-
European Heart Journal Sep 2023Previous evidence has mainly supported transient changes in cardiac function during interictal or peri-ictal phases in people with epilepsy, but the long-term risk of...
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Previous evidence has mainly supported transient changes in cardiac function during interictal or peri-ictal phases in people with epilepsy, but the long-term risk of cardiac arrhythmias is poorly described. This study aimed to assess the long-term association of epilepsy with cardiac arrhythmias, considering the potential role of genetic predisposition and antiseizure medications (ASMs) in any associations observed.
METHODS
This population-based study evaluated UK Biobank data for individuals recruited between 2006 and 2010. Cox proportional hazards models and competing risk models were used to examine the association of epilepsy history with the long-term incidence risk of cardiac arrhythmias and arrhythmias subtypes. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) were calculated to investigate the effect of genetic susceptibility. The role of ASMs was also evaluated by integrating observational and drug target Mendelian randomization (MR) evidence.
RESULTS
The study included 329 432 individuals, including 2699 people with epilepsy. Compared with those without epilepsy, people with epilepsy experienced an increased risk of all cardiac arrhythmias [hazard ratio (HR) 1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-1.53], atrial fibrillation (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.08-1.46), and other cardiac arrhythmias (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.34-1.81). The associations were not modified by genetic predisposition as indicated by PRS. Competing and sensitivity analyses corroborated these results. Individuals with epilepsy using ASMs, especially carbamazepine and valproic acid, were at a higher risk for cardiac arrhythmias. This observation was further supported by drug target MR results (PSMR < .05 and PHEIDI > .05).
CONCLUSION
This study revealed the higher risk of cardiac arrhythmias persists long term in people with epilepsy, especially among those using carbamazepine and valproic acid. These findings highlight the need for regular heart rhythm monitoring and management in people with epilepsy in order to reduce the risk of further cardiovascular complications.
Topics: Humans; Atrial Fibrillation; Carbamazepine; Epilepsy; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Valproic Acid
PubMed: 37602368
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad523 -
Current Neuropharmacology 2019After more than a century from its discovery, valproic acid (VPA) still represents one of the most efficient antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Pre and post-synaptic effects of... (Review)
Review
After more than a century from its discovery, valproic acid (VPA) still represents one of the most efficient antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Pre and post-synaptic effects of VPA depend on a very broad spectrum of actions, including the regulation of ionic currents and the facilitation of GABAergic over glutamatergic transmission. As a result, VPA indirectly modulates neurotransmitter release and strengthens the threshold for seizure activity. However, even though participating to the anticonvulsant action, such mechanisms seem to have minor impact on epileptogenesis. Nonetheless, VPA has been reported to exert anti-epileptogenic effects. Epigenetic mechanisms, including histone deacetylases (HDACs), BDNF and GDNF modulation are pivotal to orientate neurons toward a neuroprotective status and promote dendritic spines organization. From such broad spectrum of actions comes constantly enlarging indications for VPA. It represents a drug of choice in child and adult with epilepsy, with either general or focal seizures, and is a consistent and safe IV option in generalized convulsive status epilepticus. Moreover, since VPA modulates DNA transcription through HDACs, recent evidences point to its use as an anti-nociceptive in migraine prophylaxis, and, even more interestingly, as a positive modulator of chemotherapy in cancer treatment. Furthermore, VPA-induced neuroprotection is under investigation for benefit in stroke and traumatic brain injury. Hence, VPA has still got its place in epilepsy, and yet deserves attention for its use far beyond neurological diseases. In this review, we aim to highlight, with a translational intent, the molecular basis and the clinical indications of VPA.
Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Epilepsy; Histone Deacetylases; Humans; Neurons; Seizures; Status Epilepticus; Valproic Acid
PubMed: 30592252
DOI: 10.2174/1570159X17666181227165722 -
Journal of the Neurological Sciences Mar 2023Epilepsy is the most common symptom in patients with brain tumors. The shared genetic, molecular, and cellular mechanisms between tumorigenesis and epileptogenesis... (Review)
Review
Epilepsy is the most common symptom in patients with brain tumors. The shared genetic, molecular, and cellular mechanisms between tumorigenesis and epileptogenesis represent 'two sides of the same coin'. These include augmented neuronal excitatory transmission, impaired inhibitory transmission, genetic mutations in the BRAF, IDH, and PIK3CA genes, inflammation, hemodynamic impairments, and astrocyte dysfunction, which are still largely unknown. Low-grade developmental brain tumors are those most commonly associated with epilepsy. Given this strict relationship, drugs able to target both seizures and tumors would be of extreme clinical usefulness. In this regard, anti-seizure medications (ASMs) are optimal candidates as they have well-characterized effects and safety profiles, do not increase the risk of developing cancer, and already offer well-defined seizure control. The most important ASMs showing preclinical and clinical efficacy are brivaracetam, lacosamide, perampanel, and especially valproic acid and levetiracetam. However, the data quality is low or limited to preclinical studies, and results are sometimes conflicting. Future trials with a prospective, randomized, and controlled design accounting for different prognostic factors will help clarify the role of these ASMs and the clinical setting in which they might be used. In conclusion, brain tumor-related epilepsies are clear examples of how close, multidisciplinary collaborations among investigators with different expertise are warranted for pursuing scientific knowledge and, more importantly, for the well-being of patients needing targeted and effective therapies.
Topics: Humans; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Levetiracetam; Valproic Acid; Brain Neoplasms
PubMed: 36842341
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2023.120584 -
International Journal of Molecular... Jan 2022An estimated 60 million people worldwide suffer from epilepsy, half of whom are women. About one-third of women with epilepsy are of childbearing age. The childbirth... (Review)
Review
An estimated 60 million people worldwide suffer from epilepsy, half of whom are women. About one-third of women with epilepsy are of childbearing age. The childbirth rate in women with epilepsy is about 20-40% lower compared to that of the general population, which may be partly due to a lower number of these women being in relationships. Lower fertility in women with epilepsy may be linked to the disease itself, but it is mainly a result of the treatment provided. Valproate, as an antiepileptic drug inhibiting histone deacetylases, may affect the expression of genes associated with cell cycle control and cellular differentiation. Evidently, this drug is associated with the risk of malformations although other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may also trigger birth defects, however, to a lower degree. Valproate (and to a certain degree other AEDs) may induce autism spectrum disorders and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. The main mechanism responsible for all negative effects of prenatal exposure to valproate seems inhibition of histone deacetylases. Animal studies show a reduction in the expression of genes involved in social behavior and an increase in hippocampal cytokines. Valproate-induced oxidative stress may also contribute to neural tube defects. Interestingly, paternal exposure to this AED in mice may trigger neurodevelopmental disorders as well although a population-based cohort study does not confirm this effect. To lower the risk of congenital malformations and neurodevelopmental disorders, a single AED at the optimal dose and supplementation with folic acid is recommended. VPA should be avoided in women of childbearing age and especially during pregnancy.
Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Anticonvulsants; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Autism Spectrum Disorder; Epilepsy; Female; Folic Acid; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Humans; Neural Tube Defects; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects; Valproic Acid
PubMed: 35163292
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031369 -
Critical Care (London, England) Jan 2023Generalised convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE) is a medical emergency. Guidelines recommend a stepwise strategy of benzodiazepines followed by a second-line... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Generalised convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE) is a medical emergency. Guidelines recommend a stepwise strategy of benzodiazepines followed by a second-line anti-seizure medicine (ASM). However, GCSE is uncontrolled in 20-40% patients and is associated with protracted hospitalisation, disability, and mortality. The objective was to determine whether valproic acid (VPA) as complementary treatment to the stepwise strategy improves the outcomes of patients with de novo established GCSE.
METHODS
This was a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial in 244 adults admitted to intensive care units for GCSE in 16 French hospitals between 2013 and 2018. Patients received standard care of benzodiazepine and a second-line ASM (except VPA). Intervention patients received a 30 mg/kg VPA loading dose, then a 1 mg/kg/h 12 h infusion, whilst the placebo group received an identical intravenous administration of 0.9% saline as a bolus and continuous infusion. Primary outcome was proportion of patients discharged from hospital by day 15. The secondary outcomes were seizure control, adverse events, and cognition at day 90.
RESULTS
A total of 126 (52%) and 118 (48%) patients were included in the VPA and placebo groups. 224 (93%) and 227 (93%) received a first-line and a second-line ASM before VPA or placebo infusion. There was no between-group difference for patients hospital-discharged at day 15 [VPA, 77 (61%) versus placebo, 72 (61%), adjusted relative risk 1.04; 95% confidence interval (0.89-1.19); p = 0.58]. There were no between-group differences for secondary outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
VPA added to the recommended strategy for adult GCSE is well tolerated but did not increase the proportion of patients hospital-discharged by day 15.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NO
NCT01791868 (ClinicalTrials.gov registry), registered: 15 February 2012.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Valproic Acid; Benzodiazepines; Hospitalization; Patient Discharge; Administration, Intravenous
PubMed: 36624526
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-04292-7 -
BioMed Research International 2017
Topics: Animals; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Cyclosporine; Disease Models, Animal; Humans; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Valproic Acid; Zebrafish
PubMed: 28164116
DOI: 10.1155/2017/2461694 -
Current Neuropharmacology 2023
Topics: Humans; Valproic Acid; Bipolar Disorder; Lithium; Antimanic Agents; Lithium Compounds
PubMed: 37203193
DOI: 10.2174/1570159X2104230307123319 -
Clinical Medicine (London, England) Apr 2018Antiepileptic medications, and valproate principally, are commonly prescribed teratogens. There is significant concern that we are not doing enough to educate clinicians... (Review)
Review
Antiepileptic medications, and valproate principally, are commonly prescribed teratogens. There is significant concern that we are not doing enough to educate clinicians and potential parents about the risks of valproate in pregnancy. There is clear advice from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency and the International League Against Epilepsy about the risks of valproate exposure Reviews and guidelines that are focused on fetal risk, however, fall short in being able to fully replicate the complexity of a real clinical decision. Valproate is certainly life-changing if your child is one of the 10% with a major malformation or 30-40% with a neurodevelopmental disorder, but valproate is also potentially life-saving in the context of ensuring the best possible seizure control for some mothers with epilepsy. There are significant knowledge gaps regarding the risks to mothers who elect to take another drug, or to mother and baby if she comes off medication entirely. We also should be doing more to reduce rates of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), which is recognised as a key target when evaluating all maternal deaths.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; England; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Maternal Exposure; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Pregnancy Outcome; Prescriptions; Teratogens; Treatment Outcome; Valproic Acid
PubMed: 29700085
DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.18-2-s1 -
Pharmacogenomics Nov 2016The histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid (VPA) has been used for many decades in neurology and psychiatry. The more recent introduction of the histone deacetylase... (Review)
Review
The histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid (VPA) has been used for many decades in neurology and psychiatry. The more recent introduction of the histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDIs) belinostat, romidepsin and vorinostat for treatment of hematological malignancies indicates the increasing popularity of these agents. Belinostat, romidepsin and vorinostat are metabolized or transported by polymorphic enzymes or drug transporters. Thus, genotype-directed dosing could improve pharmacotherapy by reducing the risk of toxicities or preventing suboptimal treatment. This review provides an overview of clinical studies on the effects of polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics, efficacy or toxicities of HDIs including belinostat, romidepsin, vorinostat, panobinostat, VPA and a number of novel compounds currently being tested in Phase I and II trials. Although pharmacogenomic studies for HDIs are scarce, available data indicate that therapy with belinostat (UGT1A1), romidepsin (ABCB1), vorinostat (UGT2B17) or VPA (UGT1A6) could be optimized by upfront genotyping.
Topics: Depsipeptides; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Indoles; Panobinostat; Pharmacogenetics; Sulfonamides; Valproic Acid; Vorinostat
PubMed: 27767376
DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2016-0113 -
Journal For Immunotherapy of Cancer Jul 2023The treatment of B cell malignancies has dramatically changed with the introduction of immunotherapy, especially chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy....
The treatment of B cell malignancies has dramatically changed with the introduction of immunotherapy, especially chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy. However, only limited efficacy is observed in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). In the study, We detected CD123 and CLL-1 expression on leukaemia cells from Relapsed/Refractory AML (R/R AML) patients. Then, we constructed anti-CD123 CAR and CLL-1 CAR with different co-stimulation domains (CD28 or 4-1BB) and detected their anti-AML effects. To increase the efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy, we tested different strategies, including application of combined checkpoint inhibitors and histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) and We found CD123 and CLL-1 were highly expressed on AML cells. The proportions of T cell subsets and NK cells involved in anti-tumour or anti-inflammation processes in AML patients significantly decreased when compared with healthy donors. Both CD123 CAR and CLL-1 CAR displayed specific anti-AML effects To improve the lysis effects of CAR-T cells, we combined CAR-T cell therapy with different agents. PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies only slightly improved the potency of CAR-T cell therapy (CD123 CAR-T 60.92% ± 2.9087% vs. 65.43% ± 2.1893%, 60.92% ± 2.9087% vs. 67.43% ± 3.4973%; 37.37% ± 3.908% vs. 41.89% ± 5.1568%, 37.37% ± 3.908% vs. 42.84% ± 4.2635%). However, one HDACi (valproic acid [VPA]) significantly improved CAR-T cell potency against AML cells (CLL-1 CAR-T 34.97% ± 0.3051% vs. 88.167% ± 1.5327%, p < 0.0001; CD123 CAR-T 26.87% ± 2.7010% vs. 82.56% ± 3.086%, p < 0.0001 in MV411; CLL-1 CAR-T 78.77% ± 1.2061% vs. 93.743% ± 1.2333%, p < 0.0001; CD123 CAR-T 64.10% ± 1.5130% vs. 94.427% ± 0.142%, p = 0.0001 in THP-1). Combination therapy prolonged the overall survival of mice when compared with single CD123 CAR-T cell therapy (median survival: 180 days vs. unfollowed). A possible mechanism is that activated CD8+T cells upregulate natural-killer group 2 member D (NKG2D), and VPA upregulates NKG2D ligand expression in AML cells, contributing to NKG2D-mediated cytotoxicity of CAR-T cells against tumour cells. In conclusion, CD123 and CLL-1 are promising targets for AML CAR-T cell therapy. A combination of VPA pre-treatment and CAR-T against AML exhibits synergic effects.
Topics: Animals; Mice; Valproic Acid; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; NK Cell Lectin-Like Receptor Subfamily K; Cell Line, Tumor; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; T-Lymphocytes
PubMed: 37524506
DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-006857