-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Dec 2019Strength training or aerobic exercise programmes, or both, might optimise muscle and cardiorespiratory function and prevent additional disuse atrophy and deconditioning... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Strength training or aerobic exercise programmes, or both, might optimise muscle and cardiorespiratory function and prevent additional disuse atrophy and deconditioning in people with a muscle disease. This is an update of a review first published in 2004 and last updated in 2013. We undertook an update to incorporate new evidence in this active area of research.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of strength training and aerobic exercise training in people with a muscle disease.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched Cochrane Neuromuscular's Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL in November 2018 and clinical trials registries in December 2018.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs or cross-over RCTs comparing strength or aerobic exercise training, or both lasting at least six weeks, to no training in people with a well-described muscle disease diagnosis.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 14 trials of aerobic exercise, strength training, or both, with an exercise duration of eight to 52 weeks, which included 428 participants with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), dermatomyositis, polymyositis, mitochondrial myopathy, Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), or myotonic dystrophy. Risk of bias was variable, as blinding of participants was not possible, some trials did not blind outcome assessors, and some did not use an intention-to-treat analysis. Strength training compared to no training (3 trials) For participants with FSHD (35 participants), there was low-certainty evidence of little or no effect on dynamic strength of elbow flexors (MD 1.2 kgF, 95% CI -0.2 to 2.6), on isometric strength of elbow flexors (MD 0.5 kgF, 95% CI -0.7 to 1.8), and ankle dorsiflexors (MD 0.4 kgF, 95% CI -2.4 to 3.2), and on dynamic strength of ankle dorsiflexors (MD -0.4 kgF, 95% CI -2.3 to 1.4). For participants with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (35 participants), there was very low-certainty evidence of a slight improvement in isometric wrist extensor strength (MD 8.0 N, 95% CI 0.7 to 15.3) and of little or no effect on hand grip force (MD 6.0 N, 95% CI -6.7 to 18.7), pinch grip force (MD 1.0 N, 95% CI -3.3 to 5.3) and isometric wrist flexor force (MD 7.0 N, 95% CI -3.4 to 17.4). Aerobic exercise training compared to no training (5 trials) For participants with DMD there was very low-certainty evidence regarding the number of leg revolutions (MD 14.0, 95% CI -89.0 to 117.0; 23 participants) or arm revolutions (MD 34.8, 95% CI -68.2 to 137.8; 23 participants), during an assisted six-minute cycle test, and very low-certainty evidence regarding muscle strength (MD 1.7, 95% CI -1.9 to 5.3; 15 participants). For participants with FSHD, there was low-certainty evidence of improvement in aerobic capacity (MD 1.1 L/min, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.8, 38 participants) and of little or no effect on knee extension strength (MD 0.1 kg, 95% CI -0.7 to 0.9, 52 participants). For participants with dermatomyositis and polymyositis (14 participants), there was very low-certainty evidence regarding aerobic capacity (MD 14.6, 95% CI -1.0 to 30.2). Combined aerobic exercise and strength training compared to no training (6 trials) For participants with juvenile dermatomyositis (26 participants) there was low-certainty evidence of an improvement in knee extensor strength on the right (MD 36.0 N, 95% CI 25.0 to 47.1) and left (MD 17 N 95% CI 0.5 to 33.5), but low-certainty evidence of little or no effect on maximum force of hip flexors on the right (MD -9.0 N, 95% CI -22.4 to 4.4) or left (MD 6.0 N, 95% CI -6.6 to 18.6). This trial also provided low-certainty evidence of a slight decrease of aerobic capacity (MD -1.2 min, 95% CI -1.6 to 0.9). For participants with dermatomyositis and polymyositis (21 participants), we found very low-certainty evidence for slight increases in muscle strength as measured by dynamic strength of knee extensors on the right (MD 2.5 kg, 95% CI 1.8 to 3.3) and on the left (MD 2.7 kg, 95% CI 2.0 to 3.4) and no clear effect in isometric muscle strength of eight different muscles (MD 1.0, 95% CI -1.1 to 3.1). There was very low-certainty evidence that there may be an increase in aerobic capacity, as measured with time to exhaustion in an incremental cycle test (17.5 min, 95% CI 8.0 to 27.0) and power performed at VO max (maximal oxygen uptake) (18 W, 95% CI 15.0 to 21.0). For participants with mitochondrial myopathy (18 participants), we found very low-certainty evidence regarding shoulder muscle (MD -5.0 kg, 95% CI -14.7 to 4.7), pectoralis major muscle (MD 6.4 kg, 95% CI -2.9 to 15.7), and anterior arm muscle strength (MD 7.3 kg, 95% CI -2.9 to 17.5). We found very low-certainty evidence regarding aerobic capacity, as measured with mean time cycled (MD 23.7 min, 95% CI 2.6 to 44.8) and mean distance cycled until exhaustion (MD 9.7 km, 95% CI 1.5 to 17.9). One trial in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (35 participants) did not provide data on muscle strength or aerobic capacity following combined training. In this trial, muscle strength deteriorated in one person and one person had worse daytime sleepiness (very low-certainty evidence). For participants with FSHD (16 participants), we found very low-certainty evidence regarding muscle strength, aerobic capacity and VO peak; the results were very imprecise. Most trials reported no adverse events other than muscle soreness or joint complaints (low- to very low-certainty evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The evidence regarding strength training and aerobic exercise interventions remains uncertain. Evidence suggests that strength training alone may have little or no effect, and that aerobic exercise training alone may lead to a possible improvement in aerobic capacity, but only for participants with FSHD. For combined aerobic exercise and strength training, there may be slight increases in muscle strength and aerobic capacity for people with dermatomyositis and polymyositis, and a slight decrease in aerobic capacity and increase in muscle strength for people with juvenile dermatomyositis. More research with robust methodology and greater numbers of participants is still required.
Topics: Dermatomyositis; Exercise; Exercise Tolerance; Humans; Muscle Strength; Muscular Diseases; Muscular Dystrophies; Muscular Dystrophy, Facioscapulohumeral; Myotonic Dystrophy; Physical Fitness; Polymyositis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Resistance Training
PubMed: 31808555
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003907.pub5 -
Italian Journal of Dermatology and... Apr 2023Dermatomyositis (DM) is an autoimmune disorder, which belongs to a group of rare autoimmune dermatoses characterized by different skin features and variable muscle... (Review)
Review
Dermatomyositis (DM) is an autoimmune disorder, which belongs to a group of rare autoimmune dermatoses characterized by different skin features and variable muscle involvement. We recognize four main variants of DM: classic DM, clinically amyopathic DM, paraneoplastic DM, and juvenile DM. Clinically, patients show several skin features, but heliotrope rash, and violaceous papules located at the interphalangeal or metacarpophalangeal joints (Gottron's papules) are the most frequently observed. Together with skin features, patients show muscle involvement, most commonly with symmetrical weakness of the proximal muscles. DM belongs to the facultative paraneoplastic dermatoses and a wide range of solid or hematologic malignancies can be detected in DM patients. Serologically, a wide range of autoantibodies can be detected in patients with DM. Indeed, distinct serotypes can be related to specific phenotypes with specific clinical features, carrying a different risk for systemic involvement and for malignancies. Systemic corticosteroids are still considered the first-line approach, but several steroid-sparing agents, such as methotrexate, azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil, have been reported as effective in treating DM. Furthermore, new class of drugs, such as monoclonal antibodies, purified immunoglobulins or Janus kinase inhibitors are becoming more relevant in the clinical practice or are currently under investigation. In this work, we aim to offer a clinical overview of the diagnostic workout, the characteristics of DM variants, the role of autoantibodies in DM, and the management of this life-threatening systemic disorder.
Topics: Humans; Dermatomyositis; Skin; Skin Diseases; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Autoantibodies
PubMed: 37153943
DOI: 10.23736/S2784-8671.23.07458-3 -
Current Opinion in Rheumatology Nov 2022This review summarizes the recent developments about anti-MDA5 antibody positive dermatomyositis with a focus on its pathogenesis, clinical features and treatment... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
This review summarizes the recent developments about anti-MDA5 antibody positive dermatomyositis with a focus on its pathogenesis, clinical features and treatment options of rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease, its most ominous complication.
RECENT FINDINGS
Anti-MDA5+ dermatomyositis has a heterogeneous clinical spectrum with different patient subsets exhibiting widely different outcomes; severe acute interstitial lung disease is the main factor impacting prognosis. The pathogenetic role of anti-MDA5 antibodies is an active area of investigation.
SUMMARY
Anti-MDA5+ dermatomyositis has a wider spectrum of manifestations than previously thought. A high index of suspicion is needed not to miss atypical presentations. In the setting of acute interstitial lung involvement, once a confident diagnosis is made, an aggressive approach with early combined immunosuppression affords the best chances of survival.
Topics: Autoantibodies; Dermatomyositis; Humans; Interferon-Induced Helicase, IFIH1; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Prognosis
PubMed: 36094462
DOI: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000908 -
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases May 2017To develop response criteria for adult dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM). Expert surveys, logistic regression, and conjoint analysis were used to develop 287...
2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria for minimal, moderate, and major clinical response in adult dermatomyositis and polymyositis: An International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group/Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation...
To develop response criteria for adult dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM). Expert surveys, logistic regression, and conjoint analysis were used to develop 287 definitions using core set measures. Myositis experts rated greater improvement among multiple pairwise scenarios in conjoint analysis surveys, where different levels of improvement in 2 core set measures were presented. The PAPRIKA (Potentially All Pairwise Rankings of All Possible Alternatives) method determined the relative weights of core set measures and conjoint analysis definitions. The performance characteristics of the definitions were evaluated on patient profiles using expert consensus (gold standard) and were validated using data from a clinical trial. The nominal group technique was used to reach consensus. Consensus was reached for a conjoint analysis-based continuous model using absolute per cent change in core set measures (physician, patient, and extramuscular global activity, muscle strength, Health Assessment Questionnaire, and muscle enzyme levels). A total improvement score (range 0-100), determined by summing scores for each core set measure, was based on improvement in and relative weight of each core set measure. Thresholds for minimal, moderate, and major improvement were ≥20, ≥40, and ≥60 points in the total improvement score. The same criteria were chosen for juvenile DM, with different improvement thresholds. Sensitivity and specificity in DM/PM patient cohorts were 85% and 92%, 90% and 96%, and 92% and 98% for minimal, moderate, and major improvement, respectively. Definitions were validated in the clinical trial analysis for differentiating the physician rating of improvement (p<0.001). The response criteria for adult DM/PM consisted of the conjoint analysis model based on absolute per cent change in 6 core set measures, with thresholds for minimal, moderate, and major improvement.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Child, Preschool; Consensus; Dermatomyositis; Humans; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Polymyositis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sensitivity and Specificity; Severity of Illness Index
PubMed: 28385805
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211400 -
Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) Apr 2021The efficacy of combination therapy with corticosteroids and CNI, TAC and CsA, for PM/DM-ILD has been described retrospectively. However, it remains unknown which CNI... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
The efficacy of combination therapy with corticosteroids and CNI, TAC and CsA, for PM/DM-ILD has been described retrospectively. However, it remains unknown which CNI treatment regimens, TAC or CsA regimens, are more effective as initial treatments for patients with PM/DM-ILD.
METHODS
We conducted a prospective multicentre, open-label, randomized, 52-week phase 2 trial. Patients with PM/DM-ILD were randomly allocated to receive PSL plus TAC (TAC group) or PSL plus CsA (CsA group). The primary endpoint was PFS rate in the intention-to-treat population at 52 weeks. The secondary endpoints were OS rate at 52 weeks, changes in pulmonary function tests from baseline to 52 weeks and AE.
RESULTS
Fifty-eight patients were randomly assigned to the TAC group (n = 30) and the CsA group (n = 28). The PFS rates at 52 weeks were 87% in the TAC group and 71% in the CsA group (P = 0.16). The OS rates at 52 weeks were 97% in the TAC group and 93% in the CsA group (P = 0.50). The %FVC at 52 weeks in the per-protocol populations significantly increased in both groups. None of the patients discontinued the treatment due to AE.
CONCLUSION
PSL plus TAC treatment may achieve a better short-term PFS rate compared with PSL plus CsA treatment. Further studies must be conducted to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of such treatment.
Topics: Cyclosporine; Dermatomyositis; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Prednisolone; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Tacrolimus
PubMed: 33179395
DOI: 10.1111/resp.13978 -
Internal Medicine (Tokyo, Japan) 2023
Topics: Humans; Dermatomyositis; Polymyositis; Myositis; Edema
PubMed: 37532512
DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1199-22 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2022Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are a heterogeneous group of autoimmune diseases with various subtypes, myositis-specific antibodies, and affect multiple... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are a heterogeneous group of autoimmune diseases with various subtypes, myositis-specific antibodies, and affect multiple systems. The treatment of IIMs remains challenging, especially for refractory myositis. In addition to steroids and traditional immunosuppressants, rituximab (RTX), a B cell-depleting monoclonal antibody, is emerging as an alternative treatment for refractory myositis. However, the therapeutic response to RTX remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of RTX in patients with IIMs, excluding sporadic inclusion body myositis.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WanFang Data were searched for relevant studies. The overall effective rate, complete response rate, and partial response rate were calculated to assess the efficacy of RTX. The incidences of adverse events, infection, severe adverse events, severe infection, and infusion reactions were collected to evaluate the safety of RTX. Subgroup analyses were performed using IIM subtypes, affected organs, continents, and countries. We also performed a sensitivity analysis to identify the sources of heterogeneity.
RESULTS
A total of 26 studies were included in the quantitative analysis, which showed that 65% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 54%, 75%) of patients with IIMs responded to RTX, 45% (95% CI: 22%, 70%) of patients achieved a complete response, and 39% (95% CI: 26%, 53%) achieved a partial response. Subgroup analyses indicated that the overall efficacy rates in patients with refractory IIMs, dermatomyositis and polymyositis, as well as anti-synthetase syndrome were 62%, 68%, and 62%, respectively. The overall efficacy rates for muscle, lungs, and skin involvement were 59%, 65%, and 81%, respectively. In addition, studies conducted in Germany and the United States showed that patients with IIMs had an excellent response to RTX, with an effective rate of 90% and 77%, respectively. The incidence of severe adverse events and infections was 8% and 2%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
RTX may be an effective and relatively safe treatment choice in patients with IIMs, especially for refractory cases. However, further verification randomized controlled trials is warranted.
Topics: Humans; Rituximab; Myositis; Polymyositis; Immunosuppressive Agents; Autoimmune Diseases
PubMed: 36578492
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1051609 -
Neurologic Clinics Aug 2014The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) consist of rare heterogeneous autoimmune disorders that present with marked proximal and symmetric muscle weakness, except... (Review)
Review
The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) consist of rare heterogeneous autoimmune disorders that present with marked proximal and symmetric muscle weakness, except for distal and asymmetric weakness in inclusion body myositis. Despite many similarities, the IIM are fairly heterogeneous from the histopathologic and pathogenetic standpoints, and also show some clinical and treatment-response differences. The field has witnessed significant advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology and treatment of these rare disorders. This review focuses on dermatomyositis, polymyositis, and necrotizing myopathy, and examines current and promising therapies.
Topics: Autoimmune Diseases; Dermatomyositis; Female; Humans; Male; Muscle Weakness; Myositis; Myositis, Inclusion Body
PubMed: 25037081
DOI: 10.1016/j.ncl.2014.04.007 -
Giornale Italiano Di Dermatologia E... Apr 2018Dermatomyositis (DM) is a chronic autoimmune disease affecting primarily the skeletal muscle and the skin. Although the diagnosis is usually based upon clinical and... (Review)
Review
Dermatomyositis (DM) is a chronic autoimmune disease affecting primarily the skeletal muscle and the skin. Although the diagnosis is usually based upon clinical and laboratory findings, histopathology is helpful for confirmation purposes and is mandatory in amiopathic DM where there is only skin involvement. Histologically, the typical cases are characterized by subtle vacuolar interface alterations with epidermal atrophy, mild capillary ectasia and sparse perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate; these findings are similar to those seen in other connective tissue diseases, especially lupus erythematosus. This review deals with the specific histological findings that can be found in the different presentations of the disease and discuss the most common differential diagnoses. As for many other inflammatory skin diseases, the diagnosis of DM is based on a strict interaction between the dermatologist and the dermatopathologist.
Topics: Dermatomyositis; Diagnosis, Differential; Humans; Inflammation; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Skin Diseases
PubMed: 29368856
DOI: 10.23736/S0392-0488.18.05836-4 -
RMD Open Jan 2023Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5) antibody-positive dermatomyositis (MDA5-DM) is frequently complicated with rapidly progressive-interstitial...
Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5) antibody-positive dermatomyositis (MDA5-DM) is frequently complicated with rapidly progressive-interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD). The prognosis of MDA5-DM with RP-ILD is mostly poor despite intensive treatment with a combination of high-dose glucocorticoids and single conventional immunosuppressants. It was reported that the triple therapy (high-dose glucocorticoids, cyclophosphamide and tacrolimus) was more effective than a combination of high-dose glucocorticoids and stepwise addition of immunosuppressants. In addition, the efficacy of tofacitinib 10 mg/day for MDA5-DM with RP-ILD refractory to the triple therapy was suggested. However, the effect of those therapies was evaluated only in comparison to the historical control. Moreover, more importantly, there are still refractory patients even if treated with those therapies. In this case series, we report six MDA5-DM cases with RP-ILD in which the dose of tofacitinib was increased from 10 mg to 20 mg/day due to poor response to the triple therapy, followed by tofacitinib 10 mg/day. Four of six patients improved after dose escalation of tofacitinib, while two non-responders died. All six patients developed at least one infection including five cases of cytomegalovirus reactivation, one pulmonary aspergillosis, one herpes zoster and one herpes simplex keratitis. These cases suggest that the dose escalation of tofacitinib can be an option for MDA5-DM patients refractory to 10 mg/day of tofacitinib and other immunosuppressants although the risk of infection is a concern. The risk-benefit balance of the dose escalation of tofacitinib should be carefully assessed in each case.
Topics: Humans; Dermatomyositis; Glucocorticoids; Immunosuppressive Agents; Lung Diseases, Interstitial
PubMed: 36593080
DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002795