-
Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica 2014The aim of this study was to discuss the therapeutic substances used to treat nicotine addiction, not registered in Poland. This paper presents the results of the latest... (Review)
Review
The aim of this study was to discuss the therapeutic substances used to treat nicotine addiction, not registered in Poland. This paper presents the results of the latest clinical trials and the possibility of their use in the treatment of nicotine addiction. The first two discussed drugs clonidine and nortriptyline are recommended by clinical practice guidelines AHRQ (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality) as the substance of the second line in the fight against addiction. Nortriptyline belongs to tricyclic antidepressants. Its mechanism of action is the inhibition of the reuptake of norepinephrine. It is suggested as the antagonist of activity of nicotinic receptors. The results confirm its efficacy in the treatment of nicotine addiction, but many side effects limit its use. Clonidine acts presumably by inhibition of sympathetic hyperactivity characteristic of symptoms associated with nicotine rehab. The remaining compounds under discussion, such as: venlafaxine, fluoxetine, moclobemide and rimonabant, are not registered in any country with an indication to use in the treatment of nicotine addiction, however, due to the mechanism in which they act, the possibility of their use in the treatment of this disease is considered. The possibility of using anxiolytics such as: buspirone, diazepam, meprobamate and beta-blockers: metoprolol and oxprenolol is also considered in order to treat the anxiety appearing as one of the symptoms of abstinence. An interesting proposal to combat nicotine addiction are vaccines--NicVAX, CYT002-NicQb and TA-NIC. Currently, they are in clinical phase I and II of their development. Their operation would be based on the induction of specific antibodies that bind nicotine in the plasma, thus prevent it reaching the nicotinic receptors. Preliminary results confirm the possible positive effects in the prevention and treatment of nicotine addiction.
Topics: Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Cannabinoid Receptor Antagonists; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clonidine; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2A6; Humans; Nortriptyline; Tobacco Use Disorder; Vaccines
PubMed: 25272878
DOI: No ID Found -
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) Oct 2021In our in vitro and in vivo studies, we used root methanolic extract (AIRME), and investigated their free radical scavenging/antioxidant and anti-inflammatory...
In our in vitro and in vivo studies, we used root methanolic extract (AIRME), and investigated their free radical scavenging/antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. Primarily, phytochemical analysis showed rich content of phenols (70.92 mg of gallic acid/g) and flavonoids (16.01 mg of rutin/g) in AIRME. We then performed HR-LC-MS and GC-MS analyses, and identified 101 and 14 phytochemical compounds, respectively. Among them, ramipril glucuronide (1.563%), antimycin A (1.324%), swietenine (1.134%), quinone (1.152%), oxprenolol (1.118%), choline (0.847%), bumetanide (0.847%) and fenofibrate (0.711%) are the predominant phytomolecules. Evidence from in vitro studies revealed that AIRME scavenges DPPH and hydroxyl radicals in a concentration dependent manner (10-50 μg/mL). Similarly, hydrogen peroxide and lipid peroxidation were also remarkably inhibited by AIRME as concentration increases (20-100 μg/mL). In vitro antioxidant activity of AIRME was comparable to ascorbic acid treatment. For in vivo studies, carrageenan (1%, sub-plantar) was injected to rats to induce localized inflammation. Acute inflammation was represented by paw-edema, and significantly elevated ( < 0.05) WBC, platelets and C-reactive protein (CRP). However, AIRME pretreatment (150/300 mg/kg bodyweight) significantly ( < 0.05) decreased edema volume. This was accompanied by a significant ( < 0.05) reduction of WBC, platelets and CRP with both doses of AIRME. The decreased activities of superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione reductase and glutathione peroxidase in paw tissue were restored ( < 0.05 / < 0.01) with AIRME in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, AIRME attenuated carrageenan-induced neutrophil infiltrations and vascular dilation in paw tissue. For the first time, our findings demonstrated the potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of AIRME, which could be considered to develop novel anti-inflammatory drugs.
Topics: Acalypha; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antioxidants; Disease Models, Animal; Edema; Free Radical Scavengers; In Vitro Techniques; Male; Phytochemicals; Phytotherapy; Plant Extracts; Plant Roots; Plants, Medicinal; Rats; Rats, Wistar
PubMed: 34684831
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26206251 -
Heliyon Feb 2023The presence of some drugs in meat samples can cause threat to human health, therefore, its analysis is highly desirable for food safety purposes. In this work, a...
The presence of some drugs in meat samples can cause threat to human health, therefore, its analysis is highly desirable for food safety purposes. In this work, a solid-phase extraction procedure for the determination of oxprenolol, a non-selective beta-blocker, and such anabolic agents as methandienone and testosterone in beef meat samples has been developed. Extraction conditions were optimized to achieve high sensitivity and accuracy of the results. The procedure was validated using meat samples free from target analytes. As a result, high selectivity and sensitivity were observed with the detection limits between 0.25 and 1.25 ng/g, and the results were not affected by matrix components. The proposed procedure was applied to the analysis of real beef samples purchased in the market, and the results have revealed the presence of contaminated samples. The concentration of oxprenolol in the contaminated sample was 7 ng/g, methandienone content in the sample was 30 ng/g, while testosterone level was 4 ng/g.
PubMed: 36816264
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13260 -
Frontiers in Physiology 2016Though antihypertensive drugs have been in use for many decades, the mechanisms by which they act chronically to reduce blood pressure remain unclear. Over long periods,... (Review)
Review
Though antihypertensive drugs have been in use for many decades, the mechanisms by which they act chronically to reduce blood pressure remain unclear. Over long periods, mean arterial blood pressure must match the perfusion pressure necessary for the kidney to achieve its role in eliminating the daily intake of salt and water. It follows that the kidney is the most likely target for the action of most effective antihypertensive agents used chronically in clinical practice today. Here we review the long-term renal actions of antihypertensive agents in human studies and find three different mechanisms of action for the drugs investigated. (i) Selective vasodilatation of the renal afferent arteriole (prazosin, indoramin, clonidine, moxonidine, α-methyldopa, some Ca(++)-channel blockers, angiotensin-receptor blockers, atenolol, metoprolol, bisoprolol, labetolol, hydrochlorothiazide, and furosemide). (ii) Inhibition of tubular solute reabsorption (propranolol, nadolol, oxprenolol, and indapamide). (iii) A combination of these first two mechanisms (amlodipine, nifedipine and ACE-inhibitors). These findings provide insights into the actions of antihypertensive drugs, and challenge misconceptions about the mechanisms underlying the therapeutic efficacy of many of the agents.
PubMed: 27524972
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00320 -
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and... Feb 2023Beta-blockers and selected stereoisomers of beta-blockers, like bisoprolol and S-pindolol (ACM-001), have been shown to be effective in preclinical cancer cachexia...
BACKGROUND
Beta-blockers and selected stereoisomers of beta-blockers, like bisoprolol and S-pindolol (ACM-001), have been shown to be effective in preclinical cancer cachexia models. Here, we tested the efficacy of stereoisomers of oxprenolol in two preclinical models of cancer cachexia-the Yoshida AH-130 rat model and the Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) mouse model.
METHODS AND RESULTS
In the Yoshida AH130 hepatoma rat cancer cachexia model and compared with placebo, 50 mg/kg/d S-oxprenolol (HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.28-0.85, P = 0.012) was superior to 50 mg/kg/d R-oxprenolol (HR: 0.83, 95% CI 0.38-1.45, P = 0.51) in reducing mortality (= reaching ethical endpoints). Combination of the three doses (12.5, 25 and 50 mg/kg/d) that had a significant effect on body weight loss in the S-oxprenolol groups vs the same combination of the R-oxprenolol groups lead to a significantly improved survival of S-oxprenolol vs R-oxprenolol (HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.08-2.39, P = 0.0185). Interestingly, there is a clear dose dependency in S-oxprenolol-treated (5, 12.5, 25 and 50 mg/kg/d) groups, which was not observed in groups treated with R-oxprenolol. A dose-dependent attenuation of weight and lean mass loss by S-oxprenolol was seen in the Yoshida rat model, whereas R-oxprenolol had only had a significant effect on fat mass. S-oxprenolol also non-significantly reduced weight loss in the LLC model and also improved muscle function (grip strength 428 ± 25 and 539 ± 37 g/100 g body weight for placebo and S-oxprenolol, respectively). However, there was only a minor effect on quality of life indicators food intake and spontaneous activity in the Yoshida model (25 mg/kg/S-oxprenolol: 11.9 ± 2.5 g vs placebo: 4.9 ± 0.8 g, P = 0.013 and also vs 25 mg/kg/d R-oxprenolol: 7.5 ± 2.6 g, P = 0.025). Both enantiomers had no effects on cardiac dimensions and function at the doses used in this study. Western blotting of proteins involved in the anabolic/catabolic homoeostasis suggest that anabolic signalling is persevered (IGF-1 receptor, Akt) and catabolic signalling is inhibited (FXBO-10, TRAF-6) by S-pindolol, but not he R-enantiomer. Expression of glucose transporters Glut1 and Glut 4 was similar in all groups, as was AMPK.
CONCLUSIONS
S-oxprenolol is superior to R-oxprenolol in cancer cachexia animal models and shows promise for a human application in cancer cachexia.
Topics: Mice; Rats; Humans; Animals; Cachexia; Oxprenolol; Rats, Wistar; Quality of Life; Rats, Inbred Lew; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Liver Neoplasms; Pindolol
PubMed: 36346141
DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.13116 -
Blood Pressure Dec 2022Beta-blockers have solid documentation in preventing cardiovascular complications in the treatment of hypertension; atenolol, metoprolol, oxprenolol and propranolol... (Review)
Review
Diverse pharmacological properties, trial results, comorbidity prescribing and neural pathophysiology suggest European hypertension guideline downgrading of beta-blockers is not justified.
Beta-blockers have solid documentation in preventing cardiovascular complications in the treatment of hypertension; atenolol, metoprolol, oxprenolol and propranolol demonstrate proven cardiovascular prevention in hypertension mega-trials. Hypertension is characterised by activation of the sympathetic nervous system from early to late phases, which makes beta-blockers an appropriate treatment seen from a pathophysiological viewpoint, especially in patients with an elevated heart rate. Beta-blockers represent a heterogenous class of drugs with regard to both pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. This position is manifest by reference to another clinical context, beta-blocker treatment of heart failure, where unequivocally there is no class effect (no similar benefit from all beta-blockers); there are good and less good beta-blockers for heart failure. Analogous differences in beta-blocker efficacy is also likely in hypertension. Beta-blockers are widely used for the treatment of diseases comorbid with hypertension, in approximately 50 different concomitant medical conditions that are frequent in patients with hypertension, leading to many de facto beta-blocker first choices in clinical practice. Thus, beta-blockers should be regarded as relevant first choices for hypertension in clinical practice, particularly if characterised by a long half-life, highly selective beta-1 blocking activity and no intrinsic agonist properties.SUMMARYBeta-blockers have solid documentation in preventing cardiovascular complications in the treatment of hypertension; atenolol, metoprolol, oxprenolol and propranolol demonstrate proven cardiovascular prevention in hypertension mega-trialsHypertension is characterised by activation of the sympathetic nervous system from early to late phases, which makes beta-blockers an appropriate treatment seen from a pathophysiological viewpoint, especially in patients with an elevated heart rateBeta-blockers represent a heterogenous class of drugs with regard to both pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic propertiesThis position is manifest by reference to another clinical context, beta-blocker treatment of heart failure, where unequivocally there is no class effect (no similar benefit from all beta-blockers); there are good and less good beta-blockers for heart failureAnalogous differences in beta-blocker efficacy is also likely in hypertensionBeta-blockers are widely used for the treatment of diseases comorbid with hypertension, in approximately 50 different concomitant medical conditions that are frequent in patients with hypertension, leading to many de facto beta-blockers first choices in clinical practiceThese observations, in totality, inform our opinion that beta-blockers are relevant first choices for hypertension in clinical practice and this fact needs highlightingFurther, these arguments suggest European hypertension guideline downgrading of beta-blockers is not justified.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Atenolol; Cardiovascular Diseases; Comorbidity; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Metoprolol; Oxprenolol; Propranolol
PubMed: 36029011
DOI: 10.1080/08037051.2022.2110858 -
Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica Jan 2017The usefulness of derivative spectrophotometry for the determination of labetalol, sotalol and oxprenolol in binary mixtures and in human spiked serum was checked. To...
The usefulness of derivative spectrophotometry for the determination of labetalol, sotalol and oxprenolol in binary mixtures and in human spiked serum was checked. To this aim a spectrophotometric analysis of samples in the UV range was carried out and the obtained results revealed that derivative spectropho- tometry allows for the fast, accurate and precise determination of the tested substances in spite of their clear interference in the zero-order spectra. For quantitative determinations "zero-crossing" technique was used to establish wavelengths for zeros of specified component. In a mixture of labetalol and oxprenolol the following wavelengths were established: D1 λ = 245.32 nm and 266.03 nm, D2 λ = 243.30 nm and 301.09 nm. respectively. D3 derivative did not show zeros suitable for quantitative analysis. For the analysis of labetalol and sotalol mixture, D3 derivative spectrophotometry was used at the following wavelengths: = 246.03 nm and λ = 249.91 rum, respectively. In this case, the curves of Dl and D2 derivatives showed no zeros that can be used in quantitative analysis. To determine the concentration of the components in a mixture containing oxprenolol and sotalol the following wavelengths were selected: for oxprenolol DI λ = 245.32 nm, D2 λ = 240.18 run, D3 λ = 232.05 nm and for sotalol Dl λ = 230.56 nm, D2 Xλ= 232.65 nm and D3 X = 238.84 tm, respectively. The developed spectrophotometric method was characterized by high sensitivity and accuracy, LOD determined for sotalol was in the range of 0.21-1.88 μg/mL, for labetalol 1.00-3.43 μg/mL and for oxprenolol 0.16-2.06 μg/mL; LOQ determined for sotalol was in the range of 0.65-5.70 μg/mL, for labetalol 3.11-10.39 μg/mL and for oxprenolol 0.47-6.23 μg/mL, depending on the composition of the tested mixture and the order of the deriv- ative. The recovery of the individual components was within the range of 100 ± 5%. The linearity range was wide and estimated for sotalol in the range of 11.00-38.50 μg/mL, for labetalol 12.80-44.80 μg/mL and for oxprenolol 12.60-44.10 μg/mL with correlation coefficients in the range of 0.9977-0.9999.
Topics: Humans; Labetalol; Limit of Detection; Oxprenolol; Sotalol; Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet
PubMed: 29474765
DOI: No ID Found -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2014Partial agonists are a subclass of beta blockers used to treat hypertension in many countries. Partial agonist act by stimulating beta receptors when they are quiescent... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Partial agonists are a subclass of beta blockers used to treat hypertension in many countries. Partial agonist act by stimulating beta receptors when they are quiescent and blocking beta receptors when they are active. The blood pressure (BP) lowering effect of partial agonist beta blockers has not been quantified.
OBJECTIVES
To quantify the dose-related effects of various partial agonists beta blockers on systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate versus placebo in patients with primary hypertension.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Hypertension Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, EMBASE and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials up to October 2014. The WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) is searched for inclusion in the Group's Specialised Register.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled parallel or cross-over trials. Studies must contain a partial agonist monotherapy arm with fixed dose. Patients enrolled into the studies must have primary hypertension at baseline (defined as SBP/DBP > 140/90 mmHg). Duration of studies must be between three to 12 weeks.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors (GW and HB) confirmed the inclusion of studies and extracted the data independently.
MAIN RESULTS
Thirteen randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trials that examined the blood pressure lowering efficacy of six partial agonists in 605 hypertensive patients were included in this review. Five of the included studies were parallel studies and the other eight were cross-over studies. The overall risk of bias is high in this review due to the small sample size and high risk of detection bias. Pindolol, celiprolol and alprenolol lowered SBP and DBP compared to placebo. Acebutolol lowered SBP but there was no clear evidence that it lowered DBP. There was no clear evidence that pindolol and oxprenolol lowered SBP or DBP. Other than for celiprolol, sample sizes were generally small increasing the uncertainty in findings for individual agents versus placebo. In patients with moderate to severe hypertension, partial agonists (considered as a subclass) lowered peak BP by an average of 8 mmHg systolic (95% CI, -10 to -6, very low quality evidence), 4 mmHg diastolic (95%CI, -5 to -3, very low quality evidence) and reduced heart rate by five beats per minute (95%CI, -6 to -4, very low quality evidence). Higher dose partial agonists did not appear to provide additional BP lowering effects compared to lower dose. The maximum BP lowering effect of the overall subclass occurred at the starting dose. Partial agonists reduced pulse pressure by 4 mmHg (95% CI, -5 to -2, very low evidence). Only one study reported withdrawal due to adverse effects, the risk ratio (95% confidence interval) was 0.72 (0.07, 7.67).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There was very low quality evidence that in patients with moderate to severe hypertension, partial agonists lowered peak BP by an average of 8/4 mmHg and reduced heart rate by five beats per minute. There was no evidence of a greater effect at doses higher than the initial doses. This estimate was probably exaggerated as it was subject to a high risk of bias. Based on the indirect comparison of the results in this review and two Cochrane reviews on angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), which also used similar inclusion criteria as this review, the BP lowering effect appeared to be less than the effect in patients with mild to moderate elevated BP who were taking ACE inhibitors and ARBs based on an indirect comparison. Withdrawals due to adverse effects were only reported in one trial so it is impossible to assess the harm of these drugs.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Essential Hypertension; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypertension; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 25427719
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007450.pub2 -
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aug 2016Peripheral vasoconstriction has long been described as a vascular adverse effect of β-adrenoceptor blockers. Whether β-adrenoceptor blockers should be avoided in... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
Peripheral vasoconstriction has long been described as a vascular adverse effect of β-adrenoceptor blockers. Whether β-adrenoceptor blockers should be avoided in patients with peripheral vascular disease depends on pharmacological properties (e.g. preferential binding to β1 -adrenoreceptors or intrinsic sympathomimetic activity). However, this has not been confirmed in experimental studies. We performed a network meta-analysis in order to assess the comparative risk of peripheral vasoconstriction of different β-adrenoceptor blockers.
METHOD
We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including β-adrenoceptor blockers that were published in core clinical journals in the Pubmed database. All RCTs reporting peripheral vasoconstriction as an adverse effect of β-adrenoceptor blockers and controls were included. Sensitivity analyses were conducted including possibly confounding covariates (latitude, properties of the β-adrenoceptor blockers, e.g. intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, vasodilation, drug indication, drug doses). The protocol and the detailed search strategy are available online (PROSPERO registry CRD42014014374).
RESULTS
Among 2238 records screened, 38 studies including 57 026 patients were selected. Overall, peripheral vasoconstriction was reported in 7% of patients with β-adrenoceptor blockers and 4.6% in the control groups (P < 0.001), with heterogeneity among drugs. Atenolol and propranolol had a significantly higher risk than placebo, whereas pindolol, acebutolol and oxprenolol had not.
CONCLUSION
Our results suggest that β-adrenoceptor blockers have variable propensity to enhance peripheral vasoconstriction and that it is not related to preferential binding to β1 -adrenoceptors. These findings challenge FDA and European recommendations regarding precautions and contra-indications of use of β-adrenoceptor blockers and suggest that β-adrenoceptor blockers with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity could be safely used in patients with peripheral vascular disease.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sympathomimetics; Vasoconstriction; Vasodilation
PubMed: 27085011
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12980 -
Scientific Reports Jan 2021Beta-adrenergic blocking agents (abbreviated as beta-blockers) have been used for treating various cardiovascular diseases. However, the potential for asthma... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Beta-adrenergic blocking agents (abbreviated as beta-blockers) have been used for treating various cardiovascular diseases. However, the potential for asthma exacerbation is one of the major adverse effects of beta-blockers. This study aimed to compare the level of risk for an asthma attack in patients receiving various beta-blockers. We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of either placebo-controlled or active-controlled design. The current network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted under a frequentist model. The primary outcome was the incidence of asthmatic attack. A total of 24 RCTs were included. Overall NMA revealed that only oral timolol [risk ratio (RR) = 3.35 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-10.85)] and infusion of propranolol [RR = 10.19 (95% CI 1.29-80.41)] were associated with significantly higher incidences of asthma attack than the placebo, whereas oral celiprolol [RR = 0.39 (95% CI 0.04-4.11)], oral celiprolol and propranolol [RR = 0.46 (95% CI 0.02-11.65)], oral bisoprolol [RR = 0.46 (95% CI 0.02-11.65)], oral atenolol [RR = 0.51 (95% CI 0.20-1.28)], infusion of practolol [RR = 0.80 (95% CI 0.03-25.14)], and infusion of sotalol [RR = 0.91 (95% CI 0.08-10.65)] were associated with relatively lower incidences of asthma attack than the placebo. In participants with a baseline asthma history, in addition to oral timolol and infusion of propranolol, oral labetalol, oxprenolol, propranolol, and metoprolol exhibited significantly higher incidences of asthma attack than did the placebo. In conclusion, oral timolol and infusion of propranolol were associated with a significantly higher risk of developing an asthma attack in patients, especially in those with a baseline asthma history, and should be avoided in patients who present a risk of asthma.Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42020190540.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Atenolol; Bisoprolol; Cardiovascular Diseases; Celiprolol; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Incidence; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Practolol; Propranolol; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk; Sotalol; Status Asthmaticus; Timolol
PubMed: 33432057
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79837-3