-
European Journal of Oncology Nursing :... Jun 2024A systematic review investigated the effectiveness of physical activity in alleviating lower limb lymphedema among patients with gynecological cancer after surgery. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
A systematic review investigated the effectiveness of physical activity in alleviating lower limb lymphedema among patients with gynecological cancer after surgery.
METHODS
A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental designs was conducted. Six databases, Cinahl, Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science, were searched for relevant publications from inception to October 2022 and updated in January 2024. RevMan software was used to perform meta-analysis using a random-effects model.
RESULTS
Seven studies (5 randomized controlled trials) containing 261 subjects were synthesized. The risk of bias was low in the included studies. The exercise interventions for lower limb lymphedema included active, aerobic, aquatic, and weight-lifting exercises. Meta-analyses showed that active exercise had no effect on lymphedema symptoms of limb volume, pain, and heaviness. However, the effectiveness of exercise on limb volume had subthreshold borderline significance in 2 studies (standardized mean difference = 0.43, 95% confidence interval - 0.01, 0.88; I = 0%, p = 0.06). Three studies found that lymphedema symptoms were significantly improved after exercise interventions. The adherence rate of the exercise was 77-100%, with the only complication being cellulitis.
CONCLUSIONS
Although the meta-analysis does not reveal a significant effect, the systematic review study demonstrated that exercise is feasible, safe, and has a clinical effect on alleviating lymphedema-related symptoms of women following gynecological cancer surgery.
Topics: Humans; Female; Lymphedema; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Exercise Therapy; Lower Extremity; Exercise
PubMed: 38554614
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102550 -
Breast Cancer (Tokyo, Japan) Jul 2024Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers an approach to predictive modeling. The model learns to determine specific patterns of undesirable outcomes in a dataset. Therefore,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers an approach to predictive modeling. The model learns to determine specific patterns of undesirable outcomes in a dataset. Therefore, a decision-making algorithm can be built based on these patterns to prevent negative results. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the usefulness of AI in breast reconstruction.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted in August 2022 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar online databases were queried to capture all publications studying the use of artificial intelligence in breast reconstruction.
RESULTS
A total of 23 studies were full text-screened after removing duplicates, and twelve articles fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The Machine Learning algorithms applied for neuropathic pain, lymphedema diagnosis, microvascular abdominal flap failure, donor site complications associated to muscle sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis flap, surgical complications, financial toxicity, and patient-reported outcomes after breast surgery demonstrated that AI is a helpful tool to accurately predict patient results. In addition, one study used Computer Vision technology to assist in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Artery detection for flap design, considerably reducing the preoperative time compared to manual identification.
CONCLUSIONS
In breast reconstruction, AI can help the surgeon by optimizing the perioperative patients' counseling to predict negative outcomes, allowing execution of timely interventions and reducing the postoperative burden, which leads to obtaining the most successful results and improving patient satisfaction.
Topics: Humans; Mammaplasty; Female; Artificial Intelligence; Breast Neoplasms; Postoperative Complications; Machine Learning; Surgical Flaps; Patient Reported Outcome Measures
PubMed: 38619786
DOI: 10.1007/s12282-024-01582-6 -
PloS One 2024Although several acupuncture and moxibustion therapies have been tested in managing breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL), there is little consensus regarding the best... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
OBJECTIVE
Although several acupuncture and moxibustion therapies have been tested in managing breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL), there is little consensus regarding the best options for treating this condition. This systematic review and network meta-analysis compared the efficacy of various acupuncture and/or moxibustion therapies for BCRL.
METHODS
Seven databases and two clinical registration centers were searched from their inception to December 1st, 2023. The Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias assessment tool evaluated the quality of included RCTs. A pairwise meta-analysis was performed in STATA 16.0, while a network meta-analysis was performed in R 4.2.2.
RESULTS
18 studies were included in this analysis. Our results showed that acupuncture and moxibustion methods had great advantages in improving BCRL of patients with breast cancer. In particular, needle-warming moxibustion (NWM) could be the optimal acupuncture and moxibustion method for improving clinical effectiveness and reducing the degree of swelling of affected limbs.
CONCLUSION
Our findings suggest that NWM has great potential in treating BCRL. It may reduce arm circumference, lower swelling levels, and improve clinical effectiveness. Nevertheless, more multi-center, high-quality, and large sample RCTs will be needed in the future.
Topics: Humans; Moxibustion; Female; Acupuncture Therapy; Breast Cancer Lymphedema; Network Meta-Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Breast Neoplasms
PubMed: 38743748
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303513 -
Disability and Rehabilitation Jun 2024The aim of this review is to assess the efficacy and safety of using heat and cold therapy for adults with lymphoedema. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The aim of this review is to assess the efficacy and safety of using heat and cold therapy for adults with lymphoedema.
METHODS
A multi-database search was undertaken. Only studies which included adults with lymphoedema who were treated with heat or cold therapy reporting any outcome were included. Screening, data extraction, and assessment of bias were undertaken by a single reviewer and verified by a second. Due to the substantial heterogeneity, a descriptive synthesis was undertaken.
RESULTS
Eighteen studies were included. All nine studies which assessed the effects of heat-therapy on changes in limb circumference reported a point estimate indicating some reduction from baseline to end of study. Similarly, the five studies evaluating the use of heat-therapy on limb volume demonstrated a reduction in limb volume from baseline to end-of-study. Only four studies reported adverse events of which all were deemed to be minor. Only two studies explored the effects of cold therapy on lymphoedema.
CONCLUSIONS
Tentative evidence suggests heat-therapy may have some benefit in treating lymphoedema with minimal side effects. However, further high-quality randomised controlled trials are required, with a particular focus on moderating factors and assessment of adverse events.Implications for rehabilitationThis review highlights the potential benefit that heat therapy may have on reducing limb circumference and volume for adults with lymphoedema.There was no evidence that controlled localised heat therapy was unsafe.The current evidence-base is at a point where no specific clinical recommendations can be made.The use of heat therapy should only be applied as part of a methodologically robust study to treat lymphoedema.
Topics: Humans; Lymphedema; Adult; Cryotherapy; Treatment Outcome; Hot Temperature; Hyperthermia, Induced
PubMed: 37431170
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2231842 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Jan 2024Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) affects approximately 20% of women after breast cancer therapy. Advances in treatment have increased the life expectancy; thus,... (Review)
Review
Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) affects approximately 20% of women after breast cancer therapy. Advances in treatment have increased the life expectancy; thus, the prevalence of BCRL will continue to rise with the number of cancer survivors, hence the need to develop strategies to prevent this condition. We provide a systematic review of the literature on the primary prevention of BCRL by prophylactic lymphatic surgery (PLS). Between June and August 2022, we conducted a search of PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane. In the end, a total of eighteen papers were selected. The eleven studies without a control group reported only 15 of 342 patients who developed lymphedema at least six months after PLS (4.59%). The seven studies with a control group included 569 patients, 328 cases and 241 controls. Among the cases, 36 (10%) developed lymphedema. In contrast, the incidence of lymphedema in the controls was 40% (98 of 241 patients). The formulation of definite recommendations in favor of PLS is hindered by low-quality studies. There is no consensus on which technique should be preferred, nor on whether adjuvant radiotherapy might affect the efficacy of PLS. Randomized controlled trials are mandatory to conceive evidence-based recommendations.
PubMed: 38256688
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020555 -
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases Jan 2024Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a neglected tropical disease (NTD) targeted by the World Health Organization for elimination as a public health problem (EPHP). Since 2000,...
BACKGROUND
Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a neglected tropical disease (NTD) targeted by the World Health Organization for elimination as a public health problem (EPHP). Since 2000, more than 9 billion treatments of antifilarial medicines have been distributed through mass drug administration (MDA) programmes in 72 endemic countries and 17 countries have reached EPHP. Yet in 2021, nearly 900 million people still required MDA with combinations of albendazole, diethylcarbamazine and/or ivermectin. Despite the reliance on these drugs, there remain gaps in understanding of variation in responses to treatment. As demonstrated for other infectious diseases, some urgent questions could be addressed by conducting individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses. Here, we present the results of a systematic literature review to estimate the abundance of IPD on pre- and post-intervention indicators of infection and/or morbidity and assess the feasibility of building a global data repository.
METHODOLOGY
We searched literature published between 1st January 2000 and 5th May 2023 in 15 databases to identify prospective studies assessing LF treatment and/or morbidity management and disease prevention (MMDP) approaches. We considered only studies where individual participants were diagnosed with LF infection or disease and were followed up on at least one occasion after receiving an intervention/treatment.
PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
We identified 138 eligible studies from 23 countries, having followed up an estimated 29,842 participants after intervention. We estimate 14,800 (49.6%) IPD on pre- and post-intervention infection indicators including microfilaraemia, circulating filarial antigen and/or ultrasound indicators measured before and after intervention using 8 drugs administered in various combinations. We identified 33 studies on MMDP, estimating 6,102 (20.4%) IPD on pre- and post-intervention clinical morbidity indicators only. A further 8,940 IPD cover a mixture of infection and morbidity outcomes measured with other diagnostics, from participants followed for adverse event outcomes only or recruited after initial intervention.
CONCLUSIONS
The LF treatment study landscape is heterogeneous, but the abundance of studies and related IPD suggest that establishing a global data repository to facilitate IPD meta-analyses would be feasible and useful to address unresolved questions on variation in treatment outcomes across geographies, demographics and in underrepresented groups. New studies using more standardized approaches should be initiated to address the scarcity and inconsistency of data on morbidity management.
Topics: Humans; Elephantiasis, Filarial; Prospective Studies; Filaricides; Diethylcarbamazine; Albendazole; Ivermectin
PubMed: 38227595
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011882 -
Journal of Cancer Survivorship :... May 2024Nutrition plays an important role in cancer survivorship. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to critically assess and quantify the effectiveness of nutrition... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Nutrition plays an important role in cancer survivorship. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to critically assess and quantify the effectiveness of nutrition care interventions provided by dietitians to survivors who have completed treatment for cancer.
METHODS
A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from January 2004 to November 2023 reporting the effectiveness of primary care dietetic interventions with adult cancer survivors was conducted. PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Embase, ProQuest and PsycINFO databases were searched for key terms. Meta-analyses were conducted where there were sufficient studies of the same cancer type and outcomes.
RESULTS
Twelve RCTs representing 1138 cancer survivors (519 breast cancer; 75 prostate cancer; 544 colorectal cancer) were included. Primary outcome measures included weight loss (n = 6), quality of life (n = 2), reducing lymphedema-related arm volume (n = 2), nutritional status (n = 1) and increasing fruit and vegetable intake (n = 1). Weight loss was observed in studies where this was the primary outcome. Results for quality of life varied. Meta-analyses of RCTs with breast cancer survivors showed that dietitian intervention achieved a mean of 3.7 kg greater intentional weight loss and 2.3% greater body fat decrease than control (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
This study provides evidence for the effectiveness of primary care dietetic interventions by dietitians with cancer survivors, particularly with respect to intentional weight and fat loss in breast cancer survivors.
IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS
Dietitians can play a key role in managing weight and improving long term health outcomes and prognosis for cancer survivors beyond the acute care setting.
PubMed: 38710853
DOI: 10.1007/s11764-024-01583-6 -
Techniques and Outcomes in Microsurgical Treatment of Posttraumatic Lymphedema: A Systematic Review.Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery Mar 2024The microsurgical treatment of lymphedema has been well-studied and has been shown to be effective, especially in cancer-related lymphedema. Posttraumatic lymphedema...
BACKGROUND
The microsurgical treatment of lymphedema has been well-studied and has been shown to be effective, especially in cancer-related lymphedema. Posttraumatic lymphedema (PTL) is a debilitating condition that remains understudied and underreported, and surgical techniques for PTL treatment are not well-represented in the literature. The purpose of this study was to systematically review all published reports of physiologic surgical interventions for PTL.
METHODS
A search was conducted on PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science, from January 1, 2000 to December 6, 2022, using keywords "PTL," "lymphedema," and "surgery" to identify reports of PTL treated with microsurgical lymphatic reconstruction techniques. PTL cases treated with ablation, debulking, or decongestive therapy were excluded.
RESULTS
A total of 18 records that met the inclusion criteria were identified, representing 112 patients who underwent microsurgical operations for PTL. This included 60 cases of lymph flow restoration (LFR) via lymph axiality and interpositional flap transfer, 29 vascularized lymph node transfers, 11 lymphatic vessel free flaps, 10 lymphovenous anastomoses (LVAs), and 2 autologous lymphovenous transfers. Outcomes were primarily reported as clinical improvement or LFR by lymphatic imaging. All studies showed qualitative improvement of symptoms and reports with quantitative data showed statistically significant improvements.
CONCLUSION
PTL is currently underrepresented in lymphedema treatment literature, however, our results show that microsurgical techniques are successful in treating lymphedema in PTL patients. Increasing awareness of PTL and establishing standardized diagnostic criteria and treatment options will help clinicians better understand how to diagnose and treat this condition. Prospective and comparative studies are needed to determine true prevalence of PTL and optimal treatment strategies.
PubMed: 38290562
DOI: 10.1055/a-2257-5345 -
Archives of Plastic Surgery Mar 2024This is a retrospective review of surgical management for primary lymphedema. Data were extracted from 55 articles from PubMed MEDLINE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and...
This is a retrospective review of surgical management for primary lymphedema. Data were extracted from 55 articles from PubMed MEDLINE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials between the database inception and December 2022 to evaluate the outcomes of lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT), and outcomes of soft tissue extirpative procedures such as suction-assisted lipectomy (SAL) and extensive soft tissue excision. Data from 485 patients were compiled; these were treated with LVA ( = 177), VLNT ( = 82), SAL ( = 102), and excisional procedures ( = 124). Improvement of the lower extremity lymphedema index, the quality of life (QoL), and lymphedema symptoms were reported in most studies. LVA and VLNT led to symptomatic relief and improved QoL, reaching up to 90 and 61% average circumference reduction, respectively. Cellulitis reduction was reported in 25 and 40% of LVA and VLNT papers, respectively. The extirpative procedures, used mainly in patients with advanced disease, also led to clinical improvement from the volume reduction, as well as reduced incidence of cellulitis, although with poor cosmetic results; 87.5% of these reports recommended postoperative compression garments. The overall complication rates were 1% for LVA, 13% for VLNT, 11% for SAL, and 46% for extirpative procedures. Altogether, only one paper lacked some kind of improvement. Primary lymphedema is amenable to surgical treatment; the currently performed procedures have effectively improved symptoms and QoL in this population. Complication rates are related to the invasiveness of the chosen procedure.
PubMed: 38596145
DOI: 10.1055/a-2253-9859 -
Lasers in Medical Science Dec 2023Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is common among patients who have completed their cancer treatment. Although low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has been explored as... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is common among patients who have completed their cancer treatment. Although low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has been explored as a treatment option for BCRL, we could not find a regimen that is more effective than others. This meta-analysis aimed to organize existing research and determine the optimal combination of LLLT parameters for BCRL treatment. Studies were collected from four online databases: Embase, Ovid Medline, Cochrane, and Cinahl. The collected studies were reviewed by two of the authors. We focused on the aspects of the treatment area, treatment regimen, and total treatment sessions across the included studies. The comparisons between LLLT and non-LLLT were performed through a meta-analysis. Post-treatment QOL was significantly better in the axillary group. The group treated "three times/week with a laser density of 1.5-2 J/cm" had significantly better outcomes in terms of swelling reduction, both immediately post-treatment and at 1-3 months follow-ups. The group with > 15 treatment sessions had significantly better post-treatment outcomes regarding reduced swelling and improved grip strength. According to these results, LLLT can relieve the symptoms of BCRL by reducing limb swelling and improving QOL. Further exploration found that a treatment approach targeting the axilla, combined with an increased treatment frequency, appropriate laser density, and extended treatment course, yielded better outcomes. However, further rigorous, large-scale studies, including long-term follow-up, are needed to substantiate this regimen.
Topics: Humans; Female; Lymphedema; Low-Level Light Therapy; Quality of Life; Breast Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38129368
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-023-03959-z