-
Journal of Biomedical Research Mar 2016ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters ABCC1 (MRP1), ABCB1 (P-gp), and ABCG2 (BCRP) contribute to chemotherapy failure. The primary goals of this study were to...
ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters ABCC1 (MRP1), ABCB1 (P-gp), and ABCG2 (BCRP) contribute to chemotherapy failure. The primary goals of this study were to characterize the efficacy and mechanism of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), sulindac sulfide, to reverse ABCC1 mediated resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs and to determine if sulindac sulfide can influence sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs independently of drug efflux. Cytotoxicity assays were performed to measure resistance of ABC-expressing cell lines to doxorubicin and other chemotherapeutic drugs. NSAIDs were tested for the ability to restore sensitivity to resistance selected tumor cell lines, as well as a large panel of standard tumor cell lines. Other experiments characterized the mechanism by which sulindac sulfide inhibits ABCC1 substrate and co-substrate (GSH) transport in isolated membrane vesicles and intact cells. Selective reversal of multi-drug resistance (MDR), decreased efflux of doxorubicin, and fluorescent substrates were demonstrated by sulindac sulfide and a related NSAID, indomethacin, in resistance selected and engineered cell lines expressing ABCC1, but not ABCB1 or ABCG2. Sulindac sulfide also inhibited transport of leukotriene C into membrane vesicles. Sulindac sulfide enhanced the sensitivity to doxorubicin in 24 of 47 tumor cell lines, including all melanoma lines tested (7-7). Sulindac sulfide also decreased intracellular GSH in ABCC1 expressing cells, while the glutathione synthesis inhibitor, BSO, selectively increased sensitivity to sulindac sulfide induced cytotoxicity. Sulindac sulfide potently and selectively reverses ABCC1-mediated MDR at clinically achievable concentrations. ABCC1 expressing tumors may be highly sensitive to the direct cytotoxicity of sulindac sulfide, and in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs that induce oxidative stress.
PubMed: 28276667
DOI: 10.7555/JBR.30.20150108 -
BMC Gastroenterology Aug 2016Molecular studies suggest inhibition of colorectal mucosal polyamines (PAs) may be a promising approach to prevent colorectal cancer (CRC). Inhibition of ornithine... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Efficacy and safety of eflornithine (CPP-1X)/sulindac combination therapy versus each as monotherapy in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP): design and rationale of a randomized, double-blind, Phase III trial.
BACKGROUND
Molecular studies suggest inhibition of colorectal mucosal polyamines (PAs) may be a promising approach to prevent colorectal cancer (CRC). Inhibition of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) using low-dose eflornithine (DFMO, CPP-1X), combined with maximal PA export using low-dose sulindac, results in greatly reduced levels of normal mucosal PAs. In a clinical trial, this combination (compared with placebo) reduced the 3-year incidence of subsequent high-risk adenomas by >90 %. Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) is characterized by marked up-regulation of ODC in normal intestinal epithelial and adenoma tissue, and therefore PA reduction might be a potential strategy to control progression of FAP-related intestinal polyposis. CPP FAP-310, a randomized, double-blind, Phase III trial was designed to examine the safety and efficacy of sulindac and DFMO (alone or in combination) for preventing a clinically relevant FAP-related progression event in individuals with FAP.
METHODS
Eligible adults with FAP will be randomized to: CPP-1X 750 mg and sulindac 150 mg, CPP-1X placebo and sulindac 150 mg, or CPP-1X 750 mg and sulindac placebo once daily for 24 months. Patients will be stratified based on time-to-event prognosis into one of the three treatment arms: best (ie, longest time to first FAP-related event [rectal/pouch polyposis]), intermediate (duodenal polyposis) and worst (pre-colectomy). Stage-specific, "delayed time to" FAP-related events are the primary endpoints. Change in polyp burden (upper and/or lower intestine) is a key secondary endpoint.
DISCUSSION
The trial is ongoing. As of February 1, 2016, 214 individuals have been screened; 138 eligible subjects have been randomized to three treatment groups at 15 North American sites and 6 European sites. By disease strata, 26, 80 and 32 patients are included for assessment of polyp burden in the rectum/pouch, duodenal polyposis and pre-colectomy groups, respectively. Median age is 40 years; 59 % are men. The most common reasons for screening failure include minimal polyp burden (n = 22), withdrawal of consent (n = 9) and extensive polyposis requiring immediate surgical intervention (n = 9). Enrollment is ongoing.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT01483144 ; November 21, 2011) and the EU Clinical Trials Register( EudraCT 2012-000427-41 ; May 15, 2014).
Topics: Adenomatous Polyposis Coli; Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colonic Neoplasms; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Duodenal Neoplasms; Eflornithine; Female; Humans; Intestinal Mucosa; Male; Polyamines; Sulindac
PubMed: 27480131
DOI: 10.1186/s12876-016-0494-4 -
JAMAPatients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) are at markedly increased risk for duodenal polyps and cancer. Surgical and endoscopic management of duodenal... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
IMPORTANCE
Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) are at markedly increased risk for duodenal polyps and cancer. Surgical and endoscopic management of duodenal neoplasia is difficult and chemoprevention has not been successful.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effect of a combination of sulindac and erlotinib on duodenal adenoma regression in patients with FAP.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, enrolling 92 participants with FAP, conducted from July 2010 through June 2014 at Huntsman Cancer Institute in Salt Lake City, Utah.
INTERVENTIONS
Participants with FAP were randomized to sulindac (150 mg) twice daily and erlotinib (75 mg) daily (n = 46) vs placebo (n = 46) for 6 months.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The total number and diameter of polyps in the proximal duodenum were mapped at baseline and 6 months. The primary outcome was change in total polyp burden at 6 months. Polyp burden was calculated as the sum of the diameters of polyps. The secondary outcomes were change in total duodenal polyp count, change in duodenal polyp burden or count stratified by genotype and initial polyp burden, and percentage of change from baseline in duodenal polyp burden.
RESULTS
Ninety-two participants (mean age, 41 years [range, 24-55]; women, 56 [61%]) were randomized when the trial was stopped by the external data and safety monitoring board because the second preplanned interim analysis met the prespecified stopping rule for superiority. Grade 1 and 2 adverse events were more common in the sulindac-erlotinib group, with an acne-like rash observed in 87% of participants receiving treatment and 20% of participants receiving placebo (P < .001). Only 2 participants experienced grade 3 adverse events. [table: see text].
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Among participants with FAP, the use of sulindac and erlotinib compared with placebo resulted in a lower duodenal polyp burden after 6 months. Adverse events may limit the use of these medications at the doses used in this study. Further research is necessary to evaluate these preliminary findings in a larger study population with longer follow-up to determine whether the observed effects will result in improved clinical outcomes.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT 01187901.
Topics: Adenomatous Polyposis Coli; Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Duodenal Neoplasms; Erlotinib Hydrochloride; Female; Genes, APC; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sulindac
PubMed: 27002448
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.2522 -
Proceedings of the National Academy of... Jul 2015Cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM) is a disease of the central nervous system causing hemorrhage-prone multiple lumen vascular malformations and very severe...
Cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM) is a disease of the central nervous system causing hemorrhage-prone multiple lumen vascular malformations and very severe neurological consequences. At present, the only recommended treatment of CCM is surgical. Because surgery is often not applicable, pharmacological treatment would be highly desirable. We describe here a murine model of the disease that develops after endothelial-cell-selective ablation of the CCM3 gene. We report an early, cell-autonomous, Wnt-receptor-independent stimulation of β-catenin transcription activity in CCM3-deficient endothelial cells both in vitro and in vivo and a triggering of a β-catenin-driven transcription program that leads to endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition. TGF-β/BMP signaling is then required for the progression of the disease. We also found that the anti-inflammatory drugs sulindac sulfide and sulindac sulfone, which attenuate β-catenin transcription activity, reduce vascular malformations in endothelial CCM3-deficient mice. This study opens previously unidentified perspectives for an effective pharmacological therapy of intracranial vascular cavernomas.
Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Disease Models, Animal; Endothelial Cells; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Hemangioma, Cavernous, Central Nervous System; Immunohistochemistry; Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Mice, Knockout; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; Signal Transduction; Sulindac; Transforming Growth Factor beta; beta Catenin
PubMed: 26109568
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1501352112 -
Redox Biology Dec 2015Sulindac is chemopreventive and has utility in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis; however, side effects preclude its long-term use. NOSH-sulindac (AVT-18A)...
NOSH-sulindac (AVT-18A) is a novel nitric oxide- and hydrogen sulfide-releasing hybrid that is gastrointestinal safe and has potent anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antipyretic, anti-platelet, and anti-cancer properties.
Sulindac is chemopreventive and has utility in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis; however, side effects preclude its long-term use. NOSH-sulindac (AVT-18A) releases nitric oxide and hydrogen sulfide, was designed to be a safer alternative. Here we compare the gastrointestinal safety, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, anti-pyretic, anti-platelet, and anti-cancer properties of sulindac and NOSH-sulindac administered orally to rats at equimolar doses. Gastrointestinal safety: 6h post-administration, number/size of hemorrhagic lesions in stomachs were counted. Tissue samples were frozen for PGE2, SOD, and MDA determination. Anti-inflammatory: 1h after drug administration, the volume of carrageenan-induced rat paw edemas was measured for 5h. Anti-pyretic: fever was induced by LPS (ip) an hour before administration of the test drugs, core body temperature was measured hourly for 5h. Analgesic: time-dependent analgesic effects were evaluated by carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia. Antiplatelet: anti-aggregatory effects were studied on collagen-induced platelet aggregation of human platelet-rich plasma. Anti-cancer: We examined the effects of NOSH-sulindac on the growth properties of 12 human cancer cell lines of six different tissue origins. Both agents reduced PGE2 levels in stomach tissue; however, NOSH-sulindac did not cause any stomach ulcers, whereas sulindac caused significant bleeding. Lipid peroxidation induced by sulindac was higher than that from NOSH-sulindac. SOD activity was significantly lowered by sulindac but increased by NOSH-sulindac. Both agents showed similar anti-inflammatory, analgesic, anti-pyretic, and anti-platelet activities. Sulindac increased plasma TNFα whereas this rise was lower in the NOSH-sulindac-treated animals. NOSH-sulindac inhibited the growth of all cancer cell lines studied, with potencies of 1000- to 9000-fold greater than that of sulindac. NOSH-sulindac inhibited cell proliferation, induced apoptosis, and caused G2/M cell cycle block. These results demonstrate that NOSH-sulindac is gastrointestinal safe, and maintains the anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antipyretic, and antiplatelet properties of its parent compound sulinsac, with anti-growth activity against a wide variety of human cancer cells.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antineoplastic Agents; Antipyretics; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Survival; Dinoprostone; Edema; Fever; Hydrogen Sulfide; Hyperalgesia; Male; Malondialdehyde; Nitric Oxide; Nitric Oxide Donors; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Sulindac; Superoxide Dismutase
PubMed: 26298203
DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.08.012 -
Otolaryngology--head and Neck Surgery :... Mar 2015To perform a systematic review evaluating the association between sensorineural hearing loss and (1) nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as a class, (2) NSAIDs... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To perform a systematic review evaluating the association between sensorineural hearing loss and (1) nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as a class, (2) NSAIDs available over the counter, (3) NSAIDs in short intravenous courses, (4) prescription NSAIDs utilized by patients without systemic inflammatory conditions, (5) prescription NSAIDs in patients with arthritides, and (6) acetaminophen with and without concomitant narcotic usage.
DATA SOURCES
Computerized searches of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were updated through May 2014, along with manual searches and inquiries to topic experts.
REVIEW METHODS
The systematic review was performed according to an a priori protocol. Data extraction was performed by 2 independent investigators, and it focused on relevant audiologic measurements, methodological elements related to risk of bias, and potential confounders.
RESULTS
The 23 criterion-meeting studies included a total of 92,532 participants, with mixed results. Sulindac was the only specific agent to have been studied with formal audiometry in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in which hearing was the reported primary outcome: Although an effect was seen in the unadjusted analysis (pure tone threshold>15 dB, 9.3% vs 2.9%; relative risk [RR], 3.2; confidence interval [CI], 1.09-9.55; P=.02), the effect dissipated in the adjusted analysis (P=.09). There was a significant effect on self-reported hearing loss from NSAIDs as a class (RR, 1.21; CI, 1.11-1.33), ibuprofen (RR, 1.13; CI, 1.06-1.19), and acetaminophen (RR, 1.21; CI, 1.11-1.33), but no formal audiometric data confirm or refute this suggested effect. Audiometry has demonstrated profound loss in some instances of acetaminophen-narcotic combination ingestions.
CONCLUSIONS
Data are varied regarding the impact of NSAIDs and acetaminophen on population hearing health.
Topics: Acetaminophen; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Audiometry; Hearing; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural; Humans; Risk Factors
PubMed: 25560405
DOI: 10.1177/0194599814564533 -
Biochemical Pharmacology Sep 2014Phospho-sulindac amide (PSA) is a novel potential anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory agent. Here we report the metabolism of PSA in vitro. PSA was rapidly hydroxylated at...
Phospho-sulindac amide (PSA) is a novel potential anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory agent. Here we report the metabolism of PSA in vitro. PSA was rapidly hydroxylated at its butane-phosphate moiety to form two di-hydroxyl-PSA and four mono-hydroxyl-PSA metabolites in mouse and human liver microsomes. PSA also can be oxidized or reduced at its sulindac moiety to form PSA sulfone and PSA sulfide, respectively. PSA was mono-hydroxylated and cleared more rapidly in mouse liver microsomes than in human liver microsomes. Of eight major human cytochrome P450s (CYPs), CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 exclusively catalyzed the hydroxylation and sulfoxidation reactions of PSA, respectively. We also examined the metabolism of PSA by three major human flavin monooxygenases (FMOs). FMO1, FMO3 and FMO5 were all capable of catalyzing the sulfoxidation (but not hydroxylation) of PSA, with FMO1 being by far the most active isoform. PSA was predominantly sulfoxidized in human kidney microsomes because FMO1 is the dominant isoform in human kidney. PSA (versus sulindac) is a preferred substrate of both CYPs and FMOs, likely because of its greater lipophilicity and masked-COOH group. Ketoconazole (a CYP3A4 inhibitor) and alkaline pH strongly inhibited the hydroxylation of PSA, but moderately suppressed its sulfoxidation in liver microsomes. Together, our results establish the metabolic pathways of PSA, identify the major enzymes mediating its biotransformations and reveal significant inter-species and inter-tissue differences in its metabolism.
Topics: Animals; Antifungal Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Cells, Cultured; Drug Interactions; Enzyme Inhibitors; Hepatocytes; Humans; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Ketoconazole; Mice; Microsomes, Liver; Molecular Structure; Organophosphates; Quinidine; Rats; Sulindac
PubMed: 25044307
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2014.07.007 -
Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta.... Apr 2022Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a clinically important spectrum of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in humans. NASH is a stage of NAFLD progression...
Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a clinically important spectrum of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in humans. NASH is a stage of NAFLD progression wherein liver steatosis accompanies inflammation and pro-fibrotic events. Presently, there are no approved drugs for NASH, which has become a leading cause of liver transplant worldwide. To discover novel drug targets for NASH, we analyzed a human transcriptomic NASH dataset and found Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B10 (AKR1B10) as a significantly upregulated gene in livers of human NASH patients. Similarly murine Akr1b10 and Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B8 (Akr1b8) gene, which is a murine ortholog of human AKR1B10, were also found to be upregulated in a mouse model of diet-induced NASH. Furthermore, pharmacological inhibitors of AKR1B10 significantly reduced the pathological features of NASH such as steatosis, inflammation and fibrosis in mouse. In addition, genetic silencing of both mouse Akr1b10 and Akr1b8 significantly reduced the expression of proinflammatory cytokines from hepatocytes. These results, thus, underscore the involvement of murine AKR1B10 and AKR1B8 in the pathogenesis of murine NASH and raise an intriguing possibility of a similar role of AKR1B10 in human NASH.
Topics: Alcohol Oxidoreductases; Aldo-Keto Reductases; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cell Line; Cytokines; Disease Models, Animal; Hepatocytes; Humans; Liver; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; RNA Interference; RNA, Small Interfering; Sulindac
PubMed: 34954342
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2021.166319 -
Open Medicine (Warsaw, Poland) 2019There is currently no standard treatment for desmoid tumors (DTs) associated with familial polyposis coli (FAP). Familial adenomatous polyposis in DT patients is...
BACKGROUND
There is currently no standard treatment for desmoid tumors (DTs) associated with familial polyposis coli (FAP). Familial adenomatous polyposis in DT patients is sometimes a life-threatening condition.
METHODS
We enrolled all consecutive patients with FAP treated at Unit of General Surgery and Transplant, University of Naples Federico II and evaluated the incidence of DTs on FAP between 1996 and 2016.
RESULTS
We observed 45 consecutive patients with FAP; of these 5 were DT-FAP-associated. All 5 cases with FAP were young women, age 25 to 65 years, previously treated by colectomy. Of these, 4 patients presented a parietal localization and had been treated with a wide surgical exeresis; one patient had an intra-abdominal, mesenteric tumor that was unresectable at laparotomy. We performed CT-guided drainage, ureteral stenting, medical therapy (sulindac+tamoxifene), and chemotherapy (dacarba-zine+doxorubicine).All patients were alive and underwent follow-ups for 5 years post-surgery; only 1 patient with parietal localization showed a local relapse after 2 years.
CONCLUSIONS
We propose a modulated approach to the single patient with FAP, with surgery as treatment of choice for parietal localization disease and integrating different kinds of therapies (surgery alone or associated with RT, CT) for the intra-abdominal tumor.
PubMed: 31410368
DOI: 10.1515/med-2019-0064 -
Current Pharmacology Reports Oct 2015The chemoprevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) is a realistic option given the low acceptance and cost of screening colonoscopy. NSAIDs, currently not recommended for...
The chemoprevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) is a realistic option given the low acceptance and cost of screening colonoscopy. NSAIDs, currently not recommended for CRC prevention, are the most promising agents. Here, we review relevant work and assess the chemopreventive potential of NSAIDs. The chemopreventive efficacy of NSAIDs is established by epidemiological and interventional studies as well as analyses of cardiovascular-prevention randomized clinical trials. The modest chemopreventive efficacy of NSAIDs is compounded by their significant toxicity that can be cumulative. Efforts to overcome these limitations include the use of drug combinations; the emphasis on the early stages of colon carcinogenesis such as aberrant crypt foci, which may require shorter periods of drug administration; and the development of several families of chemically modified NSAIDs such as derivatives of sulindac, nitro-NSAIDs and phospho-NSAIDs, with some of them appearing to have higher safety and efficacy than conventional NSAIDs and thus to be better candidate agents. The successful development of NSAIDs as chemopreventive agents will likely require a combination of the following: identification of subjects at high risk and/or those most likely to benefit from chemoprevention; optimization of the timing, dose and duration of administration of the chemopreventive agent; novel NSAID derivatives and/or combinations of agents; and agents that may prevent other diseases in addition to CRC. Ultimately, the clinical implementation of NSAIDs for the prevention of CRC will depend on a strategy that drastically shifts the currently unacceptable risk/benefit ratio in favor of chemoprevention.
PubMed: 26688785
DOI: 10.1007/s40495-015-0042-x