-
Journal of Endovascular Therapy : An... Apr 2024The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of cilostazol prescription in patients with femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease (PAD) after... (Review)
Review
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Cilostazol Prescription in Patients With Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease After Endovascular Therapy.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of cilostazol prescription in patients with femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease (PAD) after endovascular therapy (EVT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies reporting the outcomes of cilostazol after femoropopliteal EVT of PAD up to September 2022. Clinical outcomes of interest included primary patency, in-stent restenosis (ISR), vessel re-occlusion, freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), repeat revascularization, all-cause mortality, amputation, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and major adverse limb events (MALEs), and bleeding complication.
RESULTS
A total of 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 8 observational studies containing a total of 4898 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. We found that the use of cilostazol was associated with higher primary patency after femoropopliteal artery EVT (odds ratio [OR]=1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.50-1.87, p<0.001, I=33.2%), a lower risk of ISR (OR=0.43, 95% CI=0.29-0.63, p<0.001, I=37.6%), repeat revascularization (OR=0.43, 95% CI=0.24-0.76, p<0.005, I=27.4%), and vessel re-occlusion (OR=0.59, 95% CI=0.38-0.93, p<0.05, I=0%). There was an increase in freedom from TLR rate (OR=2.19, 95% CI=1.58-3.05, p<0.001, I=0%), as well as a reduction in the occurrence of MALEs (OR=0.50, 95% CI=0.29-0.85, p<0.05, I=0%). However, there was no significant difference in amputation, MACEs, all-cause mortality, and major bleeding complications. Subgroup analysis showed that cilostazol treatment in patients with femoropopliteal drug-eluting stents (DES) implantation remained associated with higher primary patency and a lower risk of ISR.
CONCLUSIONS
After EVT of femoropopliteal artery lesions, additional oral cilostazol enhances primary patency, reduces the occurrences of ISR and vessel re-occlusion, diminishes the risks associated with MALEs, lowers the need for repeat revascularization, and increases freedom from TLR rates. However, it does not impact amputation, MACEs, all-cause mortality, or major bleeding complications. These findings suggest cilostazol as a potentially safe and effective adjunct therapy in patients with femoropopliteal PAD after EVT.
CLINICAL IMPACT
After undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT) for femoropopliteal artery lesions, the addition of cilostazol to antiplatelet therapy can significantly improve primary patency, reducing the incidence of in-stent restenosis, repeat revascularization, vessel re-occlusion, and major adverse limb events while increasing freedom from target lesion revascularization rate. The simultaneous use of drug-eluting stents in the femoropopliteal artery lesions, combined with cilostazol, potentially results in a synergistic anti-stenotic effect. This therapeutic approach does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of major bleeding events or all-cause mortality. These findings provide additional evidence supporting the treatment of anti-stenosis in patients with femoropopliteal artery lesions after EVT.
PubMed: 38590247
DOI: 10.1177/15266028241241248 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery Oct 2023Stroke is one of the devastating complications after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Underlying carotid artery atherosclerotic disease is reported to be an... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Stroke is one of the devastating complications after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Underlying carotid artery atherosclerotic disease is reported to be an independent risk factor. The optimal treatment strategy for these patients remains under debate.
METHODS
We aimed to perform a network meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of additional carotid interventions for patients with concomitant carotid artery atherosclerotic disease who require CABG by comparing perioperative adverse event rates. All articles through February 2022 were searched using MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify studies that investigated outcomes of CABG only as well as additional staged vs combined carotid interventions by both carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS).
RESULTS
Two randomized controlled trials and 23 observational studies were included, yielding a total of 32,473 patients who underwent combined CEA and CABG (n = 20,204), CEA and staged CABG (n = 6882), CABG and staged CEA (n = 340), CAS and CABG regardless of timing and sequences (n = 1224), and CABG only (n = 3823). No strategy showed a significant advantage over CABG only in all perioperative outcomes. CEA and staged CABG was associated with the lowest perioperative stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) rate, significantly lower compared with CAS and CABG (odds ratio [OR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-0.76) as well as CABG and staged CEA (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23-0.74), but was also associated with the highest perioperative mortality (OR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.67-3.85, vs CAS and CABG) and myocardial infarction rate (OR, 3.70 [95% CI, 1.16-12.5] and OR, 2.50 [95% CI, 1.35-4.55] vs CAS and CABG, vs combined CEA and CABG, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
CEA and staged CABG are associated with low perioperative stroke/transient ischemic attack rates with a tradeoff of higher mortality and myocardial infarction rate. No strategy showed a significant advantage over the CABG-only strategy in all perioperative outcomes, outlining the importance of a tailored approach and determining proper indications for carotid intervention in these patients.
Topics: Humans; Carotid Stenosis; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Risk Assessment; Treatment Outcome; Stents; Coronary Artery Bypass; Carotid Artery Diseases; Endarterectomy, Carotid; Myocardial Infarction; Stroke; Risk Factors; Carotid Arteries; Coronary Artery Disease
PubMed: 37257673
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.04.043 -
Journal of Neuroimaging : Official... 2024There are limited data regarding the comparison of balloon expandable stents (BES) and self-expanding stents (SES) for the treatment of intracranial arterial stenosis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
There are limited data regarding the comparison of balloon expandable stents (BES) and self-expanding stents (SES) for the treatment of intracranial arterial stenosis.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review to identify studies that compared SES and BES in patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. Data were extracted from relevant studies found through a search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until from January 1, 2010 to September 28, 2023. Statistical pooling with random-effects meta-analysis was undertaken to compare the rates/severity of postprocedure stenosis, technical success, 30-day stroke and/or death, cumulative clinical endpoints, and restenosis rates.
RESULTS
A total of 20 studies were included. The standardized mean difference (SMD) for postprocedure stenosis (%) was significantly lower (SMD: -0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.79 to -0.24, p < .001, 10 studies involving 1515 patients) with BES. The odds for 30-day stroke and/or death were significantly lower (odds ratio [OR] 0.68, 95% CI: 0.50-0.94, p = .019, 15 studies involving 2431 patients), and cumulative clinical endpoints on follow-up were nonsignificantly lower (OR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.30-1.37, p = .250, 10 studies involving 947 patients) with BES. The odds for restenosis during follow-up were significantly lower (OR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.31-0.80, p = .004, 13 studies involving 1115 patients) with BES.
CONCLUSIONS
Compared with SES, BES were associated with lower rates of postprocedure 30-day stroke and/or death with lower rates of restenosis during follow up and the treatment of symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.
Topics: Humans; Constriction, Pathologic; Intracranial Arterial Diseases; Stents; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38225680
DOI: 10.1111/jon.13188 -
International Journal of Stroke :... Jan 2024Hypotension is recognized as a common complication after carotid artery stenting, but its incidence and the risk factors associated with it are uncertain. Therefore, we... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Hypotension is recognized as a common complication after carotid artery stenting, but its incidence and the risk factors associated with it are uncertain. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate and identify risk factors for hypotension after surgery.
METHODS
We retrieved risk factors from eight databases for case-control and cross-sectional studies of hypotension after carotid artery stenting according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines on 28 November 2022. Data were analyzed by using R4.2.1 and Review Manager 5.3.
RESULTS
A total of 2843 samples were searched, and 17 publications were included in the analysis. The meta-analysis results showed that the incidence of hypotension after surgery was 28.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] (0.225, 0.347)). Age ⩾ 65 years (odds ratio [OR] = 4.55, 95% CI (2.50, 8.29), P < 0.00001), stenosis site (bulb) (OR = 4.41, 95% CI (2.50, 7.79), P < 0.00001), severe stenosis (OR = 3.56, 95% CI (1.62, 7.85), P = 0.002), stenosis proximity (⩽ 10 mm) to bifurcation (OR = 2.69, 95% CI (1.74, 4.15), P < 0.00001), calcified plaques (OR = 4.64, 95% CI (1.93, 11.14), P = 0.0006), post-balloon dilation (OR = 5.95, 95% CI (2.31, 15.31), P = 0.0002), bilateral carotid stenting (OR = 30.51, 95% CI (2.33, 399.89), P = 0.009), and intravenous fluid intake/mL on the first postoperative day (mean difference = 444.99, 95% CI (141.40, 748.59), P = 0.004) were risk factors for hypotension after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS
A high incidence of hypotension was observed after carotid artery stenting. Age, stenosis site, severe stenosis, stenosis proximity to bifurcation, calcified plaques, post-balloon dilation, type of surgery, and intravenous fluid intake were identified as risk factors.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Stents; Carotid Stenosis; Constriction, Pathologic; Incidence; Cross-Sectional Studies; Treatment Outcome; Stroke; Hypotension; Risk Factors; Carotid Arteries
PubMed: 37477427
DOI: 10.1177/17474930231190837 -
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular... May 2024Intracranial artery atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a major cause of stroke, especially in Asian countries. Current treatment options, including balloon-mounted stent... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Intracranial artery atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a major cause of stroke, especially in Asian countries. Current treatment options, including balloon-mounted stent (BMS) and balloon angioplasty (BA), lack sufficient evidence to determine a preferred approach. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of BMS and BA in treating ICAS.
METHODS
Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus up to December 1, 2023. Eligible studies compared BMS with BA in patients diagnosed with ICAS. Primary outcomes included the success rate and occurrence of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic). Secondary outcomes were perforator occlusion, in-stent thrombosis, death, and restenosis. Statistical analysis was conducted using R software version 4.3.1, employing a random-effects model.
RESULTS
Five high-quality studies involving 707 patients (515 males, 192 females) were included. BMS had a significantly higher success rate compared to BA (Risk Ratio [RR]: 1.13; CI: 1.03 to 1.24, p < 0.01; I = 14 %). The overall risk for stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic) was significantly higher in BMS (RR: 2.97; CI: 1.32 to 6.67, p < 0.01; I = 0 %). However, no significant difference was found between BMS and BA regarding ischemic stroke (RR: 2.33; CI: 0.80 to 6.74, p = 0.12; I = 0 %). Additionally, no significant differences were observed in terms of perforator occlusion, in-stent thrombosis, dissection, minor and major strokes, and mortality rates. BMS was associated with a lower risk of restenosis (RR: 0.31; 95 % CI: 0.12 to 0.83, p = 0.02; I = 0 %).
CONCLUSION
Our results indicate that BMS might be associated with higher success and lower restenosis rates than BA in the treatment of ICAS but with an increased overall risk of stroke. No significant differences were observed in ischemic stroke, perforator occlusion, in-stent thrombosis, dissection, minor and major strokes, and mortality rates. The choice of treatment should consider these findings, alongside the technical challenges and desired angiographic outcomes. Future randomized controlled trials are necessary to further elucidate these results.
Topics: Male; Female; Humans; Constriction, Pathologic; Angioplasty, Balloon; Stents; Stroke; Ischemic Stroke; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome; Angioplasty
PubMed: 38331010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107631 -
Seminars in Nuclear Medicine Nov 2023Computed tomography angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and F-FDG-PET have proven clinical value when evaluating patients with carotid... (Review)
Review
Computed tomography angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and F-FDG-PET have proven clinical value when evaluating patients with carotid atherosclerosis. In this systematic review, we will focus on the role of novel molecular imaging tracers in that assessment and their potential strengths to stratify stroke risk. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, the Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Library for articles reporting on molecular imaging to noninvasively detect or characterize inflammation in carotid atherosclerosis. As our focus was on nonclassical novel targets, we omitted reports solely on F-FDG and F-NaF. We summarized and mapped the selected studies to provide an overview of the current clinical development in molecular imaging in relation to risk factors, imaging and histological findings, diagnostic and prognostic performance. We identified 20 articles in which the utilized tracers to visualize carotid wall inflammation were somatostatin subtype-2- (SST2-) (n = 5), CXC-motif chemokine receptor 4- (CXCR4-) (n = 3), translocator protein- (TSPO-) (n = 2) and aVβ3 integrin-ligands (n = 2) and choline-tracers (n = 2). Tracer uptake correlated with traditional cardiovascular risk factors, that is, age, gender, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension as well as prior cardiovascular disease. We identified discrepancies between tracer uptake and grade of stenosis, plaque calcification, and F-FDG uptake, suggesting the importance of alternative characterization of atherosclerosis beyond classical neuroimaging features. Immunohistochemical analysis linked tracer uptake to markers of macrophage infiltration and neovascularization. Symptomatic carotid arteries showed higher uptake compared to asymptomatic (including contralateral, nonculprit) arteries. Some studies demonstrated a potential role of these novel molecular imaging as a specific intermediary (bio)marker for outcome. Several novel tracers show promise for identification of high-risk plaque inflammation. Based on the current evidence we cautiously propose the SST2-ligands and the choline radiotracers as viable candidates for larger prospective longitudinal outcome studies to evaluate their predictive use in clinical practice.
PubMed: 37996309
DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.10.004 -
Biomedical Engineering Online Feb 2024Aortic stenosis, hypertension, and left ventricular hypertrophy often coexist in the elderly, causing a detrimental mismatch in coupling between the heart and...
Aortic stenosis, hypertension, and left ventricular hypertrophy often coexist in the elderly, causing a detrimental mismatch in coupling between the heart and vasculature known as ventricular-vascular (VA) coupling. Impaired left VA coupling, a critical aspect of cardiovascular dysfunction in aging and disease, poses significant challenges for optimal cardiovascular performance. This systematic review aims to assess the impact of simulating and studying this coupling through computational models. By conducting a comprehensive analysis of 34 relevant articles obtained from esteemed databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed until July 14, 2022, we explore various modeling techniques and simulation approaches employed to unravel the complex mechanisms underlying this impairment. Our review highlights the essential role of computational models in providing detailed insights beyond clinical observations, enabling a deeper understanding of the cardiovascular system. By elucidating the existing models of the heart (3D, 2D, and 0D), cardiac valves, and blood vessels (3D, 1D, and 0D), as well as discussing mechanical boundary conditions, model parameterization and validation, coupling approaches, computer resources and diverse applications, we establish a comprehensive overview of the field. The descriptions as well as the pros and cons on the choices of different dimensionality in heart, valve, and circulation are provided. Crucially, we emphasize the significance of evaluating heart-vessel interaction in pathological conditions and propose future research directions, such as the development of fully coupled personalized multidimensional models, integration of deep learning techniques, and comprehensive assessment of confounding effects on biomarkers.
Topics: Aged; Humans; Aging; Coronary Vessels; Heart; Heart Ventricles; Ventricular Function, Left
PubMed: 38388416
DOI: 10.1186/s12938-024-01206-2 -
Netherlands Heart Journal : Monthly... Dec 2023The importance of revascularisation of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is unclear....
OBJECTIVE
The importance of revascularisation of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is unclear. Despite the lack of randomised controlled trials comparing different revascularisation strategies, guidelines currently recommend percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with significant proximal CAD undergoing TAVI.
METHODS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, a systematic search was conducted to identify studies comparing TAVI with and without PCI in patients with significant CAD on pre-TAVI coronary angiography. Endpoints were all-cause mortality, cardiac death, stroke, myocardial infarction and major bleeding.
RESULTS
In total, 14 studies were included, involving 3838 patients, of whom 1806 (47%) underwent PCI before TAVI. All-cause mortality did not differ significantly between TAVI with and without preceding PCI at 30 days, 1 year and > 1 year. There were no significant differences in risk of cardiac death, stroke or myocardial infarction between the groups. However, TAVI performed with PCI resulted in a higher risk of major bleeding within 30 days after TAVI (odds ratio: 0.66; 95% confidence interval: 0.46-0.94).
CONCLUSION
This systematic review and meta-analysis showed no significant differences in clinical outcomes between patients with concomitant significant CAD who were treated with TAVI with and without preceding PCI at both short- and long-term follow-up. However, there was a higher risk of major bleeding at 30 days in patients undergoing TAVI with preceding PCI. In the context of serious risk of bias in the included studies, results of randomised controlled trials are warranted.
PubMed: 37910336
DOI: 10.1007/s12471-023-01824-w -
Journal of the American Society of... Feb 2024Speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) is now routinely included in cardiac evaluations, but its role in predicting mortality and morbidity in congenital heart disease... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) is now routinely included in cardiac evaluations, but its role in predicting mortality and morbidity in congenital heart disease (CHD) is not well described. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the prognostic value of STE in patients with CHD.
METHODS
The EMBASE, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched from inception to January 2023 for terms related to all CHD, STE, and prognosis. Meta-analysis of association of right ventricle and left ventricle strain (RV S and LV S, respectively) with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) was performed in atrial switch transposition of the great arteries (asTGA)/congenitally corrected TGA (ccTGA), tetralogy of Fallot (ToF), and congenital aortic stenosis (cAS)/bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). P-value combination analysis was additionally performed for all CHD groups.
RESULTS
A total of 33 studies (30 cohorts, n = 8,619 patients, children, and adults) were included. Meta-analysis showed the following parameters as being associated with MACE: RV S in asTGA/ccTGA (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.1/%; CI, [1.03; 1.18]), RV S and LV S in ToF (HR = 1.14/%; CI, [1.03; 1.26] and HR = 1.14/%; CI, [1.08; 1.2], respectively), and LV S in cAS/BAV (HR = 1.19/%; CI, [1.15; 1.23]). The RV S and strain rate were associated with outcomes also in single ventricle/hypoplastic left heart syndrome (at all palliation stages except before Norwood stage 1) and LV S in Ebstein's anomaly.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that biventricular strain and strain rate were associated with outcomes in a variety of CHD, highlighting the need for updated recommendations on the use of STE in the current guidelines, specific to disease types.
Topics: Adult; Child; Humans; Transposition of Great Vessels; Heart Defects, Congenital; Echocardiography; Tetralogy of Fallot; Heart Ventricles; Heart Atria; Morbidity
PubMed: 37972793
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2023.11.003 -
Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery Sep 2023Flow diverters have been widely used in clinical practice for more than a decade. However, most outcome data are limited to 1 year timepoints. This study aims to offer... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Flow diverters have been widely used in clinical practice for more than a decade. However, most outcome data are limited to 1 year timepoints. This study aims to offer meta-analysis data on long-term (>1 year) safety and effectiveness results for patients with aneurysms treated with flow diverters.
METHODS
PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and SCOPUS were searched up to February 24, 2022 using the AutoLit platform. We included primary studies assessing the long-term outcomes for flow diverter devices to manage unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms with a follow-up period of >1 year. The meta-analysis was carried out using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (CMA).
RESULTS
Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled occlusion rates after flow diversion treatment for unruptured intracranial brain aneurysms were 77%, 87.4%, 84.5%, 89.4%, 96% for 1 year, 1-2 years, 2 years, 3 years, and 5 years follow-up, respectively. The in-stent stenosis rate was 4.8% and the retreatment rate for the long-term follow-up period was 5%. No delayed rupture of the aneurysm was reported, and there was one case of delayed ischemic stroke. The sensitivity analysis of the prospective studies showed a complete occlusion rate of 83.5% and 85.2% for 1 and 3 years of follow-up, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Flow diverters are safe and effective in short- and long-term follow-up and rarely cause serious delayed side effects.
Topics: Humans; Intracranial Aneurysm; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Stents; Carotid Artery Diseases; Embolization, Therapeutic; Endovascular Procedures; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36150896
DOI: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019240