-
Osteoporosis International : a Journal... Feb 2020This systematic review and meta-analysis showed a significant reduction of (major) osteoporotic fractures and hip fractures after screening using fracture risk... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
This systematic review and meta-analysis showed a significant reduction of (major) osteoporotic fractures and hip fractures after screening using fracture risk assessment and bone densitometry compared with usual care. The results indicate that screening is effective for fracture risk reduction, especially hip fractures. To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of population screening for high fracture risk on fracture prevention compared with usual care. MEDLINE and Embase were searched for studies published until June 20th 2019. Randomized studies were selected that screened for high fracture risk using at least bone densitometry, screened in a general population, provided subsequent treatment with anti-osteoporosis medication, had a usual care group as comparator, and had at least one fracture-related outcome (all fractures, (major) osteoporotic fractures, or hip fractures). The primary assessment was the hazard ratio (HR) for fracture-related outcomes. All-cause mortality was a secondary outcome. Random-effects models were used to estimate pooled HRs. We identified 1186 potentially eligible articles and included three randomized studies: the ROSE study, the SCOOP study, and the SOS with a total number of N = 42,009 participants. Respectively, 11%, 15%, and 18% of the participants in the intervention group started medication. Meta-analysis showed a statistically significant and clinically relevant reduction of osteoporotic fractures (HR = 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.89-1.00), major osteoporotic fractures (HR = 0.91; 95%CI = 0.84-0.98), and hip fractures (HR = 0.80; 95%CI = 0.71-0.91), but no reduction of all fractures (HR = 0.95; 95%CI = 0.89-1.02). The pooled HR for the secondary outcome all-cause mortality was 1.04 (95% CI = 0.95-1.14). Numbers needed to screen to prevent one fracture were 247 and 272 for osteoporotic fractures and hip fractures, respectively (corresponding to 113 and 124 performed bone densitometry examinations, and 25 and 28 persons being treated). This meta-analysis showed that population screening is effective to reduce osteoporotic fractures and hip fractures. Implementation of screening in older women should be considered as serious option to prevent osteoporotic fractures, especially hip fractures.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Hip Fractures; Humans; Mass Screening; Osteoporosis; Osteoporotic Fractures; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Assessment
PubMed: 31838551
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-05226-w -
Frontiers in Public Health 2022Previous studies assessed the relationship between individual sleep behavior and fracture risk, rather than taking into account the joint complexity of the sleep...
BACKGROUND
Previous studies assessed the relationship between individual sleep behavior and fracture risk, rather than taking into account the joint complexity of the sleep behaviors. We aimed to explore the association between sleep pattern and risk of imminent recurrent osteoporotic fracture in older hospitalized patients due to an index osteoporotic fracture, where sleep pattern was evaluated as a combination incorporating five common sleep behaviors (i.e., insomnia, snoring, nocturnal sleep duration, daytime napping, and midnight waking up).
METHODS
We used data from a prospective cohort study for analyses. Patients who aged not < 55 years and were admitted to the hospital due to an index osteoporotic fracture were recruited. Sleep pattern was grouped as healthy, intermediate, and poor pattern, based on the categorization of overall sleep scores. We used Cox proportional hazard models to explore sleep pattern in relation to imminent recurrent fracture.
RESULTS
We included a total of 185 elderly hospitalized patients for analyses with mean (± standard deviation) age = 71.5 ± 10.3 years and 87.0% female. During a mean follow-up of 14.7 months, there were 10 (5.4%) recurrent osteoporotic fractures observed. A significantly higher overall sleep score was found in patients with recurrent fractures when compared with those without fractures (3.20 vs. 2.36, = 0.038). Both intermediate ( = 0.76) and poor sleep patterns ( = 0.093) were non-significantly associated with an elevated risk of fracture when compared with a healthy pattern. Per-one-increase in the overall sleep score was significantly related to an increased risk of fracture: hazard ratio = 1.60 (95% confidence interval: 1.00--2.55) from the multivariable model.
CONCLUSION
Per-one-increase in the overall sleep score was found to be significantly associated with a 60% higher risk of imminent recurrent osteoporotic fracture in the elderly, and intermediate and poor sleep patterns were non-significantly related to an increased risk of recurrent fracture. More high-quality evidence is required to further evaluate the relationship between the sleep pattern and the risk of recurrent osteoporotic fracture in the elderly.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Osteoporotic Fractures; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Sleep
PubMed: 36062120
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.980352 -
Osteoporosis International : a Journal... Aug 2022
Topics: Bone Density; Female; Humans; Mass Screening; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal; Osteoporotic Fractures; Postmenopause; Risk Factors
PubMed: 35763073
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-022-06419-6 -
JAMA Network Open Aug 2023FRAX is the most widely used and validated fracture risk prediction tool worldwide. Vertebral fractures, which are an indicator of subsequent osteoporotic fractures, can...
IMPORTANCE
FRAX is the most widely used and validated fracture risk prediction tool worldwide. Vertebral fractures, which are an indicator of subsequent osteoporotic fractures, can be identified using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) vertebral fracture assessment (VFA).
OBJECTIVE
To assess the calibration of FRAX and develop a simple method for improving FRAX-predicted fracture probability in the presence of VFA-identified fracture.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This prognostic study analyzed the DXA and VFA results of all individuals who underwent a VFA between March 31, 2010, and March 31, 2018, who were included in the Manitoba Bone Mineral Density Registry. These individuals were randomly assigned to either the development cohort or validation cohort. A modified algorithm-based qualitative approach was used by expert readers to code VFAs as positive (≥1 vertebral fractures detected) or negative (0 vertebral fracture detected). Statistical analysis was conducted from August 7, 2022, to May 22, 2023.
EXPOSURES
FRAX scores for major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture were calculated with or without VFA results.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Incident fractures and death were ascertained using linked population-based health care provincial data. Cumulative incidence curves for MOF and hip fracture were constructed, including competing mortality, to predict the 10-year observed risk of fracture. The observed probability was compared with FRAX-predicted fracture probability with and without VFA results and recalibrated FRAX from derived multipliers.
RESULTS
The full cohort of 11 766 individuals was randomly allocated to the development cohort (n = 7854; 7349 females [93.6%]; mean [SD] age, 75.7 [6.8] years) or the validation cohort (n = 3912; 3713 females [94.9%]; mean [SD] age, 75.5 [6.9] years). Over a mean (SD) observation time of 3.8 (2.3) years, with the longest observation at 7.5 years, FRAX was well calibrated in subgroups with negative VFA results. For individuals without a prior clinical fracture but with a positive VFA result, the 10-year FRAX-predicted MOF probability was 16.3% (95% CI, 15.7%-16.8%) without VFA information and 23.4% (95% CI, 22.7%-24.1%) with VFA information. The observed 10-year probabilities were 26.9% (95% CI, 26.0%-27.8%) and 11.2% (95% CI, 10.3%-12.1%), respectively, resulting in recalibration multipliers of 1.15 (95% CI, 0.87-1.43) for MOF and 1.31 (95% CI, 0.75-1.87) for hip fracture. For individuals with a prior clinical fracture and a positive VFA result, the 10-year FRAX-predicted probabilities were 25.0% (95% CI, 24.2%-25.7%) for MOF and 9.3% (95% CI, 8.7%-10.0%) for hip fracture. The observed 10-year probabilities were 38.1% (95% CI, 37.0%-39.1%) for MOF and 16.4% (95% CI, 15.4%-17.4%) for hip fracture, resulting in a recalibration multiplier of 1.53 (95% CI, 1.10-1.96) for MOF and 1.76 (95% CI, 1.17-2.35) for hip fracture. Good calibration (>0.90) was confirmed using the derived multipliers in the validation cohort.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Results of this prognostic study suggest that FRAX underestimated fracture risk in patients with VFA-identified fractures. Simple multipliers could recover FRAX calibration in individuals with VFA-identified fractures.
Topics: Aged; Female; Humans; Bone Density; Hip Fractures; Osteoporotic Fractures; Probability; Spinal Fractures; Male; Aged, 80 and over
PubMed: 37589976
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.29253 -
Archives of Osteoporosis Feb 2020Retrospective and prospective population-based survey in a region of the Republic of Kazakhstan determined the incidence of fractures at the hip, proximal humerus and...
UNLABELLED
Retrospective and prospective population-based survey in a region of the Republic of Kazakhstan determined the incidence of fractures at the hip, proximal humerus and distal forearm. The hip fracture rates were used to create a FRAX® model to enhance fracture risk assessment in Kazakhstan.
OBJECTIVE
This paper describes the epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures in the Republic of Kazakhstan that was used to develop a country specific FRAX® tool for fracture prediction.
METHODS
We carried out a retrospective population-based survey in Taldykorgan in the Republic of Kazakhstan representing approximately 1% of the country's population. Hip, forearm and humerus fractures were identified retrospectively in 2015 and 2016 from hospital registers and the trauma centre. Hip fractures were prospectively identified in 2017 from the same sources and additionally from primary care data. Age- and sex-specific incidence of hip fracture and national mortality rates were incorporated into a FRAX model for Kazakhstan. Fracture probabilities were compared with those from neighbouring countries having FRAX models.
RESULTS
The difference in hip fracture incidence between the retrospective and prospective survey indicated that approximately 25% of hip fracture cases did not come to hospital attention. The incidence of hip fracture applied nationally suggested that the estimated number of hip fractures nationwide in persons over the age of 50 years for 2015 was 11,690 and is predicted to increase by 140% to 28,000 in 2050. Hip fracture incidence was a good predictor of forearm and humeral fractures in men but not in women.
CONCLUSION
The FRAX model should enhance accuracy of determining fracture probability among the Kazakh population and help guide decisions about treatment.
Topics: Age Distribution; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Forearm Injuries; Hip Fractures; Hospitals; Humans; Incidence; Kazakhstan; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Statistical; Osteoporotic Fractures; Probability; Prospective Studies; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sex Distribution; Shoulder Fractures
PubMed: 32108270
DOI: 10.1007/s11657-020-0701-3 -
Value in Health Regional Issues May 2017To estimate the 3-month direct and indirect costs associated with osteoporotic fractures from both the hospital's and patient's perspectives in Singapore and to compare... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
OBJECTIVES
To estimate the 3-month direct and indirect costs associated with osteoporotic fractures from both the hospital's and patient's perspectives in Singapore and to compare the cost between acute and prevalent osteoporotic fractures.
METHODS
Resource use and expenditure data were collected using interviewer-administered questionnaires at baseline and at a 3-month follow-up between July 2013 and January 2014. Estimated osteoporotic fracture-related costs included hospitalizations, accident and emergency room visits, outpatient physician visits, laboratory tests, medications, transportation, health care and community services, special equipment and home/car modifications, and productivity loss.
RESULTS
A total of 67 patients agreed to participate, giving a response rate of 64.4%. The mean (median) 3-month direct medical cost from the hospital's perspective was found to be SGD 3,886.90 (SGD 413.10), of which 74.2% was accounted for by inpatient services, 25.2% by outpatient services, and 0.6% by accident and emergency services. Moreover, considerable variation (SD = SGD 2,615.40) was observed in the costs of outpatient rehabilitation services. Findings were similar when the patient's perspective was taken. The total costs, with both direct and indirect costs included, were SGD 11,438.70 (acute) and SGD 1,015.40 (prevalent), of which 34.7% and 8.0%, respectively, were accounted for by inpatient services.
CONCLUSIONS
Hospitalization was associated with the highest cost borne by both the hospital and the patient, and informal care dominated indirect costs. Better knowledge of the financial consequences of fragility fractures could enable proactive and preventive measures to be undertaken, especially at sites of care with high cost drivers.
Topics: Aged; Cost of Illness; Female; Health Expenditures; Health Resources; Hospitalization; Humans; Inpatients; Interviews as Topic; Length of Stay; Male; Osteoporotic Fractures; Prospective Studies; Singapore; Surveys and Questionnaires
PubMed: 28648313
DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2016.12.002 -
The Medical Journal of Malaysia Mar 2023Osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture pose a major public health problem in our ageing population, and particularly concerning is the increased morbidity and mortality...
INTRODUCTION
Osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture pose a major public health problem in our ageing population, and particularly concerning is the increased morbidity and mortality associated with osteoporotic hip fractures. While overall diagnosis and treatment for osteoporosis have improved, osteoporosis in men remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. We aim to describe the difference in clinical characteristics between elderly men and women with osteoporotic hip fractures in Sarawak General Hospital.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All patients diagnosed with osteoporotic hip fracture admitted to Sarawak General Hospital from June 2019 to March 2021 were recruited, and demographic data and clinical features were obtained.
RESULTS
There were 140 patients with osteoporotic hip fracture, and 40 were men (28.6%). The mean age for males was 74.1 ± 9.5 years, while the mean age for females was 77.4 ± 9.1 years (p=0.06). The types of fracture consisted of neck of femur=78, intertrochanteric=61 and subtrochanteric=1. More men were active smokers (15% vs 1%, p<0.001). There were 20 men with secondary osteoporosis (50%), while 13 women (13%) had secondary osteoporosis (p<0.001). The causes of secondary osteoporosis among the men were hypogonadism, COPD, glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, renal disease, androgen deprivation therapy, thyroid disorder, prostate cancer and previous gastrectomy. There were two deaths among the men and four deaths among the women during the inpatient and 3 months follow-up period. There was no statistical significance between the mortality rates between male patients (5%) and female patients (4%) (p=0.55).
CONCLUSION
There were more females with osteoporotic hip fractures, and there were significantly more males with secondary osteoporotic hip fractures.
Topics: Humans; Male; Aged; Middle Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Osteoporotic Fractures; Hospitals, General; Sex Factors; Androgen Antagonists; Malaysia; Prostatic Neoplasms; Hip Fractures; Osteoporosis
PubMed: 36988532
DOI: No ID Found -
Endocrinology and Metabolism (Seoul,... Mar 2020Osteoporotic fracture (OF) is associated with high disability and morbidity rates. The burden of OF may be reduced by early identification of subjects who are vulnerable... (Review)
Review
Osteoporotic fracture (OF) is associated with high disability and morbidity rates. The burden of OF may be reduced by early identification of subjects who are vulnerable to fracture. Although the current fracture risk assessment model includes clinical risk factors (CRFs) and bone mineral density (BMD), its overall ability to identify individuals at high risk for fracture remains suboptimal. Efforts have therefore been made to identify potential biomarkers that can predict the risk of OF, independent of or combined with CRFs and BMD. This review highlights the emerging biomarkers of bone metabolism, including sphongosine-1-phosphate, leucine-rich repeat-containing 17, macrophage migration inhibitory factor, sclerostin, receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand, and periostin, and the importance of biomarker risk score, generated by combining these markers, in enhancing the accuracy of fracture prediction.
Topics: Biomarkers; Bone Density; Humans; Osteoporotic Fractures; Prognosis; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors
PubMed: 32207264
DOI: 10.3803/EnM.2020.35.1.55 -
Bone Feb 2022Fracture risk is most frequently assessed using Dual X-ray absorptiometry to measure areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool...
PURPOSE
Fracture risk is most frequently assessed using Dual X-ray absorptiometry to measure areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX). However, these approaches have limitations and additional bone measurements may enhance the predictive ability of these existing tools. Increased cortical porosity has been associated with incident fracture in some studies, but not in others. In this prospective study, we examined whether cortical bone structure of the proximal femur predicts incident fractures independent of aBMD and FRAX score.
METHODS
We pooled 211 postmenopausal women with fractures aged 54-94 years at baseline and 232 fracture-free age-matched controls based on a prior nested case-control study from the Tromsø Study in Norway. We assessed baseline femoral neck (FN) aBMD, calculated FRAX 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF), and quantified femoral subtrochanteric cortical parameters: porosity, area, thickness, and volumetric BMD (vBMD) from CT images using the StrAx1.0 software. Associations between bone parameters and any incident fracture, MOF and hip fracture were determined using Cox's proportional hazard models to calculate hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval.
RESULTS
During a median follow-up of 7.2 years, 114 (25.7%) of 443 women suffered one or more incident fracture. Cortical bone structure did not predict any incident fracture or MOF after adjustment for age, BMI, and previous fracture. Each SD higher total cortical porosity, thinner cortices, and lower cortical vBMD predicted hip fracture with increased risk of 46-62% (HRs ranging from 1.46 (1.01-2.11) to 1.62 (1.02-2.57)). After adjustment for FN aBMD or FRAX score no association remained significant. Both lower FN aBMD and higher FRAX score predicted any incident fracture, MOF and hip fractures with HRs ranging from 1.45-2.56.
CONCLUSIONS
This study showed that cortical bone measurements using clinical CT did not add substantial insight into fracture risk beyond FN aBMD and FRAX. We infer from these results that fracture risk related to the deteriorated bone structure seems to be largely captured by a measurement of FN aBMD and the FRAX tool.
Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Bone Density; Case-Control Studies; Cortical Bone; Female; Femur; Femur Neck; Hip Fractures; Humans; Male; Osteoporotic Fractures; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment
PubMed: 34875395
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.116284 -
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Mar 2023Thoracolumbar fascia injury (FI) is rarely discussed in osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) patients in previous literature and it is usually neglected and treated as...
BACKGROUND
Thoracolumbar fascia injury (FI) is rarely discussed in osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) patients in previous literature and it is usually neglected and treated as an unmeaning phenomenon. We aimed to evaluate the characteristics of the thoracolumbar fascia injury and further discuss its clinical significance in the treatment of kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) patients.
METHODS
Based on the presence or absence of FI, 223 OVF patients were divided into two groups. The demographics of patients with and without FI were compared. The visual analogue scale and Oswestry disability index scores were compared preoperatively and after PKP treatment between these groups.
RESULTS
Thoracolumbar fascia injuries were observed in 27.8% of patients. Most FI showed a multi-level distribution pattern which involved a mean of 3.3 levels. Location of fractures, severity of fractures and severity of trauma were significantly different between patients with and without FI. In further comparison, severity of trauma was significantly different between patients with severe and non-severe FI. In patients with FI, VAS and ODI scores of 3 days and 1 month after PKP treatment were significantly worse compared to those without FI. It showed the same trend in VAS and ODI scores in patients with severe FI when compared to those patients with non-severe FI.
CONCLUSIONS
FI is not rare in OVF patients and presents multiple levels of involvement. The more serious trauma suffered, the more severe thoracolumbar fascia injury presented. The presence of FI which was related to residual acute back pain significantly affected the effectiveness of PKP in treating OVFs.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
retrospectively registered.
Topics: Humans; Spinal Fractures; Spine; Osteoporotic Fractures; Kyphoplasty; Fascia
PubMed: 36879207
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06280-6