-
Neuromuscular Disorders : NMD Oct 2022Pyridostigmine is the most commonly used drug in the symptomatic treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG); however, research into its effectiveness and side effects is...
Pyridostigmine is the most commonly used drug in the symptomatic treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG); however, research into its effectiveness and side effects is scarce. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness, prevalence of side effects and net benefit of pyridostigmine. All MG patients participating in the Dutch-Belgian myasthenia patient registry were included. A dynamic online questionnaire was developed to assess the effectiveness, side effects and net benefit of pyridostigmine. Out of 642 invited patients, 410 patients (64%) fully completed the questionnaire; 61% reported that they currently used pyridostigmine, 36% had discontinued pyridostigmine and 2% reported to never have used pyridostigmine. Patients reported a median effectiveness of 60, IQR 28-78 and net benefit of 65, IQR 45-84. Of all patients currently using pyridostigmine, 91% reported side effects (vs. 55% in the control group). Most frequently reported side effects were flatulence, urinary urgency, muscle cramps, blurred vision and hyperhidrosis. In the group of patients who discontinued pyridostigmine, side effects were the reason for discontinuation in 26%. Diarrhea, abdominal cramps and muscle twitching were the most frequently cited reasons to discontinue pyridostigmine. These results can be used to guide shared decision making prior to starting symptomatic treatment for MG.
Topics: Humans; Pyridostigmine Bromide; Cross-Sectional Studies; Myasthenia Gravis; Muscle Weakness
PubMed: 36184373
DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2022.09.002 -
Transactions of the American Clinical... 2015It has been more than 20 years since the United States and coalition forces entered Kuwait and Iraq. Actual combat was of remarkably short duration: less than 1 week of... (Review)
Review
It has been more than 20 years since the United States and coalition forces entered Kuwait and Iraq. Actual combat was of remarkably short duration: less than 1 week of sustained ground activity and 6 weeks of air missions. Thus, it was surprising when approximately 200,000 returning US veterans were affected by a chronic multi-symptom illness that came to be known as Gulf War Illness (GWI). There were many challenges in investigating GWI, not least of which was that it took several years before the condition was officially taken seriously. There were multiple exposures to potentially causal agents on and off the battlefield, but these exposures were documented incompletely if at all, leaving epidemiologists to rely on self-report for information. In the past 2 years, significant controversy has arisen over the future directions of the field. Despite these challenges, several studies have implicated exposure to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors such as pyridostigmine bromide in the genesis of the condition. The story of GWI can inform research into other conditions and guide future work on veterans' health.
Topics: Chronic Disease; Gulf War; History, 20th Century; History, 21st Century; Humans; Military Medicine; Persian Gulf Syndrome; Prognosis; Risk Factors; Veterans Health
PubMed: 26330683
DOI: No ID Found -
Revista de Neurologia Aug 2021Early diagnosis based on clinical findings, neurophysiological studies and serum antibody titres allows early initiation of symptomatic treatment and oncological...
INTRODUCTION
Early diagnosis based on clinical findings, neurophysiological studies and serum antibody titres allows early initiation of symptomatic treatment and oncological screening. Reports of patients with LEMS in Latin America are scarce.
AIM
This article aims to describe the characteristics of patients with LEMS from a private centre in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and to compare them with those of other series that have been published.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
The medical records of 13 patients with LEMS with clinical findings, compatible electromyogram and/or positive antibodies were reviewed. Follow-up was performed until associated neoplasia was ruled out or confirmed according to the recommended algorithms.
RESULTS
Four patients were diagnosed with T-LEMS, two of them with small-cell lung carcinoma. Of the nine patients with NT-LEMS, five had a DELTA-P score of 3 and 4. Nine patients presented with the classic clinical triad from the onset of the disease. All patients had electromyogram findings compatible with presynaptic neuromuscular plaque defect. Of the total, 70% improved symptomatically with pyridostigmine.
CONCLUSIONS
The clinical findings, together with compatible neurophysiological studies, are sufficient for the diagnosis of LEMS. The relationship between the DELTA-P score and the risk of small-cell lung carcinoma could not be replicated. Symptomatic treatment with pyridostigmine represents an effective therapeutic alternative.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Argentina; Carcinoma, Small Cell; Electromyography; Female; Humans; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous; Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Neuromuscular Junction; Pyridostigmine Bromide; Retrospective Studies; Symptom Assessment; Young Adult
PubMed: 34291446
DOI: 10.33588/rn.7303.2021140 -
Indian Journal of Pharmacology 2018The management of myasthenia gravis (MG) during pregnancy requires special skills as both diseases as well as its treatment can have deleterious effects on mother and... (Review)
Review
The management of myasthenia gravis (MG) during pregnancy requires special skills as both diseases as well as its treatment can have deleterious effects on mother and fetus. MG often affects women in second and third decades of life during the childbearing age. Exacerbations of MG are likely to occur during the first trimester and postpartum period. The treatment of MG during pregnancy needs to be individualized depending on the severity of MG as well as the efficacy of various treatment modalities and their possible harmful effects on pregnancy. In addition, special attention has to be given to avoid drugs and other factors (such as urinary tract infections) which may worsen MG. The key to successful outcome during pregnancy in myasthenic women lies in multidisciplinary care involving obstetricians, neurologists, anesthetist as well as neonatologist. In this review, we discuss various therapeutic options available for the management of MG during pregnancy and provide recommendations based on the current best evidence.
Topics: Azathioprine; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Disease Management; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Myasthenia Gravis; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Pregnancy Outcome; Prenatal Care; Pyridostigmine Bromide; Severity of Illness Index
PubMed: 30783322
DOI: 10.4103/ijp.IJP_452_17 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Mar 2023To examine associations between the pyridostigmine bromide (PB) pill and/or pesticide exposure during the 1990-1991 Gulf War (GW) and eye findings years after...
To examine associations between the pyridostigmine bromide (PB) pill and/or pesticide exposure during the 1990-1991 Gulf War (GW) and eye findings years after deployment. A cross-sectional study of South Florida veterans who were deployed on active duty during the GW Era (GWE). Information on GW exposures and ocular surface symptoms were collected via standardized questionnaires and an ocular surface examination was performed. Participants underwent spectral domain-ocular coherence tomography (SD-OCT) imaging that included retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), ganglion cell layer (GCL), and macular maps. We examined for differences in eye findings between individuals exposed versus not exposed to PB pills or pesticides during service. A total of 40.7% (n = 44) of individuals reported exposure to PB pills and 41.7% (n = 45) to pesticides; additionally, 24 reported exposure to both in the GW arena. Demographics were comparable across groups. Individuals exposed to PB pills reported higher dry eye (DE) symptoms scores (the 5-Item Dry Eye Questionnaire, DEQ-5: 9.3 ± 5.3 vs. 7.3 ± 4.7, = 0.04) and more intense ocular pain (average over the last week: 2.4 ± 2.6 vs. 1.5 ± 1.8, = 0.03; Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory modified for the Eye (NPSI-E): 18.2 ± 20.0 vs. 10.8 ± 13.8, = 0.03) compared to their non-exposed counterparts. DE signs were comparable between the groups. Individuals exposed to PB pills also had thicker OCT measurements, with the largest difference in the outer temporal segment of the macula (268.5 ± 22.2 μm vs. 260.6 ± 14.5 μm, = 0.03) compared to non-exposed individuals. These differences remained significant when examined in multivariable models that included demographics and deployment history. Individuals exposed to pesticides had higher neuropathic ocular pain scores (NPSI-E: 17.1 ± 21.1 vs. 11.6 ± 12.9, = 0.049), but this difference did not remain significant in a multivariable model. Individuals exposed to PB pills during the GWE reported more severe ocular surface symptoms and had thicker OCT measures years after deployment compared to their non-exposed counterparts.
PubMed: 36983407
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12062407 -
Neurobiology of Stress May 2022Gulf War Illness (GWI) is a multi-symptom illness that continues to affect over 250,000 American Gulf War veterans. The causes of GWI remain equivocal; however,...
Gulf War Illness (GWI) is a multi-symptom illness that continues to affect over 250,000 American Gulf War veterans. The causes of GWI remain equivocal; however, prophylactic use of the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor pyridostigmine bromide (PB), and the stress of combat have been identified as two potential causative factors. Both PB and stress alter acetylcholine (ACh), which mediates both cognition and anti-inflammatory responses. As inflammation has been proposed to contribute to the cognitive deficits and immune dysregulation in GWI, the goal of this study was to determine the long-term effects of PB and stress on the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway in the central nervous system and periphery. We used our previously established rat model of GWI and microdialysis to assess cholinergic neurochemistry in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and hippocampus following a mild immune challenge (lipopolysaccharide; LPS). We then examined LPS-induced changes in inflammatory markers in PFC and hippocampal homogenates. We found that PB treatment produces a long-lasting potentiation of the cholinergic response to LPS in both the PFC and hippocampus. Interestingly, this prolonged effect of PB treatment enhancing cholinergic responses to LPS was accompanied by paradoxical increases in the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines in these brain regions. Collectively, these findings provide evidence that neuroinflammation resulting from dysregulation of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway is a mechanistic mediator in the progression of the neurochemical and neurocognitive deficits in GWI and more broadly suggest that dysregulation of this pathway may contribute to neuroinflammatory processes in stress-related neurological disorders.
PubMed: 35573808
DOI: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2022.100446 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... May 2021Orthostatic hypotension is an excessive fall in blood pressure (BP) while standing and is the result of a decrease in cardiac output or defective or inadequate...
BACKGROUND
Orthostatic hypotension is an excessive fall in blood pressure (BP) while standing and is the result of a decrease in cardiac output or defective or inadequate vasoconstrictor mechanisms. Fludrocortisone is a mineralocorticoid that increases blood volume and blood pressure. Fludrocortisone is considered the first- or second-line pharmacological therapy for orthostatic hypotension alongside mechanical and positional measures such as increasing fluid and salt intake and venous compression methods. However, there has been no Cochrane Review of the benefits and harms of this drug for this condition.
OBJECTIVES
To identify and evaluate the benefits and harms of fludrocortisone for orthostatic hypotension.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the following databases on 11 November 2019: Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL. We also searched trials registries.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included all studies evaluating the benefits and harms of fludrocortisone compared to placebo, another drug for orthostatic hypotension, or studies without comparators, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs and observational studies. We included studies in people with orthostatic hypotension due to a chronic peripheral neuropathy, a central autonomic neuropathy, or autonomic failure from other causes, but not medication-induced orthostatic hypotension or orthostatic hypotension from acute volume depletion or blood loss.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used Cochrane methodological procedures for most of the review. We developed and used a tool to prioritize observational studies that offered the best available evidence where there are gaps in the evidence from RCTs. We assessed the certainty of evidence for fludrocortisone versus placebo using GRADE.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 13 studies of 513 participants, including three cross-over RCTs and 10 observational studies (three cohort studies, six case series and one case-control study). The included RCTs were small (total of 28 participants in RCTs), short term (two to three weeks), only examined fludrocortisone for orthostatic hypotension in people with two conditions (diabetes and Parkinson disease), and had variable risk of bias (two had unclear risk of bias and one had low risk of bias). Heterogeneity in participant populations, comparators and outcome assessment methods prevented meta-analyses of the RCTs. We found very low-certainty evidence about the effects of fludrocortisone versus placebo on drop in BP in people with diabetes (-26 mmHg versus -39 mmHg systolic; -7 mmHg versus -11 mmHg diastolic; 1 cross-over study, 6 participants). For people with Parkinson disease, we found very-low certainty evidence about the effects of fludrocortisone on drop in BP compared to pyridostigmine (-14 mmHg versus -22.1 mmHg diastolic; P = 0.036; 1 cross-over study, 9 participants) and domperidone (no change after treatment in either group; 1 cross-over study, 13 participants). For orthostatic symptoms, we found very low-certainty evidence for fludrocortisone versus placebo in people with diabetes (4 out of 5 analyzed participants had improvements in orthostatic symptoms, 1 cross-over study, 6 participants), for fludrocortisone versus pyridostigmine in people with Parkinson disease (orthostatic symptoms unchanged; 1 cross-over study, 9 participants) or fludrocortisone versus domperidone (improvement to 6 for both interventions on the Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale-Orthostatic Domain (COMPASS-OD); 1 cross-over study, 13 participants). Evidence on adverse events was also very low-certainty in both populations, but indicated side effects were minimal. Observational studies filled some gaps in evidence by examining the effects in larger groups of participants, with more diverse conditions, over longer periods of time. One cohort study (341 people studied retrospectively) found fludrocortisone may not be harmful in the long term for familial dysautonomia. However, it is unclear if this translates to long-term improvements in BP drop or a meaningful improvement in orthostatic symptoms.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of fludrocortisone on blood pressure, orthostatic symptoms or adverse events in people with orthostatic hypotension and diabetes or Parkinson disease. There is a lack of information on long-term treatment and treatment of orthostatic hypotension in other disease states. There is a need for standardized reporting of outcomes and for standardization of measurements of blood pressure in orthostatic hypotension.
Topics: Bias; Diabetes Mellitus; Domperidone; Dysautonomia, Familial; Fludrocortisone; Humans; Hypotension, Orthostatic; Observational Studies as Topic; Parkinson Disease; Pyridostigmine Bromide; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 34000076
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012868.pub2 -
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity Oct 2023Gulf War Illness (GWI) collectively describes the multitude of central and peripheral disturbances affecting soldiers who served in the 1990-1991 Gulf War. While the...
Gulf War Illness (GWI) collectively describes the multitude of central and peripheral disturbances affecting soldiers who served in the 1990-1991 Gulf War. While the mechanisms responsible for GWI remain elusive, the prophylactic use of the reversible acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, pyridostigmine bromide (PB), and war-related stress have been identified as chief factors in GWI pathology. Post-deployment stress is a common challenge faced by veterans, and aberrant cholinergic and/or immune responses to these psychological stressors may play an important role in GWI pathology, especially the cognitive impairments experienced by many GWI patients. Therefore, the current study investigated if an immobilization stress challenge would produce abnormal responses in PB-treated rats three months later. Results indicate that hippocampal cholinergic responses to an immobilization stress challenge are impaired three months after PB administration. We also assessed if an immune or stress challenge reveals deficits in PB-treated animals during hippocampal-dependent learning and memory tasks at this delayed timepoint. Novel object recognition (NOR) testing paired with either acute saline or lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 30 µg/kg, i.p.), as well as Morris water maze (MWM) testing was conducted approximately three months after PB administration and/or repeated restraint stress. Rats with a history of PB treatment exhibited 24-hour hippocampal-dependent memory deficits when challenged with LPS, but not saline, in the NOR task. Similarly, in the same cohort, PB-treated rats showed 24-hour memory deficits in the MWM task. Ultimately, these studies highlight the long-term effects of PB treatment on hippocampal function and provide insight into the progressive cognitive deficits observed in veterans with GWI.
Topics: Rats; Animals; Persian Gulf Syndrome; Gulf War; Lipopolysaccharides; Acetylcholinesterase; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Pyridostigmine Bromide; Cognitive Dysfunction; Memory Disorders; Disease Models, Animal
PubMed: 37437820
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2023.07.003 -
Acta Neurologica Belgica Apr 2023As new treatments are becoming available for patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), it is worth reflecting on the actual status of MG treatment to determine which... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
As new treatments are becoming available for patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), it is worth reflecting on the actual status of MG treatment to determine which patients would most likely benefit from the new treatments.
METHODS
We reviewed the clinical files of all MG patients seen at the Department of Neurology of the Antwerp University Hospital during the years 2019, 2020 and 2021.
RESULTS
163 patients were included. Age at diagnosis varied from the first to the eighth decades, with a peak of incidence from 60 to 70 years for both genders, and an additional peak from 20 to 30 years in women. Diplopia and ptosis were by far the most common onset symptom. At maximum disease severity, 24% of the patients still had purely ocular symptoms and 4% needed mechanical ventilation. 97% of the patients received a treatment with pyridostigmine and 68% with corticosteroids, often in combination with immunosuppressants. More than half reported side effects. At the latest visit, 50% of the patients were symptom-free. Also, half of the symptomatic patients were fulltime at work or retired with no or mild limitations in daily living. The remaining patients were working part-time, on sick leave, or retired with severe limitations.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
The majority of MG patients are doing well with currently available treatments, but often at the cost of side effects in the short and in the long term. A significant group is in need of better treatments.
Topics: Humans; Female; Male; Belgium; Myasthenia Gravis; Pyridostigmine Bromide; Blepharoptosis; Diplopia
PubMed: 36658451
DOI: 10.1007/s13760-023-02187-0