-
Otolaryngology--head and Neck Surgery :... Apr 2024This review sought to determine the characteristics of adults diagnosed with new onset laryngomalacia including airway symptoms, laryngoscopic findings, treatments, and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This review sought to determine the characteristics of adults diagnosed with new onset laryngomalacia including airway symptoms, laryngoscopic findings, treatments, and outcomes. Moreover, we wanted to highlight suspected limitations in the literature.
DATA SOURCES
Studies were identified through CINAHL, Cochrane Review, PubMed, and Scopus published between 1966 and 2023.
REVIEW METHODS
The search was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist by 2 independent investigators. A meta-analysis of proportions and continuous measures was conducted.
RESULTS
Of the 1121 abstracts identified, 33 articles pertaining to laryngomalacia in the adult population were included. The most common presenting symptoms were stridor at rest (78.3%, 65.1-88.3) and dyspnea with exertion (83.8%, 64.8-96.3). The most suspected etiology was exercise-induced (86.0%, 69.4-95.5), and the most common description of laryngomalacia on visualization was collapse of supraglottic structures during exercise (93.3%, 79.0-99.1). Nonsurgical options were attempted in 87.0% (54.0-99.1), which included oral appliances, respiratory retraining, breathing techniques, and working with a speech pathologist. Surgical options were ultimately performed in 84.2% (75.0-91.0). Complete resolution of symptoms following therapy was seen in 61.9% (48.0-74.6).
CONCLUSION
Adult onset laryngomalacia is difficult to characterize. It typically presents in patients during exercise, with neurological injury, or idiopathically. Surgical management can lead to improvement or complete resolution of symptoms. The need for a universal nomenclature is highlighted in this review, as it is inconsistently classified.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Laryngomalacia; Larynx; Laryngoscopy; Laryngoplasty; Dyspnea
PubMed: 38219735
DOI: 10.1002/ohn.639 -
Cureus Oct 2023Muco-obstructive lung disease is a new classification under the diseases of respiratory tract. A lot of discussion is still going on regarding this new group of... (Review)
Review
Muco-obstructive lung disease is a new classification under the diseases of respiratory tract. A lot of discussion is still going on regarding this new group of diseases. It is characterised by obstruction of the respiratory tract with a thick mucin layer. Usually in normal individuals, the mucus is swept out of the respiratory system while coughing in the form of sputum or phlegm, but if the consistency of the mucus is thick, or the amount is heavy or there is a certain defect in the ciliary function of the respiratory tract, the mucus is not cleared and it gets accumulated in the lungs alveoli, therefore blocking it. The mucus trapped in the distal airways cannot be cleared by coughing therefore forming a layer in the alveoli and bronchioles. Long-standing condition causes inflammation and infection. This new group of diseases specifically includes chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cystic fibrosis (CF), primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) and non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB). Asthma, although an obstructive disease of the lung, is not particularly included under muco-obstructive lung disease. The major symptoms with which these diseases present are sputum production, chronic cough and acute exacerbations of the condition. The mucus adheres to the lung parenchyma causing airway obstruction and hyperinflation. In this article, we will see how muco-obstructive lung diseases affect the normal physiology of the respiratory system and how is it different from other obstructive and restrictive lung diseases. We will individually look into all the four conditions that come under the category of muco-obstructive lung diseases.
PubMed: 37954759
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46866 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2023The Neonatal Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) makes practice recommendations for the care of newborn infants in the delivery... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The Neonatal Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) makes practice recommendations for the care of newborn infants in the delivery room (DR). ILCOR recommends that all infants who are gasping, apnoeic, or bradycardic (heart rate < 100 per minute) should be given positive pressure ventilation (PPV) with a manual ventilation device (T-piece, self-inflating bag, or flow-inflating bag) via an interface. The most commonly used interface is a face mask that encircles the infant's nose and mouth. However, gas leak and airway obstruction are common during face mask PPV. Nasal interfaces (single and binasal prongs (long or short), or nasal masks) and laryngeal mask airways (LMAs) may also be used to deliver PPV to newborns in the DR, and may be more effective than face masks.
OBJECTIVES
To determine whether newborn infants receiving PPV in the delivery room with a nasal interface compared to a face mask, laryngeal mask airway (LMA), or another type of nasal interface have reduced mortality and morbidity. To assess whether safety and efficacy of the nasal interface differs according to gestational age or ventilation device.
SEARCH METHODS
Searches were conducted in September 2022 in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Epistemonikos, and two trial registries. We searched conference abstracts and checked the reference lists of included trials and related systematic reviews identified through the search.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCT's that compared the use of nasal interfaces to other interfaces (face masks, LMAs, or one nasal interface to another) to deliver PPV to newborn infants in the DR.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Each review author independently evaluated the search results against the selection criteria, screened retrieved records, extracted data, and appraised the risk of bias. If they were study authors, they did not participate in the selection, risk of bias assessment, or data extraction related to the study. In such instances, the study was independently assessed by other review authors. We contacted trial investigators to obtain additional information. We completed data analysis according to the standards of Cochrane Neonatal, using risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence Intervals (CI) to measure the effect of the different interfaces. We used fixed-effect models and the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence.
MAIN RESULTS
We included five trials, in which 1406 infants participated. They were conducted in 13 neonatal centres across Europe and Australia. Each of these trials compared a nasal interface to a face mask for the delivery of respiratory support to newborn infants in the DR. Potential sources of bias were a lack of blinding to treatment allocation of the caregivers and investigators in all trials. The evidence suggests that resuscitation with a nasal interface in the DR, compared with a face mask, may have little to no effect on reducing death before discharge (typical risk ratio (RR) 0.72, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.13; 3 studies, 1124 infants; low-certainty evidence). Resuscitation with a nasal interface may reduce the rate of intubation in the DR, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.85; 5 studies, 1406 infants; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain for the rate of intubation within 24 hours of birth (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.09; 3 studies, 749 infants; very low-certainty evidence), endotracheal intubation outside the DR during hospitalisation (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.42; 1 study, 144 infants; very low-certainty evidence) and cranial ultrasound abnormalities (intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) grade ≥ 3, or periventricular leukomalacia; RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.61; 3 studies, 749 infants; very low-certainty evidence). Resuscitation with a nasal interface in the DR, compared with a face mask, may have little to no effect on the incidence of air leaks (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.09; 2 studies, 507 infants; low-certainty evidence), or the need for supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks' corrected gestational age (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.40; 2 studies, 507 infants; low-certainty evidence). We identified one ongoing study, which compares a nasal mask to a face mask to deliver PPV to infants in the DR. We did not identify any completed trials that compared nasal interfaces to LMAs or one nasal interface to another.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Nasal interfaces were found to offer comparable efficacy to face masks (low- to very low-certainty evidence), supporting resuscitation guidelines that state that nasal interfaces are a comparable alternative to face masks for providing respiratory support in the DR. Resuscitation with a nasal interface may reduce the rate of intubation in the DR when compared with a face mask. However, the evidence is very uncertain. This uncertainty is attributed to the use of a new ventilation system in the nasal interface group in two of the five trials. As such, it is not possible to differentiate separate, specific effects related to the ventilation device or to the interface in these studies.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Humans; Resuscitation; Positive-Pressure Respiration; Respiration, Artificial; Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation; Intubation, Intratracheal
PubMed: 37787113
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009102.pub2 -
Cureus Nov 2023Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a recurrent partial or complete obstruction of the upper airway during sleep caused by narrowing or collapse of the pharyngeal wall. It... (Review)
Review
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a recurrent partial or complete obstruction of the upper airway during sleep caused by narrowing or collapse of the pharyngeal wall. It leads to microstimulation and oxyhemoglobin desaturation, resulting in sleepiness and loud snoring. OSA negatively affects the cardiovascular system and may contribute to neurocognitive impairment. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness and efficacy of appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea. The effectiveness was assessed by using the Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI). An electronic search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Google Scholar was conducted between 1998 and 2021. Articles were independently assessed by three reviewers. The quality of a randomised control trial (RCT) is assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias method. The tool GRADE was used to achieve the desired level of confidence for each outcome reported. Several studies used continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), mandibular advancement devices (MAD), and tongue retention devices (TRD). The meta-analysis included a total of six papers that met the inclusion criteria. Results showed that CPAP significantly improved AHI compared with an oral appliance (random effects: difference in means = 8.40, 95% CI = 7.21 to 9.60). It was also found that oral appliance (OA) therapy significantly improved AHI compared with baseline before appliance therapy (random effects: mean difference = 13.40, 95% CI = 10.87 to 15.93; p.00001). For mild to moderate OSA, CPAP is considered the gold standard. Our meta-analysis of six RCTs found favorable evidence for OSA patients receiving oral devices; however, they were less effective than CPAP. A subgroup analysis found that MAD may be a beneficial treatment for mild to moderate OSA patients who do not respond to CPAP. The findings suggest that oral appliances may be an effective treatment for OSA, especially in patients with mild to moderate OSA.
PubMed: 38058324
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.48280 -
American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy Sep 2023Leiomyomas are benign smooth muscle tumors that are rarely diagnosed in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Leiomyomas are benign smooth muscle tumors that are rarely diagnosed in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses.
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review summarizes the histopathologic and clinical tumor characteristics, surgical management, and follow-up of sinonasal leiomyomas.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature on sinonasal leiomyoma was performed by applying the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for level of evidence. Patient demographics, clinical and pathological tumor characteristics, primary intervention, and results of follow-up were evaluated.
RESULTS
Forty studies including 84 patients with sinonasal leiomyoma were identified. The tumor was most often located in the nasal cavity (47/84, 56%) originating from the inferior turbinate (32/84, 38%). Patients mostly presented with symptoms originating from an intranasal mass, including recurrent epistaxis (41/84, 49%), nasal obstruction (43/84, 51.2%), and localized facial or head pain (25/84, 29.8%). Surgery was performed in all cases. An endoscopic approach was most frequently chosen. Recurrence occurred only twice (2.4%). Morbidity was noted in 2 cases (2.4%) following postoperative bleeding and 1 (1.2%) case following a CSF leak.
CONCLUSION
Sinonasal leiomyomas are neoplasms of the smooth muscle manifesting clinically with recurrent epistaxis and nasal obstruction. Management goal is total resection with clear margins to avoid local recurrence.
Topics: Humans; Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms; Nasal Obstruction; Epistaxis; Follow-Up Studies; Leiomyoma; Nose Neoplasms
PubMed: 37093753
DOI: 10.1177/19458924231170464 -
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive &... May 2024Cleft lip nasal deformity (CLND)-associated nasal airway obstruction (CL-NAO) may be inadequately characterized, with its functional implications subsequently... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Cleft lip nasal deformity (CLND)-associated nasal airway obstruction (CL-NAO) may be inadequately characterized, with its functional implications subsequently underappreciated and neglected. The purpose of this systematic review is to (1) summarize the available assessment results in CL-NAO, (2) evaluate the reliability of current assessment tools, and (3) identify ongoing gaps and inconsistencies for future study.
METHODS
A systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases was performed for articles studying CL-NAO. Articles focusing on noncleft populations or surgical techniques were excluded. Extracted data included information about study design, patient demographics, medical history, and assessment scores.
RESULTS
Twenty-six articles met criteria for inclusion. Assessments included patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), anatomic characterizations of CLND, and nasal airflow and resistance studies. Objective assessments were generally more reliable than subjective assessments in CLND. Unilateral CLND was better represented in the literature than bilateral CLND. For unilateral CLND, the cleft side was more obstructed than the noncleft side, with stereotyped patterns of anterior nasal deformity but varied middle and posterior deformity patterns. Overall, there was considerable heterogeneity in study design regarding stratification of CLND cohorts by age, cleft phenotype and laterality, and surgical history.
CONCLUSIONS
A wide range of subjective and objective assessment tools were used to characterize CL-NAO, including PROMs, anatomic measurements, and airflow and resistance metrics. Overall, objective assessments of CL-NAO were more reliable than subjective surveys, which may have resulted from variable expectations regarding nasal patency in the CLND population combined with large heterogeneity in study design.
Topics: Humans; Cleft Lip; Nasal Obstruction; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Rhinoplasty; Nose
PubMed: 38493539
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.02.061 -
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive &... Mar 2024The purpose of the study was to comprehensively review the improvement in nasal airway obstruction after secondary rhinoplasty for cleft lip. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The purpose of the study was to comprehensively review the improvement in nasal airway obstruction after secondary rhinoplasty for cleft lip.
METHODS
The search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for relevant studies published within the past twenty years. Inclusion criteria encompassed patients undergoing secondary rhinoplasty with cleft lip nasal deformity and some evaluation of the nasal outcome.
RESULTS
A thorough analysis of available studies identified 29 articles that met the inclusion criteria for final assessment. Seven (24.1%) studies were classified as Therapeutic Ⅱ (T II) according to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons level of evidence scale, while the majority were categorized as T III (17.2%), T IV (51.7%), and T V (6.9%). Subjective methods were employed in 21 articles to measure nasal ventilation outcomes, whereas 8 studies utilized objective methods. Overall findings from all included studies consistently indicated an improvement in nasal ventilation post-surgery.
CONCLUSIONS
Although there is no consensus regarding the impact of secondary rhinoplasty on nasal airway obstruction in cleft lip patients, this review suggests that it can effectively alleviate such obstructions. We conducted an anatomical analysis to investigate the impact of various surgical techniques on nasal ventilation to provide recommendations for postoperative ventilation assessment.
Topics: Humans; Rhinoplasty; Cleft Lip; Nasal Obstruction; Nose; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38367410
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.01.023 -
Current Pain and Headache Reports Apr 2024The combination of ketamine with propofol and dexmedetomidine has gained popularity for sedation and general anesthesia in different populations. In our meta-nalysis, we... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
The combination of ketamine with propofol and dexmedetomidine has gained popularity for sedation and general anesthesia in different populations. In our meta-nalysis, we helped the anesthesiologists to know the efficiency and the efficacy of both combinations in adult and pediatric patients.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to August 1, 2023. Our outcome parameters for efficacy were recovery time, pain score, and physician satisfaction while for safety were the related cardiorespiratory, neurological, and gastrointestinal adverse events.
RECENT FINDINGS
Twenty-two trials were included with a total of 1429 patients. We found a significantly longer recovery time in the ketadex group of 7.59 min (95% CI, 4.92, 10.26; I = 94%) and a significantly less pain score of - 0.72 (95% CI, - 1.10, - 0.34; I = 0%). Adults had a significantly better physician satisfaction score with the ketofol group, odds ratio of 0.29 (95% CI, 0.12, 0.71; I = 0%). Recovery agitations were higher in the ketofol group with an odds ratio of 0.48 (95% CI, 0.24, 0.98; I = 36%). Furthermore, we found a significant difference between the combinations with a higher incidence in the ketadex group with pooled odds ratio of 1.75 (95% CI, 1.06, 2.88; I = 15%). Ketadex was associated with lower pain scores, hypoxic events and airway obstruction, and emergence agitation. At the same time, ketofol had much more clinician satisfaction which might be attributed to the shorter recovery time and lower incidence of nausea and vomiting. Therefore, we suppose that ketadex is the better combination in periprocedural sedation for both adult and pediatric patients who are not at greater risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Child; Propofol; Dexmedetomidine; Ketamine; Anesthesia, General; Vomiting; Pain; Hypnotics and Sedatives
PubMed: 38214834
DOI: 10.1007/s11916-023-01208-0 -
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial... Oct 2023Le Fort I maxillary impaction is an orthognathic surgical procedure to reposition the maxillary complex superiorly. The objective of this study is to investigate if... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Le Fort I maxillary impaction is an orthognathic surgical procedure to reposition the maxillary complex superiorly. The objective of this study is to investigate if maxillary impaction negatively affects the nasal airway.
METHODS
A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to investigate the effects of maxillary impaction on the nasal cavity. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were accessed. Observational studies, nonrandomized, and randomized controlled trials were included if Le Fort 1 maxillary impaction and nasal airway outcomes assessments were performed. Studies were excluded if maxillary impaction or nasal airway outcome assessment was not performed or if the study included patients with cleft or craniofacial syndromes, previous nasal surgeries, or active respiratory tract. The demographic data, study methodology, magnitude of maxillary impaction, and outcomes related to the nasal airway were collected. These outcomes includes anatomical changes (evaluated by rhinoscopy, acoustic rhinometry, and computed tomography), changes to nasal airflow and resistance (evaluated by rhinomanometry) and changes to quality of life.
RESULTS
The search yielded 7517 studies. Ten studies were included after the application of the selection criteria. A total of 126 patients underwent pure maxillary impaction, 97 underwent maxillary impaction and advancement, and 12 had impaction with setback. Despite that maxillary impactions decreased the nasal cavity volume by +21.7%, the cross-sectional area of the narrowest parts of the cavity was only reduced by -8.4%. Maxillary impactions generally increases the nasal airflow (+12.6%) while reducing nasal resistance (-20.2%). Rhinoscopies also showed a reduction in nasal obstruction.
CONCLUSION
Maxillary impaction did not negatively affect the nasal airway. The surgeries did not lead to the reduction of the cross-sectional area at the strictures of the nasal cavities. The nasal airflow and resistance was not decreased and increased, respectively. The quality of life of the patients was also not shown to have worsened.
PubMed: 37478897
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2023.06.013 -
Clinical Oral Investigations Oct 2023To provide a critical overview of the effect of various orthodontic and/or dentofacial orthopedic interventions on three-dimensional volumetric changes in the upper... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To provide a critical overview of the effect of various orthodontic and/or dentofacial orthopedic interventions on three-dimensional volumetric changes in the upper airway.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Four databases were searched for clinical studies concerning 3D volumetric assessments based on CBCT before and after orthodontics interventions. The quality of the studies was assessed using the quality assessment tool of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. After the use of inclusion and exclusion criteria, the pre-and post-treatment volumes were used to visualize the effect of various orthodontics interventions.
RESULTS
A total of 48 studies were included in this review and none of which were RCTs. The quality of all included studies was assessed as medium. Overall, there is a tendency for an increase in airway volumes after various orthodontic interventions, except for studies concerning extraction therapy with fixed appliances in adults, in which both increases and decreases in airway volumes have been reported.
CONCLUSION
Orthodontic treatment by growth modification and non-extraction therapy with fixed appliances, regardless of the malocclusion, generally showed positive effects on the airway volume. Orthodontic treatment in combination with extractions does not provide an unambiguous insight. A consensus on the methodology of the airway measurement and nomenclature is urgently needed in order to gain insight into the effect of different interventions on three-dimensional airway changes.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Various orthodontic treatments do not negatively influence the upper airway volume. However, extraction therapy in adults should be chosen with caution, especially in subjects belonging to a group susceptible to airway obstruction.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Spiral Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Malocclusion
PubMed: 37723313
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05207-8