-
ERJ Open Research Oct 2015Salvage chemotherapy (CT) for relapsing or refractory small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains disappointing. experiments showed that valproic acid increases apoptosis of...
Salvage chemotherapy (CT) for relapsing or refractory small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains disappointing. experiments showed that valproic acid increases apoptosis of SCLC cell lines exposed to doxorubicin, vindesine and bis(2-chloroethyl)amine. The primary objective of this phase II study was to determine whether epigenetic modulation with valproic acid in addition to a doxorubicin, vindesine and cyclophosphamide (VAC) regimen improves 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Patients with pathologically proven SCLC refractory to prior platinum derivatives and etoposide were eligible. After central registration, patients received VAC plus daily oral valproic acid. 64 patients were registered, of whom six were ineligible. Seven patients did not receive any CT, leaving 51 patients assessable for the primary end-point. The objective response rate was 19.6%. Median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI 2.5-3.6 months) and 6-month PFS was 6%. Median survival time was 5.9 months (95% CI 4.7-7.5 months). Toxicity was mainly haematological, with 88% and 26% grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombopenia, respectively. Despite an interesting response rate, the addition of valproic acid to VAC did not translate into adequate PFS in relapsing SCLC or SCLC refractory to platinum-etoposide.
PubMed: 27730152
DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00029-2015 -
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases Apr 2024Multisystem childhood Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) patients, especially those with risk organ (RO) involved, had not been satisfactorily treated under the...
BACKGROUND
Multisystem childhood Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) patients, especially those with risk organ (RO) involved, had not been satisfactorily treated under the international traditional schemes as high incidences of reactivation with late sequelae were largely reported. Over years, we have observed that LCH patients with varied clinical symptoms responded differently to different drugs, suggesting the current grouping strategies based only on the number of organs involved might be inadequate. LCH has been defined as an inflammatory myeloid tumor, thus this study has innovatively divided LCH pediatric patients into inflammatory or malignant symptoms group, and given different intensity treatment regimens to different groups.
AIM
This clinical study aimed to explore a more appropriate patient grouping system according to the LCH symptom presentations and examine the clinical outcomes of treatment strategies in different groups.
METHODS
According to the clinical manifestations, 37 cases of children were divided into Group A (only inflammatory symptoms) and Group B (malignant symptoms with or without inflammatory symptoms). Patients in Group A and B were initially treated with vindesine (VDS) and methylprednisolone (PSL), and VDS, PSL, pirarubicin (THP) and cyclophosphamide (CTX), respectively. Treatment responses were evaluated six weeks after the induction therapy in all patients, and the criteria were disease status and clinical scores of symptoms.
RESULTS
Pre- and post-treatment scores were 1.22 ± 0.547 and 0.00 ± 0.00 in Group A, and 14.79 ± 1.686 and 1.00 ± 1.563 in Group B, respectively. All patients had subsequentlly received maintenance therapy without progressive disease. The 4-year overall survival (OS) rate was 100% in both groups and the 4-year event-free survival (EFS) was 94.4% in Group A and 89.5% in Group B, respectively. There were no obvious adverse events (AE) in Group A, whereas the main AE in Group B were alopecia and non-lethal hematological toxicity.
CONCLUSION
Stratification according to patients' clinical symptoms, with low-intensity treatment for inflammatory symptoms (mild manifestations) and intensive treatment with multiple drugs for malignant symptoms (severe manifestations), is a positive exploration that simplifies stratification method, achieves good long-term remission of the disease, and obtains a higher survival rate and quality of life, which seemed to be more appropriate for LCH patients.
Topics: Humans; Histiocytosis, Langerhans-Cell; Female; Male; Pilot Projects; Child, Preschool; Child; Infant; Inflammation; Adolescent
PubMed: 38654381
DOI: 10.1186/s13023-024-03151-8 -
Clinical & Translational Oncology :... Aug 2023This is a retrospective, single-center PSM study evaluating the efficacy and safety of chidamide combined with the CHOEP (C-CHOEP) regimen versus the single CHOEP...
Long-time follow-up of patients with untreated peripheral T cell lymphoma following chidamide combined with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, vindesine, prednisone, and etoposide therapy: a single-center propensity score-matching study.
PURPOSE
This is a retrospective, single-center PSM study evaluating the efficacy and safety of chidamide combined with the CHOEP (C-CHOEP) regimen versus the single CHOEP regimen in patients with untreated peripheral T cell lymphomas (PTCL).
PATIENTS
Patients newly diagnosed with PTCL between January 2015 and June 2021 were recruited, and were 1:1 divided into C-CHOEP and CHOEP groups according to their first-line chemotherapy regimens. The PSM method was used to match the baseline variables to balance the confounding factors.
RESULTS
A cohort of 33 patients each in the C-CHOEP and CHOEP groups was generated after propensity score-matching (PSM). The complete remission (CR) rates of the C-CHOEP regimen were higher than that of the CHOEP regimen (56.3 vs. 25.8%, p = 0.014), whereas the duration of response of the C-CHOEP group was shorter (median DOR 30 vs. 57 months), resulting in roughly similar progression-free survival (PFS) and (overall survival) OS between the two groups. The responding patients who received chidamide maintenance therapy showed a trend of superior PFS and OS compared with patients who did not receive maintenance therapy.
CONCLUSIONS
The C-CHOEP regimen was well tolerated but failed to show advantages over the CHOEP regimen in patients with untreated PTCL; however, the chidamide maintenance may contribute to a more durable response and stable long-term survival.
Topics: Humans; Lymphoma, T-Cell, Peripheral; Prednisone; Etoposide; Epirubicin; Vindesine; Follow-Up Studies; Retrospective Studies; Propensity Score; Vincristine; Doxorubicin; Cyclophosphamide; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 37020164
DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03135-3 -
Oncology Letters May 2015A 39-year-old female presented to The First Affiliated Hospital of Jishou University (Jishou, Hunan) with a fever of unknown origin and progressive abdominal distension....
A 39-year-old female presented to The First Affiliated Hospital of Jishou University (Jishou, Hunan) with a fever of unknown origin and progressive abdominal distension. Physical examination revealed generalized lymphadenopathy, multiple non-tender cutaneous nodules, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly and abdominal edema. An axillary lymph node biopsy indicated hyaline vascular type Castleman disease, and color Doppler and computed tomography scans suggested Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS). Based on the abdominal distension and impairments of the liver and kidneys, an inferior vena cavography and balloon dilatation were performed, confirming the diagnosis of BCS and leading to symptomatic improvement. The patient commenced a combination chemotherapy regimen of cyclophosphamide (0.4 g; days 1-3), vindesine (4 mg; day 1) and prednisolone (100 mg; days 1-5), with no melioration of symptoms. Theprubicin was added to suppress the aggravation of the disease on day six of the chemotherapy cycle. The patient exhibited symptomatic remission for one week, however, she subsequently succumbed to intracranial hemorrhage and infections of the lung and intestine due to long-term myelosuppression following chemotherapy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of BCS in a patient with multicentric Castleman disease without human immunodeficiency virus infection.
PubMed: 26137030
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.3010 -
British Journal of Haematology Aug 2019JCOG9801, a randomized phase III trial, reported that vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone (VCAP); doxorubicin, ranimustine and prednisone (AMP);... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Possibility of a risk-adapted treatment strategy for untreated aggressive adult T-cell leukaemia-lymphoma (ATL) based on the ATL prognostic index: a supplementary analysis of the JCOG9801.
JCOG9801, a randomized phase III trial, reported that vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone (VCAP); doxorubicin, ranimustine and prednisone (AMP); and vindesine, etoposide, carboplatin and prednisone (VECP) (VCAP-AMP-VECP; mLSG15) showed superior clinical outcomes when compared to cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone every 2 weeks (CHOP-14; mLSG19) in patients with untreated aggressive adult T-cell leukaemia-lymphoma (ATL). To identify patients who require VCAP-AMP-VECP, we conducted a supplementary analysis of JCOG9801. Overall, 105 patients were included and categorized into low- (n = 44), intermediate- (n = 54) and high-risk (n = 7) groups according to the age-adjusted ATL prognostic index (ATL-PI). We excluded the high-risk group due to small numbers of patients. VCAP-AMP-VECP did not show any superior trend for overall survival (OS) in the low-risk group (hazard ratio: 1·04; 95% confidence interval: 0·54-2·04). Better OS was observed in the intermediate-risk group treated with VCAP-AMP-VECP (hazard ratio: 0·65; 95% confidence interval: 0·36-1·19). In the intermediate-risk group, the VCAP-AMP-VECP arm showed higher complete response rates than the CHOP-14 arm (44·0% vs. 13·8%). The VCAP-AMP-VECP arm in both risk groups exhibited grade 4 thrombocytopenia, while grade 4 neutropenia was only observed in the intermediate-risk group. VCAP-AMP-VECP remains suitable for the intermediate-risk group, whereas its benefits appear modest in the low-risk group.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Female; Humans; Leukemia-Lymphoma, Adult T-Cell; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Young Adult
PubMed: 31099033
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.15950 -
Medicine Dec 2017Although still relatively rare, multiple primary malignant neoplasms (MPMNs) have been increasingly reported in recent years. (Review)
Review
RATIONALE
Although still relatively rare, multiple primary malignant neoplasms (MPMNs) have been increasingly reported in recent years.
PATIENT CONCERNS AND DIAGNOSES
A 65-year-old man was referred to our hospital for a painless, incidental left axillary lump. Ultrasound showed enlarged left axillary lymph nodes. An excisional biopsy was conducted on 3 lymph nodes. The pathological diagnosis was determined to be metastatic adenocarcinoma and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) in the lymph nodes. Further physical examination of the patient yielded a 1.5-cm hard, left subareolar mass.
INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES
The patient underwent modified radical mastectomy. The diagnosis was grade II invasive ductal carcinoma (stage IIA). The axillary lymph node showed MCL (stage I, group A), but not metastatic ductal carcinoma. The patient received chemotherapy, including 6 courses of CHOP (A chemotherapy protocol consists of cyclophosphamide 1.2 g day 1, doxorubicin 80 mg day 1, vindesine 4 mg day1, and prednisone 90 mg from day 1 to 5) for lymphoma and breast cancer. The patient was also administered endocrine therapy. After a 54-month follow-up, the patient was well with no evidence of disease.
LESSONS
MPMNs are easily misdiagnosed as a primary and metastatic tumor, leading to delayed or erroneous treatment. Male breast cancer in a patient with MCL is rare. Early diagnosis and proper therapy are necessary for an optimal prognosis. Further studies are required to define the mechanisms and risk factors of MPMNs.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Biopsy; Breast Neoplasms, Male; Combined Modality Therapy; Humans; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Male; Mastectomy; Neoplasm Grading; Neoplasms, Multiple Primary
PubMed: 29310379
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008911 -
Medicine Dec 2020The rarity of adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) in China, coupled with its clinicopathologic mimicry of primary skin disease, poses a diagnostic challenge. The...
RATIONALE
The rarity of adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) in China, coupled with its clinicopathologic mimicry of primary skin disease, poses a diagnostic challenge. The method of diagnosis and mechanism of immune regulation in ATLL are discussed in the present report.
PATIENT CONCERNS
A 51-year-old Chinese man was admitted to the hospital with 2-years history of systemic plaque lesions and 1-year history of left ankle joint pain.
DIAGNOSES
The patient was diagnosed with ATLL based on the results of flow cytometry immunophenotype and human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) serology.
INTERVENTIONS
The patient received 3 cycles of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin/ vinorelbine, and dexamethasone (CHOP) chemotherapy. However, he relapsed and did not respond to epirubicin, vindesine, etoposide, dexamethasone (EPOCH) chemotherapy.
OUTCOMES
His family discontinued the treatment and opted for hospice care.
LESSONS
Patch and plaque ATLL types exhibits a better survival rate, but atypical skin patches delays the diagnosis of ATLL and negatively affects the patient survival. Based on the present findings, we suggest that patients with petal-like nuclear lymphocytes in blood smears, a high CD4: CD8 ratio, and strong CD25 expression should undergo HTLV-1 serology testing.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cyclophosphamide; Diagnosis, Differential; Doxorubicin; Etoposide; Flow Cytometry; Human T-lymphotropic virus 1; Humans; Leukemia-Lymphoma, Adult T-Cell; Male; Middle Aged; Prednisolone; Prednisone; Skin Diseases; Vincristine
PubMed: 33327284
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023491 -
Indian Journal of Hematology & Blood... Dec 2014Arsenic trioxide (ATO) combined with dexamethasone, melphalan or other cytostatic agents had been used to treat refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) patients. We...
Arsenic trioxide (ATO) combined with dexamethasone, melphalan or other cytostatic agents had been used to treat refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) patients. We assessed the safety and efficacy of ATO combined with vindesine/cyclophosphamide/melphalan/prednisone (VCMP) or vindesine/doxorubicin/dexamethsone (VAD) chemotherapy for MM patients who failed more than two different prior regimens. All patients received ATO (0.25 mg/kg day) for 10 days/cycle combined with VCMP or VAD in 30-day cycles. Vindesine (1.4 mg/m(2)) was given intravenously on day 1, cyclophosphamide (400 mg/m(2) day) was given intravenously on days 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, melphalan (6 mg/day) and prednisone (1 mg/kg day) were given orally day 1 to day 10 for VCMP regimen. VAD regimen consisted of vindesine 1 mg/day and doxorubicin 10 mg/day intravenously drip for 4 days with oral dexamethasone 40 mg/day for days 1-4, 9-12, 17-20. Patients who completed at least one cycle were evaluated for response to treatment. Objective responses occurred in 35 of 63 (56 %) patients, including seven complete, 14 partial and 14 minor responses. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6 and 23 months respectively. 12 patients had elevated serum creatinine levels (SCr) at baseline, and 9 of 12 (75 %) showed decreased SCr levels during treatment. Frequent Grade 3/4 non-hematological adverse events included arrhythmia, hypertension, fatigue and neuropathy. These results indicate that ATO combined with VCMP or VAD was effective and well tolerated as a new therapeutic option for patients with relapsed or refractory MM.
PubMed: 25435724
DOI: 10.1007/s12288-013-0320-x -
Scientific Reports Dec 2017We performed a retrospective study of 49 patients with newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), to compare the efficacy and safety of different...
We performed a retrospective study of 49 patients with newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), to compare the efficacy and safety of different high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) based systemic chemotherapy regimens as induction therapy. 25 patients received AB ± R alternative regimen (consist methotrexate, ifosfamide, vindesine, dexamethasone, carmustine and teniposide), while others received HD-MTX ± R regimen. The complete response rate and overall response rate of AB ± R group and HD-MTX ± R group were 36.83% vs. 33.33%, and 68.42% vs. 71.43%, while the 2-year OS and PFS rate were 71.43% vs. 74.62%, and 42.86% vs. 54.64%, respectively. In Age > 60 subgroup, the 2-year OS and PFS rate of AB ± R group and HD-MTX ± R group were 81.82% vs. 33.33%, and 54.55% vs. 33.33%. No significant differences were found in grade 3 or 4 toxicity rate. Generally, HD-MTX ± R regimen was not inferior to AB ± R alternative regimen, but AB ± R alternative regimen seemed achieving more survival benefits in the elderly. We suggest to adjust HD-MTX ± R regimen by changing the dose-reduction strategy especially in elderly patients and adding other powerful drugs that can well penetrate blood-brain barrier to improve the efficacy.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; China; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Nervous System Diseases; Progression-Free Survival; Retrospective Studies; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 29213063
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-17359-1 -
BMC Cancer Jun 2022Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has become the cornerstone of treatment for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). The aim of this... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has become the cornerstone of treatment for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacies and toxicities of different CCRT regimens in the treatment of LA-NSCLC by adopting a network meta-analysis (NMA).
METHODS
An exhaustive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) was conducted to identify relevant studies from inception to October 1, 2020. Direct and indirect evidence was combined to calculate the odds radios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), as well as to plot the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curves. Cluster analyses were adopted to compare the efficacies and toxicities of different CCRT regimens according to the similarity of 2 variables. Publication bias was detected by comparison-adjusted funnel plots.
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies were enrolled in this NMA, including 18 regimens: CCRT (cisplatin + etoposide), CCRT (carboplatin + paclitaxel), CCRT (pemetrexed + carboplatin), CCRT (pemetrexed + cisplatin), CCRT (docetaxel + cisplatin), CCRT (S-1 + cisplatin), CCRT (mitomycin + vindesine + cisplatin), CCRT (cisplatin + vinorelbine), CCRT (cisplatin), CCRT (etoposide + cisplatin + amifostine), RT, CCRT (5-FU), CCRT (paclitaxel + cisplatin), CCRT (irinotecan + carboplatin), CCRT (nedaplatin), CCRT (carboplatin + etoposide), CCRT (paclitaxel), and CCRT (carboplatin). The results indicated that the regimens with CCRT (cisplatin + etoposide), CCRT (carboplatin + paclitaxel), CCRT (pemetrexed + cisplatin), CCRT (S-1 + cisplatin), and CCRT (cisplatin + vinorelbine) had relatively better efficacies compared with other regimens. As for toxicities of different CCRT regimens, the CCRT (carboplatin + paclitaxel), CCRT (pemetrexed + cisplatin), and CCRT (docetaxel + cisplatin) were relatively lower.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study demonstrated that CCRT (pemetrexed + cisplatin) and CCRT (carboplatin + paclitaxel) might be the best options for the treatment of LA-NSCLC, and CCRT (pemetrexed + cisplatin) had the highest 3-year overall survival (OS) rate.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carboplatin; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Chemoradiotherapy; Cisplatin; Docetaxel; Etoposide; Humans; Irinotecan; Lung Neoplasms; Network Meta-Analysis; Paclitaxel; Pemetrexed; Vinorelbine
PubMed: 35725420
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09717-8