-
Journal of Managed Care & Specialty... Jun 2019The treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has evolved over time, and direct-acting antivirals (DAA) have revolutionized HCV therapy. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
The treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has evolved over time, and direct-acting antivirals (DAA) have revolutionized HCV therapy.
OBJECTIVES
To (a) assess early treatment discontinuation and (b) identify predictors of early discontinuation in a cohort of patients receiving second-generation DAAs.
METHODS
We identified HCV patients newly prescribed simeprevir/sofosbuvir (SIM/SOF), ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF), ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir (OPrD), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR), and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) between 2014 and 2017. Early discontinuation was defined as duration of therapy less than 8 weeks. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association of drug regimens and potential predictive factors to early discontinuation.
RESULTS
We identified 26,098 DAA-treated patients: 67.8% with LDV/SOF, 9.9% with OPrD, 8.5% with SIM/SOF, 7.8% with SOF/VEL, 5.2% with EBR/GZR, and 0.8% with GLE/PIB. With approval of new therapies in 2016 and 2017, use of OPrD, LDV/SOF, and SIM/SOF declined substantially. At baseline, there was some heterogeneity of past HCV drug use and comorbidity across groups; patients on SIM/SOF had the highest frequency of previous interferon, cirrhosis, and decompensated cirrhosis. Most HCV patients received therapy for 8-12 weeks; fewer patients went through 16-week and 24-week therapy courses. Early discontinuation rates (95% CI) were 7.1% (6.0-8.2) for SIM/SOF, 3.2% (2.9-3.5) for LDV/SOF, 9.6% (8.5-10.7) for OPrD, 3.1% (2.3-3.8) for SOF/VEL, 4.2% (3.1-5.3) for EBR/GZR, and 2.5% (0.3-4.7) for GLE/PIB. In multivariable analyses, versus OPrD, patients starting other drug regimens were less likely to discontinue therapy early. Early discontinuation was more common in women, patients with baseline anemia, and Medicare and Medicaid patients.
CONCLUSIONS
These real-world data confirm low rates of early discontinuation in users of second-generation DAAs. Future research focusing on socio-economic and sex/gender issues may help further optimize care for patients with HCV.
DISCLOSURES
This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Klein has received grants for investigator-initiated trials from ViiV Healthcare, Janssen, Gilead, and Merck, as well as consulting fees from ViiV Healthcare, Merck, and AbbVie. Feld has received research support and/or scientific consulting fees from AbbVie, Contravir, Enanta, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, and Wako. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Results from this study were presented as a poster at the 34th International Conference of Phamacoepidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management; August 22-26, 2018; Prague, Czech Republic.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Canada; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Sustained Virologic Response
PubMed: 31134863
DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.6.697 -
World Journal of Hepatology Mar 2015The first interferon-free regimens have been approved for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). In the liver transplant (LT) setting, these... (Review)
Review
The first interferon-free regimens have been approved for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). In the liver transplant (LT) setting, these regimens are expected to have an important effect, because graft loss due to HCV recurrence is a serious problem after LT. The response to the hitherto conventional treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin is poor. The significantly better response rates achieved with boceprevir-based and telaprevir-based triple therapy have led to better graft and patient survival rates, but severe drug interactions with immunosuppressants limit the feasibility of this therapy for LT patients. With the approval of sofosbuvir in January 2014, of simeprevir in May 2014, and of daclatasvir in August 2014, three antiviral agents are now available and promise to be applicable without relevant adverse effects or negative interactions with immunosuppressants. Thus, 2014 marks the beginning of a new era of treatment options for HCV recurrence after LT. Although safety and efficacy studies of several interferon-free regimens for patients with HCV recurrence after LT have achieved good preliminary results, reports of clinical experiences with LT patients are scarce. The lack of randomized studies, the small number of enrolled and carefully selected patients, and the heterogeneity of these studies make the results questionable. Real-life experiences are eagerly awaited so that clinicians can estimate the usefulness and the pitfalls of these new regimens. Additionally, the high costs of these agents may limit their accessibility for many patients. The aim of this review is to summarize the current experience with and the expectations of the new direct-acting antiviral agents for LT patients.
PubMed: 25848476
DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i3.532 -
Annals of Gastroenterology 2015The development of protease inhibitors (PIs) such as telaprevir and boceprevir constitutes a milestone in chronic hepatitis C antiviral treatment since it has achieved... (Review)
Review
The development of protease inhibitors (PIs) such as telaprevir and boceprevir constitutes a milestone in chronic hepatitis C antiviral treatment since it has achieved sustained virological response (SVR) rates of up to 75% in naïve and 29-88% in treatment-experienced patients with genotype 1 infection. Both require combination treatment with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) as PI monotherapy results in resistant mutations. New direct acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have recently been approved or their approval is imminent. Simeprevir administered orally as one pill per day in combination with PEG-IFN/RBV will be the next PI to be approved. The SVR rates at about 72-80% for treatment-naïve patients are not a major improvement over telaprevir or boceprevir. However, this treble combination has fewer side effects and drug-drug interactions and most patients undergo shorter treatment duration (24 months) due to earlier treatment responses. Sofosbuvir is the first available once-daily NS5B polymerase inhibitor which has been approved in combination with PEG-IFN/RBV for just 12 weeks with 89% SVR in treatment-naïve patients with genotype 1 infection and 83-100% in treatment-experienced patients with genotypes 2/3. The current review focuses on the recent rapid and continuous developments in the management of chronic HCV infection with DAAs in combination with PEG-IFN/RBV.
PubMed: 25608803
DOI: No ID Found -
BMC Infectious Diseases Jan 2016About one third of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) also have chronic hepatitis due to hepatitis C virus (HCV). HCV therapy with simeprevir,... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
About one third of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) also have chronic hepatitis due to hepatitis C virus (HCV). HCV therapy with simeprevir, pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFNα) and ribavirin (RBV) have been shown to be superior to PegIFNα + RBV alone in non-HIV patients, but no randomized trials in patients with HCV genotype 1 (HCV-1)/HIV coinfection are available.
METHODS
This was a historical comparison of study C212 (simeprevir + PegIFNα-2a + RBV in patients with HCV-1/HIV coinfection) with studies in which HCV-1/HIV coinfected patients were treated with PegIFNα-2a + RBV alone. A systematic literature search was performed to identify eligible studies. Efficacy and safety results of PegIFNα-2a + RBV studies were combined in random- and fixed-effects inverse-variance weighted meta-analyses of proportions using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsin transformation method, and compared with the results of study C212.
RESULTS
The literature search revealed a total of 2392 records, with 206 articles selected for full-text review. Finally, 11 relevant articles reporting on 12 relevant study groups were included. Results on sustained virologic response 24 weeks after end of treatment (SVR24) were available from all 12 study groups. Pooled SVR24 for PegIFNα-2a + RBV from the random-effects meta-analysis was 28.2% (95% CI 23.8% to 32.9%). The comparison between study C212 (SVR24 = 72.6%; 95% CI 63.1% to 80.9%) revealed substantial superiority of simeprevir + PegIFNα-2a + RBV compared to PegIFNα-2a + RBV alone, with an absolute risk difference of 45% (95% CI 34 to 55). This finding was robust in a sensitivity analysis that only included historical studies with a planned treatment duration of at least 48 weeks and the same RBV dose as in study C212. No increases in the frequency of important adverse event categories including anemia were identified, but these analyses were limited by the low number of studies.
CONCLUSION
This historical comparison provides first systematic evidence for the superiority of simeprevir + PegIFNα-2a + RBV compared to PegIFNα-2a + RBV in patients with HCV-1/HIV coinfection. Given the limitations of the historical comparison for safety endpoints, additional data on the comparative safety of simeprevir in patients with HCV-1/HIV coinfection would be desirable.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Identifier for study TMC435-TiDP16-C212 (ClinicalTrials.gov): NCT01479868.
Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiviral Agents; Coinfection; Drug Therapy, Combination; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Interferon-alpha; Polyethylene Glycols; Recombinant Proteins; Ribavirin; Simeprevir; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26753774
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-015-1311-3 -
Cancers Jun 2023Breast cancer alone accounts for the majority of cancer deaths among women, with the most commonly diagnosed subtype being estrogen receptor positive (ER+). Survival has...
Breast cancer alone accounts for the majority of cancer deaths among women, with the most commonly diagnosed subtype being estrogen receptor positive (ER+). Survival has greatly improved for patients with ER+ breast cancer, due in part to the development of antiestrogen compounds, such as tamoxifen. While treatment of the primary disease is often successful, as many as 30% of patients will experience recurrence and metastasis, mainly due to developed endocrine therapy resistance. In this study, we discovered two tamoxifen combination therapies, with simeprevir and VX-680, that reduce the tumor burden in animal models of ER+ breast cancer more than either compound or tamoxifen alone. Additionally, these tamoxifen combinations reduced the expression of HER2, a hallmark of tamoxifen treatment, which can facilitate acquisition of a treatment-resistant phenotype. These combinations could provide clinical benefit by potentiating tamoxifen treatment in ER+ breast cancer.
PubMed: 37370789
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15123179 -
Medicine Mar 2016All possible direct-acting antiviral agent (DAA) regimens for treatment-naive hepatitis C genotype 1 were evaluated by many randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials: Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents for Treatment-Naive Hepatitis C Genotype 1.
All possible direct-acting antiviral agent (DAA) regimens for treatment-naive hepatitis C genotype 1 were evaluated by many randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, the optimum regimen remains inconclusive. We aim to compare interventions in terms of sustained virological response at 12 (SVR12) and 24 (SVR24) weeks after the end of treatment and adverse effects (AEs) (fatigue, headache, nausea, insomnia). PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for RCTs until July 31, 2015. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) between treatments on clinical outcomes. Twenty-two eligible RCTs were included. Compared with peginterferon-ribavirin (PR), daclatasvir plus PR (OR 8.90, P < 0.001), faldaprevir plus PR (OR 3.72, P < 0.001), simeprevir plus PR (OR 3.59, P < 0.001), sofosbuvir plus PR (OR 4.69, P < 0.001) yield a significant effect in improving SVR12. Consistently, simeprevir plus PR (OR 3.49, P < 0.001), sofosbuvir plus PR (OR 4.51, P < 0.001), daclatasvir plus PR (OR 4.77, P < 0.001) also improved the rates of SVR24 significantly compared with PR. With respect to AEs, compared with PR, ledipasvir plus sofosbuvir plus PR (OR 2.13, P < 0.001) confer a significant AE in nausea, whereas daclatasvir plus PR (OR 0.20, P < 0.001 and OR 0.18, P < 0.001, respectively) lowered the incidence of fatigue and nausea significantly when compared with ledipasvir plus sofosbuvir plus PR. Daclatasvir plus PR was the most effective in SVR12 and SVR24, but caused an increased AEs profile (headache and insomnia). Combined ledipasvir with sofosbuvir or combination of PR was associated with higher incidence of fatigue and nausea.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Drug Therapy, Combination; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Odds Ratio; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26945424
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003004 -
Clinical and Experimental Hepatology Mar 2022In chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients in whom prior direct-acting antiviral agent (DAA) treatment had failed, outcomes after retreatment are optimal. Combination...
Successful treatment of hepatitis C genotype 4 using sofosbuvir, daclatasvir, simeprevir and ribavirin in Egyptian patients with direct-acting antiviral agent treatment failure.
INTRODUCTION
In chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients in whom prior direct-acting antiviral agent (DAA) treatment had failed, outcomes after retreatment are optimal. Combination of sofosbuvir (SOF), daclatasvir (DCV), simeprevir (SIM), and ribavirin (RBV) in treatment experienced patients is recommended in current guidelines despite insufficient data. Our aim is to determine the efficacy and safety of SOF, DCV, SIM plus RBV in HCV infected patients who failed prior DAA treatment.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
One hundred and seventeen patients who failed to respond to SOF containing regimens were randomized according to previous response to therapy to non-responders and relapsers. Duration of therapy depends on fibrosis stages. SOF, DCV, SIM and weight based RBV 12 weeks for F1 and F2 (group I) and 24 weeks for F3 and F4 (group II).
RESULTS
In the non-responder group, a sustained virologic response (SVR) occurred in 100% in group I (F1 and F2) and 97% in group II (F3 and F4). Relapse was 3% in group II (F3 and F4). No patients from either group had breakthrough or non-response. In relapsers SVR was 100% in group I (F1 and F2) and 96% in group II (F3 and F4). Breakthrough, relapse and non-response were 2%, 4%, 2% respectively only in group II (F3 and F4).
CONCLUSIONS
Combining multiple DAAs with different viral targets may be effective treatment protocol in previous non-responders and relapsers with short durations of treatment.
PubMed: 35415259
DOI: 10.5114/ceh.2022.114246 -
Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2015The availability of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy has launched a new era in the management of chronic hepatitis C. Sofosbuvir, a uridine nucleotide analog that... (Review)
Review
The availability of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy has launched a new era in the management of chronic hepatitis C. Sofosbuvir, a uridine nucleotide analog that inhibits the hepatitis C RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, is the backbone of chronic hepatitis C therapy. Acting at the catalytic site of the polymerase, sofosbuvir is highly potent in suppressing viral replication and has a high genetic barrier to resistance. Sofosbuvir is effective across all hepatitis C genotypes, and is a mainstay of interferon-free combination therapy. In Phase II and III studies, genotype 1 patients who took sofosbuvir in combination with another DAA such as the NS3-4A protease inhibitor, simeprevir, or the NS5A replication complex inhibitors, ledipasvir or daclatasvir, achieved a sustained virologic response rate of over 90%. Harvoni(®), a combination tablet of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir, dosed once daily is recommended for 24 weeks for treatment-experienced genotype 1 patients with cirrhosis, but 12 weeks of therapy is sufficient for all other populations. While genotype 2 (12 weeks or 16 weeks) and treatment-naïve genotype 3 patients (24 weeks) have excellent response rates with sofosbuvir and ribavirin, treatment-experienced cirrhotic genotype 3 patients may need the addition of another DAA such as daclatasvir. Sofosbuvir is efficacious in special populations such as HIV-hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients and liver transplant recipients and has already made a profound impact in these groups. Since it is renally eliminated, patients with advanced kidney disease or on dialysis must await dosing recommendations. Sofosbuvir-based regimens appear to be well tolerated with headache and fatigue being the most common side effects. The opportunity to cure patients with hepatitis C with sofosbuvir combination therapy is likely to change the future for our patients, particularly if the emphasis shifts to identifying those patients unaware that they are infected and providing affordable access to treatment.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Drug Combinations; Drug Design; Drug Resistance, Viral; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Sofosbuvir
PubMed: 25987834
DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S65255 -
Federal Practitioner : For the Health... Apr 2016A patient with hepatitis C infection and hepatocellular carcinoma developed significant hyperbilirubinemia and acute kidney injury after initiation of a simeprevir and...
A patient with hepatitis C infection and hepatocellular carcinoma developed significant hyperbilirubinemia and acute kidney injury after initiation of a simeprevir and sofosbuvir regimen.
PubMed: 30766171
DOI: No ID Found -
International Journal of Antimicrobial... Jan 2022In a bid to contain the current COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic, various countermeasures have been applied. To date, however, there is a lack of an...
In a bid to contain the current COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic, various countermeasures have been applied. To date, however, there is a lack of an effective drug for the treatment of COVID-19. Through molecular modelling studies, simeprevir, a protease inhibitor approved for the management of hepatitis C virus infection, has been predicted as a potential antiviral against SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2), the causative agent of COVID-19. Here we assessed the efficacy of simeprevir against SARS-CoV-2 both in vitro in Vero E6 cells and in vivo in a human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2) transgenic mouse model. The results showed that simeprevir could inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication in Vero E6 cells with a half-maximal effective concentration (EC) of 1.41 ± 0.12 μM. In a transgenic hACE2 mouse model of SARS-CoV-2 infection, intraperitoneal administration of simeprevir at 10 mg/kg/day for 3 consecutive days failed to suppress viral replication. These findings collectively imply that simeprevir does not inhibit SARS-CoV-2 in vivo and therefore do not support its application as a treatment against COVID-19 at a dosage of 10 mg/kg/day.
Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2; Animals; Antiviral Agents; COVID-19; Chlorocebus aethiops; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Male; Mice; Mice, Transgenic; Negative Results; Protease Inhibitors; SARS-CoV-2; Simeprevir; Vero Cells; Virus Replication; COVID-19 Drug Treatment
PubMed: 34929295
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106499