-
Journal of Vision Mar 2023Vision under natural conditions could be studied by combining electroencephalogram (EEG) and eye tracking as well as using saccades as triggers for the onset of the...
Vision under natural conditions could be studied by combining electroencephalogram (EEG) and eye tracking as well as using saccades as triggers for the onset of the fixation-related potentials (FRPs) and for the oculomotor inhibition (OMI) that follows every saccade. The result of this analysis is thought to be equivalent to the event-related response following a peripheral preview. Previous studies that measured responses to visual deviants in a sequence of flashed stimuli found an increased negativity in the occipital N1 component (visual mismatch negativity [vMMN]), and prolonged saccadic inhibition for unexpected events. The aim of the current study was to develop an oddball paradigm in constrained natural-viewing and determine whether a similar mismatched FRP and prolonged OMI for deviance could be found. To this end, we developed a visual oddball paradigm on a static display to generate expectancy and surprise across successive saccades. Observers (n = 26) inspected, one after the other, seven small patterns of E and an inverted E arranged on the screen along a horizontal path, with one frequent (standard) and one rare (deviant), looking for a superimposed tiny dot target in each 5-second trial. Our results show a significantly larger FRP-N1 negativity for the deviant, compared with the standard and prolonged OMI of the following saccade, as previously found for transient oddballs. Our results show, for the first time, prolonged OMI and stronger fixation-related N1 to a task-irrelevant visual mismatch (vMMN) in natural, but task-guided viewing. These two signals combined could serve as markers of prediction error in free viewing.
Topics: Humans; Evoked Potentials, Visual; Electroencephalography; Eye Movements; Saccades; Eye-Tracking Technology; Visual Perception
PubMed: 36976167
DOI: 10.1167/jov.23.3.17 -
Journal of Neurophysiology Dec 2016Saccadic eye movements rapidly displace the image of the world that is projected onto the retinas. In anticipation of each saccade, many neurons in the visual system... (Review)
Review
Saccadic eye movements rapidly displace the image of the world that is projected onto the retinas. In anticipation of each saccade, many neurons in the visual system shift their receptive fields. This presaccadic change in visual sensitivity, known as remapping, was first documented in the parietal cortex and has been studied in many other brain regions. Remapping requires information about upcoming saccades via corollary discharge. Analyses of neurons in a corollary discharge pathway that targets the frontal eye field (FEF) suggest that remapping may be assembled in the FEF's local microcircuitry. Complementary data from reversible inactivation, neural recording, and modeling studies provide evidence that remapping contributes to transsaccadic continuity of action and perception. Multiple forms of remapping have been reported in the FEF and other brain areas, however, and questions remain about the reasons for these differences. In this review of recent progress, we identify three hypotheses that may help to guide further investigations into the structure and function of circuits for remapping.
Topics: Animals; Brain; Brain Mapping; Humans; Nerve Net; Photic Stimulation; Saccades; Visual Fields; Visual Pathways
PubMed: 27655962
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00182.2016 -
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal... Apr 2017The anti-saccade task has emerged as an important tool for investigating the complex nature of voluntary behaviour. In this task, participants are instructed to suppress... (Review)
Review
The anti-saccade task has emerged as an important tool for investigating the complex nature of voluntary behaviour. In this task, participants are instructed to suppress the natural response to look at a peripheral visual stimulus and look in the opposite direction instead. Analysis of saccadic reaction times (SRT: the time from stimulus appearance to the first saccade) and the frequency of direction errors (i.e. looking toward the stimulus) provide insight into saccade suppression mechanisms in the brain. Some direction errors are reflexive responses with very short SRTs (express latency saccades), while other direction errors are driven by automated responses and have longer SRTs. These different types of errors reveal that the anti-saccade task requires different forms of suppression, and neurophysiological experiments in macaques have revealed several potential mechanisms. At the start of an anti-saccade trial, pre-emptive top-down inhibition of saccade generating neurons in the frontal eye fields and superior colliculus must be present before the stimulus appears to prevent express latency direction errors. After the stimulus appears, voluntary anti-saccade commands must compete with, and override, automated visually initiated saccade commands to prevent longer latency direction errors. The frequencies of these types of direction errors, as well as SRTs, change throughout the lifespan and reveal time courses for development, maturation, and ageing. Additionally, patients diagnosed with a variety of neurological and/or psychiatric disorders affecting the frontal lobes and/or basal ganglia produce markedly different SRT distributions and types of direction errors, which highlight specific deficits in saccade suppression and inhibitory control. The anti-saccade task therefore provides valuable insight into the neural mechanisms of saccade suppression and is a valuable tool in a clinical setting.This article is part of the themed issue 'Movement suppression: brain mechanisms for stopping and stillness'.
Topics: Brain; Humans; Inhibition, Psychological; Reaction Time; Saccades
PubMed: 28242726
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0192 -
Scientific Reports Jun 2021About 40% of schizophrenia patients report discrete visual disturbances which could occur if saccadic suppression, the decrease of visual sensitivity around saccade...
About 40% of schizophrenia patients report discrete visual disturbances which could occur if saccadic suppression, the decrease of visual sensitivity around saccade onset, is impaired. Two mechanisms contribute to saccadic suppression: efference copy processing and backwards masking. Both are reportedly altered in schizophrenia. However, saccadic suppression has not been investigated in schizophrenia. 17 schizophrenia patients and 18 healthy controls performed a saccadic suppression task using a Gabor stimulus with individually adjusted contrast, which was presented within an interval 300 ms around saccade onset. Visual disturbance scores were higher in patients than controls, but saccadic suppression strength and time course were similar in both groups with lower saccadic suppression rates being similarly related to smaller saccade amplitudes. Saccade amplitudes in the saccadic suppression task were reduced in patients, in contrast to unaltered amplitudes during a saccade control task. Notably, smaller saccade amplitudes were related to higher visual disturbances scores in patients. Saccadic suppression performance was unrelated to symptom expression and antipsychotic medication. Unaltered saccadic suppression in patients suggests sufficiently intact efference copy processing and backward masking as required for this task. Instead, visual disturbances in patients may be related to restricted saccadic amplitudes arising from cognitive load while completing a task.
Topics: Adult; Contrast Sensitivity; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Photic Stimulation; Psychotic Disorders; Psychotropic Drugs; Saccades; Schizophrenia; Vision Disorders; Visual Perception
PubMed: 34162939
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92531-2 -
Journal of Vision Jul 2020Humans make two to four rapid eye movements (saccades) per second, which, surprisingly, does not lead to abrupt changes in vision. To the contrary, we perceive a stable...
Humans make two to four rapid eye movements (saccades) per second, which, surprisingly, does not lead to abrupt changes in vision. To the contrary, we perceive a stable world. Hence, an important question is how information is integrated across saccades. To investigate this question, we used the sequential metacontrast paradigm (SQM), where two expanding streams of lines are presented. When one line is spatially offset, the other lines are perceived as being offset, too. When more lines are offset, all offsets integrate mandatorily; that is, observers cannot report the individual offsets but perceive one integrated offset. Here, we asked observers to make a saccade during the SQM. Even though the saccades caused a highly disrupted motion trajectory on the retina, offsets presented before and after the saccade integrated mandatorily. When observers made no saccade and the streams were displaced on the screen so that a similarly disrupted retinal image occurred as in the previous condition, no integration occurred. We suggest that trans-saccadic integration and perception are determined by object identity in spatiotopic coordinates and not by the retinal image.
Topics: Adult; Female; Form Perception; Humans; Male; Photic Stimulation; Retina; Saccades; Young Adult
PubMed: 32729906
DOI: 10.1167/jov.20.7.33 -
The Journal of Neuroscience : the... Mar 2023We are constantly sampling our environment by moving our eyes, but our subjective experience of the world is stable and constant. Stimulus displacement during or shortly...
We are constantly sampling our environment by moving our eyes, but our subjective experience of the world is stable and constant. Stimulus displacement during or shortly after a saccade often goes unnoticed, a phenomenon called the saccadic suppression of displacement. Although we fail to notice such displacements, our oculomotor system computes the prediction errors and adequately adjusts the gaze and future saccadic execution, a phenomenon known as saccadic adaptation. In the present study, we aimed to find a brain signature of the trans-saccadic prediction error that informs the motor system but not explicit perception. We asked participants (either sex) to report whether a visual target was displaced during a saccade while recording electroencephalography (EEG). Using multivariate pattern analysis, we were able to differentiate displacements from no displacements, even when participants failed to report the displacement. In other words, we found that trans-saccadic prediction error is represented in the EEG signal 100 ms after the displacement presentation, mainly in occipital and parieto-occipital channels, even in the absence of explicit perception of the displacement. Stability in vision occurs even while performing saccades. One suggested mechanism for this counterintuitive visual phenomenon is that external displacement is suppressed during the retinal remapping caused by a saccade. Here, we shed light on the mechanisms of trans-saccadic stability by showing that displacement information is not entirely suppressed and specifically present in the early stages of visual processing. Such a signal is relevant and computed for oculomotor adjustment despite being neglected for perception.
Topics: Humans; Saccades; Visual Perception; Eye Movements; Electroencephalography; Retina
PubMed: 36759191
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0563-22.2022 -
Journal of Neurophysiology Jul 2017Behavioral measures of decision making are usually limited to observations of decision outcomes. In the present study, we made use of the fact that oculomotor and...
Behavioral measures of decision making are usually limited to observations of decision outcomes. In the present study, we made use of the fact that oculomotor and sensory selection are closely linked to track oculomotor decision making before oculomotor responses are made. We asked participants to make a saccadic eye movement to one of two memorized target locations and observed that visual sensitivity increased at both the chosen and the nonchosen saccade target locations, with a clear bias toward the chosen target. The time course of changes in visual sensitivity was related to saccadic latency, with the competition between the chosen and nonchosen targets resolved faster before short-latency saccades. On error trials, we observed an increased competition between the chosen and nonchosen targets. Moreover, oculomotor selection and visual sensitivity were influenced by top-down and bottom-up factors as well as by selection history and predicted the direction of saccades. Our findings demonstrate that saccade decisions have direct visual consequences and show that decision making can be traced in the human oculomotor system well before choices are made. Our results also indicate a strong association between decision making, saccade target selection, and visual sensitivity. We show that saccadic decisions can be tracked by measuring spatial attention. Spatial attention is allocated in parallel to the two competing saccade targets, and the time course of spatial attention differs for fast-slow and for correct-erroneous decisions. Saccade decisions take the form of a competition between potential saccade goals, which is associated with spatial attention allocation to those locations.
Topics: Adult; Attention; Decision Making; Female; Humans; Male; Oculomotor Muscles; Reaction Time; Saccades; Space Perception
PubMed: 28356478
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00665.2016 -
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Jul 2021Saccadic electrooculograms are discrete biosignals that contain the instantaneous angular position of the human eyes as a response to saccadic visual stimuli. These...
Saccadic electrooculograms are discrete biosignals that contain the instantaneous angular position of the human eyes as a response to saccadic visual stimuli. These signals are essential to monitor and evaluate several neurological diseases, such as Spinocerebellar Ataxia type 2 (SCA2). For this, biomarkers such as peak velocity, latency and duration are computed. To compute these biomarkers, we need to obtain the velocity profile of the signals using numerical differentiation methods. These methods are affected by the noise present in the electrooculograms, specially in subjects that suffer neurological diseases. This noise complicates the comparison of the differentiation methods using real saccadic signals because of the impossibility of establishing exact saccadic onset and offset points. In this work, we evaluate 16 differentiation methods by the design of an experiment that uses synthetic saccadic electrooculograms generated from parametric models of both healthy subjects and subjects suffering from Spinocerebellar Ataxia type 2 (SCA2). For these synthetic electrooculograms the exact velocity profile is known, hence we can use them as a reference for comparison and error computing for the tasks of saccade identification and saccade biomarker computing. Finally, we identify the best fitting method or methods for each evaluated task.
Topics: Electrooculography; Humans; Saccades
PubMed: 34372261
DOI: 10.3390/s21155021 -
Journal of Vision Jul 2022Saccadic eye movements are often imprecise and result in an error between expected and actual retinal target location after the saccade. Repeated experience of this...
Saccadic eye movements are often imprecise and result in an error between expected and actual retinal target location after the saccade. Repeated experience of this error produces changes in saccade amplitude to reduce the error and concomitant changes in apparent visual location. We investigated the relationship between these two plastic processes in a series of experiments. Following a recent paradigm of inhibition of saccadic adaptation, in which participants are instructed to look at the initial target position and to continue to look at that position even if the target were to move again, our participants nevertheless perceived a visual probe presented near the saccade target to be shifted in direction of the target error. The location percept of the target gradually shifted and diverged over time from the executed saccade. Our findings indicate that changes in perceived location can be the same even when changes in saccade amplitude differ according to instruction and can develop even when the amplitude of the saccades executed during the adaptation procedure does not change. There are two possible explanations for this divergence between the adaptation states of saccade amplitude and perceived location. Either the intrasaccadic target step might trigger updating of the association between pre- and post-saccadic target positions, causing the localization shift, or the saccade motor command adjusts together with the perceived location at a common adaptation site, downstream from which voluntary control is exerted upon the executed eye movement only.
Topics: Adaptation, Physiological; Eye Movements; Humans; Saccades
PubMed: 35834378
DOI: 10.1167/jov.22.8.3 -
Journal of Vision Sep 2022Saccades let the visual scene sweep with high speed across the retina, thus producing a massive motion stimulus. Yet, in natural vision, we never perceive motion that is...
Saccades let the visual scene sweep with high speed across the retina, thus producing a massive motion stimulus. Yet, in natural vision, we never perceive motion that is produced by saccades. The absence of perisaccadic motion perception might be caused by a transient reduction of visual sensitivity at the time of saccade initiation, so-called saccadic suppression. Saccade suppression occurs for contrast, displacement, and motion stimuli. Saccade suppression of displacements has been shown to be context sensitive. After performing saccades in sessions without perisaccadic stimulation, saccade suppression magnitude is drastically decreased (Zimmermann, 2020). Here, we aimed to test whether saccade suppression of contrast is similarly modulated by context. To this end, we projected stimuli on a homogeneously white wall such that we could establish a ganzfeld-like environment that, depending on the experimental session, did or did not contain any visible contrast stimuli. We first successfully replicated the context sensitivity of saccade suppression of displacements. Then, we tested context sensitivity of contrast suppression by asking subjects to perform several saccades either across the uniform white wall or across a background consisting of a sinusoidal grating. In contrast to perisaccadic context sensitivity for displacement suppression, we did not find context sensitivity for suppression of contrast.
Topics: Humans; Motion Perception; Photic Stimulation; Retina; Saccades; Vision, Ocular; Visual Perception
PubMed: 36083219
DOI: 10.1167/jov.22.10.10