-
Acta Bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis Dec 2018Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is due to the chronic exposure of the esophageal mucosa to acid secretion from the stomach. Helicobacter pylori (H.p.) infection,... (Review)
Review
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is due to the chronic exposure of the esophageal mucosa to acid secretion from the stomach. Helicobacter pylori (H.p.) infection, is a risk factor for the development of peptic ulcer, atrophic gastritis and gastric cancer, and causes various effects on gastric function. The relationship between GERD and H.pylori infection is still subject of debate. Background and aim: In literature no clear causal relationship has been established between GERD and H. pylori infection, although some papers support the onset of esophagitis in patients in whom the infection has been cured. Aim of this work is to review the most recent literature data about the relationship between reflux disease and H. pylori infection. Methods: Articles reviewed were found through literature searches on PubMed, Google Scholar using keywords such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, Helicobacter pylori, acid-related disorders, GERD and esophagitis.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Causality; Esophagitis, Peptic; Gastritis; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Helicobacter Infections; Helicobacter pylori; Humans; Peptic Ulcer; Smoking; Stomach Neoplasms
PubMed: 30561416
DOI: 10.23750/abm.v89i8-S.7918 -
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection... 2022The prevalence of infection has exceeded 50% worldwide, and it is considered a high-risk factor for chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer, gastric adenocarcinoma,... (Review)
Review
The prevalence of infection has exceeded 50% worldwide, and it is considered a high-risk factor for chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer, gastric adenocarcinoma, gastroesophageal reflux disease and functional dyspepsia. drug resistance is a common problem worldwide. In recent years, the relationship between infection and gastrointestinal microecology has received much attention. infection changes the structure and composition of gastrointestinal microflora by regulating the gastrointestinal microecological environment, local pH value, cytokines and antimicrobial peptides, and immune response and then plays a crucial role in the occurrence and development of digestive system tumors, liver metabolism and extragastrointestinal diseases. The quadruple strategy of eradication can also aggravate gastrointestinal microflora disorder. However, probiotics can reduce intestinal flora changes and imbalances through different mechanisms, thus enhancing the efficacy of eradication therapy and reducing adverse reactions caused by eradication therapy. Therefore, this paper reviews the relationship between infection and gastrointestinal microecology and its clinical application, providing a basis for clinical treatment.
Topics: Dyspepsia; Gastritis; Helicobacter Infections; Helicobacter pylori; Humans; Peptic Ulcer
PubMed: 36061875
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.938608 -
JAMA Internal Medicine Nov 2014Current guidelines recommend an intravenous bolus dose of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) followed by continuous PPI infusion after endoscopic therapy in patients with... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
IMPORTANCE
Current guidelines recommend an intravenous bolus dose of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) followed by continuous PPI infusion after endoscopic therapy in patients with high-risk bleeding ulcers. Substitution of intermittent PPI therapy, if similarly effective as bolus plus continuous-infusion PPI therapy, would decrease the PPI dose, costs, and resource use.
OBJECTIVE
To compare intermittent PPI therapy with the currently recommended bolus plus continuous-infusion PPI regimen for reduction of ulcer rebleeding.
DATA SOURCES
Searches included MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases through December 2013; US and European gastroenterology meeting abstracts from 2009 to 2013; and bibliographies of systematic reviews.
STUDY SELECTION
Randomized trials of patients with endoscopically treated high-risk bleeding ulcers (active bleeding, nonbleeding visible vessels, and adherent clots) comparing intermittent doses of PPIs and the currently recommended regimen (80-mg intravenous bolus dose of a PPI followed by an infusion of 8 mg/h for 72 hours).
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Duplicate independent data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were performed. Data were pooled using a fixed-effects model or a random effects model if statistical heterogeneity was present.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was rebleeding within 7 days; additional predefined outcomes included rebleeding within 3 and 30 days, need for urgent intervention, mortality, red blood cell transfusion, and length of hospital stay. The primary hypothesis, defined before initiation of the literature review, was that intermittent use of PPIs was noninferior to bolus plus continuous infusion of PPIs, with the noninferiority margin predefined as an absolute risk difference of 3%.
RESULTS
The risk ratio of rebleeding within 7 days for intermittent vs bolus plus continuous infusion of PPIs was 0.72 (upper boundary of 1-sided 95% CI, 0.97) and the absolute risk difference was -2.64% (upper boundary of 1-sided 95% CI, -0.28%, which is well below the predefined noninferiority margin of 3%). Risk ratios for rebleeding within 30 days and 3 days, mortality, and urgent interventions were less than 1 and mean differences for blood transfusion and hospital length of stay were less than 0, indicating that no summary estimate showed an increased risk with intermittent therapy. The upper boundaries of 95% CIs for absolute risk differences were less than 1.50% for all predefined rebleeding outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Intermittent PPI therapy is comparable to the current guideline-recommended regimen of intravenous bolus plus a continuous infusion of PPIs in patients with endoscopically treated high-risk bleeding ulcers. Guidelines should be revised to recommend intermittent PPI therapy.
Topics: Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Peptic Ulcer; Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage; Proton Pump Inhibitors
PubMed: 25201154
DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4056 -
Zeitschrift Fur Gastroenterologie Feb 2017
Topics: Evidence-Based Medicine; Gastroenterology; Germany; Helicobacter Infections; Helicobacter pylori; Humans; Peptic Ulcer; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27919112
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-119653 -
The Lancet. Gastroenterology &... Apr 2018Gastroprotectant drugs are used for the prevention and treatment of peptic ulcer disease and might reduce its associated complications, but reliable estimates of the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Gastroprotectant drugs are used for the prevention and treatment of peptic ulcer disease and might reduce its associated complications, but reliable estimates of the effects of gastroprotectants in different clinical settings are scarce. We aimed to examine the effects of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), prostaglandin analogues, and histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) in different clinical circumstances by doing meta-analyses of tabular data from all relevant unconfounded randomised trials of gastroprotectant drugs.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE and Embase from Jan 1, 1950, to Dec 31, 2015, to identify unconfounded, randomised trials of a gastroprotectant drug (defined as a PPI, prostaglandin analogue, or H2RA) versus control, or versus another gastroprotectant. Two independent researchers reviewed the search results and extracted the prespecified outcomes and key characteristics for each trial. We did meta-analyses of the effects of gastroprotectant drugs on ulcer development, bleeding, and mortality overall, according to the class of gastroprotectant, and according to the individual drug within a gastroprotectant class.
FINDINGS
We identified comparisons of gastroprotectant versus control in 849 trials (142 485 participants): 580 prevention trials (110 626 participants), 233 healing trials (24 033 participants), and 36 trials for the treatment of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (7826 participants). Comparisons of one gastroprotectant drug versus another were available in 345 trials (64 905 participants), comprising 160 prevention trials (32 959 participants), 167 healing trials (28 306 participants), and 18 trials for treatment of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (3640 participants). The median number of patients in each trial was 78 (IQR 44·0-210·5) and the median duration was 1·4 months (0·9-2·8). In prevention trials, gastroprotectant drugs reduced development of endoscopic ulcers (odds ratio [OR] 0·27, 95% CI 0·25-0·29; p<0·0001), symptomatic ulcers (0·25, 0·22-0·29; p<0·0001), and upper gastrointestinal bleeding (0·40, 0·32-0·50; p<0·0001), but did not significantly reduce mortality (0·85, 0·69-1·04; p=0·11). Larger proportional reductions in upper gastrointestinal bleeding were observed for PPIs than for other gastroprotectant drugs (PPIs 0·21, 99% CI 0·12-0·36; prostaglandin analogues 0·63, 0·35-1·12; H2RAs 0·49, 0·30-0·80; p=0·0005). Gastroprotectant drugs were effective in preventing bleeding irrespective of the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (p=0·56). In healing trials, gastroprotectants increased endoscopic ulcer healing (3·49, 95% CI 3·28-3·72; p<0·0001), with PPIs more effective (5·22, 99% CI 4·00-6·80) than prostaglandin analogues (2·27, 1·91-2·70) and H2RAs (3·80, 3·44-4·20; p<0·0001). In trials among patients with acute bleeding, gastroprotectants reduced further bleeding (OR 0·68, 95% CI 0·60-0·78; p<0·0001), blood transfusion (0·75, 0·65-0·88; p=0·0003), further endoscopic intervention (0·56, 0·45-0·70; p<0·0001), and surgery (0·72, 0·61-0·84; p<0·0001), but did not significantly reduce mortality (OR 0·90, 0·72-1·11; p=0·31). PPIs had larger protective effects than did H2RAs for further bleeding (p=0·0107) and blood transfusion (p=0·0130).
INTERPRETATION
Gastroprotectants, in particular PPIs, reduce the risk of peptic ulcer disease and its complications and promote healing of peptic ulcers in a wide range of clinical circumstances. However, this meta-analysis might have overestimated the benefits owing to small study bias.
FUNDING
UK Medical Research Council and the British Heart Foundation.
Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Anti-Ulcer Agents; Histamine H2 Antagonists; Humans; Peptic Ulcer; Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage; Prostaglandins, Synthetic; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Secondary Prevention
PubMed: 29475806
DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30037-2 -
Zhongguo Ying Yong Sheng Li Xue Za Zhi... Dec 2023A peptic ulcer is a lesion (sore) on the stomach lining, or duodenum. Peptic ulcers are probably a twentieth-century condition. The ulcer disease continues to be a... (Review)
Review
A peptic ulcer is a lesion (sore) on the stomach lining, or duodenum. Peptic ulcers are probably a twentieth-century condition. The ulcer disease continues to be a significant source of worldwide morbidity and mortality. The Gastrointestinal ulcers and duodenal ulcers are considered the two most extreme types of peptic ulcers. Peptic ulcers are found to be caused by an excess of violent factors including Hydrochloric acid (HCL) pepsin, refluxed bile leukotrienes (LT), reactive oxygen species (ROS) and protective factors, these include mucus-bicarbonate barrier functions, prostaglandins (PGs), mucosal blood flow, cell regeneration and migration, non-enzymatic and enzymatic and certain growth factors. The primary cause of peptic ulcer disease is pylori infection and the use of NSAIDs. This review article underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in the management of ulcers to improve patient outcomes and quality of life.
Topics: Humans; Peptic Ulcer
PubMed: 38755116
DOI: 10.62958/j.cjap.2023.006 -
Critical Care (London, England) Jan 2018Pharmacologic stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is recommended in critically ill patients with high risk of stress-related gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. However, as to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Pharmacologic stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is recommended in critically ill patients with high risk of stress-related gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. However, as to patients receiving enteral feeding, the preventive effect of SUP is not well-known. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effect of pharmacologic SUP in enterally fed patients on stress-related GI bleeding and other clinical outcomes.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database from inception through 30 Sep 2017. Eligible trials were RCTs comparing pharmacologic SUP to either placebo or no prophylaxis in enterally fed patients in the ICU. Results were expressed as risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) with accompanying 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and publication bias were explored.
RESULTS
Seven studies (n = 889 patients) were included. There was no statistically significant difference in GI bleeding (RR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.31, p = 0.37) between groups. This finding was confirmed by further subgroup analyses and sensitivity analysis. In addition, SUP had no effect on overall mortality (RR 1.21; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.56, p = 0.14), Clostridium difficile infection (RR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.25 to 3.19, p = 0.86), length of stay in the ICU (MD 0.04 days; 95% CI, -0.79 to 0.87, p = 0.92), duration of mechanical ventilation (MD -0.38 days; 95% CI, -1.48 to 0.72, p = 0.50), but was associated with an increased risk of hospital-acquired pneumonia (RR 1.53; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.27; p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS
Our results suggested that in patients receiving enteral feeding, pharmacologic SUP is not beneficial and combined interventions may even increase the risk of nosocomial pneumonia.
Topics: Clostridium Infections; Critical Care; Duodenal Ulcer; Enteral Nutrition; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Histamine H2 Antagonists; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Length of Stay; Peptic Ulcer; Respiration, Artificial; Risk Management; Time Factors
PubMed: 29374489
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-017-1937-1 -
JPMA. the Journal of the Pakistan... Jul 2023Duodenal ulcer perforation, a frequent surgical emergency, needs simple closure with indirect Graham's Omentopexy which is effective with excellent results in majority...
Duodenal ulcer perforation, a frequent surgical emergency, needs simple closure with indirect Graham's Omentopexy which is effective with excellent results in majority of cases despite patients' late presentation. The objective of the study was to determine the frequency of postoperative complications of perforated duodenal ulcer, conducted in the Surgery Department, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, from March 20, 2018 to September 20, 2018. The study was a descriptive case series of 108 patients of both genders with perforated duodenal ulcer > 1 week old with ASA score I & II. Patients with trauma and comorbidities were excluded. The patients underwent laparotomy and peritoneal toilet, and after noting the site of perforation indirect Graham's Omentopexy was performed. Complications like duodenal fistula, peritonitis, and paralytic ileus, and patient's death within 10 days of surgery were noted. Age ranged from 18 to 50 years with mean age of 35.027±5.13 years, mean weight 71.120±12.77 kg, mean height 1.541 ±0.09 metres, mean BMI 29.975±4.99 kg/m2, and the mean duration of complaint was 4.194±1.30 weeks. Male predominance in 75 (69.4%) patients. Duodenal fistula was seen in 10 (9.3%) patients, peritonitis 12 (11.1%), paralytic ileus 14 (13%) and mortality was in 11 (10.2%) patients.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Adult; Infant; Duodenal Ulcer; Risk Factors; Peptic Ulcer Perforation; Peritonitis; Fistula
PubMed: 37469068
DOI: 10.47391/JPMA.4768 -
BMJ Case Reports Jul 2021Over-the-counter analgesic medications are widely used amongst American adults and are also available in powder forms. Their adverse effects have been well documented in...
Over-the-counter analgesic medications are widely used amongst American adults and are also available in powder forms. Their adverse effects have been well documented in literature. Gastrocolic fistulas as a complication of peptic ulcer disease from analgesic powder usage have been previously unreported. Here, we report a patient with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and acute anaemia secondary to peptic ulcer complicated by gastrocolic fistula in a patient using analgesic powder.
Topics: Adult; Colonic Diseases; Gastric Fistula; Humans; Intestinal Fistula; Peptic Ulcer; Powders
PubMed: 34257113
DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2021-242055 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Feb 2021This review considers the data on () which have been accumulated over 40 years since its description as an etiological factor in gastrointestinal diseases. The majority... (Review)
Review
This review considers the data on () which have been accumulated over 40 years since its description as an etiological factor in gastrointestinal diseases. The majority of modern publications are devoted to the study of the pathogenic properties of the microorganism in the development of chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, and gastric cancer, as well as methods for its eradication. However, in recent years, there have been more and more studies which have suggested that has a beneficial, or potentially positive, effect on the human body. The authors have attempted to objectively analyze the information accumulated in the literature on . Some studies consider it as one of the recently identified human bacterial pathogens, and special attention is paid to the evidence suggesting that it is probably part of the composition of the human microbiome as a commensal ( from French to English is a table companion) or even a symbiont. The presented data discussing the presence or absence of the effect of on human health suggest that there is an apparent ambiguity of the problem. The re-assessment of the data available on infection is important in order to answer the question of whether it is necessary to create a program of mass eradication or to apply a more personalized approach to treating patients with -associated gastrointestinal diseases and to perform eradication therapy.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Gastritis, Atrophic; Helicobacter Infections; Helicobacter pylori; Humans; Peptic Ulcer; Stomach Neoplasms
PubMed: 33642828
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i7.545