-
European Urology Mar 2019Available models for predicting lymph node invasion (LNI) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) might not be applicable to men...
A Novel Nomogram to Identify Candidates for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Among Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted and Systematic Biopsies.
BACKGROUND
Available models for predicting lymph node invasion (LNI) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) might not be applicable to men diagnosed via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsies.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the accuracy of available tools to predict LNI and to develop a novel model for men diagnosed via MRI-targeted biopsies.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
A total of 497 patients diagnosed via MRI-targeted biopsies and treated with RP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) at five institutions were retrospectively identified.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES
Three available models predicting LNI were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analyses. A nomogram predicting LNI was developed and internally validated.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS
Overall, 62 patients (12.5%) had LNI. The median number of nodes removed was 15. The AUC for the Briganti 2012, Briganti 2017, and MSKCC nomograms was 82%, 82%, and 81%, respectively, and their calibration characteristics were suboptimal. A model including PSA, clinical stage and maximum diameter of the index lesion on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), grade group on targeted biopsy, and the presence of clinically significant PCa on concomitant systematic biopsy had an AUC of 86% and represented the basis for a coefficient-based nomogram. This tool exhibited a higher AUC and higher net benefit compared to available models developed using standard biopsies. Using a cutoff of 7%, 244 ePLNDs (57%) would be spared and a lower number of LNIs would be missed compared to available nomograms (1.6% vs 4.6% vs 4.5% vs 4.2% for the new nomogram vs Briganti 2012 vs Briganti 2017 vs MSKCC).
CONCLUSIONS
Available models predicting LNI are characterized by suboptimal accuracy and clinical net benefit for patients diagnosed via MRI-targeted biopsies. A novel nomogram including mpMRI and MRI-targeted biopsy data should be used to identify candidates for ePLND in this setting.
PATIENT SUMMARY
We developed the first nomogram to predict lymph node invasion (LNI) in prostate cancer patients diagnosed via magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy undergoing radical prostatectomy. Adoption of this model to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection could avoid up to 60% of these procedures at the cost of missing only 1.6% patients with LNI.
Topics: Aged; Clinical Decision-Making; Decision Support Techniques; Europe; Humans; Image-Guided Biopsy; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Lymphatic Metastasis; Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional; Male; Middle Aged; Nomograms; Patient Selection; Predictive Value of Tests; Prostatic Neoplasms; Reproducibility of Results; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 30342844
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.012 -
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology Jan 2024Nodal status is one of the most important prognostic factors for patients with apparent early stage endometrial cancer. The role of retroperitoneal staging in... (Review)
Review
Nodal status is one of the most important prognostic factors for patients with apparent early stage endometrial cancer. The role of retroperitoneal staging in endometrial cancer is controversial. Nodal status provides useful prognostic data, and allows to tailor the need of postoperative treatments. However, two independent randomized trials showed that the execution of (pelvic) lymphadenectomy increases the risk of having surgery-related complication without improving patients' outcomes. Sentinel node mapping aims to achieve data regarding nodal status without increasing morbidity. Sentinel node mapping is the removal of first (clinically negative) lymph nodes draining the uterus. Several studies suggested that sentinel node mapping is not inferior to lymphadenectomy in identifying patients with nodal disease. More importantly, thorough ultrastaging sentinel node mapping allows the detection of low volume disease (micrometastases and isolated tumor cells), that are not always detectable via conventional pathological examination. Therefore, the adoption of sentinel node mapping guarantees a higher identification of patients with nodal disease than lymphadenectomy. Further evidence is needed to assess the value of various adjuvant strategies in patients with low volume disease and to tailor those treatments also on the basis of the molecular and genomic characterization of endometrial tumors.
Topics: Female; Humans; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy; Sentinel Lymph Node; Lymphatic Metastasis; Neoplasm Staging; Lymph Nodes; Lymph Node Excision; Endometrial Neoplasms
PubMed: 37973163
DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e29 -
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Jan 2022The value of pelvic lymphadenectomy (LAE) has been subject of discussions since the 1980s. This is mainly due to the fact that the relation between lymph node...
BACKGROUND
The value of pelvic lymphadenectomy (LAE) has been subject of discussions since the 1980s. This is mainly due to the fact that the relation between lymph node involvement of the groin and pelvis is poorly understood and therewith the need for pelvic treatment in general.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
N = 514 patients with primary vulvar squamous cell cancer (VSCC) FIGO stage ≥ IB were treated at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf between 1996 and 2018. In this analysis, patients with pelvic LAE (n = 21) were analyzed with regard to prognosis and the relation of groin and pelvic lymph node involvement.
RESULTS
The majority had T1b/T2 tumors (n = 15, 78.9%) with a median diameter of 40 mm (11-110 mm). 17/21 patients showed positive inguinal nodes. Pelvic nodal involvement without groin metastases was not observed. 6/17 node-positive patients with positive groin nodes also had pelvic nodal metastases (35.3%; median number of affected pelvic nodes 2.5 (1-8)). These 6 patients were highly node positive with median 4.5 (2-9) affected groin nodes. With regard to the metastatic spread between groins and pelvis, no contralateral spread was observed. Five recurrences were observed after a median follow-up of 33.5 months. No pelvic recurrences were observed in the pelvic nodal positive group. Patients with pelvic metastasis at first diagnosis had a median progression-free survival of only 9.9 months and overall-survival of 31.1 months.
CONCLUSION
A relevant risk for pelvic nodal involvement only seems to be present in highly node-positive disease, therefore pelvic staging (and radiotherapy) is probably unnecessary in the majority of patients with node-positive VSCC.
Topics: Female; Groin; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Lymphatic Metastasis; Neoplasm Staging; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Vulvar Neoplasms
PubMed: 34387725
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06156-x -
Best Practice & Research. Clinical... Jan 2022Endometrial cancer (EC) usually presented as a localized disease at diagnosis (67%), 20% of patients diagnosed with regional spread, and distant metastasis accounted for... (Review)
Review
Endometrial cancer (EC) usually presented as a localized disease at diagnosis (67%), 20% of patients diagnosed with regional spread, and distant metastasis accounted for 9%. The standard treatments include hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and pelvic with/without paraaortic lymph node dissection/biopsy. Adjuvant therapy is arranged according to risk factors and stages. Risk group classification varied among different guidelines and studies and evolved with time. Adjuvant modalities include chemotherapy, radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, antiangiogenesis agents, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and multi-target agents. We review the recent literature to incorporate important advances in trial results, real-world big data, and knowledge in biomarkers of EC to update appropriate adjuvant therapy and post-surgical treatment of EC patients.
Topics: Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Endometrial Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Lymph Node Excision; Lymphatic Metastasis; Neoplasm Staging; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 34420863
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.06.002 -
World Journal of Surgical Oncology Jun 2023Cervical cancer (CC) is one of the most common gynaecologic malignancies. The prognosis of stage IIIC1p cervical cancer patients treated by surgery is heterogeneous....
BACKGROUND
Cervical cancer (CC) is one of the most common gynaecologic malignancies. The prognosis of stage IIIC1p cervical cancer patients treated by surgery is heterogeneous. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyse the factors influencing the prognosis in such patients.
METHODS
From January 2012 to December 2017, 102 patients with cervical cancer who underwent surgical treatment in the Department of Gynaecology and Tumours, Changzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital, and had pelvic lymph node metastasis confirmed by pathology were analysed retrospectively. All patients underwent radical hysterectomy with/without oophorectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy with/without para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Clinical data was collected including age, surgical method, ovarian status, intraoperative blood loss, perioperative complications, tumour size, pathological type, depth of stromal invasion (DSI), whether the lymphatic vascular space was infiltrated, number of pelvic lymph node metastases, location of pelvic lymph node metastases, total number of lymph nodes resected, lymph node ratio (LNR), nature of vaginal margin, whether parametrium was involved, postoperative adjuvant therapy, preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and prognostic information of patients. Survival curves for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference between the survival curves was tested using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate COX regression models were used to assess the factors associated with overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with stage IIIC1p cervical cancer. Nomogram plots were constructed to predict OS and DFS, and the predictive accuracy of the nomograms was measured by Harrell's C-index and calibration curves.
RESULTS
A total of 102 patients with stage IIIC1p cervical cancer were included in the study, and the median follow-up time was 63 months (range from 6 to 130 months). The 5-year OS was 64.7%, and the 5-year DFS was 62.7%. Multivariate analysis showed that no postoperative adjuvant therapy, LNR > 0.3 and NLR > 3.8 were independent risk factors for OS and DFS in patients with stage IIIC1p cervical cancer.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with stage IIIC1p cervical cancer have a poor prognosis. Lower OS and DFS were associated with no postoperative adjuvant therapy, LNR > 0.3 and NLR > 3.8.
Topics: Female; Child; Humans; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Lymphatic Metastasis; Neoplasm Staging; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Hysterectomy
PubMed: 37344912
DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03076-9 -
PloS One 2022This study aimed to determine 5-year progression-free and overall survival in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma, to determine clinical and surgical-pathologic...
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to determine 5-year progression-free and overall survival in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma, to determine clinical and surgical-pathologic features, to recognize patterns of recurrence and to identify prognostic factors influencing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
DESIGN
This was a single institution, retrospective 10-year review of patients treated at Tygerberg Hospital in South Africa with pathologically confirmed uterine carcinosarcoma.
METHODS
A total of 61 patients were studied. Demographic, clinicopathological, treatment and outcome information were obtained. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the effects of variables on PFS and OS.
RESULTS
Eighteen patients (29%) presented as FIGO stage I disease, 5 patients (8%) as stage II, 16 patients (26%) as stage III and 22 patients (36%) as stage IV disease. Fifty of the 61 patients (82%) had surgery. Five-year PFS and 5-year OS were 17.3% (CI 8.9%-27.9%) and 19.7% (CI 10.6%-30.8%), respectively. Seventeen patients presented with recurrence of which 5 (29.4%) were local and 12 (70.6%) were outside the pelvis. In the univariate analysis, tumour diameter ≥ 100mm (HR 4.57; 95% CI 1.59-13.19; p-value 0.005) was associated with 5-year PFS and in univariate analysis of OS, a positive family history (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.18-0.99; p-value 0.047), receiving a full staging operation (HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.18-0.78; p-value 0.008) and receiving any other modality of treatment, with or without surgery, (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.27-0.85; p-value 0.012) were associated with better survival. An abnormal cervical smear (HR 2.4; 95% CI 1.03-5.6; p-value 0.041), late-stage disease (HR 3.48; 95% CI 1.79-6.77; p-value < 0.001), presence of residual tumour (HR 3.66; 95% CI 1.90-7.02; p-value < 0.001), myometrial invasion more than 50% (HR 2.29; 95% CI 1.15-4.57; p-value 0.019), cervical involvement (HR 3.38; 95% CI 1.64-6.97; p-value 0.001) and adnexal involvement (HR 3.21; 95% CI 1.56-6.63; p-value 0.002) were associated with a higher risk of death. In the multivariate analysis, full staging operation was associated with a risk of progression of disease (HR 3.49; 95% CI 1.17-10.41; p-value 0.025). Advanced stage (HR 4.2; 95% CI 2.09-8.44; p-value < 0.001) was associated with a higher risk of death. Any other modality of treatment (HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.15-0.53; p-value < 0.001) and full staging laparotomy (HR 0.27; 95% CI 0.12-0.59; p-value 0.001) was a protective factor for death.
CONCLUSIONS
Carcinosarcoma is an aggressive cancer with poorer survival in this specific cohort than has been described in other contemporary cohorts. Biological or genetic factors are a possible explanation for lower overall survival in this population. Although it is also possible that later diagnosis and poor access to health care contribute to poorer survival. Most recurrences occur outside of the pelvis. Full staging surgery (including pelvic lymphadenectomy) and additional use of other modalities (either for radical or palliative intent) improve survival.
Topics: Carcinosarcoma; Female; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Neoplasm Staging; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Uterine Neoplasms
PubMed: 35862371
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271526 -
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology May 2023The Lymphadenectomy in Ovarian Neoplasms (LION) study revealed that systemic lymphadenectomy did not bring survival benefit for advanced ovarian cancer patients with... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The Lymphadenectomy in Ovarian Neoplasms (LION) study revealed that systemic lymphadenectomy did not bring survival benefit for advanced ovarian cancer patients with clinically normal lymph nodes and was associated with a higher incidence of operative complications. However, there is no consensus on whether lymphadenectomy has survival benefit or not in early epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).
METHODS
We designed the LOVE study, a multicenter, randomized controlled, phase III trial to compare the efficacy and safety of comprehensive staging surgery with or without lymphadenectomy in stages IA-IIB EOC and fallopian tube carcinomas (FTC). The hypothesis is that the oncological outcomes provided by comprehensive staging surgery without lymphadenectomy are non-inferior to those of conventional completion staging surgery in early-stage EOC and FTC patients who have indications for post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients assigned to experimental group will undergo comprehensive staging surgery, but lymphadenectomy. Patients assigned to comparative group will undergo completion staging surgery including systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. All subjects will receive 3-6 cycles of standard adjuvant chemotherapy. Major inclusion criteria are pathologic confirmed stage IA-IIB EOC or FTC, and patients have indications for adjuvant chemotherapy either confirmed by intraoperative fast frozen section or previous pathology after an incomplete staging surgery. Major exclusion criteria are non-epithelial tumors and low-grade serous carcinoma. Patients with severe rectum involvement which lead to partial rectum resection will be excluded. The sample size is 656 subjects. Primary endpoint is disease-free survival.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04710797.
Topics: Humans; Female; Prospective Studies; Lymphatic Metastasis; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Ovarian Neoplasms; Neoplasm Staging; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
PubMed: 37116952
DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e52 -
Journal of B.U.ON. : Official Journal... 2021To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the treatment of endometrial carcinoma.
PURPOSE
To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the treatment of endometrial carcinoma.
METHODS
The clinical data of 110 patients with endometrial carcinoma were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were categorized into two groups. The pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLD) group was subjected to pelvic lymph node dissection alone, while the para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PALD)+PLD group underwent pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding, volume of postoperative drainage, number of resected lymph nodes, number of positive lymph nodes, and incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups of patients. In addition, the tumor recurrence and survival were followed up and compared.
RESULTS
The operation time was significantly longer in the PALD+PLD group than that in the PLD group (p<0.001). The average number of resected lymph nodes and the number of positive lymph nodes in the PALD+PLD group were significantly greater than those in the PLD group. The total recurrence rate was 9.1% (5/55) vs. 20.0% (11/55) between the PLD group and PALD+PLD group, indicating a statistically significant difference (p=0.045). Moreover, the recurrence rate of stage III patients was 50.0% (3/6) and 25.0% (5/55) in the PLD group and PALD+PLD group, respectively, showing a statistically significant difference (p=0.034). During the follow-up period, the 3-year overall survival (OS) was 90.9% (50/55) and 96.4% (53/55) in the PLD group and PALD+PLD group, respectively, indicating no statistically significant difference (p=0.249, log-rank test).
CONCLUSION
Laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma can increase the number of resected lymph nodes and reduce the recurrence rate. Moreover, it does not increase the incidence rate of surgical complications.
Topics: Endometrial Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Laparoscopy; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Middle Aged
PubMed: 34761585
DOI: No ID Found -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2017This is an update of a previous Cochrane review published in Issue 1, 2010 and updated in Issue 9, 2015. The role of lymphadenectomy in surgical management of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
This is an update of a previous Cochrane review published in Issue 1, 2010 and updated in Issue 9, 2015. The role of lymphadenectomy in surgical management of endometrial cancer remains controversial. Lymph node metastases can be found in approximately 10% of women who before surgery are thought to have cancer confined to the womb. Removal of all pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes (lymphadenectomy) at initial surgery has been widely advocated, and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy remains part of the FIGO (International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics) staging system for endometrial cancer. This recommendation is based on data from studies that suggested improvement in survival following pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. However, these studies were not randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and treatment of pelvic lymph nodes may not confer a direct therapeutic benefit, other than allocating women to poorer prognosis groups. Furthermore, the Cochrane review and meta-analysis of RCTs of routine adjuvant radiotherapy to treat possible lymph node metastases in women with early-stage endometrial cancer found no survival advantage. Surgical removal of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes has serious potential short-term and long-term sequelae. Therefore, it is important to investigate the clinical value of this treatment.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of lymphadenectomy for the management of endometrial cancer.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and Embase to June 2009 for the original review, updated the search to June 2015 for the last updated version and further extended the search to March 2017 for this version of the review. We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, and reference lists of included studies, and we contacted experts in the field.
SELECTION CRITERIA
RCTs and quasi-RCTs that compared lymphadenectomy versus no lymphadenectomy in adult women diagnosed with endometrial cancer.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Hazard ratios (HRs) for overall and progression-free survival and risk ratios (RRs) comparing adverse events in women who received lymphadenectomy versus those with no lymphadenectomy were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. We assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach.
MAIN RESULTS
978 unique references were identified via the search strategy. All but 50 were excluded by title and abstract screening. Three RCTs met the inclusion criteria; for one small RCT, data were insufficient for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The two RCTs included in the analysis randomly assigned 1945 women, reported HRs for survival adjusted for prognostic factors and based on 1851 women and had an overall low risk of bias, as they satisfied four of the assessment criteria. The third study had an overall unclear risk of bias, as information provided was not adequate concerning random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, or completeness of outcome reporting.Results of the meta-analysis remained unchanged from the previous versions of this review and indicated no differences in overall and recurrence-free survival between women who underwent lymphadenectomy and those who did not undergo lymphadenectomy (pooled hazard ratio (HR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81 to 1.43; HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.58 for overall and recurrence-free survival, respectively) (1851 participants, two studies; moderate-quality evidence).We found no difference in risk of direct surgical morbidity between women who underwent lymphadenectomy and those who did not undergo lymphadenectomy. However, women who underwent lymphadenectomy had a significantly higher risk of surgery-related systemic morbidity and lymphoedema/lymphocyst formation than those who did not undergo lymphadenectomy (RR 3.72, 95% CI 1.04 to 13.27; RR 8.39, 95% CI 4.06 to 17.33 for risk of surgery-related systemic morbidity and lymphoedema/lymphocyst formation, respectively) (1922 participants, two studies; high-quality evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
This review found no evidence that lymphadenectomy decreases risk of death or disease recurrence compared with no lymphadenectomy in women with presumed stage I disease. Evidence on serious adverse events suggests that women who undergo lymphadenectomy are more likely to experience surgery-related systemic morbidity or lymphoedema/lymphocyst formation. Currently, no RCT evidence shows the impact of lymphadenectomy in women with higher-stage disease and in those at high risk of disease recurrence.
Topics: Adult; Disease-Free Survival; Endometrial Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Lymphatic Metastasis; Lymphedema; Lymphocele; Postoperative Complications; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 28968482
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007585.pub4 -
American Society of Clinical Oncology... Jan 2024Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in men with around 1.4 million new cases every year. In patients with localized disease, management...
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in men with around 1.4 million new cases every year. In patients with localized disease, management options include active surveillance (AS), radical prostatectomy (RP; with or without pelvic lymph node dissection), or radiotherapy to the prostate (with or without pelvic irradiation) with or without hormonotherapy. In advanced disease, treatment options include systemic treatment(s) and/or treatment to primary tumour and/or metastasis-directed therapies (MDTs). Specifically, in advanced stage, the current trend is earlier intensification of treatment such as dual or triple combination systemic treatments or adding treatment to primary and MDT to systemic treatment. However, earlier treatment intensification comes with the cost of increased morbidity and mortality resulting from drug-/treatment-related side effects. The main goal is and should be to provide the best possible care and oncologic outcomes with minimum possible side effects. This chapter will explore emerging possibilities to de-escalate treatment in PCa driven by enhanced insights into disease biology and the natural course of PCa such as AS in intermediate-risk disease or salvage versus adjuvant radiotherapy in post-RP patients. Considerations arising from advancements in PCa imaging and technological advancements in surgical and radiation therapy techniques including omitting pelvic lymph node dissection in the era of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emitting tomography, the potential of MDT to delay/omit systemic treatment in metachronous oligorecurrence, and the efficacy of hypofractionation schemes compared with conventional fractionated radiotherapy will be discussed.
Topics: Male; Humans; Prostatic Neoplasms; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Lymph Node Excision; Medical Oncology; Neoplasms, Second Primary
PubMed: 38206291
DOI: 10.1200/EDBK_430466