-
Journal of Molecular Modeling Mar 2022Increased expression and activation of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) could lead to recurrent implantation failure (RIF). Therefore, TNF-α inhibition may be a...
Increased expression and activation of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) could lead to recurrent implantation failure (RIF). Therefore, TNF-α inhibition may be a strategic way to enhance the implantation rate in women with RIF. Nowadays, monoclonal antibodies are considered an effective therapeutic method for TNF-α inhibition. Unfortunately, monoclonal antibody treatments have several disadvantages. Thus, the design of small molecules capable of inhibiting TNF-α has become critical in recent years. In silico drug repurposing of FDA-approved drugs for TNF-α inhibition was used in this study. PyRx tools were employed for virtual screening. Additionally, the free energy of binding, the number of hydrogen bonds, and the number of drug contacts with the protein were calculated using the molecular dynamics (MD) simulation method. Virtual screening results reveal that 17 of 2471 FDA-approved drugs benefited from favorable binding energy with TNF-α (delta G < - 10 kcal/mol). Two of the 17 drugs, progesterone and prednisone, were the most frequently used without adverse effects during pregnancy. As a result, MD simulation was used to investigate these two drugs further. According to the MD simulation results, prednisone appears to have a higher affinity for TNF-α than progesterone, and consequently, the prednisone complex stability is higher. For the first time, this study examined the possible role of prednisone and progesterone in inhibiting TNF-α using in silico methods.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Female; Humans; Molecular Dynamics Simulation; Prednisone; Progesterone; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
PubMed: 35347442
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-022-05093-z -
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases Sep 2023Mepolizumab at the dose of 300 mg/4 weeks has been recently approved as an add-on therapy for patients with uncontrolled hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) without any...
Mepolizumab at the dose of 300 mg/4 weeks has been recently approved as an add-on therapy for patients with uncontrolled hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) without any identifiable non-hematologic secondary cause. According to the available real-life evidence mepolizumab 300 mg and 100 mg, licensed for severe eosinophilic asthma, are comparable in terms of drug efficacy. However, the clinical rationale for selecting one dose or the other has not been explored. We investigated the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab 100 mg in idiopathic HES (I-HES) patients as a steroid sparing strategy for disease remission maintenance by assessing clinical conditions, blood eosinophil count (BEC) and adverse events at baseline and at 3-6-12 months follow-up. Overall, 11 patients were enrolled (females 4-36%) with a median age of 62 years (IQR 55.0-72.0). At 3-month visit both prednisone daily dose and BEC significantly decreased from baseline, whilst a substantial improvement of Brief fatigue inventory score (BFI) was not recorded before the 6 months assessment. More than 70% of patients completely stopped prednisone at 12-months follow-up, without any flare in terms of BEC and BFI. No adverse event was registered. Although larger studies are needed, our report firstly describes that in a well-defined population, diagnosed with I-HES and in disease remission, low dose mepolizumab is a safe and effective steroid-sparing option for remission maintenance. It suggests that a personalized treatment dose might be explored according to the disease classification and activity at the time of biologic treatment start.
Topics: Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Aged; Prednisone; Precision Medicine; Hypereosinophilic Syndrome
PubMed: 37752586
DOI: 10.1186/s13023-023-02918-9 -
Journal of Crohn's & Colitis Mar 2023Corticosteroid-free remission is an important treatment goal for patients with ulcerative colitis [UC]. The corticosteroid-sparing effects of filgotinib, an oral, Janus...
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Corticosteroid-free remission is an important treatment goal for patients with ulcerative colitis [UC]. The corticosteroid-sparing effects of filgotinib, an oral, Janus kinase 1 preferential inhibitor, were assessed in SELECTION, a placebo-controlled, phase 2b/3 trial in moderately to severely active UC.
METHODS
These post hoc analyses assessed 1-, 3-, 6-, and 8-month rates of corticosteroid-free clinical remission at Week 58 and change in median daily prednisone-equivalent dose over time. A matching-adjusted indirect comparison [MAIC] of maintenance studies assessed corticosteroid-free remission with filgotinib 200 mg, intravenous vedolizumab, subcutaneous vedolizumab, and oral tofacitinib.
RESULTS
The Maintenance Study full analysis set included 199 patients receiving filgotinib 200 mg and 98 receiving placebo. Among patients receiving corticosteroids at Maintenance Study baseline, at Week 58, 30.4%, 29.3%, 27.2%, and 21.7% receiving filgotinib had been in corticosteroid-free remission for ≥1, ≥3, ≥6, or ≥8 months, respectively, versus 6.4% receiving placebo across thresholds [p <0.05]. Median daily prednisone-equivalent dose decreased from 17.5 mg/day to 10.0 mg/day with filgotinib treatment during the Maintenance Study. Based upon the MAIC, filgotinib was associated with greater likelihood of corticosteroid-free clinical remission versus intravenous vedolizumab (odds ratio [OR], 15.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-139.9; p <0.05]) and similar odds to subcutaneous vedolizumab [OR, 3.8; CI, 0.2-63.8; p = 0.36] in biologic-naïve patients, and similar odds to tofacitinib overall [OR, 2.0; 0.4-9.1; p = 0.39].
CONCLUSIONS
Filgotinib 200 mg demonstrated corticosteroid-sparing effects and maintained corticosteroid-free clinical remission in patients with UC. MAIC results should be interpreted cautiously given the large CIs and differences in study design and patient populations. [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02914522].
Topics: Humans; Colitis, Ulcerative; Prednisone; Pyridines; Triazoles; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Janus Kinase Inhibitors
PubMed: 36006011
DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac122 -
Medicine Jun 2020The pathogenesis of myasthenia gravis (MG) has strong connection with thymic abnormalities. Thymic hyperplasia or thymoma can be found with most patients. Thymectomy is... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
Effectiveness and safety of thymectomy plus prednisone compares with prednisone monotherapy for the treatment of non-thymomatous Myasthenia Gravis: Protocol for a systematic review.
BACKGROUND
The pathogenesis of myasthenia gravis (MG) has strong connection with thymic abnormalities. Thymic hyperplasia or thymoma can be found with most patients. Thymectomy is currently one of the regular treatment in clinic, which is, however, still controversial for non-thymomatous MG. This research will assess the effectiveness and safety of thymectomy plus prednisone compared to prednisone monotherapy for the treatment of non-thymomatous MG systematically.
METHODS
According to eligibility and ineligibility criteria, 8 databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan-fang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China Science and Technology Journal Database (CSTJ), will be searched to gather the up-to-standard articles from September 2000 to September 2025. Inclusion criteria are as follows: randomized controlled trials of thymectomy plus prednisone for the treatment of non-thymomatous MG. The quantitative myasthenia gravis score (QMG) and the dose of prednisone required will be accepted as the main outcomes. Data synthesis, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression analysis will be conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. We will use Egger or Begg test to evaluate symmetry on a funnel plot which is made to assess reporting bias, and use trial sequential analysis (TSA) to exclude the probability of false positives.
RESULTS
This systematic review will measure the QMG and the dose of prednisone required, the myasthenia gravis activities of daily living scale scores (MG-ADL), treatment-associated complications, incidence of myasthenic crisis and other aspects to comprehensively assess the clinical benefits of thymectomy plus prednisone for MG patients without thymoma.
CONCLUSION
The conclusion of this study will achieve convincing evidence to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of thymectomy plus prednisone for the treatment of non-thymomatous MG.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD 42020167735.
Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Combined Modality Therapy; Humans; Myasthenia Gravis; Prednisone; Thymectomy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32569233
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020832 -
PloS One 2018Rituximab is a promising steroid sparing agent used in the treatment of moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris. Its exact place in the algorithm of pemphigus treatment,... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Rituximab is a promising steroid sparing agent used in the treatment of moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris. Its exact place in the algorithm of pemphigus treatment, vis-à-vis other, conventional adjuvant therapy (CAT) is not known.
OBJECTIVE
To describe and compare disease course outcomes and morbidity among patients with moderate to severe pemphigus who received rituximab therapy (RT) in addition to prednisone and CAT, versus those who were treated with prednisone and CAT alone.
METHODS
A 16-year retrospective case control study was designed with adult patients who were seen at the Duke University Dermatology Immunodermatology clinic from 1999-2015, who had a diagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris, and required prednisone and at least 1 systemic CAT. All patients had at least 6 months follow up from the initial visit. Interventions included RT, systemic CAT, and prednisone. The main outcome measured was prednisone intake. Secondary outcomes were complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR).
RESULTS
40 patients were included in the study. All initially received prednisone and at least 1 systemic CAT. 13/40 eventually went on to receive RT, while 27/40 remained on CAT (CAT-only). Patients in the RT group, pre-RT, had a median prednisone intake of 658.57 mg/month. Rituximab treatment significantly reduced this to 177.22 mg/month (p = 0.002). Median prednisone intake of the CAT-only group was 141.33 mg/month. This was significantly less than Pre-RT (p = 0.01) and on par with Post-RT intake (p = 0.58). 54% of patients in the RT group and 64% of those in the CAT-only group achieved CR. All patients in the RT group and 96% of those in the CAT-only group achieved at least PR.
CONCLUSIONS
32.5% of our patients with moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris failed prednisone and traditional CAT treatment and required rituximab therapy. Rituximab reduced the monthly prednisone intake in these patients by 73%. This suggests that a subset of patients with moderate to severe pemphigus may benefit from early institution of rituximab therapy. Rituximab significantly reduces the monthly prednisone requirement among CAT-resistant pemphigus vulgaris patients to levels on par with CAT-responsive patients.
Topics: Adjuvants, Immunologic; Aged; Case-Control Studies; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pemphigus; Prednisone; Remission Induction; Retrospective Studies; Rituximab; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30252855
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198074 -
JAMA Network Open Mar 2024The association between the use of bone-modifying agents (BMAs) and the outcomes among patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) treated with... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
IMPORTANCE
The association between the use of bone-modifying agents (BMAs) and the outcomes among patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) treated with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) remains unclear.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the association between BMA use and the outcomes of patients with mCSPC receiving AAP.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
In this cohort study, a post hoc analysis of individual participant data from the LATITUDE trial was performed. The LATITUDE trial, a phase 3 randomized clinical trial, aimed to assess the efficacy of AAP and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) vs dual-placebo and ADT in patients with high-risk mCSPC (data cutoff, August 15, 2018). Eligible patients had newly diagnosed prostate cancer with metastases and at least 2 of 3 high-risk factors (Gleason score ≥8, presence of ≥3 lesions on bone scan, or presence of measurable visceral metastasis). The trial was conducted at 235 sites in 34 countries. Data for the present study were evaluated from July 18 to September 23, 2023.
EXPOSURES
Use of BMAs was defined as the administration of bisphosphonates and denosumab within 90 days before and after randomization.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcomes were time to skeletal-related events (SREs) and overall survival (OS). An SRE was defined as a clinical or pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, palliative radiation to bone, or surgery involving bone. Differences in these outcomes were examined using the restricted mean survival time from inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves, estimated until the last event was observed (longest time observed, 63.9 months). Treatment × covariate interactions were analyzed using weighted Cox proportional hazards regression models for the total cohort.
RESULTS
In the total cohort of 1199 patients (956 [79.7%] younger than 75 years), 597 (49.8%) received AAP and ADT, including 474 (79.4%) younger than 75 years and 384 (64.3%) with more than 10 bone metastases (AAP cohort); 602 (50.2%) were treated with dual placebo and ADT, including 482 (80.1%) younger than 75 years and 377 (62.6%) with more than 10 bone metastases (ADT cohort). In the AAP cohort, 132 patients (22.1%) received BMAs, while in the ADT cohort, 131 (21.8%) did. Zoledronic acid was the most frequently administered BMA in both the AAP (93 [70.5%]) and the ADT (88 [67.2%]) cohorts. During the median follow-up of 51.8 (IQR, 47.2-57.0) months in the AAP cohort, BMA use was associated with a longer time to SRE (difference, 7.8 [95% CI, 4.2-11.3] months) but not with OS (difference, 1.6 [95% CI, -2.5 to 5.8] months). In the ADT cohort, BMA use was associated with both time to SRE (difference, 9.3 [95% CI, 5.2-13.3] months) and OS (difference, 5.5 [95% CI, 3.2-9.8] months). No evidence was found that the outcomes of BMA varied by AAP or ADT (hazard ratio for time to SRE, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.48-2.08]; P = .99 for interaction; hazard ratio for OS, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.88-1.96]; P = .18 for interaction).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
The findings of this cohort study suggest that use of BMAs was associated with a longer time to SRE in patients with high-risk mCSPC treated with ADT, with or without AAP, suggesting that BMA use might provide benefits to this population.
Topics: Male; Humans; Abiraterone Acetate; Prostatic Neoplasms; Androgen Antagonists; Cohort Studies; Prednisone; Castration
PubMed: 38488793
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.2467 -
The Journal of International Medical... May 2019This study aimed to report a unique case of primary adrenal insufficiency that was accompanied by painful gynecomastia, which was resolved by treatment with prednisone.... (Review)
Review
This study aimed to report a unique case of primary adrenal insufficiency that was accompanied by painful gynecomastia, which was resolved by treatment with prednisone. Enlargement of the left breast with continuous weakness and generalized nausea in a male was discovered 3 months before admission. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain was normal 1 month before presentation. A physical examination revealed that the diameter of the left breast was 5 cm and the height was 3 cm. Laboratory investigations revealed hyponatremia, with a low serum cortisol level and an elevated prolactin level. Hyperprolactinemia was suspected because of adrenal deficiency that was directly or indirectly associated with increased prolactin levels. Thus, a diagnosis of hyperprolactinemia was confirmed. Ultrasonography of the left breast showed glandular tissue hyperplasia. In the present study, treating adrenal insufficiency with prednisone relieved both gynecomastia and hyponatremia. However, gynecomastia regression and hyponatremia resolution were observed when prednisone was stopped. Gynecomastia completely resolved by re-administering prednisone. Therefore, treating the underlying disease is essential so that prednisone can be given in a timely manner.
Topics: Aged; Gynecomastia; Hormones; Humans; Hyperplasia; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Prednisone; Ultrasonography, Doppler
PubMed: 30958070
DOI: 10.1177/0300060519840896 -
PLoS Computational Biology Jun 2023Cycling of biologic or targeted synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients due to non-response is a problem...
Cycling of biologic or targeted synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients due to non-response is a problem preventing and delaying disease control. We aimed to assess and validate treatment response of b/tsDMARDs among clusters of RA patients identified by deep learning. We clustered RA patients clusters at first-time b/tsDMARD (cohort entry) in the Swiss Clinical Quality Management in Rheumatic Diseases registry (SCQM) [1999-2018]. We performed comparative effectiveness analyses of b/tsDMARDs (ref. adalimumab) using Cox proportional hazard regression. Within 15 months, we assessed b/tsDMARD stop due to non-response, and separately a ≥20% reduction in DAS28-esr as a response proxy. We validated results through stratified analyses according to most distinctive patient characteristics of clusters. Clusters comprised between 362 and 1481 patients (3516 unique patients). Stratified (validation) analyses confirmed comparative effectiveness results among clusters: Patients with ≥2 conventional synthetic DMARDs and prednisone at b/tsDMARD initiation, male patients, as well as patients with a lower disease burden responded better to tocilizumab than to adalimumab (hazard ratio [HR] 5.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.76-16.94], and HR 8.44 [3.43-20.74], and HR 3.64 [2.04-6.49], respectively). Furthermore, seronegative women without use of prednisone at b/tsDMARD initiation as well as seropositive women with a higher disease burden and longer disease duration had a higher risk of non-response with golimumab (HR 2.36 [1.03-5.40] and HR 5.27 [2.10-13.21], respectively) than with adalimumab. Our results suggest that RA patient clusters identified by deep learning may have different responses to first-line b/tsDMARD. Thus, it may suggest optimal first-line b/tsDMARD for certain RA patients, which is a step forward towards personalizing treatment. However, further research in other cohorts is needed to verify our results.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Adalimumab; Prednisone; Deep Learning; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products
PubMed: 37267387
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011073 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. Relapse and incomplete recovery from relapse are common in...
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. Relapse and incomplete recovery from relapse are common in NMOSD. Most patients with NMOSD have IgG to aquaporin-4 (AQP4-IgG). New biological agents for AQP4-IgG-seropositive NMOSD, such as satralizumab, have become available for maintenance therapy. Satralizumab is an anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody. To date, few studies have evaluated satralizumab as an add-on treatment in pediatric NMOSD patients. Here, we report an 11-year-old girl with NMOSD who frequently relapsed under long-term treatment, including oral prednisone, rituximab, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and maintenance intravenous immunoglobulin treatment even with B-cell depletion. For the poor treatment response and to improve the efficacy of relapse prevention further, the patient received satralizumab treatment as an add-on therapy to MMF plus oral prednisone, with a dose of 120 mg administered subcutaneously at weeks 0, 2, and 4 and every 4 weeks after that. After initiating satralizumab, the patient remained relapse-free for 14 months at the last follow-up. Satralizumab might be effective and safe as an add-on treatment in refractory pediatric AQP4-IgG-seropositive NMOSD under B-cell depletion.
Topics: Female; Humans; Child; Neuromyelitis Optica; Prednisone; Autoantibodies; Mycophenolic Acid; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Recurrence
PubMed: 37915570
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1257955 -
Reumatologia Clinica Feb 2024To compare the effect of combined treatment with prednisone and methotrexate (MTX) versus prednisone alone over laboratory parameters in giant cell arteritis (GCA). (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVE
To compare the effect of combined treatment with prednisone and methotrexate (MTX) versus prednisone alone over laboratory parameters in giant cell arteritis (GCA).
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial about usefulness of treatment with prednisone and MTX versus prednisone and placebo in GCA (Ann Intern Med 2001;134:106-114). As a part of follow-up of patients (n=42), we performed laboratory analysis in 20 time points during the two-year period of follow-up. To analyze differences, we calculated the area under the curve (AUC) for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), hemoglobin, and platelets, and compared the results in both groups adjusting by time of follow-up, existence of relapses and dose of prednisone.
RESULTS
A total of 724 laboratory measurements were done. Median value of ESR was 33 [18-56] in patients with placebo and 26 [15-44] in patients with MTX (P=0.0002). No significant differences were observed in ESR during relapses. The mean ESR value followed a parallel course in both groups, but was lower in the group with MTX than in the group with placebo in 18 of 20 time points of follow-up. The AUC of ESR by time of follow-up was 28,461.7±12,326 in the group with placebo and 19,598.4±8,117 in the group with MTX (mean difference 8,863, 95% CI 1.542-16.184; P=0.019). The course of other laboratory parameters paralleled, without statistical significance, those observed for ESR.
CONCLUSIONS
These data, along with clinical data, suggest that MTX might play a role as a disease-modifying agent in the treatment of GCA.
Topics: Humans; Giant Cell Arteritis; Methotrexate; Prednisone; Recurrence; Double-Blind Method
PubMed: 38395494
DOI: 10.1016/j.reumae.2024.01.003