-
Clinical Pharmacology in Drug... Oct 2019A fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet of ertugliflozin, a selective inhibitor of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2, and sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor,... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
A fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet of ertugliflozin, a selective inhibitor of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2, and sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, was developed for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Four studies were conducted under fasted conditions to demonstrate bioequivalence of ertugliflozin/sitagliptin FDC tablets and individual components at respective strengths when coadministered in healthy subjects. All studies had open-label, randomized, 2-period, 2-sequence, single-dose crossover designs. In each study 18 or 19 subjects were enrolled and received an ertugliflozin/sitagliptin FDC tablet (5 mg/50 mg, 5 mg/100 mg, 15 mg/50 mg, or 15 mg/100 mg) and corresponding strengths of ertugliflozin and sitagliptin coadministered as individual components. For both ertugliflozin and sitagliptin, the 90%CIs for the ratio (FDC:coadministration) of geometric means for area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time, and maximum observed plasma concentration, were within acceptance criteria for bioequivalence (80% to 125%). All adverse events were mild in intensity. The 4 studies demonstrated that each strength of FDC tablet is bioequivalent to the respective dose of coadministered individual components. This indicates that the known efficacy and tolerability of ertugliflozin and sitagliptin when coadministered can be translated to the use of a FDC formulation.
Topics: Adult; Area Under Curve; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Combinations; Fasting; Female; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Male; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Tablets; Therapeutic Equivalency; Young Adult
PubMed: 31219248
DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.722 -
Journal of Managed Care & Specialty... Jul 2021Oral semaglutide is the first orally administered glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) approved by the FDA. Clinical trials found that oral semaglutide 14... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
Oral semaglutide is the first orally administered glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) approved by the FDA. Clinical trials found that oral semaglutide 14 mg had a greater reduction in hemoglobin A1c (A1c) compared with empagliflozin 25 mg and sitagliptin 100 mg and was noninferior to liraglutide 1.8 mg. However, US cost-effectiveness data for oral semaglutide are limited and do not consider the costs of adverse events. To assess the short-term cost-effectiveness of oral semaglutide compared with empagliflozin, sitagliptin, and liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes. A decision analysis over a 52-week time horizon was used to evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness of oral semaglutide vs empagliflozin, sitagliptin, and liraglutide from a US health care payer's perspective. Data on efficacy, adverse events, and discontinuation were derived from 52-week data from phase 3, head-to-head clinical trials (PIONEER 2, 3, and 4). Costs included drug and administration cost and treatment of gastrointestinal adverse events. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated as the difference in cost over the difference in A1c reduction between oral semaglutide and comparators. In the base-case analysis, 52-week treatment costs with oral semaglutide were $2,660 and $3,104 higher and $2,337 less than empagliflozin, sitagliptin, and liraglutide, respectively. Incremental (greater) A1c reductions were seen with oral semaglutide at 0.40%, 0.50%, and 0.30% vs empagliflozin, sitagliptin, and liraglutide, respectively. ICERs per 1% reduction in A1c for oral semaglutide were $6,650 and $6,207 vs empagliflozin and sitagliptin, respectively. Oral semaglutide was dominant vs liraglutide (ICER of -$7,790). Oral semaglutide was dominant relative to liraglutide, offering a cost-saving GLP-1RA oral alternative. While there is not a recognized willingness-to-pay threshold for a 1% reduction in A1c, oral semaglutide may be cost-effective relative to empagliflozin and sitagliptin if a decision maker's willingness-to-pay threshold exceeds $6,650 and $6,207, respectively. No outside funding supported this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Costs; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucosides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Liraglutide; Sitagliptin Phosphate; United States
PubMed: 34185562
DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.7.840 -
Transplantation May 2023Postkidney transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) affects cardiovascular, allograft, and recipient health. We tested whether early intervention with sitagliptin for... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Sitagliptin Versus Placebo to Reduce the Incidence and Severity of Posttransplant Diabetes Mellitus After Kidney Transplantation-A Single-center, Randomized, Double-blind Controlled Trial.
BACKGROUND
Postkidney transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) affects cardiovascular, allograft, and recipient health. We tested whether early intervention with sitagliptin for hyperglycemia (blood glucose >200 mg/dL) within the first week of transplant and discontinued at 3 mo could prevent development of PTDM in patients without preexisting diabetes.
METHODS
The primary efficacy objective was to improve 2-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) by > 20 mg/dL at 3 mo posttransplant. The secondary efficacy objective was to prevent new onset PTDM, defined as a normal OGTT at 3 mo.
RESULTS
Sixty-one patients consented, and 50 patients were analyzed. The 3-mo 2-h OGTT (end of treatment) was 141.00 ± 62.44 mg/dL in the sitagliptin arm and 165.22 ± 72.03 mg/dL ( P = 0.218) in the placebo arm. The 6-mo 2-h OGTT (end of follow-up) was 174.38 ± 77.93 mg/dL in the sitagliptin arm and 171.86 ± 83.69 ng/dL ( P = 0.918) in the placebo arm. Mean intrapatient difference between 3- and 6-mo 2-h OGTT in the 3-mo period off study drug was 27.56 + 52.74 mg/dL in the sitagliptin arm and -0.14 + 45.80 mg/dL in the placebo arm ( P = 0.0692). At 3 mo, 61.54% of sitagliptin and 43.48% of placebo patients had a normal 2-h OGTT ( P = 0.2062), with the absolute risk reduction 18.06%. There were no differences in HbA1c at 3 or 6 mo between sitagliptin and placebo groups. Participants tolerated sitagliptin well.
CONCLUSIONS
Although this study did not show a significant difference between groups, it can inform future studies in the use of sitagliptin in the very early posttransplant period.
Topics: Humans; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Hypoglycemic Agents; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Kidney Transplantation; Incidence; Blood Glucose; Double-Blind Method; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36279020
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004373 -
The New England Journal of Medicine Jan 2021Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4; also known as CD26), a transmembrane receptor expressed on T cells, has a costimulatory function in activating T cells. In a mouse model,...
BACKGROUND
Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4; also known as CD26), a transmembrane receptor expressed on T cells, has a costimulatory function in activating T cells. In a mouse model, down-regulation of CD26 prevented graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) but preserved graft-versus-tumor effects. Whether inhibition of DPP-4 with sitagliptin may prevent acute GVHD after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation is not known.
METHODS
We conducted a two-stage, phase 2 clinical trial to test whether sitagliptin plus tacrolimus and sirolimus would reduce the incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD from 30% to no more than 15% by day 100. Patients received myeloablative conditioning followed by mobilized peripheral-blood stem-cell transplants. Sitagliptin was given orally at a dose of 600 mg every 12 hours starting the day before transplantation until day 14 after transplantation.
RESULTS
A total of 36 patients who could be evaluated, with a median age of 46 years (range, 20 to 59), received transplants from matched related or unrelated donors. Acute GVHD occurred in 2 of 36 patients by day 100; the incidence of grade II to IV GVHD was 5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1 to 16), and the incidence of grade III or IV GVHD was 3% (95% CI, 0 to 12). Nonrelapse mortality was zero at 1 year. The 1-year cumulative incidences of relapse and chronic GVHD were 26% (95% CI, 13 to 41) and 37% (95% CI, 22 to 53), respectively. GVHD-free, relapse-free survival was 46% (95% CI, 29 to 62) at 1 year. Toxic effects were similar to those seen in patients undergoing allogeneic stem-cell transplantation.
CONCLUSIONS
In this nonrandomized trial, sitagliptin in combination with tacrolimus and sirolimus resulted in a low incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD by day 100 after myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02683525.).
Topics: Adult; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Leukemia, Myeloid; Male; Middle Aged; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma; Recurrence; Sirolimus; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Survival Analysis; Tacrolimus; Transplantation, Homologous; Young Adult
PubMed: 33406328
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2027372 -
Scientific Reports May 2021Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists have shown cardioprotective effects which have been suggested to be mediated through inhibition of oxidative stress. We... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists have shown cardioprotective effects which have been suggested to be mediated through inhibition of oxidative stress. We investigated the effect of treatment with a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (liraglutide) on oxidative stress measured as urinary nucleic acid oxidation in persons with type 2 diabetes. Post-hoc analysis of two independent, randomised, placebo-controlled and double-blinded clinical trials. In a cross-over study where persons with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria (LIRALBU, n = 32) received liraglutide (1.8 mg/day) or placebo for 12 weeks in random order, separated by 4 weeks of wash-out. In a parallel-grouped study where obese persons with type 2 diabetes (SAFEGUARD, n = 56) received liraglutide (1.8 mg/day), sitagliptin (100 mg/day) or placebo for 12 weeks. Endpoints were changes in the urinary markers of DNA oxidation (8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG)) and RNA oxidation [8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanosine (8-oxoGuo)]. In LIRALBU, we observed no significant differences between treatment periods in urinary excretion of 8-oxodG [0.028 (standard error (SE): 0.17] nmol/mmol creatinine, p = 0.87) or of 8-oxoGuo [0.12 (0.12) nmol/mmol creatinine, p = 0.31]. In SAFEGUARD, excretion of 8-oxodG was not changed in the liraglutide group [2.8 (- 8.51; 15.49) %, p = 0.62] but a significant decline was demonstrated in the placebo group [12.6 (- 21.3; 3.1) %, p = 0.02], resulting in a relative increase in the liraglutide group compared to placebo (0.16 nmol/mmol creatinine, SE 0.07, p = 0.02). Treatment with sitagliptin compared to placebo demonstrated no significant difference (0.07 (0.07) nmol/mmol creatinine, p = 0.34). Nor were any significant differences for urinary excretion of 8-oxoGuo liraglutide vs placebo [0.09 (SE: 0.07) nmol/mmol creatinine, p = 0.19] or sitagliptin vs placebo [0.07 (SE: 0.07) nmol/mmol creatinine, p = 0.35] observed. This post-hoc analysis could not demonstrate a beneficial effect of 12 weeks of treatment with liraglutide or sitagliptin on oxidatively generated modifications of nucleic acid in persons with type 2 diabetes.
Topics: 8-Hydroxy-2'-Deoxyguanosine; Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Guanosine; Humans; Liraglutide; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Oxidative Stress; Sitagliptin Phosphate
PubMed: 34012064
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90191-w -
Circulation Jun 2019The EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial (Empagliflozin Cardiovascular Outcome Event Trial in Type 2 diabetes Mellitus Patients) showed that empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
The EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial (Empagliflozin Cardiovascular Outcome Event Trial in Type 2 diabetes Mellitus Patients) showed that empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, reduces the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) by 35%, on top of standard of care in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and established cardiovascular disease. The EMPRISE (Empagliflozin Comparative Effectiveness and Safety) study aims to assess empagliflozin's effectiveness, safety, and healthcare utilization in routine care from August 2014 through September 2019. In this first interim analysis, we investigated the risk of HHF among T2D patients initiating empagliflozin versus sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor.
METHODS
Within 2 commercial and 1 federal (Medicare) claims data sources in the United States, we identified a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort of T2D patients ≥18 years old initiating empagliflozin or sitagliptin from August 2014 through September 2016. The HHF outcome was defined as a HF discharge diagnosis in the primary position (HHF-specific); a broader definition was based on a HF discharge diagnosis in any position (HHF-broad). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were estimated controlling for over 140 baseline characteristics in each data source and pooled by fixed-effects meta-analysis.
RESULTS
After propensity-score matching, we identified 16,443 patient pairs who initiated empagliflozin or sitagliptin. Average age was approximately 59 years, almost 54% of the participants were males, and approximately 25% had records of existing cardiovascular disease. Compared with sitagliptin, the initiation of empagliflozin decreased the risk of HHF-specific by 50% (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28-0.91), and the risk of HHF-broad by 49% (HR, 0.51;95% CI, 0.39-0.68), over a mean follow-up of 5.3 months. The results were consistent in patients with and without baseline cardiovascular disease, and for empagliflozin at both the 10- and 25-mg daily doses; analyses comparing empagliflozin versus the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor class, and comparing sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor classes also produced consistent findings.
CONCLUSIONS
The first interim analysis from EMPRISE showed that compared with sitagliptin, the initiation of empagliflozin was associated with a decreased risk of HHF among patients with T2D as treated in routine care, with and without a history of cardiovascular disease.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03363464.
Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Glucosides; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States
PubMed: 30955357
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.039177 -
Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics Jan 2022In vivo studies suggest that arrhythmia risk may be greater with less selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, but evidence from population-based studies is missing.... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
In vivo studies suggest that arrhythmia risk may be greater with less selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, but evidence from population-based studies is missing. We aimed to compare saxagliptin, sitagliptin, and linagliptin with regard to risk of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA)/ventricular arrhythmia (VA). We conducted high-dimensional propensity score (hdPS) matched, new-user cohort studies. We analyzed Medicaid and Optum Clinformatics separately. We identified new users of saxagliptin, sitagliptin (both databases), and linagliptin (Optum only). We defined SCA/VA outcomes using emergency department and inpatient diagnoses. We identified and then controlled for confounders via a data-adaptive, hdPS approach. We generated marginal hazard ratios (HRs) via Cox proportional hazards regression using a robust variance estimator while adjusting for calendar year. We identified the following matched comparisons: saxagliptin vs. sitagliptin (23,895 vs. 96,972) in Medicaid, saxagliptin vs. sitagliptin (48,388 vs. 117,383) in Optum, and linagliptin vs. sitagliptin (36,820 vs. 78,701) in Optum. In Medicaid, use of saxagliptin (vs. sitagliptin) was associated with an increased rate of SCA/VA (adjusted HR (aHR), 2.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-3.25). However, in Optum data, this finding was not present (aHR, 0.79, 95% CI 0.41-1.51). Further, we found no association between linagliptin (vs. sitagliptin) and SCA/VA (aHR, 0.65, 95% CI 0.36-1.17). We found discordant results regarding the association between SCA/VA with saxagliptin compared with sitagliptin in two independent datasets. It remains unclear whether these findings are due to heterogeneity of treatment effect in the different populations, chance, or unmeasured confounding.
Topics: Adamantane; Administrative Claims, Healthcare; Aged; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Cohort Studies; Databases, Factual; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Linagliptin; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Sitagliptin Phosphate
PubMed: 34331322
DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2381 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2024To evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of cetagliptin (CAS number:2243737-33-7) in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
AIMS
To evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of cetagliptin (CAS number:2243737-33-7) in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A population PK/PD model was developed to quantify the PK and PD characteristics of cetagliptin in patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
32 Chinese adults with T2DM were enrolled in this study. The subjects were randomly assigned to receive either cetagliptin (50 mg or 100 mg), placebo, or sitagliptin (100 mg) once daily for 14 days. Blood samples were collected for PK and PD analysis. Effects on glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and glucagon were evaluated following an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (day15). Effects on HbA1c and glycated albumin (GA), and safety assessments were also conducted. Meanwhile, a population PK/PD model was developed by a sequential two-step analysis approach using Phoenix.
RESULTS
Following multiple oral doses, cetagliptin was rapidly absorbed and the mean half-life were 34.9-41.9 h. Steady-state conditions were achieved after 1 week of daily dosing and the accumulation was modest. The intensity and duration of DPP-4 inhibition induced by 50 mg cetagliptin were comparable with those induced by sitagliptin, and 100 mg cetagliptin showed a much longer sustained DPP-4 inhibition (≥80%) than sitagliptin. Compared with placebo group, plasma active GLP-1 AUEC increased by 2.20- and 3.36-fold in the 50 mg and 100 mg cetagliptin groups. A decrease of plasma glucose and increase of insulin and C-peptide were observed following OGTT in cetagliptin groups. Meanwhile, a tendency of reduced GA was observed, whereas no decreasing trend was observed in HbA1c. All adverse events related to cetagliptin and sitagliptin were assessed as mild. A population PK/PD model was successfully established. The two-compartment model and Sigmoid-E model could fit the observed data well. Total bilirubin (TBIL) was a covariate of volume of peripheral compartment distribution (V), and V increased with the increase of TBIL.
CONCLUSIONS
Cetagliptin was well tolerated, inhibited plasma DPP-4 activity, increased plasma active GLP-1 levels, and exhibited a certain trend of glucose-lowering effect in patients with T2DM. The established population PK/PD model adequately described the PK and PD characteristics of cetagliptin.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Hypoglycemic Agents; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glycated Hemoglobin; C-Peptide; Blood Glucose; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Insulin
PubMed: 38529396
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1359407 -
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism Mar 2018The gut hormone peptide tyrosine tyrosine (PYY) is critical for maintaining islet integrity and restoring islet function following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The...
AIMS
The gut hormone peptide tyrosine tyrosine (PYY) is critical for maintaining islet integrity and restoring islet function following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The expression of PYY and its receptors (NPYRs) in islets has been documented but not fully characterized. Modulation of islet PYY by the proteolytic enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) has not been investigated and the impact of DPP-IV inhibition on islet PYY function remains unexplored. Here we have addressed these gaps and their effects on glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS). We have also investigated changes in pancreatic PYY in diabetes and following RYGB.
METHODS
Immunohistochemistry and gene expression analysis were used to assess PYY, NPYRs and DPP-IV expression in rodent and human islets. DPP-IV activity inhibition was achieved by sitagliptin. Secretion studies were used to test PYY and the effects of sitagliptin on insulin release, and the involvement of GLP-1. Radioimmunoassays were used to measure hormone content in islets.
RESULTS
PYY and DPP-IV localized in different cell types in islets while NPYR expression was confined to the beta-cells. Chronic PYY application enhanced GSIS in rodent and diabetic human islets. DPP-IV inhibition by sitagliptin potentiated GSIS; this was mediated by locally-produced PYY, and not GLP-1. Pancreatic PYY was markedly reduced in diabetes. RYGB strongly increased islet PYY content, but did not lead to full restoration of pancreatic GLP-1 levels.
CONCLUSION
Local regulation of pancreatic PYY, rather than GLP-1, by DPP-IV inhibition or RYGB can directly modulate the insulin secretory response to glucose, indicating a novel role of pancreatic PYY in diabetes and weight-loss surgery.
Topics: Animals; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Gastric Bypass; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Secretion; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Male; Mice; Rats, Wistar; Receptors, Neuropeptide Y; Sitagliptin Phosphate
PubMed: 28892258
DOI: 10.1111/dom.13113 -
Revista Medica Del Instituto Mexicano... Jul 2023The control of diabetes mellitus is multifactorial, the different therapeutic options make it necessary to compare the effectiveness with previous therapeutic schemes. (Observational Study)
Observational Study
BACKGROUND
The control of diabetes mellitus is multifactorial, the different therapeutic options make it necessary to compare the effectiveness with previous therapeutic schemes.
OBJECTIVE
Analize the indicators of control of diabetes mellitus after incorporating liraglutide, sitagliptin/metformin, linagliptin, and sitagliptin.
METHODS
Observational, analytical, longitudinal study. Glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, and blood pressure were compared after the inclusion of new cues in patients with diabetes mellitus; in addition to the control indicators reported in the unit in october, november, and december 2000, with those of 2021 in the same months. A descriptive analysis was performed, T for related samples and McNemar, a value of < .05 was considered significant, a confidence level of 95%, with the IBM-SPSS 24 software.
RESULTS
352 files were analyzed, 59% women, aged 26 to 88 years, and the percentage of control decreased after the change of scheme (38.4% vs 35.8%) without a statistical difference (p .503). There was no statistical difference between the levels of glucose, glycated hemoglobin, weight, and blood pressure before and six months after the change. In the unit, the regimen glycemic control indicator improved in October, November, and December 2020 compared to the same months in 2021, it increased (from 17.2, 18.7, and 16.3, to 41.6, 47.2, and 46.5%). Blood pressure control went from 64.5, 66.7, and 67 to 82.4, 85.1, and 83.1%.
CONCLUSIONS
The control indicators in the unit improved, however, the patients who used the new keys did not show any difference.
Topics: Humans; Female; Male; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Liraglutide; Linagliptin; Hypoglycemic Agents; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Longitudinal Studies; Treatment Outcome; Metformin; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glucose; Drug Therapy, Combination; Blood Glucose
PubMed: 37540652
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8200442