-
World Journal of Gastroenterology Jul 2019Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is one of the most severe complications after pancreatic surgeries. POPF develops as a consequence of pancreatic juice leakage... (Review)
Review
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is one of the most severe complications after pancreatic surgeries. POPF develops as a consequence of pancreatic juice leakage from a surgically exfoliated surface and/or anastomotic stump, which sometimes cause intraperitoneal abscesses and subsequent lethal hemorrhage. In recent years, various surgical and perioperative attempts have been examined to reduce the incidence of POPF. We reviewed several well-designed studies addressing POPF-related factors, such as reconstruction methods, anastomotic techniques, stent usage, prophylactic intra-abdominal drainage, and somatostatin analogs, after pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy, and we assessed the current status of POPF. In addition, we also discussed the current status of POPF in minimally invasive surgeries, laparoscopic surgeries, and robotic surgeries.
Topics: Drainage; Humans; Laparoscopy; Pancreas; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreatic Juice; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreaticojejunostomy; Postoperative Care; Postoperative Complications; Risk Factors; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Somatostatin; Stents; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31391768
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i28.3722 -
Annals of Surgery Mar 2023The aim of this study was to develop a classification system for pancreas-associated risk factors in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
A Simple Classification of Pancreatic Duct Size and Texture Predicts Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: A classification of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to develop a classification system for pancreas-associated risk factors in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most relevant PD-associated complication. A simple standardized surgical reporting system based on pancreas-associated risk factors is lacking.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies investigating clinically relevant (CR) POPF (CR-POPF) and pancreas-associated risk factors after PD. A meta-analysis of CR-POPF rate for texture of the pancreas (soft vs not-soft) and main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Based on the results, the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) proposes the following classification: A, not-soft (hard) texture and MPD >3 mm; B, not-soft (hard) texture and MPD ≤3 mm; C, soft texture and MPD >3 mm; D, soft texture and MPD ≤3 mm. The classification was evaluated in a multi-institutional, international cohort.
RESULTS
Of the 2917 articles identified, 108 studies were included in the analyses. Soft pancreatic texture was significantly associated with the development of CR-POPF [odds ratio (OR) 4.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.67-4.89, P < 0.01) following PD. Similarly, MPD diameter ≤3 mm significantly increased CR-POPF risk compared with >3 mm diameter MPDs (OR 3.66, 95% CI 2.62-5.12, P < 0.01). The proposed 4-stage system was confirmed in an independent cohort of 5533 patients with CR-POPF rates of 3.5%, 6.2%, 16.6%, and 23.2% for type A-D, respectively ( P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
For future pancreatic surgical outcomes studies, the ISGPS recommends reporting these risk factors according to the proposed classification system for better comparability of results.
Topics: Humans; Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreas; Pancreatic Ducts; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Risk Factors; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 33914473
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004855 -
Indian Journal of Cancer 2023Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most feared complication following pancreatic resection. Octreotide, a synthetic somatostatin analog, has been widely used... (Review)
Review
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most feared complication following pancreatic resection. Octreotide, a synthetic somatostatin analog, has been widely used by pancreatic surgeons worldwide after pancreatic resections, often as per surgeon's discretion, to prevent POPF especially in cases at high risk of developing POPF. We herein analyze the data available till date of the subject. A PubMed search with keywords "somatostatin OR octreotide OR somatostatin analogues AND postoperative pancreatic fistula" was made. Further filters were applied in the search "Clinical Trial, Meta-Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trial, Systematic Review, from 1990 - 2021," and the 68 results thus obtained were analyzed and included in this narrative review. There is considerable heterogeneity among the studies assessing the role of octreotide in the prevention of POPF making data comparison difficult, and hence results remain inconclusive. Most of the earlier studies used different definitions of POPF and other complications; included patients with varied pancreatic pathologies such as cancer, chronic pancreatitis, and benign lesions; surgical techniques such as pancreaticoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, and other procedures; use of somatostatin and its analogs such as octreotide, lanreotide, pasireotide, and vapreotide; varied surgeon and institutional volume; and so on. Besides, pancreatic surgery is per se a complex surgical procedure and has its own inherent biases related to patient and the pancreas itself affecting the overall outcome. Data indicate favorable role of newer somatostatin analogs, and further studies are urgently needed. The question about the efficacy of prophylactic octreotide to reduce POPF after pancreaticoduodenectomy remains open to debate.
Topics: Humans; Octreotide; Pancreas; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Somatostatin; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37530235
DOI: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_280_21 -
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Feb 2020Pancreaticojejunal anastomosis is one of the most demanding procedures in surgery. Up to now, no technique has been proven to reduce the incidence of POPF when compared... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Pancreaticojejunal anastomosis is one of the most demanding procedures in surgery. Up to now, no technique has been proven to reduce the incidence of POPF when compared to the other methods.
PURPOSE
The aim of this review was to provide a concise and illustrated description of the most recent methods of pancreaticojejunostomy. Their development was directly related to the still ongoing search by surgeons for such a technique of anastomosis that would eliminate the problem of POPF.
CONCLUSIONS
Knowledge of various techniques of anastomosis may help the surgeon to find the most suitable and optimal method of pancreatic-intestinal anastomosis for the patient.
Topics: Humans; Pancreas; Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreaticojejunostomy
PubMed: 31975148
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01855-6 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Mar 2015Recent advances in surgical techniques and perioperative management have markedly reduced operative morbidity after distal pancreatectomy (DP). However, some questions... (Review)
Review
Recent advances in surgical techniques and perioperative management have markedly reduced operative morbidity after distal pancreatectomy (DP). However, some questions remain regarding the protocol for the perioperative management of DP, in particular, with regard to the development of pancreatic fistula (PF). A review of DP was therefore conducted in order to standardize the management of patients for a favorable outcome. Overall, operative technique and perioperative management emerged as two critical factors contributing to favorable outcome in DP patients. As for the operative method, surgical and closure techniques exhibited differences in outcome. Laparoscopic DP generally yields more favorable perioperative outcomes compared to open DP, and is applicable for benign tumors and some ductal carcinomas of the pancreas. Robotic DP is also available for safe pancreatic surgery. En bloc celiac axis resection offers a high R0 resection rate and potentially allows for some local control in the case of advanced pancreatic cancer. Following resection, staple closure was not found to reduce the rate of PF when compared to hand-sewn closure. In addition, ultrasonic dissection devices, fibrin glue sealing, and staple closure with mesh reinforcement were shown to significantly reduce PF, although there was some bias in these studies. In perioperative management, both preoperative and postoperative treatment affected outcome. First, preoperative endoscopic pancreatic stenting may be an effective prophylactic measure against fistula development following DP in selected patients. Second, in postoperative management, a multifactorial approach including prophylactic antibiotics improved high surgical site infection rates following complex hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery. Furthermore, although conflicting results have been reported, somatostatin analogues should be administered selectively to patients considered to have a high risk for PF. Finally, careful drain management also facilitates a favorable outcome in patients with PF after DP. The results of the review indicate that laparoscopic DP coupled with perioperative management influences outcome in DP patients.
Topics: Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde; Drainage; Humans; Laparoscopy; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Fistula; Patient Selection; Perioperative Care; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Somatostatin; Stents; Surgical Wound Infection; Suture Techniques; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 25805921
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i11.3166 -
Updates in Surgery Aug 2021Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) still represents the major driver of surgical morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy. The purpose of this narrative review was... (Review)
Review
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) still represents the major driver of surgical morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy. The purpose of this narrative review was to critically analyze current evidence supporting the use of total pancreatectomy (TP) to prevent the development of POPF in patients with high-risk pancreas, and to explore the role of completion total pancreatectomy (CP) in the management of severe POPF. Considering the encouraging perioperative outcomes, TP may represent a promising tool to avoid the morbidity related to an extremely high-risk pancreatic anastomosis in selected patients. Surgical management of severe POPF is only required in few critical scenarios. In this context, even if anecdotal, CP might play a role as last resort in expert hands.
Topics: Humans; Pancreas; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors
PubMed: 34363601
DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01130-3 -
Scientific Reports May 2023Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) can significantly affect the treatment course and outcome in pancreatic cancer patients. Preoperative...
Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) can significantly affect the treatment course and outcome in pancreatic cancer patients. Preoperative prediction of CR-POPF can aid the surgical decision-making process and lead to better perioperative management of patients. In this retrospective study of 108 pancreatic head resection patients, we present risk models for the prediction of CR-POPF that use combinations of preoperative computed tomography (CT)-based radiomic features, mesh-based volumes of annotated intra- and peripancreatic structures and preoperative clinical data. The risk signatures were evaluated and analysed in detail by visualising feature expression maps and by comparing significant features to the established CR-POPF risk measures. Out of the risk models that were developed in this study, the combined radiomic and clinical signature performed best with an average area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.86 and a balanced accuracy score of 0.76 on validation data. The following pre-operative features showed significant correlation with outcome in this signature ([Formula: see text]) - texture and morphology of the healthy pancreatic segment, intensity volume histogram-based feature of the pancreatic duct segment, morphology of the combined segment, and BMI. The predictions of this pre-operative signature showed strong correlation (Spearman correlation co-efficient, [Formula: see text]) with the intraoperative updated alternative fistula risk score (ua-FRS), which is the clinical gold standard for intraoperative CR-POPF risk stratification. These results indicate that the proposed combined radiomic and clinical signature developed solely based on preoperatively available clinical and routine imaging data can perform on par with the current state-of-the-art intraoperative models for CR-POPF risk stratification.
Topics: Humans; Pancreatic Fistula; Retrospective Studies; Pancreas; Postoperative Complications; Pancreatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 37161007
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-34168-x -
Cirugia Y Cirujanos 2022To compare the short-term outcomes of patients undergoing open DP (ODP) and laparoscopic DP (LDP); and to analyze the association between the section site of the...
AIMS
To compare the short-term outcomes of patients undergoing open DP (ODP) and laparoscopic DP (LDP); and to analyze the association between the section site of the pancreas and pancreatic fistula.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Clinical, perioperative, and histopathologic data of patients who underwent ODP and LDP between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS
70 patients were included. 39 (56%) underwent ODP and 31 (44%) underwent LDP. The tumor size in ODP group was 70mm and in LDP group was 45mm (p = 0,032) Blood loss was lower in LDP group (229mL versus 498mL) (p = 0,001). Operative time, spleen preservation, B/C pancreatic fistula, major morbidity, reoperation, and length of hospital stay, were similar in both groups. There was no postoperative mortality. No differences were found in B/C pancreatic fistula rate regarding to pancreatic transection site.
CONCLUSIONS
LDP is a safe procedure, with perioperative outcomes similar to ODP and with less blood loss. The pancreatic transection site did not influence post-operative pancreatic fistula rate.
Topics: Hospitals; Humans; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35636945
DOI: 10.24875/CIRU.20001247 -
International Journal of Surgery... Feb 2022To determine the incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) following radical gastrectomy and to identify independent risk factors of...
OBJECTIVE
To determine the incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) following radical gastrectomy and to identify independent risk factors of CR-POPF.
BACKGROUND
CR-POPF and its sequelae are potential complications following radical gastrectomy. The reported incidence of CR-POPF was quite different across various regions, and no consensus was reached.
METHODS
Between December 2017 to November 2018, patients who underwent radical gastrectomy from 22 centers across 13 regions in China were prospectively recruited. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of CR-POPF, defined by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) in 2016. Clinically relevant change and short-term outcomes were recorded to diagnose and grade the POPF. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF).
RESULTS
A total of 2089 cases were analyzed. The incidence of biochemical leakage (BL) and CR-POPF were 19.6% and 1.1% respectively. All CR-POPF patients recovered well after appropriate treatment and no Grade C POPF were recorded. Logistic regression analysis showed pTNM III (OR, 2.940; 95% CI 1.180-7.325; P = 0.021) and LigaSure usage (OR, 6.618; 95% CI 1.847-23.707; P = 0.004) were independent risk factors of CR-POPF. LigaSure usage (OR, 4.817; 95% CI 1.184-19.598; P = 0.028), the drain amylase content (D-AMY) on postoperative day 3 (POD3) ≥5 times the upper limit of normal amylase (OR, 3.476; 95% CI 1.240-9.744; P = 0.018) and open surgery (OR, 2.463; 95% CI 1.003-6.050; P = 0.049) were independent predictors for identifying CR-POPF from BL.
CONCLUSION
In rich-experienced gastric cancer centers, there is high prevalence of BL secondary to radical gastrectomy without clinical impact. Fewer patients suffered Grade B POPF, and Grade C POPF was less common. The patients with pTNM III or LigaSure usage were prone to suffer CR-POPF. Surgery procedure, LigaSure usage combined with D-AMY measurement on POD3 are promising for early identification of CR-POPF.
Topics: Gastrectomy; Humans; Incidence; Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors
PubMed: 34990829
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106219 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Jul 2014With the development of imaging technology and surgical techniques, pancreatic resections to treat pancreatic tumors, ampulla tumors, and other pancreatic diseases have... (Review)
Review
With the development of imaging technology and surgical techniques, pancreatic resections to treat pancreatic tumors, ampulla tumors, and other pancreatic diseases have increased. Pancreaticoduodenectomy, one type of pancreatic resection, is a complex surgery with the loss of pancreatic integrity and various anastomoses. Complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy such as pancreatic fistulas and anastomosis leakage are common and significantly associated with patient outcomes. Pancreatic fistula is one of the most important postoperative complications; this condition can cause intraperitoneal hemorrhage, septic shock, or even death. An effective way has not yet been found to avoid the occurrence of pancreatic fistula. In most medical centers, the frequency of pancreatic fistula has remained between 9% and 13%. The early detection and routine drainage of anastomotic fistulas, pancreatic fistulas, bleeding, or other intra-abdominal fluid collections after pancreatic resections are considered as important and effective ways to reduce postoperative complications and the mortality rate. However, many recent studies have argued that routine drainage after abdominal operations, including pancreaticoduodenectomies, does not affect the incidence of postoperative complications. Although inserting drains after pancreatic resections continues to be a routine procedure, its necessity remains controversial. This article reviews studies of the advantages and disadvantages of routine drainage after pancreaticoduodenectomy and discusses the necessity of this procedure.
Topics: Abdominal Abscess; Drainage; Humans; Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; Unnecessary Procedures
PubMed: 25009383
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8110