-
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Feb 2020Target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) is a term to describe a nonlinear pharmacokinetic (PK) phenomenon that is caused by high-affinity binding of a compound to its... (Review)
Review
Target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) is a term to describe a nonlinear pharmacokinetic (PK) phenomenon that is caused by high-affinity binding of a compound to its pharmacologic targets. As the interaction between a drug and its pharmacologic target belongs to the process of pharmacodynamics (PD), TMDD can be viewed as a consequence of "PD affecting PK." Although there are numerous TMDD-related articles in the literature, most of them focus on characterizing TMDD using various mathematical models, which may not be suitable for those readers who have little interest in mathematical modeling and only want to have an understanding of the basic concept. The goal of this review is to serve as a "primer" on TMDD. This review explains (1) how TMDD happens; (2) why large-molecule and small-molecule compounds exhibiting TMDD demonstrate substantially different nonlinear PK behaviors; (3) what nonlinear PK profiles look like in large-molecule and small-molecule compounds exhibiting TMDD, using pegfilgrastim, erythropoietin, ABT-384, and linagliptin as case examples; and (4) how to identify whether the nonlinear PK of a compound is because of TMDD.
Topics: Animals; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Nonlinear Dynamics; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Pharmacokinetics; Tissue Distribution
PubMed: 31793004
DOI: 10.1002/jcph.1545 -
Blood Cancer Journal May 2017The aim of this cohort study was to compare a condensed schedule of consolidation therapy with high-dose cytarabine on days 1, 2 and 3 (HDAC-123) with the HDAC schedule... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
The aim of this cohort study was to compare a condensed schedule of consolidation therapy with high-dose cytarabine on days 1, 2 and 3 (HDAC-123) with the HDAC schedule given on days 1, 3 and 5 (HDAC-135) as well as to evaluate the prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim after chemotherapy in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission. One hundred and seventy-six patients were treated with HDAC-135 and 392 patients with HDAC-123 with prophylactic pegfilgrastim at days 10 and 8, respectively, in the AMLSG 07-04 and the German AML Intergroup protocol. Time from start to chemotherapy until hematologic recovery with white blood cells >1.0 G/l and neutrophils >0.5 G/l was in median 4 days shorter in patients receiving HDAC-123 compared with HDAC-135 (P<0.0001, each), and further reduced by 2 days (P<0.0001) by pegfilgrastim. Rates of infections were reduced by HDAC-123 (P<0.0001) and pegfilgrastim (P=0.002). Days in hospital and platelet transfusions were significantly reduced by HDAC-123 compared with HDAC-135. Survival was neither affected by HDAC-123 versus HDAC-135 nor by pegfilgrastim. In conclusion, consolidation therapy with HDAC-123 leads to faster hematologic recovery and less infections, platelet transfusions as well as days in hospital without affecting survival.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Consolidation Chemotherapy; Cytarabine; Daunorubicin; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Filgrastim; Humans; Length of Stay; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Transfusion; Polyethylene Glycols; Survival Rate
PubMed: 28548643
DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2017.45 -
Biologics : Targets & Therapy 2016Neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (FN) are frequent and potentially fatal toxicities of myelosuppressive anticancer treatments. The introduction of granulocyte... (Review)
Review
Neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (FN) are frequent and potentially fatal toxicities of myelosuppressive anticancer treatments. The introduction of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) in clinical practice has remarkably reduced the duration and severity of neutropenia, as well as the incidence of FN, thus allowing the administration of chemotherapeutic agents at the optimal dose and time with lower risk. The current scenario of G-CSFs in Europe includes filgrastim, lenograstim, some G-CSF biosimilars, and pegfilgrastim. Recently, a novel long-acting G-CSF, lipegfilgrastim, became available. Lipegfilgrastim is a glycopegylated G-CSF, alternative to pegfilgrastim, and has shown in randomized trials, to be equivalent to pegfilgrastim in reducing the incidence of severe neutropenia and FN in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy, with a similar safety profile. Furthermore, lipegfilgrastim was more effective than the placebo in reducing the incidence of severe neutropenia, its duration, and time to absolute neutrophil count recovery, in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving myelosuppressive therapy. Although the number of studies currently published is still limited, lipegfilgrastim seems to be a promising drug in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.
PubMed: 26858523
DOI: 10.2147/BTT.S58597 -
Cancer Medicine Sep 2020Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of two recently developed biosimilars of pegfilgrastim, a pegylated form of the recombinant human granulocyte-colony... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of two recently developed biosimilars of pegfilgrastim, a pegylated form of the recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) analog filgrastim with those of the reference pegfilgrastim. We retrospectively analyzed data from patients diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who were treated with first-line R-CHOP chemotherapy and received pegylated G-CSF for primary prophylaxis. The following pegylated G-CSFs were analyzed in this study: reference pegfilgrastim (Neulasta ) and two of its biosimilars (tripegfilgrastim; Dulastin and pegteograstim; Neulapeg ). In total, 296 patients were enrolled. The number of patients with at least one episode of neutropenia during R-CHOP chemotherapy was the lowest in the reference cohort (pegfilgrastim: 127 of 193 patients, 65.8%; tripegfilgrastim: 64 of 69 patients, 92.8%; pegteograstim: 28 of 34 patients, 82.4%, P < .001). The number of patients with at least one episode of febrile neutropenia was also lowest in the reference cohort (pegfilgrastim: 67 of 193 patients, 34.7%; tripegfilgrastim: 38 of 69 patients, 55.1%; pegteograstim: 16 of 34 patients, 47.1%, P = .009). There were no differences in the duration of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia or treatment outcomes (rate of complete response or relapse and survival). There were no reports of grade 3 or higher adverse events requiring discontinuation of prophylactic pegylated G-CSF in any group. The safety of the pegfilgrastim biosimilars for prophylactic purposes was comparable to that of the reference pegfilgrastim; however, in terms of their efficacy, the incidence of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia tended to be higher than that when using pegfilgrastim. The clinical relevance of these results in the biosimilar cohorts should be explored.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bacterial Infections; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Cyclophosphamide; Doxorubicin; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Filgrastim; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Humans; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Male; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Polyethylene Glycols; Prednisone; Retrospective Studies; Rituximab; Treatment Outcome; Vincristine
PubMed: 32633471
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3261 -
Cancer Reports (Hoboken, N.J.) Nov 2022Biologicals have become an integral part of cancer treatment both as therapeutic agents and as supportive care agents. It is important to know that biologics are large,... (Review)
Review
Biologicals have become an integral part of cancer treatment both as therapeutic agents and as supportive care agents. It is important to know that biologics are large, complex molecular entities requiring extensive immunogenicity testing and pharmacovigilance strategies to ensure no immune response is evoked in the body. Oncology's pharmacological market is dominated by biologics; however, their high development and manufacturing costs are burdensome to health care systems. Biologics being the most expensive prescription drugs on the market limit the accessibility for necessary treatment in the case of many patients. As biologics patents expire, the development of biosimilars is underway in an effort to lower costs and enable patients to access new cancer therapies. Regulatory guidelines for biosimilars have now been established and are constantly being revised to address any issues, facilitating their robust development. Moreover, many scientific societies offer guidance to help stakeholders better understand current regulations and biosimilar's safety. Despite the potential cost benefits, lack of knowledge about biosimilars, and the possibility of immunogenicity have created an uncertain environment for healthcare professionals and patients. In this review, we provide an overview of relevant legislation and regulations, pharmacoeconomics, and stakeholder perceptions regarding biosimilars. The article also describes biosimilars in development, as well as the ones currently available on the market.
Topics: Humans; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Antineoplastic Agents; Medical Oncology
PubMed: 36195576
DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1720 -
Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in... Jul 2021In 1991, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approved rmetHuGCSF for human use. This recombinant methionyl human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, or...
In 1991, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approved rmetHuGCSF for human use. This recombinant methionyl human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, or filgrastim, saw use in over 1 million patients in its first 5 years on the market. In 2002, the FDA approved a version of filgrastim with covalent linkage to a monomethoxypolyethylene glycol, increasing the molecular size and half-life to replace multiple days of dosing with a single injection. These medications remained standard of care for neutropenia until the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 created an abbreviated pathway to licensure for biologic products. Practitioners now have their pick of numerous and expanding options for pegfilgrastim biosimilars.
PubMed: 34430064
DOI: 10.6004/jadpro.2021.12.5.9 -
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2015Chemotherapy, irradiation, and other agents are widely used to target the process of cell division in neoplastic cells. However, while these therapies are effective... (Review)
Review
Chemotherapy, irradiation, and other agents are widely used to target the process of cell division in neoplastic cells. However, while these therapies are effective against most cancers, the high proliferative rate of the cells of the hematopoietic system that produce billions of blood cells needed daily throughout life is extremely sensitive to these agents, resulting in loss of blood cell populations, which can be life threatening. Neutropenia is the most serious hematologic toxicity of chemotherapy, which can result in patient morbidity and mortality due to opportunistic infection and often is the limiting factor in dose escalation or duration of chemotherapeutic administration. Neutropenic patients often require hospitalization and incur substantial medical costs associated with anti-infective therapy. Treatment of iatrogenic and congenic neutropenia was changed in the early 1990s with the introduction of filgrastim (Neupogen(®)) and pegfilgrastim (Neulasta(®)). With the expiration of patent lives of both of these drugs, biosimilars have begun to emerge. In this review, we will summarize the chemical characteristics, pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of lipegfilgrastim (Lonquex(®)), the first long-acting biosimilar filgrastim to receive regulatory approval and enter the marketplace.
Topics: Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia; Filgrastim; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Humans; Polyethylene Glycols; Recombinant Proteins
PubMed: 25878498
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S55796