-
Cureus Dec 2023Severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) is characterized by persistent airway inflammation and frequent exacerbations despite standard treatments. Mepolizumab, a monoclonal... (Review)
Review
Severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) is characterized by persistent airway inflammation and frequent exacerbations despite standard treatments. Mepolizumab, a monoclonal antibody that reduces eosinophil levels by targeting interleukin-5, has emerged as an add-on therapy for patients with SEA. This systematic review evaluated mepolizumab's efficacy and safety for treating SEA. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major databases. Thirty-two studies with over 6,000 patients were included, comprising randomized controlled trials, open-label extensions, and real-world observational analyses. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using standard tools. Meta-analysis was deemed inappropriate due to heterogeneity. Instead, a narrative synthesis was performed. Mepolizumab significantly reduced exacerbation rates by around 50% and improved symptoms and lung function compared to placebo in pivotal trials. Long-term open-label studies showed sustained reductions in exacerbations and stable lung function for up to 4.5 years. Real-world data demonstrated consistent 50%-90% exacerbation decreases across diverse patient populations over 6-24 months. Mepolizumab exhibited an acceptable safety profile, with mild injection site reactions and headaches as most common adverse events. While specific subgroups may show enhanced responses, mepolizumab displayed broad efficacy regardless of patient demographics or phenotypes. The extensive evidence provides robust support for mepolizumab as an efficacious and safe add-on treatment option for patients with severe, refractory eosinophilic asthma. Further high-quality comparative effectiveness research is warranted to optimize patient selection and positioning among emerging biologics.
PubMed: 38161547
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49781 -
The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and... Aug 2023To investigate whether implementation of a multidisciplinary airway team was associated with improvement in (1) rate of successful airway securement at first attempt;... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To investigate whether implementation of a multidisciplinary airway team was associated with improvement in (1) rate of successful airway securement at first attempt; (2) time to secure airway; and (3) overall complication rate in patients with a difficult airway, as compared with usual care.
DATA SOURCES
Ovid Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central, and CINAHL databases.
REVIEW METHODS
Systematic review of literature on inpatient multidisciplinary team management of difficult airways, including all studies performed in inpatient settings, excluding studies of ventilator weaning, flight/military medicine, EXIT procedures, and simulation or educational studies. DistillerSR was used for article screening and risk of a bias assessment to evaluate article quality. Data was extracted on study design, airway team composition, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes including airway securement, complications, and mortality.
RESULTS
From 5323 studies screened, 19 studies met inclusion criteria with 4675 patients. Study designs included 12 quality improvement projects, 6 cohort studies, and 1 randomized controlled trial. Four studies evaluated effect of multidisciplinary difficult airway teams on airway securement; all reported higher first attempt success rate with team approach. Three studies reported time to secure the difficult airways, all reporting swifter airway securement with team approach. The most common difficult airway complications were hypoxia, esophageal intubation, hemodynamic instability, and aspiration. Team composition varied, including otolaryngologists, anesthesiologists, intensivists, nurses, and respiratory care practitioners.
CONCLUSION
Multidisciplinary difficult airway teams are associated with improved clinical outcomes compared to unstructured emergency airway management; however, studies have significant heterogeneity in team composition, algorithms for airway securement, and outcomes reported. Further evidence is necessary to define the clinical efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and best practices relating to implementing difficult airway teams in inpatient settings.
Topics: Humans; Airway Management
PubMed: 36189709
DOI: 10.1177/00034894221123124 -
Sleep Medicine Reviews Aug 2023Continuous positive airway pressure is the first-line and gold-standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Pharmacotherapy is not commonly used in treating OSA... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Continuous positive airway pressure is the first-line and gold-standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Pharmacotherapy is not commonly used in treating OSA until recently. Combined noradrenergic and antimuscarinic agents have been clinically applied for OSA patients with variable results. This meta-analysis study aimed to investigate the efficacy of the combined regimen on OSA. A systematic literature search was performed up to November 2022 for the effects of the combined regimen on OSA. Eight randomized controlled trials were identified and systematically reviewed for meta-analysis. There were significant mean differences between OSA patients taking a combined regimen and placebo in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) [mean difference (MD) -9.03 events/h, 95%CI (-16.22, -1.83 events/h; P = 0.01] and lowest oxygen saturation [MD 5.61%, 95% CI % (3.43, 7.80); P < 0.01]. Meta-regression showed that a higher proportion of male participants was associated with a greater reduction of AHI (p = 0.04). This study showed a positive but modest effect of pharmacotherapy in the reduction of OSA severity. The combination drugs are most applicable to male OSA patients based on their efficacy and pharmacological susceptibility. Pharmacotherapy may be applied as an alternative, adjunctive or synergistic treatment under careful consideration of its side effects.
Topics: Humans; Male; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure; Norepinephrine
PubMed: 37423095
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2023.101809 -
A systematic review and meta-analysis of macrolides in the management of adult patients with asthma.Allergology International : Official... Jul 2024The efficacy of macrolides in the management of asthma has been studied but remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of macrolides in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The efficacy of macrolides in the management of asthma has been studied but remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of macrolides in the management of adult patients with asthma.
METHODS
Randomized controlled trials of macrolides used in adult patients with asthma were searched for in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi databases to evaluate the efficacy and safety of macrolides.
RESULTS
Seventeen reports with macrolide treatment durations ranging from 6 to 48 weeks were included. Macrolides did not reduce exacerbations requiring hospitalization, severe exacerbations, or rescue use of short-acting beta-2 agonist inhalers; improve lung function; decrease peripheral blood or sputum neutrophil counts; or decrease fractional exhaled nitric oxide compared to placebo. Macrolides statistically improved asthma control and quality of life but by less than the minimal clinically important difference. Peripheral blood eosinophil counts as well as serum and sputum eosinophilic cationic protein concentrations were significantly decreased with macrolides compared to placebo. The improvement of asthma symptoms and airway hyperresponsiveness varied by study. The safety profile of macrolides was comparable to that of placebo.
CONCLUSIONS
Although macrolides have some useful clinical aspects, there is not sufficient evidence to recommend their use in the management of adult patients with asthma.
Topics: Humans; Asthma; Macrolides; Adult; Treatment Outcome; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Quality of Life
PubMed: 38296770
DOI: 10.1016/j.alit.2024.01.002 -
Otolaryngology--head and Neck Surgery :... Nov 2023To analyze evidence supporting an association between immune-related diseases and Ménière's disease (MD) since it has long been thought to be related to autoimmune... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To analyze evidence supporting an association between immune-related diseases and Ménière's disease (MD) since it has long been thought to be related to autoimmune disorders and allergies.
DATA SOURCES
We retrieved records from Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library to identify studies published between January 2002 and October 2022.
REVIEW METHODS
Articles were independently assessed by 2 reviewers and verified by a third reviewer. Published cross-sectional studies, cohort/longitudinal studies, case series, and noncomparative cohort studies were considered eligible for inclusion. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to a registered protocol on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Selected studies were classified into 2 groups: epidemiological and genetic association studies. Relative frequencies and odds ratios (ORs) for each autoinflammatory/autoimmune disease or genetic marker reported to be associated with MD.
RESULTS
Fifteen studies from 6 countries met our inclusion criteria. Nine are epidemiological studies and 6 are genetic association studies. The epidemiological studies were used to perform 3 different meta-analyses. Airway allergic disease and autoimmune thyroid disease showed a significant association with MD (OR = 2.27 [2.08-2.48] and OR = 1.35 [1.25-1.46]); while rheumatoid arthritis did not (OR = 0.63 [0.28-1.41]). Other comorbidities also showed a significant association with MD like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, vitiligo, fibromyalgia, arthritis, and psoriasis.
CONCLUSION
Epidemiological evidence supports an association between MD and immune-related disorders in European and Asian populations, with population-specific effects. The evaluation of thyroid diseases, airway allergic diseases, and other inflammatory diseases should be implemented in the clinical management of MD patients.
Topics: Humans; Meniere Disease; Cross-Sectional Studies; Autoimmune Diseases; Cohort Studies; Comorbidity; Hypersensitivity
PubMed: 37272729
DOI: 10.1002/ohn.386 -
Journal of Medical Internet Research Jul 2023eHealth monitoring technologies offer opportunities to more objectively assess symptoms when they appear in daily life. Asthma is the most common chronic disease in... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
eHealth monitoring technologies offer opportunities to more objectively assess symptoms when they appear in daily life. Asthma is the most common chronic disease in childhood with an episodic course, requiring close follow-up of pediatric asthma control to identify disease deterioration, prevent exacerbations, and enhance quality of life. eHealth technologies in pediatric asthma care show promising results regarding feasibility, acceptability, and asthma-related health outcomes. However, broad systematic evaluations of eHealth technologies in pediatric asthma are lacking.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this scoping review was to identify the types and applications of eHealth technologies for monitoring and treatment in pediatric asthma and explore which monitoring domains show the most relevance or potential for future research.
METHODS
A scoping review was conducted using the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. A systematic and comprehensive search was performed on English papers that investigated the development, validation, or application of eHealth technologies for home monitoring or treatment of pediatric asthma in the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, IEEE, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and ACM Digital Library. Two authors independently assessed eligibility and extracted data. Data were presented by a descriptive analysis of characteristics and a narrative report for each eHealth domain.
RESULTS
The review included 370 manuscripts. The following 10 monitoring domains were identified: air quality, airway inflammation markers, lung function, physical activity, sleep, audiovisual, other physiological measurements, questionnaires, medication monitoring, and digital environment (ie, digital platforms, applications, websites, and software tools to monitor or support monitoring). Rising numbers of studies were seen, and the numbers accelerated in the last few years throughout most domains, especially medication monitoring and digital environment. Limited studies (35/370, 9.5%) of multiparameter monitoring strategies, using three or more domains, were found. The number of monitoring validation studies remained stable, while development and intervention studies increased. Intervention outcomes seemed to indicate the noninferiority and potential superiority of eHealth monitoring in pediatric asthma.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic scoping review provides a unique overview of eHealth pediatric asthma monitoring studies, and it revealed that eHealth research takes place throughout different monitoring domains using different approaches. The outcomes of the review showed the potency for efficacy of most monitoring domains (especially the domains of medication monitoring, lung function, and digital environment). Future studies could focus on modifying potentially relevant hospital-based diagnostics for the home setting to investigate potential beneficial effects and focus on combining home-monitoring domains to facilitate multiparameter decision-making and personalized clinical decision support.
Topics: Humans; Child; Quality of Life; Telemedicine; Asthma; Software; Sleep
PubMed: 37477966
DOI: 10.2196/45896 -
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia Nov 2023This meta-analysis aimed at identifying the risk factors for and their strengths in predicting difficult mask ventilation (MV) through a systematic approach. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
STUDY OBJECTIVE
This meta-analysis aimed at identifying the risk factors for and their strengths in predicting difficult mask ventilation (MV) through a systematic approach.
DESIGN
Meta-analysis of observational studies.
SETTING
Operating room.
INTERVENTION
Airway- or patient-related risk factors for difficult MV reported in over 20% of eligible studies identified through literature review.
PATIENTS
Adults receiving anesthetic induction with requirement of MV.
MEASUREMENTS
Databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to July 2022. The primary outcomes were the identification of commonly reported risk factors for MV and a comparison of their strengths in difficult MV prediction, while the secondary outcomes were the prevalence of difficult MV in the general population and those with obesity.
MAIN RESULTS
Meta-analysis of 20 observational studies involving 335,846 patients identified 13 risk factors with predictive strengths (all p < 0.05): neck radiation (OR = 5.0, five studies, n = 277,843), increased neck circumference (OR = 4.04, 11 studies, n = 247,871), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (OR = 3.61, 12 studies, n = 331,255), presence of beard (OR = 3.35, 12 studies, n = 295,443), snoring (OR = 3.06, 14 studies, n = 296,105), obesity (OR = 2.99, 11 studies, n = 278,297), male gender (OR = 2.76, 16 studies, n = 320,512), Mallampati score III-IV (OR = 2.36, 17 studies, n = 335,016), limited mouth opening (OR = 2.18, six studies, n = 291,795), edentulous (OR = 2.12, 11 studies, n = 249,821), short thyroid-mental distance (OR = 2.12, six studies, n = 328,311), old age (OR = 2, 11 studies, n = 278,750), and limited neck movement (OR = 1.98, nine studies, n = 155,101). The prevalence of difficult MV was 6.1% (16 studies, n = 334,694) and 14.4% (four studies, n = 1152) in the general population and those with obesity, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results demonstrated the strengths of 13 most common risk factors for predicting difficult MV, which may serve as an evidence-based reference for clinicians to incorporate into their daily practice.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Male; Prevalence; Laryngeal Masks; Risk Factors; Obesity; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
PubMed: 37413763
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111197 -
Journal of Clinical Nursing Oct 2023To systematically locate, evaluate and synthesize evidence regarding effectiveness of interprofessional tracheostomy teams in increasing speaking valve use and... (Review)
Review
AIM(S)
To systematically locate, evaluate and synthesize evidence regarding effectiveness of interprofessional tracheostomy teams in increasing speaking valve use and decreasing time to speech and decannulation, adverse events, lengths of stay (intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital) and mortality. In addition, to evaluate facilitators and barriers to implementing an interprofessional tracheostomy team in hospital settings.
DESIGN
Systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model's guidance.
METHODS
Our clinical question: Do interprofessional tracheostomy teams increase speaking valve use and decrease time to speech and decannulation, adverse events, lengths of stay and mortality? Primary studies involving adult patients with a tracheostomy were included. Eligible studies were systematically reviewed by two reviewers and verified by another two reviewers.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies met eligibility criteria; primarily pre-post intervention cohort studies. Percent increase in speaking valve use ranged 14%-275%; percent reduction in median days to speech ranged 33%-73% and median days to decannulation ranged 26%-32%; percent reduction in rate of adverse events ranged 32%-88%; percent reduction in median hospital length of stay days ranged 18-40 days; no significant change in overall ICU length of stay and mortality rates. Facilitators include team education, coverage, rounds, standardization, communication, lead personnel and automation, patient tracking; barrier is financial.
CONCLUSION
Patients with tracheostomy who received care from a dedicated interprofessional team showed improvements in several clinical outcomes.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE
Additional high-quality evidence from rigorous, well-controlled and adequately powered studies are necessary, as are implementation strategies to promote broader adoption of interprofessional tracheostomy team strategies. Interprofessional tracheostomy teams are associated with improved safety and quality of care.
IMPACT
Evidence from review provides rationale for broader implementation of interprofessional tracheostomy teams.
REPORTING METHOD
PRISMA and Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM).
PATIENT/PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION
None.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Tracheostomy; Patient Care Team; Intensive Care Units; Speech
PubMed: 37395139
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16815 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Sep 2023Heart failure (HF) patients commonly experience obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), which may worsen their condition. We reviewed a diverse range of studies to investigate... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Heart failure (HF) patients commonly experience obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), which may worsen their condition. We reviewed a diverse range of studies to investigate the prevalence of OSA in HF patients, the effects of positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment, and the potential impact of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and sacubitril/valsartan on OSA outcomes.
METHODS
We analyzed case-control, observational studies, and randomized controlled trials. Prevalence rates, PAP treatment, and HF pharmacotherapy were assessed.
RESULTS
Numerous studies revealed a high prevalence of OSA in HF patients, particularly with preserved ejection fraction. PAP treatment consistently improved an apnea-hypopnea index, left ventricular ejection fraction, oxygen saturation, and overall quality of life. Emerging evidence suggests that SGLT2i and sacubitril/valsartan might influence OSA outcomes through weight loss, improved metabolic profiles, and potential direct effects on upper airway muscles.
CONCLUSIONS
The complex interplay between OSA and HF necessitates a multifaceted approach. PAP treatment has shown promising results in improving OSA symptoms and HF parameters. Additionally, recent investigations into the effects of HF pharmacotherapy on OSA suggest their potential as adjunctive therapy. This review provides insights for clinicians and researchers, highlighting the importance of addressing OSA and HF in patient management strategies.
PubMed: 37834783
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196139 -
International Journal of Medical... Aug 2023This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of telemedicine-based follow-up management on adults with obstructive sleep apnea. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of telemedicine-based follow-up management on adults with obstructive sleep apnea.
METHODS
Publications were searched in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase. Studies were selected according to the predefined screening criteria, and their qualities were assessed by the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The statistical analyses were performed using Stata12.0 software. It was registered in PROSPERO with the number: CRD42021276414.
RESULTS
A total of 33 articles with 8,689 participants were included. Telemedicine-based follow-up management improved average daily continuous positive airway pressure usage by 36 min (weighted mean difference:0.61;95% confidence interval: 0.39 to 0.83), and the percentage of days with continuous positive airway pressure usage more than four hours by 10.67% in obstructive sleep apnea patients. The meta-analysis of good continuous positive airway pressure compliance showed telemedicine-based follow-up management did not lead to good continuous positive airway pressure compliance (odds ratio: 1.13;95% confidence interval: 0.72 to 1.76). The pooled mean difference of sleep quality was 0.15 (standardized mean difference:0.15; 95% confidence interval: -0.03 to 0.32), and daytime sleepiness was -0.26 (weighted mean difference: -0.26;95% confidence interval: -0.79 to 0.28). The pooled mean difference of apnea hypopnea index was -0.53 (95% confidence interval: -3.58 to 2.51). As for the overall quality of life, the pooled mean difference was -0.25 (standardized mean difference: -0.25;95% confidence interval: -0.25 to 0.76).
CONCLUSION
Telemedicine-based follow-up management was beneficial for continuous positive airway pressure compliance of obstructive sleep apnea patients within six months. However, it could not improve sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, the severity of obstructive sleep apnea, and quality of life in obstructive sleep apnea patients compared with traditional follow-up. Moreover, it was more cost-effective, but there was no consensus on whether it would increase the workload of medical staff.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Follow-Up Studies; Quality of Life; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Telemedicine; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence
PubMed: 37269609
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105108