-
Injury Dec 2020The biomechanical properties of small vessels and microvascular anastomoses have not been studied completely yet. However, in case of vascular injury and various...
INTRODUCTION
The biomechanical properties of small vessels and microvascular anastomoses have not been studied completely yet. However, in case of vascular injury and various microsurgical reconstructive procedures a safe anastomosis is essential. Quick and reliable tests are needed to test various anastomoses in research and in teaching courses as well for quality control and proper feedback. We aimed to compare selected biomechanical properties of the simple interrupted, the continuous suture and the modified Lauritzen's sleeve-technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sixty femoral arteries from chicken thigh biopreparates and 12 abdominal aortas from rats were used in this study. In case of the pressure resistance test the groups were: the simple interrupted, the continuous suture and the modified Lauritzen's sleeve-technique. The tensile-strength, elongation and elasticity measurement groups were the simple interrupted and continuous sutures with 8 and 12 stitches. Furthermore the suture materials in various conditions (simple thread, knotted threads, stitch with intact and damaged threads) were also compared. The tensile-strength and the pressure probe devices were custom made in cooperation with the Faculty of Informatics.
RESULTS
The average diameter of the chicken femoral arteries was 3.25±0.38 mm. The sleeve-technique showed the biggest pressure drop (56±16.41 mmHg), however, it was the fastest method. The tensile-strength of simple interrupted suture was 4.55±0.7 Newton (N), being lower than of the intact vessel (6.8 ± 1.4 N). The tensile-strength did not differ significantly between the 12-stitch simple interrupted and continuous sutures, however, the latter was stronger. The anastomoses made on thread model were significantly stronger than the ones on vessels.
CONCLUSION
The main variables were the number of stitches and the strength of the vessel. The pressure drop was not correlated with the stitch number. One incorrect stitch can dramatically increase the leakage. Although the sleeve-technique is quick to be performed, it cannot withstand high pressure. The suture material itself is far stronger then the vessel. The vessel tensile strength was decreased in the anastomoses. For the given vessel diameter more than 8 stitches should be used.
Topics: Anastomosis, Surgical; Animals; Microsurgery; Rats; Suture Techniques; Sutures; Tensile Strength
PubMed: 32147145
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.104 -
The Journal of Surgical Research Nov 2020The use of sutures remains the first choice for wound closure. However, incorrect use of a suture technique can lead to impaired healing. Many techniques are described... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
The use of sutures remains the first choice for wound closure. However, incorrect use of a suture technique can lead to impaired healing. Many techniques are described for high-tension wounds, but not much is known about their mechanical properties. Complications of excessive tension include dehiscence, infection, and ischemic necrosis and could be prevented. This study aimed to compare forces in five techniques (single, horizontal mattress, vertical mattress, pulley, and modified pulley suture) in a standardized wound tension model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A standardized neoprene wound model was developed on the ForceTRAP system (MediShield B.V., Delft, The Netherlands) to mimic a 5 Newton (N) wound. Five different suture techniques were each repeated 10 times by a student, resident dermatology, and dermsurgeon. The pulling force of the suture's first throw was measured with the Hook-in-Force sensor (Technical University Delft, The Netherlands). Changes in wound tension were measured by the ForceTRAP system. The ForceTRAP is a platform measuring forces from 0 to 20 N in three dimensions with an accuracy of 0.1 N. The Hook-in-Force is a force sensor measuring 0-15 N with an accuracy of 0.5 N. Maximum and mean forces were calculated for each suture technique and operator.
RESULTS
Mean maximum pulling force: 5.69 N (standard deviation [SD], 0.88) single, 7.25 N (SD, 1.33) vertical mattress, 8.11 N (SD, 1.00) horizontal mattress, 3.46 N (SD, 0.61) pulley, and 4.52 N (SD, 0.67) modified pulley suture. The mean force increase on the skin (substitute) ranged between 0.80 N (pulley) and 0.96 N (vertical mattress).
CONCLUSIONS
The pulley suture requires less pulling force compared with other techniques. The mechanical properties of sutures should be taken in consideration when choosing a technique to close wounds.
Topics: Dermatologic Surgical Procedures; Materials Testing; Suture Techniques; Sutures; Tensile Strength
PubMed: 32543379
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.05.033 -
Scientific Reports Feb 2023To address the growing demand for more elastic sutures free from unwanted knot loosening, we fabricated an absorbable monofilament suture from...
To address the growing demand for more elastic sutures free from unwanted knot loosening, we fabricated an absorbable monofilament suture from poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) and subjected it to physical property characterization and performance evaluation (in vitro and in vivo degradability tests and a porcine abdominal wall suture test). As this flexible, highly stretchable, and difficult-to-untie suture exhibited additional advantages of small knot size and medium to long-term bioabsorbability, it was concluded to be a safe alternative to existing monofilament sutures, with far-reaching potential applications.
Topics: Animals; Swine; Physical Phenomena; Sutures; Suture Techniques
PubMed: 36841914
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30292-w -
International Journal of Computer... Jun 2022The use of motion sensors is emerging as a means for measuring surgical performance. Motion sensors are typically used for calculating performance metrics and assessing...
PURPOSE
The use of motion sensors is emerging as a means for measuring surgical performance. Motion sensors are typically used for calculating performance metrics and assessing skill. The aim of this study was to identify surgical gestures and tools used during an open surgery suturing simulation based on motion sensor data.
METHODS
Twenty-five participants performed a suturing task on a variable tissue simulator. Electromagnetic motion sensors were used to measure their performance. The current study compares GRU and LSTM networks, which are known to perform well on other kinematic datasets, as well as MS-TCN++, which was developed for video data and was adapted in this work for motion sensors data. Finally, we extended all architectures for multi-tasking.
RESULTS
In the gesture recognition task the MS-TCN++ has the highest performance with accuracy of [Formula: see text] and F1-Macro of [Formula: see text], edit distance of [Formula: see text] and F1@10 of [Formula: see text] In the tool usage recognition task for the right hand, MS-TCN++ performs the best in most metrics with an accuracy score of [Formula: see text], F1-Macro of [Formula: see text], F1@10 of [Formula: see text], and F1@25 of [Formula: see text]. The multi-task GRU performs best in all metrics in the left-hand case, with an accuracy of [Formula: see text], edit distance of [Formula: see text], F1-Macro of [Formula: see text], F1@10 of [Formula: see text], and F1@25 of [Formula: see text].
CONCLUSION
In this study, using motion sensor data, we automatically identified the surgical gestures and the tools used during an open surgery suturing simulation. Our methods may be used for computing more detailed performance metrics and assisting in automatic workflow analysis. MS-TCN++ performed better in gesture recognition as well as right-hand tool recognition, while the multi-task GRU provided better results in the left-hand case. It should be noted that our multi-task GRU network is significantly smaller and has achieved competitive results in the rest of the tasks as well.
Topics: Biomechanical Phenomena; Gestures; Humans; Motion; Sutures
PubMed: 35419721
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-022-02615-1 -
Acta Medica Portuguesa Jan 2022Postpartum haemorrhage is still the main cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Many treatments are available, but they may threaten fertility potential. As a... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Postpartum haemorrhage is still the main cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Many treatments are available, but they may threaten fertility potential. As a uterine sparing procedure, we aimed to review uterine compression sutures in order to better understand when they should represent an appropriate option.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A comprehensive search in MEDLINE and PubMed databases including the terms 'postpartum haemorrhage' and 'uterine compression sutures' was performed. Results were revised and articles reviewing or presenting case reports of uterine compression sutures to treat postpartum haemorrhage were included.
RESULTS
The first description of uterine compression sutures to control postpartum haemorrhage was published in 1997, by B-Lynch et al. After this publication, many others have reported successful management of postpartum haemorrhage with different suturing techniques. Most of them describe success rates above 75% and the possibility of fertility preservation, with cases of uneventful pregnancy after uterine compression sutures already published. Complications associated with each technique are rare.
DISCUSSION
Reports of use of uterine compression sutures include small series of cases or even single case reports which limits the quality of existing evidence to support one technique over another. Nevertheless, uterine compression sutures are recognized as an effective surgical conservative strategy to control postpartum haemorrhage due to uterine atony and its use is recommended, if possible, prior to hysterectomy.
CONCLUSION
Uterine compression sutures are effective, safe and simple to perform in an emergent situation and preserve fertility potential in cases of postpartum haemorrhage.
Topics: Female; Humans; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Pregnancy; Suture Techniques; Sutures; Uterine Inertia; Uterus
PubMed: 32208130
DOI: 10.20344/amp.11987 -
HPB : the Official Journal of the... Oct 2022This study aims to describe the technique and the results of double-layer continuous suture hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and total...
BACKGROUND
This study aims to describe the technique and the results of double-layer continuous suture hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and total pancreatectomy (TP).
METHODS
A prospectively maintained database was analyzed retrospectively to identify incidence and severity of biliary leaks (BL) (ISGLS definition), as well as of HJ stenosis (HJS), cholangitis, and need for redo-HJ (in patients with a follow-up ≥3 years) in a consecutive series of 800 procedures (PD = 603; TP = 197). Predictors of biliary complications were also identified.
RESULTS
BLs occurred in 5 patients (0.6%), including 2 (0.3%) combined pancreatic and biliary leaks. Rates of HJS, cholangitis, and need for redo-HJ were 6.1%, 5.4%, and 2.0%, respectively. Incidence of BL was 0.6% in open procedures (4/587) and 0.4% in robotic operations (1/213). Incidence of late biliary complications was also equivalent in open and robotic procedures. Occurrence of BL was predicted by ASA IV status and duodenal cancer, HJS by any associated vascular procedure and hepatic duct size < 8 mm, cholangitis by any associated vascular procedure and normal bilirubin/hepatic enzymes, and redo HJ by history of cholecystectomy and neuroendocrine tumor/cancer.
DISCUSSION
Double layer continuous suture HJ is associated with low BL rates, and an acceptable incidence of late complications.
Topics: Humans; Pancreatectomy; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Retrospective Studies; Biliary Tract Diseases; Cholangitis; Sutures; Bilirubin; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 35654670
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.05.005 -
International Urogynecology Journal Jun 2021Pelvic organ prolapse is a common problem in urogynecological surgery. Abdominal and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is currently considered to be the gold standard of...
INTRODUCTION
Pelvic organ prolapse is a common problem in urogynecological surgery. Abdominal and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is currently considered to be the gold standard of treatment. The main problem remains the anatomical point of fixation as well as how sutures are placed. We evaluated the biomechanical difference between an in-line ligament suture versus an orthogonal ligament suture and a single suture versus a continuous suture at the anterior longitudinal ligament in an in-vitro, sacrocolpopexy model.
METHODS
Biomechanical in-vitro testing was performed on human, non-embalmed, female cadaver pelvises. An Instron test frame (tensinometer) was used for load/ displacement analysis. The average patient age was 75 years. Ligament preparation yielded 15 ligaments available for testing. Recorded parameters were the ultimate load, failure displacement, and stiffness.
RESULTS
This in-vitro analysis of different suturing methods showed the difference between an orthogonal and an in-line approach to be the ultimate load. Orthogonal sutures displayed an ultimate load of 80 N while in-line suturing yielded only 57 N (p < 0.05). For the anterior longitudinal ligament, this study demonstrated that continuous suture is significantly superior to a single suture regarding failure displacement (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
We established baseline biomechanical parameters for the sacrospinous ligament and anterior longitudinal ligament. An orthogonal suture is superior to an in-line suture in an in-vitro model. A continuous suture is superior to a single suture at the anterior longitudinal ligament. Clinical trials might be able to evaluate whether any clinical significance can be established from these findings.
Topics: Aged; Biomechanical Phenomena; Female; Humans; Ligaments, Articular; Pelvic Organ Prolapse; Suture Techniques; Sutures
PubMed: 33263782
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04609-6 -
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica... Jun 2021Barbed sutures are used in cesarean delivery with the intended benefits of better tissue approximation, hemostasis, and strength, as well as reduced operative time. A... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Barbed sutures are used in cesarean delivery with the intended benefits of better tissue approximation, hemostasis, and strength, as well as reduced operative time. A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to assess the safety and efficacy of the use of barbed suture compared with conventional sutures in cesarean delivery.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and three clinical trial registries, were searched from inception to December 2019, without restriction by language or publication year. Randomized controlled trials comparing the use of barbed suture with conventional sutures in closure of any layer (uterine/fascial/skin) during cesarean delivery were included. The safety outcomes included estimated blood loss, pain, mortality, and other morbidity including infection, re-operation or re-admission. Effectiveness outcomes included closure time, need for additional suture and scar integrity. Study selection, data extraction, risk-of-bias, and quality assessment were independently performed by two authors. Primary analysis compared outcomes for all layers of surgical closure, whereas subgroup analysis was performed by individual layer. Pooled mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% CI were calculated using a random effects model. Level of evidence was assessed using GRADE criteria. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020168859.
RESULTS
The review included four trials (three comparing uterine closure and one comparing skin closure), at high risk of bias, representing 460 participants. Primary analysis showed no morbidity differences between two groups. The use of barbed suture for uterine closure was associated with shorter incision closure time (MD 110.58 seconds, 95% CI 93.79-127.36 seconds), shorter total surgical time (MD 1.92 minutes, 95% CI 0.03-3.80 minutes), and a reduced need for additional hemostatic sutures (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.28-0.54), with no difference in estimated blood loss (MD 46.17 mL, 95% CI 13.55 to -105.89 mL) or postoperative morbidity (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.46-2.01). The level of evidence was deemed to be low to very low, based on inconsistency and imprecision of results.
CONCLUSIONS
Barbed sutures may be a suitable alternative to conventional sutures for uterine closure because they reduce uterine repair time, total surgical time, and the need for additional hemostatic sutures, without an increase in blood loss or maternal morbidity.
Topics: Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques; Blood Loss, Surgical; Cesarean Section; Dissection; Female; Humans; Postoperative Complications; Pregnancy; Surgical Wound Infection; Suture Techniques; Sutures
PubMed: 33404082
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14080 -
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za... May 2022To provide systematic information for deep understanding and improvement of tension-reducing suture of deep layer skin.
OBJECTIVE
To provide systematic information for deep understanding and improvement of tension-reducing suture of deep layer skin.
METHODS
The related literature over the years was extensively collected and precisely processed to summarize the characteristics and applications of different tension-reducing suture of deep layer skin.
RESULTS
Throughout the development of plastic surgery, tension-reducing suture of deep layer skin mainly includes vertical mattress suture and its modified styles, horizontal mattress suture and its modified styles, and some special types of suture technique, and each one of them has its own characteristics and is suitable for wounds with different tension and shape.
CONCLUSION
Clinically, surgeons need to select appropriate tension-reducing suture techniques according to specific factors such as wound location and tension, so as to fully reduce the tension of the wound, which can achieve good wound healing and prevent the pathological scaring.
Topics: Neurosurgical Procedures; Suture Techniques; Sutures; Wound Healing
PubMed: 35570642
DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202201042 -
Medicine Nov 2023Meniscus suture is an important treatment method for meniscus injury and contributes to the preservation of proprioception, restoration of knee biomechanics and... (Review)
Review
Meniscus suture is an important treatment method for meniscus injury and contributes to the preservation of proprioception, restoration of knee biomechanics and alleviation of progressive osteoarthritis. However, there are few visualized analyses concerning the present studies of meniscus suture. This paper aims to evaluate the global trends, highlights and frontiers of meniscus suture. A bibliometric analysis was conducted based on the results of studies related to meniscus suture from web of science core collection. VOSviewer, GraphPad Prism, Microsoft Excel and R-bibliometrix were utilized for the bibliometric analysis of country and institution distribution, chronological distribution, source journals analysis, prolific authors and institutions analysis, keywords analysis, and reference co-citation analysis. A total of 950 publications on meniscus suture from 177 different sources were retrieved over the set time span. These publications were completed by 3177 authors from 1112 institutions in 54 countries. The United States was the most prolific country with 7960 citations and 348 publications (36.63%). Furumatsu Takayuki acted as the most prolific author (51 publications), while Robert F LaPrade with 1398 citations was the most-cited author. And more papers were published in the core journals, including American Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy and Arthroscopy Techniques. Furthermore, "meniscus healing," "meniscus root tear" seem to be the emerging research hotspots. Notably, the publication trend concerning the all-inside suture technique has been rising during the past decade. The number of research publications on meniscus suture has been continuously risen since 2010. The authors, publications and institutions from the United States and East Asia were still the mainstays in this field. And the all-inside suture may become the mainstream surgical technique in the future, with meniscus healing and meniscus root tears being research highlights recently.
Topics: Humans; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Knee Joint; Bibliometrics; Meniscus; Sutures
PubMed: 37986335
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034995