-
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 2015Paclitaxel is a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent with a broad spectrum of activity against cancers in humans. In 1992, paclitaxel was approved by the U.S. Food and... (Review)
Review
Paclitaxel is a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent with a broad spectrum of activity against cancers in humans. In 1992, paclitaxel was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as Taxol(®) for use in advanced ovarian cancer. Two years later, it was approved for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Paclitaxel was originally isolated from the bark of the Pacific yew tree, Taxus brevifolia in 1971. Taxanes are a family of microtubule inhibitors. As a member of this family, paclitaxel suppresses spindle microtubule dynamics. This activity results in the blockage of the metaphase-anaphase transitions, and ultimately in the inhibition of mitosis, and induction of apoptosis in a wide spectrum of cancer cells. Additional anticancer activities of paclitaxel have been defined that are independent of these effects on the microtubules and may include the suppression of cell proliferation as well as antiangiogenic effects. Based on its targeting of a fundamental feature of the cancer phenotype, the mitotic complex, it is not surprising that paclitaxel has been found to be active in a wide variety of cancers in humans. This review summarizes the evidence in support of paclitaxel's broad anticancer activity and introduces the rationale for, and the progress in development of novel formulations of paclitaxel that may preferentially target cancers and that are not associated with the risks for hypersensitivity in dogs. Of note, a novel nanoparticle formulation of paclitaxel that substantially limits hypersensitivity was recently given conditional approval by the FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine for use in dogs with resectable and nonresectable squamous cell carcinoma and nonresectable stage III, IV and V mammary carcinoma.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Humans; Neoplasms; Paclitaxel
PubMed: 26179168
DOI: 10.1111/jvim.12596 -
JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions Sep 2020
Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon; Humans; Paclitaxel; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32412550
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.05.006 -
Molecular Medicine Reports Dec 2020Paclitaxel is a potent antineoplastic agent, but poor solubility and resistance have limited its use. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) are widely studied as drug carriers... (Review)
Review
Paclitaxel is a potent antineoplastic agent, but poor solubility and resistance have limited its use. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) are widely studied as drug carriers because they can be engineered to prevent drug insolubility, carry nucleic acid payloads for gene therapy, target specific tumor cell lines, modulate drug release and amplify photothermal therapy. Consequently, the conjugation of paclitaxel with AuNPs to improve antiproliferative and pro‑apoptotic potency may enable improved clinical outcomes. There are currently a number of different AuNPs under development, including simple drug or nucleic acid carriers and targeted AuNPs that are designed to deliver therapeutic payloads to specific cells. The current study reviewed previous research on AuNPs and the development of AuNP‑based paclitaxel delivery.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Line, Tumor; Drug Carriers; Drug Delivery Systems; Gold; Humans; Metal Nanoparticles; Neoplasms; Nucleic Acids; Paclitaxel
PubMed: 33173972
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2020.11580 -
International Journal of Biological... 2023Cancer has been considered as complex malignant consequence of genetic mutations that control the cellular proliferation, differentiation and homeostasis, thus making... (Review)
Review
Cancer has been considered as complex malignant consequence of genetic mutations that control the cellular proliferation, differentiation and homeostasis, thus making tumor treatment extremely challenging. To date, a variety of cargo molecules, including nucleic acids drugs (pDNA, miRNA and siRNA), therapeutic drugs (doxorubicin, paclitaxel, daunomycin and gefitinib) and imaging agents (radioisotopes, fluorescence dyes, and MRI contrast agents) have been regarded as the potential medicines in clinical application. However, non-single therapeutic drug could induce the satisfied clinical results because of tumor heterogeneity and multiple drug resistance and the nanotechnology-based combined therapy is becoming an advanced important mode for enhanced anticancer effects. The review gathers the current advanced development to co-deliver small-molecular drugs and nucleic acids for the anticancer therapy with nanomedicine-based combination. Furthermore, the superiority is definitely presented and the barriers are detail discussed to surmount the clinical challenges. In final, future perspectives in rational direction for combined tumor therapy of drugs and nucleic acids are exhibited.
Topics: Humans; Antineoplastic Agents; Nucleic Acids; Drug Carriers; Paclitaxel; Neoplasms; Drug Delivery Systems
PubMed: 36778126
DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.79328 -
Journal For Immunotherapy of Cancer Jun 2023In the randomized, controlled, phase III KEYNOTE-061 trial, second-line pembrolizumab did not significantly prolong overall survival (OS) versus paclitaxel in patients... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Association between gene expression signatures and clinical outcomes of pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel in advanced gastric cancer: exploratory analysis from the randomized, controlled, phase III KEYNOTE-061 trial.
BACKGROUND
In the randomized, controlled, phase III KEYNOTE-061 trial, second-line pembrolizumab did not significantly prolong overall survival (OS) versus paclitaxel in patients with PD-L1-positive (combined positive score ≥1) advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer but did elicit a longer duration of response and offered a favorable safety profile. This prespecified exploratory analysis was conducted to evaluate associations between tumor gene expression signatures and clinical outcomes in the phase III KEYNOTE-061 trial.
METHODS
Using RNA sequencing data obtained from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded baseline tumor tissue samples, we evaluated the 18-gene T-cell-inflamed gene expression profile (TcellGEP) and 10 non-TcellGEP signatures (angiogenesis, glycolysis, granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cell (gMDSC), hypoxia, monocytic MDSC (mMDSC), MYC, proliferation, RAS, stroma/epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition/transforming growth factor-β, WNT). The association between each signature on a continuous scale and outcomes was analyzed using logistic (objective response rate (ORR)) and Cox proportional hazards regression (progression-free survival (PFS) and OS). One-sided (pembrolizumab) and two-sided (paclitaxel) p values were calculated for TcellGEP (prespecified α=0.05) and the 10 non-TcellGEP signatures (multiplicity-adjusted; prespecified α=0.10).
RESULTS
RNA sequencing data were available for 137 patients in each treatment group. TcellGEP was positively associated with ORR (p=0.041) and PFS (p=0.026) for pembrolizumab but not paclitaxel (p>0.05). The TcellGEP-adjusted mMDSC signature was negatively associated with ORR (p=0.077), PFS (p=0.057), and OS (p=0.033) for pembrolizumab, while the TcellGEP-adjusted glycolysis (p=0.018), MYC (p=0.057), and proliferation (p=0.002) signatures were negatively associated with OS for paclitaxel.
CONCLUSIONS
This exploratory analysis of tumor TcellGEP showed associations with ORR and PFS for pembrolizumab but not for paclitaxel. TcellGEP-adjusted mMDSC signature was negatively associated with ORR, PFS, and OS for pembrolizumab but not paclitaxel. These data suggest myeloid-driven suppression may play a role in resistance to PD-1 inhibition in G/GEJ cancer and support a strategy of considering immunotherapy combinations which target this myeloid axis.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
NCT02370498.
Topics: Humans; Paclitaxel; Stomach Neoplasms; Transcriptome; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
PubMed: 37399357
DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-006920 -
ACS Nano Aug 2023Modest tissue penetrance, nonuniform distribution, and suboptimal release of drugs limit the potential of intracranial therapies against glioblastoma. Here, a...
Modest tissue penetrance, nonuniform distribution, and suboptimal release of drugs limit the potential of intracranial therapies against glioblastoma. Here, a conformable polymeric implant, μMESH, is realized by intercalating a micronetwork of 3 × 5 μm poly(lactic--glycolic acid) (PLGA) edges over arrays of 20 × 20 μm polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) pillars for the sustained delivery of potent chemotherapeutic molecules, docetaxel (DTXL) and paclitaxel (PTXL). Four different μMESH configurations were engineered by encapsulating DTXL or PTXL within the PLGA micronetwork and nanoformulated DTXL (nanoDTXL) or PTXL (nanoPTXL) within the PVA microlayer. All four μMESH configurations provided sustained drug release for at least 150 days. However, while a burst release of up to 80% of nanoPTXL/nanoDTXL was documented within the first 4 days, molecular DTXL and PTXL were released more slowly from μMESH. Upon incubation with U87-MG cell spheroids, DTXL-μMESH was associated with the lowest lethal drug dose, followed by nanoDTXL-μMESH, PTXL-μMESH, and nanoPTXL-μMESH. In orthotopic models of glioblastoma, μMESH was peritumorally deposited at 15 days post-cell inoculation and tumor proliferation was monitored via bioluminescence imaging. The overall animal survival increased from ∼30 days of the untreated controls to 75 days for nanoPTXL-μMESH and 90 days for PTXL-μMESH. For the DTXL groups, the overall survival could not be defined as 80% and 60% of the animals treated with DTXL-μMESH and nanoDTXL-μMESH were still alive at 90 days, respectively. These results suggest that the sustained delivery of potent drugs properly encapsulated in conformable polymeric implants could halt the proliferation of aggressive brain tumors.
Topics: Animals; Glioblastoma; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Nanoparticles; Paclitaxel; Docetaxel; Polymers; Polyvinyl Alcohol; Cell Line, Tumor
PubMed: 37379253
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.3c01574 -
Journal of Controlled Release :... Jun 2019Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a major adverse effect of paclitaxel. Several liposome-based products have been approved and demonstrated superior...
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a major adverse effect of paclitaxel. Several liposome-based products have been approved and demonstrated superior efficacy and safety profiles for other drugs. The first objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of liposome formulation of paclitaxel (L-PTX) on neurotoxicity in-vitro and in-vivo in comparison to the standard Taxol® formulation. The second aim was to investigate the effect of formulation on paclitaxel biodistribution following intravenous administration in an animal model. Free paclitaxel was toxic to cell of neuronal origin (IC50 = 18.4 μg/mL) at a lower concentration than to lung cancer cells (IC50 = 59.1 μg/mL), and L-PTX demonstrated a comparable toxicity in both cell lines (IC50 = 31.8 and 33.7 μg/mL). Administration of L-PTX at 2 mg/kg per dose for a total of 4 doses on day 0, 2, 4, and 6 to rats did not result in increased sensitivity in response to mechanical or thermal stimulation of hind paws, in comparison to Taxol® administration at the same dose level that resulted in neuropathy. Paclitaxel biodisposition was evaluated for two formulations in plasma, liver, lung, brain, spinal cord, skin and muscle of rats after single intravenous dose at 6 mg/kg. The exposure to paclitaxel in brain, spinal cord, muscle, and skin was lower in the L-PTX group compared to Taxol® group. PEGylated liposomes containing paclitaxel were successfully developed and demonstrated reduced neurotoxicity in-vitro in neuronal cells and prevented development of peripheral neuropathy in-vivo. This proof of concept study showed that formulation in nanoparticles is a promising approach for reducing (or preventing) neurotoxicity caused by cancer drugs.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Brain; Cell Line, Tumor; Drug Compounding; Humans; Liposomes; Liver; Lung; Male; Muscles; Nanoparticles; Paclitaxel; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Skin; Spinal Cord; Tissue Distribution
PubMed: 30981814
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.04.013 -
Open Biology Nov 2017Paclitaxel is a successful anti-cancer drug that kills cancer cells in two-dimensional culture through perturbation of mitosis, but whether it causes tumour regression... (Review)
Review
Paclitaxel is a successful anti-cancer drug that kills cancer cells in two-dimensional culture through perturbation of mitosis, but whether it causes tumour regression by anti-mitotic actions is controversial. Drug candidates that specifically target mitosis, including inhibitors of kinesin-5, AurkA, AurkB and Plk1, disappointed in the clinic. Current explanations for this discrepancy include pharmacokinetic differences and hypothetical interphase actions of paclitaxel. Here, we discuss post-mitotic micronucleation as a special activity of taxanes that might explain their higher activity in solid tumours. We review data showing that cells which exit mitosis in paclitaxel are highly micronucleated and suffer post-mitotic DNA damage, and that these effects are much stronger for paclitaxel than kinesin-5 inhibitors. We propose that post-mitotic micronucleation promotes inflammatory signalling via cGAS-STING and other pathways. In tumours, this signalling may recruit cytotoxic leucocytes, damage blood vessels and prime T-cell responses, leading to whole-tumour regression. We discuss experiments that are needed to test the micronucleation hypothesis, and its implications for novel anti-mitotic targets and enhancement of taxane-based therapies.
Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antimitotic Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Humans; Micronuclei, Chromosome-Defective; Neoplasms; Paclitaxel
PubMed: 29142107
DOI: 10.1098/rsob.170182 -
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Apr 2016Peritoneal carcinomatosis is present in more than 60% of gastric cancer, 40% of ovarian cancer, and 35% of colon cancer patients. It is the second most common cause of...
Peritoneal carcinomatosis is present in more than 60% of gastric cancer, 40% of ovarian cancer, and 35% of colon cancer patients. It is the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality, with a median survival of 1 to 3 months. Cytoreductive surgery combined with intraperitoneal chemotherapy is the current clinical treatment, but achieving curative drug accumulation and penetration in peritoneal carcinomatosis lesions remains an unresolved challenge. Here, we used flexible and pH-sensitive polymersomes for payload delivery to peritoneal gastric (MKN-45P) and colon (CT26) carcinoma in mice. Polymersomes were loaded with paclitaxel and in vitro drug release was studied as a function of pH and time. Paclitaxel-loaded polymersomes remained stable in aqueous solution at neutral pH for up to 4 months. In cell viability assay on cultured cancer cell lines (MKN-45P, SKOV3, CT26), paclitaxel-loaded polymersomes were more toxic than free drug or albumin-bound paclitaxel (Abraxane). Intraperitoneally administered fluorescent polymersomes accumulated in malignant lesions, and immunofluorescence revealed an intense signal inside tumors with no detectable signal in control organs. A dual targeting of tumors was observed: direct (circulation-independent) penetration, and systemic, blood vessel-associated accumulation. Finally, we evaluated preclinical antitumor efficacy of paclitaxel-polymersomes in the treatment of MKN-45P disseminated gastric carcinoma using a total dose of 7 mg/kg. Experimental therapy with paclitaxel-polymersomes improved the therapeutic index of drug over free paclitaxel and Abraxane, as evaluated by intraperitoneal tumor burden and number of metastatic nodules. Our findings underline the potential utility of the polymersome platform for delivery of drugs and imaging agents to peritoneal carcinomatosis lesions. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(4); 670-9. ©2016 AACR.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Cell Line, Tumor; Disease Models, Animal; Doxorubicin; Drug Carriers; Drug Compounding; Drug Liberation; Drug Stability; Humans; Injections, Intraperitoneal; Mice; Paclitaxel; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Polymers; Tissue Distribution; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
PubMed: 26880267
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0713-T -
Current Medicinal Chemistry 2021Paclitaxel (PTX) is the first natural plant-derived chemotherapeutic drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration. However, the clinical applications of PTX are... (Review)
Review
Paclitaxel (PTX) is the first natural plant-derived chemotherapeutic drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration. However, the clinical applications of PTX are limited by some drawbacks, such as poor water solubility, rapid blood clearance, nonspecific distribution, and adverse side effects. Nanocarriers have made important contributions to drug delivery and cancer therapy in recent years. However, low drug loading capacity, nanocarrier excipients-induced toxicity or immunogenicity, and complicated synthesis technologies pose a challenge for the clinical application of nanocarriers. To address these issues, the self-delivery nanomedicine (SDNs), in which pure drug molecules directly self-assemble into nanomedicine, have been developed for drug delivery and enhancing antitumor efficacy. In this review, we comprehensively summarize the recent advances in PTX-based SDNs for cancer therapy. First, the self-assembly strategies to develop pure PTX nanodrugs are discussed. Then, the emerging strategies of co-assembly PTX and other therapeutic agents for effective combination therapy are presented, composing of combination chemotherapy, chemo-photothermal therapy, chemo-photodynamic therapy, chemo-immunotherapy, and chemo-gene therapy. Finally, the limitations and future outlook of SDNs are discussed. The rational design of these unique nanoplatforms may make a new direction to develop highly efficient drug delivery systems for cancer therapy.
Topics: Cell Line, Tumor; Drug Delivery Systems; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Nanomedicine; Nanoparticles; Neoplasms; Paclitaxel
PubMed: 33176629
DOI: 10.2174/0929867327666201111143725