-
Expert Review of Hematology 2024This study evaluated the benefits and risks of patients with refractory or relapsed acute lymphocytic leukemia (R/R ALL) treated with anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
This study evaluated the benefits and risks of patients with refractory or relapsed acute lymphocytic leukemia (R/R ALL) treated with anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and blinatumomab.
METHODS
PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies.
RESULTS
The pooled complete remission (CR) rate and minimal residual disease (MRD) negative rate were 48%, 31% for blinatumomab, and 86% and 80% for CAR T-cell therapy.
CONCLUSIONS
The CAR T-cell therapy group exhibited a higher likelihood of CR rate than the blinatumomab group in every analysis regardless of adjustment subgroups. CAR T-cell therapy was associated with a significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) compared with blinatumomab (2-year OS 55% vs 25%; 2-year RFS 40% vs 22%). CAR T-cell therapy was more effective for achieving CR and bridging to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) than blinatumomab (2-year OS 75% vs. 57%). An emerging role for blinatumomab is as a bridging agent pre-SCT, and for patients who achieve an MRD-negative state pre-SCT, post-SCT outcomes are expected to be the same as CAR-T. For adverse effects (AEs), blinatumomab was associated with a lower rate of grade ≥3 hematological toxicity, CRS, and neurological events.
Topics: Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma; Antibodies, Bispecific; Recurrence; Antigens, CD19
PubMed: 38135295
DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2023.2298732 -
Journal of Geriatric Oncology Mar 2024Anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is transforming the care of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is transforming the care of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Unfortunately, despite being a disease of older adults these patients remain under-represented in most pivotal clinical trials. We performed a systematic review and proportion meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials and observational studies of anti-BCMA CAR-T therapy in patients with MM with the aim to determine the efficacy and safety of this therapy in older adults (≥65 years).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We searched the Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), Ovid, Embase, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases through September 9, 2022 and abstracts from the American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting 2022. Primary outcome measures included overall response rate (ORR), rates of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and immune cell-effector-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). study was registered with PROSPERO (study number: CRD42022334287).
RESULTS
After screening 2218 references, 14 studies were included for data extraction, with a total of 558 patients, 26.2% (n = 146) of whom were older adults. The pooled ORR amongst this population was 93%, which was comparable to the ORR of 86% amongst younger patients. In older adults, the rates of CRS (any grade) and grade ≥ 3 were 95% and 21%, respectively. For younger patients, the pooled rate of CRS (any grade) and grade ≥ 3 CRS was 91% and 20%, respectively. The rate of ICANS (any grade) in older adults was 15%, which was higher than that observed in those <65 years.
CONCLUSION
Older adults experience comparable outcomes to younger patients with anti-BCMA CAR-T therapy, albeit with numerically higher rates of neurotoxicity.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Multiple Myeloma; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Prospective Studies; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37723045
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101628 -
Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Jan 2024The safety and efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in solid organ transplant recipients is poorly understood, given the paucity of available data... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The safety and efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in solid organ transplant recipients is poorly understood, given the paucity of available data in this patient population. There is a theoretical risk of compromising transplanted organ function with CAR T cell therapy; conversely, organ transplantation-related immunosuppression can alter the function of CAR T cells. Given the prevalence of post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease, which often can be difficult to treat with conventional chemoimmunotherapy, understanding the risks and benefits of delivering lymphoma-directed CAR T cell therapy in solid organ transplant recipients is of utmost importance. We sought to determine the efficacy of CAR T cell therapy in solid organ transplant recipients as well as the associated adverse effects, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and compromised solid organ transplant function. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of adult recipients of solid organ transplant who received CAR T cell therapy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Primary outcomes included efficacy, defined as overall response (OR), complete response (CR), progression-free survival, and overall survival, as well as rates of CRS and ICANS. Secondary outcomes included rates of transplanted organ loss, compromised organ function, and alterations to immunosuppressant regimens. After a systematic literature review and 2-reviewer screening process, we identified 10 studies suitable for descriptive analysis and 4 studies suitable for meta-analysis. Among all patients, 69% (24 of 35) achieved a response to CAR T cell therapy, and 52% (18 of 35) achieved a CR. CRS of any grade occurred in 83% (29 of 35), and CRS grade ≥3 occurred in 9% (3 of 35). Sixty percent of the patients (21 of 35) developed ICANS, and 34% (12 of 35) developed ICANS grade ≥3. The incidence of any grade 5 toxicity among all patients was 11% (4 of 35). Fourteen percent of the patients (5 of 35) experienced loss of the transplanted organ. Immunosuppressant therapy was held in 22 patients but eventually restarted in 68% of them (15 of 22). Among the studies included in the meta-analysis, the pooled OR rate was 70% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29.2% to 100%; I = 71%) and the pooled CR rate was 46% (95% CI, 25.4% to 67.8%; I = 29%). The rates of any grade CRS and grade ≥3 CRS were 88% (95% CI, 69% to 99%; I = 0%) and 5% (95% CI, 0% to 21%; I = 0%), respectively. The rates of any grade ICANS and ICANS grade ≥3 were 54% (95% CI, 9% to 96%; I = 68%) and 40% (95% CI, 3% to 85%; I = 63%), respectively. The efficacy of CAR T cell therapy in solid organ transplant recipients is comparable to that in the general population as reported in prior investigational studies, with an acceptable toxicity profile in terms of CRS, ICANS, and transplanted organ compromise. Further studies are needed to determine long-term effects on organ function, sustained response rates, and best practices peri-CAR T infusion period in this patient population.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Lymphoma; Organ Transplantation; Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing; Antigens, CD19; Cytokine Release Syndrome; Immunosuppressive Agents; Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy
PubMed: 37279856
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.05.018 -
European Journal of Haematology Dec 2023The treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) changed remarkably since the European Medicines Agency-approved chimeric antigen...
Cost-effectiveness analysis of transplant-ineligible relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treatment options-Experience of the efficiency frontier approach.
OBJECTIVES
The treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) changed remarkably since the European Medicines Agency-approved chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies (axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel], lisocabtagene maraleucel [liso-cel], tisagenlecleucel [tisa-cel]) for the third-line onwards (3+L), and targeted therapies (polatuzumab vedotin-bendamustine-rituximab [pola-BR], tafasitamab-lenalidomide [Tafa-L]) for the second-line (2L) onwards. As associated rising treatment costs represent an economic burden, the cost-effectiveness of transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL interventions was assessed from a German healthcare payer's perspective, using the efficiency frontier (EF) approach.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was performed to determine the clinical benefit concerning median overall survival (OS) of bendamustine-rituximab (BR), rituximab-gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (R-GemOx), axi-cel, liso-cel, tisa-cel, pola-BR, and Tafa-L. First-year treatment costs (drug and medical services costs) were calculated. Results were merged on two-dimensional graphs illustrating 2L and 3+L EFs.
RESULTS
Second-line EF is formed by BR (median OS 11.49 months, €23 958) and Tafa-L (45.7, €104 541), 3+L EF is formed by R-GemOx (12.0, €29 080), Tafa-L (15.5, €104 541), and axi-cel (18.69, €308 516). These interventions build the respective cost-effectiveness thresholds for novel interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
Using the EF approach, the currently most cost-effective interventions (based on cost-effectiveness ratios) in the indication of R/R DLBCL were identified to guide international reimbursement decisions.
Topics: Humans; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis; Bendamustine Hydrochloride; Rituximab; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Antigens, CD19
PubMed: 37644352
DOI: 10.1111/ejh.14095 -
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy =... May 2024Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy, a groundbreaking immunotherapy. However, it faces formidable challenges in treating solid tumors, grappling with issues... (Review)
Review
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy, a groundbreaking immunotherapy. However, it faces formidable challenges in treating solid tumors, grappling with issues like poor trafficking, limited penetration, and insufficient persistence within the tumor microenvironment (TME). CAR-T cells are engineered to express receptors that target specific cancer antigens, enhancing their ability to recognize and eliminate cancer cells. This review paper explores the intricate interplay between CAR-T therapy and radiotherapy (RT), investigating their synergistic potential. Radiotherapy, a standard cancer treatment, involves using high doses of radiation to target and damage cancer cells, disrupting their ability to grow and divide. We highlight that RT modulates the TME, augments antigen presentation, and promotes immune cell infiltration, bolstering CAR-T cell-mediated tumor eradication. Molecular insights shed light on RT-induced alterations in tumor stroma, T cell recruitment promotion, and induction of immunogenic cell death. Noteworthy, strategies, such as combining hypofractionated radiotherapy with myeloid-derived suppressor cell blockade, underscore innovative approaches to enhance CAR-T cell therapy in solid tumors. Bridging indications for RT and CAR-T cells in hematological malignancies are discussed, emphasizing scenarios where RT strategically enhances CAR-T cell efficacy. The paper critically evaluates the RT as a bridge compared to traditional chemotherapy, highlighting timing and dosage considerations crucial for optimizing CAR-T therapy outcomes. In summary, the paper provides valuable insights into the intricate molecular mechanisms activated by RT and innovative strategies to improve CAR-T cell therapy, fostering a deeper understanding of their combined potential in cancer treatment.
Topics: Humans; Neoplasms; Tumor Microenvironment; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Animals; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Combined Modality Therapy; Radiotherapy
PubMed: 38574625
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116532 -
Journal of Autoimmunity Nov 2023This systematic review aimed to characterise the cognitive outcomes of patients who received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This systematic review aimed to characterise the cognitive outcomes of patients who received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.
METHODS
A systematic search of the literature was performed using PubMed, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Medline, and CINAHL (February 2023). Risk of bias was assessed using the JBI Checklist for Case Reports and the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Non-randomised Studies.
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies met inclusion criteria with a total of 1104 participants. There was considerable methodological heterogeneity with differing study designs (e.g., cohort studies, clinical trials, case studies, a qualitative interview, and a focus group), measures of cognition (e.g., self-report, neuropsychological measures, clinician assessed/neurological examinations), and longest follow-up time points (i.e., five days to five years).
DISCUSSION
Results of the studies were heterogenous with studies demonstrating stable, improved, or reduced cognition across differing time points. Overall, cognitive symptoms are common particularly in the acute stage (<2 weeks) post-infusion. Most deficits that arise in the acute stage resolve within one to two weeks, however, there is a subset of patients who continue to experience and self-report persistent deficits in the subacute and chronic stages. Future studies are needed to comprehensively analyse cognition using a combination of self-report and psychometric measures following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in the acute, subacute, and chronic settings.
Topics: Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Cognition; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37837807
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaut.2023.103126 -
Reviews in Medical Virology Jul 2024Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection poses significant risks in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) recipients. Despite advances in antiviral... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Efficacy and safety of adoptive T-cell therapy in treating cytomegalovirus infections post-haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection poses significant risks in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) recipients. Despite advances in antiviral therapies, issues such as drug resistance, side effects, and inadequate immune reconstitution remain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adoptive cell therapy (ATC) in managing CMV infections in allo-HSCT recipients. Adhering to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive database search through July 2023. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on studies involving HSCT patients with CMV infections treated with ATC. The primary outcome was the response rate to ATC, and secondary outcomes included adverse events associated with ATC. The Freeman-Tukey transformation was applied for analysis. In the meta-analysis of 40 studies involving 953 participants, ATC achieved an overall integrated response rate of 90.16%, with a complete response of 82.59% and a partial response of 22.95%. ATC source, HLA matching, steroid intake, and age group markedly influenced response rates. Donor-derived T-cell treatments exhibited a higher response rate (93.66%) compared to third-party sources (88.94%). HLA-matched patients demonstrated a response rate of 92.90%, while mismatched patients had a lower rate. Children showed a response rate of 83.40%, while adults had a notably higher rate of 98.46%. Adverse events were minimal, with graft-versus-host disease occurring in 24.32% of patients. ATC shows promising response rates in treating CMV infections post-HSCT, with an acceptable safety profile. However, to establish its efficacy conclusively and compare it with other antiviral treatments, randomised controlled trials are essential. Further research should prioritise such trials over observational and one-arm studies to provide robust evidence for clinical decision-making.
Topics: Humans; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; T-Lymphocytes; Treatment Outcome; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Cytomegalovirus; Transplantation, Homologous
PubMed: 38878003
DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2558 -
Virology Journal May 2024Multiple studies have provided evidence of suboptimal or poor immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Immunologic responses to the third and fourth doses of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines in cell therapy recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Multiple studies have provided evidence of suboptimal or poor immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cell therapy compared to healthy individuals. Given the dynamic nature of SARS-CoV2, characterized by the emergence of many viral variations throughout the general population, there is ongoing discussion regarding the optimal quantity and frequency of additional doses required to sustain protection against SARS-CoV2 especially in this susceptible population. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the immune responses of HSCT and CAR-T cell therapy recipients to additional doses of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.
METHODS
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the study involved a comprehensive search across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, Embase, and Cochrane Biorxiv and medRxiv, focusing on the serological responses to the third and fourth vaccine doses in HSCT and CAR-T cell patients.
RESULTS
This study included 32 papers, with 31 qualifying for the meta-analysis. Results showed that after the third dose, the seroconversion rate in HSCT and CAR-T cell therapy recipients who didn't respond to the second dose was 46.10 and 17.26%, respectively. Following the fourth dose, HSCT patients had a seroconversion rate of 27.23%. Moreover, post-third-dose seropositivity rates were 87.14% for HSCT and 32.96% for CAR-T cell therapy recipients. Additionally, the seropositive response to the fourth dose in the HSCT group was 90.04%.
CONCLUSION
While a significant portion of HSCT recipients developed antibodies after additional vaccinations, only a minority of CAR-T cell therapy patients showed a similar response. This suggests that alternative vaccination strategies are needed to protect these vulnerable groups effectively. Moreover, few studies have reported cellular responses to additional SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations in these patients. Further studies evaluating cellular responses are required to determine a more precise assessment of immunogenicity strength against SARS-CoV-2 after additional doses.
Topics: Humans; COVID-19 Vaccines; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Antibodies, Viral; Vaccination; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy
PubMed: 38702752
DOI: 10.1186/s12985-024-02375-1 -
Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Jun 2024Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) are CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapies approved for relapsed/refractory... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) are CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapies approved for relapsed/refractory aggressive large B cell lymphoma (LBCL). Significant costs and complex manufacturing underscore the importance of evidence-based counseling regarding the outcomes of these treatments. With the aim of examining the efficacy and safety of axi-cel versus tisa-cel in patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive LBCL, we performed a systematic literature search of comparative studies evaluating outcomes in relapsed/refractory aggressive LBCL after treatment with axi-cel or tisa-cel. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and hematotoxicity. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were used to generate summary statistics. A total of 2372 participants were included in the 8 studies in our analysis. The dropout rate between apheresis and infusion was 13% for axi-cel versus 18% for tisa-cel, and the median time from apheresis to infusion was 32 days versus 45 days. Axi-cel showed higher odds for a complete response (OR, 1.65; P < .001) and was associated with higher odds for PFS at 1 year after infusion (OR, .60; P < .001). OS appeared to be improved with axi-cel (OR, .84; 95% CI, .68 to 1.02; P = .08), whereas the cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 11.5% for axi-cel versus 3.7% for tisa-cel (P = .002). The main predictors for survival were lactate dehydrogenase level, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, and response to bridging, and axi-cel maintained superior efficacy even in elderly patients. In terms of safety, axi-cel was associated with significantly higher odds of any-grade CRS (OR, 3.23; P < .001), but not of grade ≥3 CRS (P = .92). Axi-cel was associated with significantly higher odds of severe ICANS grade ≥3 (OR, 4.03; P < .001). In terms of hematotoxicity, axi-cel was significantly associated with higher odds of severe neutropenia at 1 month after infusion (OR, 2.06; P = .003). As a result, axi-cel was associated with significantly greater resource utilization, including prolonged hospital stay, more frequent intensive care admission, and use of agents such as tocilizumab for toxicity management. We provide strong evidence of the greater efficacy of axi-cel versus tisa-cel in relapsed/refractory aggressive LBCL. The higher toxicity and NRM seen with axi-cel might not counterbalance the overall results, highlighting the need for timely intervention and careful selection of patients, balancing resource utilization and clinical benefit.
Topics: Humans; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Biological Products; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Antigens, CD19; Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell; Cytokine Release Syndrome; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38281590
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.01.074 -
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia Jun 2024The application of CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cell therapy has improved outcomes for thousands of patients with non-Hodgkin B cell lymphoma (NHL).... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The application of CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cell therapy has improved outcomes for thousands of patients with non-Hodgkin B cell lymphoma (NHL). The toxicities associated with various CAR T cell products, however, can be severe and difficult to anticipate.
METHODS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we set out to determine whether there are measurable differences in common toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), cytopenias, and infections, between CAR T products that are commercially available for the treatment of NHL.
RESULTS
After a stringent study selection process, we used a cohort of 1364 patients enrolled in 15 prospective clinical trials investigating the use of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel). We found that the rates of CRS and ICANS were significantly higher with axi-cel as compared to both liso-cel and tisa-cel. Conversely, we demonstrated that rates of all-grade and severe neutropenia were significantly greater with liso-cel. Febrile neutropenia and all-grade infection rates did not differ significantly between products though rates of severe infection were increased with axi-cel.
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, this study serves as the first to delineate toxicity profiles associated with various available CAR T products. By better understanding associated toxicities, it may become possible to tailor therapies towards individual patients and anticipate the development of toxicities at earlier stages.
Topics: Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen
PubMed: 38582666
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2024.02.007