcome measure was microstructural integrity of white matter.
RESULTS
Eighty-eight participants (age range, 18-85 years) completed a baseline scan; 75 completed a follow-up scan, of which 72 (32 men and 40 women) were useable for final analyses. There was a significant treatment-group by time interaction in cortical thickness (left, t = 3.3; P = .001; right, t = 3.6; P < .001) but not surface area. No significant interaction was found for fractional anisotropy, but one for mean diffusivity of the white matter skeleton was present (t = -2.6, P = .01). When the analysis was restricted to those who sustained remission, exposure to olanzapine compared with placebo was associated with significant decreases in cortical thickness in the left hemisphere (β [SE], 0.04 [0.009]; t34.4 = 4.7; P <.001), and the right hemisphere (β [SE], 0.03 [0.009]; t35.1 = 3.6; P <.001). Post hoc analyses showed that those who relapsed receiving placebo experienced decreases in cortical thickness compared with those who sustained remission.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, antipsychotic medication was shown to change brain structure. This information is important for prescribing in psychiatric conditions where alternatives are present. However, adverse effects of relapse on brain structure support antipsychotic treatment during active illness.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01427608.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antipsychotic Agents; Cerebral Cortex; Depressive Disorder, Major; Diffusion Tensor Imaging; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Psychotic Disorders; Sertraline; White Matter; Young Adult
PubMed: 32101271
DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.0036 -
Clinical Cardiology May 2024Olanzapine, an atypical antipsychotic medication, has gained prominence in the treatment of schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders due to its effectiveness and... (Review)
Review
Olanzapine, an atypical antipsychotic medication, has gained prominence in the treatment of schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders due to its effectiveness and perceived safety profile. However, emerging evidence suggests a potential link between olanzapine use and adverse cardiovascular effects, including cardiomyopathy. This narrative review explores the mechanisms, clinical implications, and management strategies associated with olanzapine-induced cardiomyopathy. A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted to investigate the relationship between olanzapine and cardiomyopathy. The search included epidemiological studies, clinical case reports, and mechanistic research focusing on the pathophysiology of olanzapine-induced cardiomyopathy. The review also examined treatment strategies for managing this potential complication. Olanzapine-induced cardiomyopathy is hypothesized to be associated with metabolic disturbances and receptor antagonism. The metabolic effects of olanzapine, such as weight gain, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia, share similarities with obesity-related cardiomyopathy. Additionally, olanzapine's antagonism of certain receptors may contribute to cardiovascular stress. The review highlighted that patients with new-onset heart failure and significant weight gain while on olanzapine should be closely monitored for signs of cardiomyopathy. Early detection and prompt withdrawal of olanzapine, along with initiation of goal-directed medical therapy, are crucial for mitigating this potentially life-threatening condition. The relationship between olanzapine and cardiomyopathy is complex and not yet fully understood. However, the potential for significant cardiovascular risk necessitates vigilance among healthcare providers. Early identification and management of olanzapine-induced cardiomyopathy can improve patient outcomes. Further research is needed to elucidate the precise mechanisms behind this adverse effect and to develop optimized treatment strategies for patients requiring antipsychotic therapy.
Topics: Humans; Olanzapine; Antipsychotic Agents; Cardiomyopathies; Obesity; Schizophrenia; Diagnosis, Differential; Risk Factors
PubMed: 38767024
DOI: 10.1002/clc.24278