-
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Jun 2024Several approaches to surgical techniques and graft types exist in posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction. The literature lacks knowledge regarding outcomes after... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Several approaches to surgical techniques and graft types exist in posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction. The literature lacks knowledge regarding outcomes after autograft versus allograft reconstruction for PLC injuries.
PURPOSE
To comprehensively review the current literature on PLC reconstruction and compare outcomes between autograft and allograft tissues.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
The PubMed and Scopus online databases were searched with the terms "PLC,""posterolateral knee,""posterolateral corner," and "reconstruction" in varying combinations. Patient characteristics, graft type, graft failure, surgical techniques, functional outcome scores, and varus laxity on stress radiographs were reviewed and compared between PLC reconstruction with autografts versus allografts.
RESULTS
Included were 22 studies comprising 33 cohorts: 16 autografts (n = 280 knees) and 17 allografts (336 knees). There were 69 isolated PLC reconstructions (58 allografts and 11 autografts) and 493 multiligament reconstructions (269 autografts and 224 allografts). There was no difference in the mean patient age (30.5 vs 33.5 years, respectively; = .11) or mean follow-up (39.5 vs 37.7 months, respectively; = .68) between the autograft and allograft groups. There was no evidence to suggest a difference in graft failures between graft types (pooled mean autograft vs allograft: 0.44 vs 0.41 failures; = .95). There was a significant difference in the mean postoperative Lysholm scores for autografts versus allografts (89.6 vs 85.5, respectively; = .04). There was no difference between the cohorts in preoperative or postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores or postoperative varus laxity.
CONCLUSION
Our review and meta-analysis indicated no significant differences in graft failure rates or objective outcomes after PLC reconstruction based on graft type alone. There was a significant difference in postoperative Lysholm scores in favor of the autograft group and no significant difference in IKDC subjective scores.
PubMed: 38840793
DOI: 10.1177/23259671241247542 -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Aug 2023To perform a meta-analysis of RCTs evaluating donor site morbidity after bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB), hamstring tendon (HT) and quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Lower donor site morbidity with hamstring and quadriceps tendon autograft compared with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
PURPOSE
To perform a meta-analysis of RCTs evaluating donor site morbidity after bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB), hamstring tendon (HT) and quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
METHODS
PubMed, OVID/Medline and Cochrane databases were queried in July 2022. All level one articles reporting the frequency of specific donor-site morbidity were included. Frequentist model network meta-analyses with P-scores were conducted to compare the prevalence of donor-site morbidity, complications, all-cause reoperations and revision ACLR among the three treatment groups.
RESULTS
Twenty-one RCTs comprising the outcomes of 1726 patients were included. The overall pooled rate of donor-site morbidity (defined as anterior knee pain, difficulty/impossibility kneeling, or combination) was 47.3% (range, 3.8-86.7%). A 69% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.18-0.56) and 88% (95% CI: 0.04-0.33) lower odds of incurring donor-site morbidity was observed with HT and QT autografts, respectively (p < 0.0001, both), when compared to BTB autograft. QT autograft was associated with a non-statistically significant reduction in donor-site morbidity compared with HT autograft (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.14-1.03, n.s.). Treatment rankings (ordered from best-to-worst autograft choice with respect to donor-site morbidity) were as follows: (1) QT (P-score = 0.99), (2) HT (P-score = 0.51) and (3) BTB (P-score = 0.00). No statistically significant associations were observed between autograft and complications (n.s.), reoperations (n.s.) or revision ACLR (n.s.).
CONCLUSION
ACLR using HT and QT autograft tissue was associated with a significant reduction in donor-site morbidity compared to BTB autograft. Autograft selection was not associated with complications, all-cause reoperations, or revision ACLR. Based on the current data, there is sufficient evidence to recommend that autograft selection should be personalized through considering differential rates of donor-site morbidity in the context of patient expectations and activity level without concern for a clinically important change in the rate of adverse events.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level I.
Topics: Humans; Autografts; Patellar Ligament; Network Meta-Analysis; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tendons; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction; Transplantation, Autologous; Hamstring Tendons; Morbidity; Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Grafting
PubMed: 37000243
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07402-2 -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Oct 2023To compare graft dimensions, functional outcomes, and failure rates following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with either five-strand or four-strand... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Though five-strand hamstring autografts demonstrate greater graft diameter, postoperative outcomes are equivocal to four-strand hamstring autograft preparations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of level I and II studies.
PURPOSE
To compare graft dimensions, functional outcomes, and failure rates following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with either five-strand or four-strand hamstring autograft options.
METHODS
Three databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE) were searched from inception to 22 April 2023 for level I and II studies comparing five- and four-strand hamstring autografts in ACLR. The authors adhered to the PRISMA and R-AMSTAR guidelines as well as the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data on demographics, surgical details and rehabilitation, graft diameter, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and rates of positive Lachman test, positive pivot shift test, and graft rupture were extracted. PROMs included Knee Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales, Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC).
RESULTS
One randomized controlled trial (RCT) and four prospective cohort studies with 572 patients were included. Graft diameters were larger in the five-strand group with a mean difference of 0.93 mm (95% CI 0.61 to 1.25, p < 0.001, I = 66%). The five-strand group reported statistically higher KOOS ADL subscale and Lysholm scores with a mean difference of 4.85 (95% CI 0.14 to 9.56, p = 0.04, I = 19%) and 3.01 (95% CI 0.48 to 5.53, p = 0.02, I = 0%), respectively. There were no differences in KOOS symptoms, pain, quality of life, or sports subscales, or IKDC scores. There were no differences in rates of positive Lachman test, positive pivot shift test, or graft rupture with pooled odds ratios of 0.62 (95% CI 0.13 to 2.91, n.s., I = 80%), 0.94 (95% CI 0.51 to 1.75, n.s., I = 31%), and 2.13 (95% CI 0.38 to 12.06, n.s., I = 0%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Although five-stranded hamstring autografts had significantly larger graft diameters compared to four-stranded grafts with a mean difference of 0.93 mm, similar graft rupture rates and clinical laxity assessments were identified following ACLR. While some PROMs were statistically superior in the five-stranded hamstring groups, the threshold for the minimal clinical important difference was not reached indicating similar clinical outcomes overall.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level II.
Topics: Humans; Autografts; Hamstring Tendons; Knee Joint; Transplantation, Autologous; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37477649
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07515-8 -
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Dec 2023Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery with quadriceps tendon (QT) grafts, both with and without a patellar bone plug, have gained popularity in recent... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery with quadriceps tendon (QT) grafts, both with and without a patellar bone plug, have gained popularity in recent years in the primary and revision settings. Postoperative complications occur with the use of QT autografts.
PURPOSE
To systematically review the incidence of postoperative complications after primary ACLR QT autograft and compare complication rates in patients undergoing all-soft tissue QT grafts versus QT grafts with a patellar bone plug (QTPB).
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
A literature search using the 2020 PRISMA guidelines was performed by querying PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases from database inception through August 2022. Included were evidence level 1 to 4 human clinical studies in English that reported complications after primary ACLR with QT autograft. The incidence of complications within the included studies was extracted. Differences in the incidence of postoperative complications between ACLR with QT with and without a patellar bone plug were calculated.
RESULTS
A total of 20 studies from 2004 to 2022, comprised of 2381 patients (2389 knees; 68.3% male) with a mean age of 27 years (range, 12-58 years), were identified. The mean follow-up was 28.5 months (range, 6-47 months). The total incidence of complications was 10.3%, with persistent postoperative knee pain being the most common (10.8%). Patients who underwent ACLR with all-soft tissue QT grafts had a 2.7-times increased incidence of anterior knee pain (23.3% vs 8.6%) and reoperations (5.9% vs 3.2%) when compared with QTPB grafts ( < .01 for both). There was no appreciable difference in total complications, graft failures, ACLR revisions, cyclops lesions, or range of motion deficit ( > .05 for all). Patellar fractures occurred exclusively after QTPB (2.2%).
CONCLUSION
Complications after primary ACLR using QT autograft were recorded in 10.5% of knees, with anterior knee pain being the most common. No difference was reported in the overall incidence of complications with the use of the QT versus QTPB grafts; however, anterior knee pain was 2.7 times greater with use of a soft tissue quadriceps graft.
PubMed: 38145223
DOI: 10.1177/23259671231199728 -
The American Journal of Sports Medicine Sep 2023The rerupture or need for revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a serious complication. Preventive strategies that target the early... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The rerupture or need for revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a serious complication. Preventive strategies that target the early identification of risk factors are important to reduce the incidence of additional surgery.
PURPOSE
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate risk factors for revision or rerupture after ACLR.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
Literature searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from database inception to November 2021 and updated in January 2022. Quantitative, original studies reporting potential adjusted risk factors were included. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for potential risk factors.
RESULTS
A total of 71 studies across 13 countries with a total sample size of 629,120 met the inclusion criteria. Fifteen factors were associated with an increase in the risk of revision or rerupture after ACLR: male sex (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.14-1.41), younger age (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.05-1.08), lower body mass index (BMI) (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.06), family history (OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.50-4.08), White race (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.08-1.60), higher posterolateral tibial slope (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.26), preoperative high-grade anterior knee laxity (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.46-3.64), higher baseline Marx activity level (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13), return to a high activity level/sport (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.15-3.57), an ACLR within less than a year after injury (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.81-2.32), a concomitant medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.31-2.00), an anteromedial portal or transportal technique (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.22-1.51), hamstring tendon (HT) autografts (vs bone-patellar tendon-bone [BPTB] autografts) (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.40-1.82), allografts (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.65-4.19), and smaller graft diameter (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.05-1.38). The other factors failed to show an association with an increased risk of revision or rerupture after ACLR.
CONCLUSION
Male sex, younger age, lower BMI, family history, White race, higher posterolateral tibial slope, preoperative high-grade anterior knee laxity, higher baseline Marx activity level, return to a high activity level/sport, an ACLR within less than a year from injury, a concomitant MCL injury, an anteromedial portal or transportal technique, HT autografts (vs BPTB autografts), allografts, and smaller graft diameter may increase the risk of revision or rerupture after ACLR. Raising awareness and implementing effective preventions/interventions for risk factors are priorities for clinical practitioners to reduce the incidence of revision or rerupture after ACLR.
Topics: Humans; Male; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction; Knee Joint; Transplantation, Homologous; Risk Factors
PubMed: 36189967
DOI: 10.1177/03635465221119787 -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Dec 2023Research regarding revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (RACLR) with quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts is lacking. The purpose of this study was to perform... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Quadriceps tendon autograft has similar clinical outcomes when compared to hamstring tendon and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts for revision ACL reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
PURPOSE
Research regarding revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (RACLR) with quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts is lacking. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of RACLR with QT and compare its patient outcomes to RACLR with hamstring tendon (HT) and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autografts.
METHODS
Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, a search for studies using QT in RACLR was performed within PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL from database date of inception through December 26, 2022. Primary outcomes sought included: failure rate, Lysholm scores, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, IKDC grades, arthrometric knee side-to-side differences (STSD), pivot shift grade, donor site morbidity, return to sport, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores.
RESULTS
Nine studies were included consisting of 606 RACLR: 349 QT, 169 HT, and 88 BTB. Overall failure rates were 7.6% QT, 13.3% HT, and 8.7% BTB. Mean weighted Lysholm scores were 85.8 ± 3.8 QT, 82.5 ± 3.8 HT and 86.6 ± 4.5 BTB. IKDC average scores were 82.3 ± 1.6 QT, 80.1 ± 1.7 HT, and 81.7 ± 5.5BTB. Combined rates of IKDC A/B grades were 88.4% and 80.0% for QT and HT, respectively. VAS average scores were 0.9 ± 1.1 QT, 1.4 ± 0.2 HT, and 0.7 ± 0.8 for BTB. Side-to-side difference was reported for QT and HT with average values of 1.7 ± 0.6 mm and 2.1 ± 0.5 mm, respectively. Grade 0 or 1 pivot shifts were reported in 96.2% of QT patients and 91.3% of HT. Donor site morbidity, only reported for QT and HT, was 14.6 ± 9.7% and 23.6 ± 14.1%, respectively. QT resulted in a mean Tegner score of 5.9 ± 1.5 versus HT 5.7 ± 1.5. Rate of return to pivoting sports was 38.0% QT, 48.6% HT, and 76.9% BTB. Across all outcomes, there was no significant difference when comparing QT to HT, QT to BTB, and QT compared to HT and BTB combined.
CONCLUSIONS
RACLR with QT yields satisfactory patient reported outcomes, satisfactory improvement in knee laxity, expected return to sport rates, and has an overall 7.6% failure rate. Outcomes are comparative to those of HT and BTB making it an acceptable graft choice for RACLR. Surgeons should consider using QT autograft for RACLR, especially when other autografts are unavailable.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
IV.
Topics: Humans; Hamstring Tendons; Autografts; Patellar Ligament; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Tendons; Transplantation, Autologous; Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Grafting
PubMed: 37804345
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07592-9 -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Aug 2023The purpose of this study was to synthesize and quantitatively assess the outcomes of ACL Revision using a quadriceps tendon (QT) graft and to compare them with those of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
No difference in patient reported outcomes, laxity, and failure rate after revision ACL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon compared to hamstring tendon graft: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to synthesize and quantitatively assess the outcomes of ACL Revision using a quadriceps tendon (QT) graft and to compare them with those of ACL Revisions performed with hamstring tendons (HT) graft.
METHODS
A comprehensive search based on the PRISMA protocol was performed across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception until February 2022. Clinical studies reporting the outcomes of ACL Revision with QT autograft were included. Subjective and Objective IKDC, Tegner activity level, Lysholm knee score, KOOS score, VAS for pain, knee laxity (KT-1000/2000 arthrometer, Lachman test, and pivot-shift test), and graft failure were assessed. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed and a quality assessment of the included studies was carried out with the MINORS score.
RESULTS
Seven studies met the selection criteria and were included in the systematic review for the qualitative synthesis of data. A pooled mean of all the variables was provided for the 7 studies, while 3 studies included a control group of ACL Revision with HT and were included in a meta-analysis. A total of 420 participants with a mean age of 28.9 ± 10.5 years and a mean postoperative follow-up of 39.3 ± 16.4 months were assessed. Of these, 277 patients underwent ACL Revision with QT and 143 patients underwent ACL Revision with HT. In the QT group, average graft failure was 9.8% compared to 17.4% in the HT group. KOOS Sport and pivot-shift test showed better postoperative outcomes in QT than HT, although it was not statistically significant (p = 0.052).
CONCLUSION
The QT autograft was associated with an improved trend of rotatory laxity, PROMs and failure rate compared to HT autograft after revision ACL reconstruction. The QT autograft for revision ACL reconstruction is supported by the current literature. It is a viable graft that should be considered for both primary and revision ACL reconstruction.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level IV.
Topics: Humans; Adolescent; Young Adult; Adult; Hamstring Tendons; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction; Tendons; Transplantation, Autologous; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Autografts
PubMed: 36961538
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07380-5 -
Annals of Plastic Surgery Jan 2024Nerve capping is a method of neuroma treatment or prevention that consists of the transplantation of a proximal nerve stump into an autograft or other material cap,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND/AIM OF THE STUDY
Nerve capping is a method of neuroma treatment or prevention that consists of the transplantation of a proximal nerve stump into an autograft or other material cap, after surgical removal of the neuroma or transection of the nerve. The aim was to reduce neuroma formation and symptoms by preventing neuronal adhesions and scar tissue. In this narrative literature review, we summarize the studies that have investigated the effectiveness of nerve capping for neuroma management to provide clarity and update the clinician's knowledge on the topic.
METHODS
A systematic electronic search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria was performed in the PubMed database combining "neuroma," "nerve," "capping," "conduit," "treatment," "management," "wrap," "tube," and "surgery" as search terms. English-language clinical studies on humans and animals that described nerve capping as a treatment/prevention technique for neuromas were then selected based on a full-text article review. The data from the included studies were compiled based on the technique and material used for nerve capping, and technique and outcomes were reviewed.
RESULTS
We found 10 applicable human studies from our literature search. Several capping materials were described: epineurium, nerve, muscle, collagen nerve conduit, Neurocap (synthetic copolymer of lactide and caprolactone, which is biocompatible and resorbable), silicone rubber, and collagen. Overall, 146 patients were treated in the clinical studies. After surgery, many patients were completely pain-free or had considerable improvement in pain scores, whereas some patients did not have improvement or were not satisfied after the procedure. Nerve capping was used in 18 preclinical animal studies, using a variety of capping materials including autologous tissues, silicone, and synthetic nanofibers. Preclinical studies demonstrated successful reduction in rates of neuroma formation.
CONCLUSIONS
Nerve capping has undergone major advancements since its beginnings and is now a useful option for the treatment or prevention of neuromas. As knowledge of peripheral nerve injuries and neuroma prevention grows, the criterion standard neuroprotective material for enhancement of nerve regeneration can be identified and applied to produce reliable surgical outcomes.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Amputation Stumps; Collagen; Neuroma; Peripheral Nerve Injuries; Peripheral Nerves
PubMed: 37962245
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003714 -
Journal of Translational Medicine Sep 2023Cell-based strategies focusing on replacement or protection of dopaminergic neurons have been considered as a potential approach to treat Parkinson's disease (PD) for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Cell-based strategies focusing on replacement or protection of dopaminergic neurons have been considered as a potential approach to treat Parkinson's disease (PD) for decades. However, despite promising preclinical results, clinical trials on cell-therapy for PD reported mixed outcomes and a thorough synthesis of these findings is lacking. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate cell-therapy for PD patients.
METHODS
We systematically identified all clinical trials investigating cell- or tissue-based therapies for PD published before July 2023. Out of those, studies reporting transplantation of homogenous cells (containing one cell type) were included in meta-analysis. The mean difference or standardized mean difference in quantitative neurological scale scores before and after cell-therapy was analyzed to evaluate treatment effects.
RESULTS
The systematic literature search revealed 106 articles. Eleven studies reporting data from 11 independent trials (210 patients) were eligible for meta-analysis. Disease severity and motor function evaluation indicated beneficial effects of homogenous cell-therapy in the 'off' state at 3-, 6-, 12-, or 24-month follow-ups, and for motor function even after 36 months. Most of the patients were levodopa responders (61.6-100% in different follow-ups). Cell-therapy was also effective in improving the daily living activities in the 'off' state of PD patients. Cells from diverse sources were used and multiple transplantation modes were applied. Autografts did not improve functional outcomes, while allografts exhibited beneficial effects. Encouragingly, both transplantation into basal ganglia and to areas outside the basal ganglia were effective to reduce disease severity. Some trials reported adverse events potentially related to the surgical procedure. One confirmed and four possible cases of graft-induced dyskinesia were reported in two trials included in this meta-analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis provides preliminary evidence for the beneficial effects of homogenous cell-therapy for PD, potentially to the levodopa responders. Allogeneic cells were superior to autologous cells, and the effective transplantation sites are not limited to the basal ganglia. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022369760.
Topics: Humans; Parkinson Disease; Levodopa; Transplantation, Autologous; Transplantation, Homologous; Allogeneic Cells
PubMed: 37679754
DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04484-x -
Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery &... Oct 2023The viability of augmenting small-diameter hamstring autografts with allografts remains unclear. Recent studies have reported different clinical results after allograft... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Comparison of failure rates and functional outcomes between hamstring autografts and hybrid grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
The viability of augmenting small-diameter hamstring autografts with allografts remains unclear. Recent studies have reported different clinical results after allograft augmentation. Hence, we sought to determine whether hamstring autografts and hybrid grafts differed in terms of failure rates and functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We also evaluated whether the results of the comparisons differed based on allograft sterilization methods.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed by searching the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases to identify prospective or retrospective studies (evidence levels 1, 2, or 3) that compared the failure rates and functional outcomes of ACL reconstruction using autografts and hybrid grafts.
RESULTS
We identified 15 relevant studies, including 1,521 patients, with 798 and 723 treated using autografts and hybrid grafts, respectively. Fourteen studies were retrospective comparative studies, and one was a prospective randomized controlled trial. Of these, three studies used non-irradiated allografts. In the analysis of all participants, no significant differences in failure rates and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were observed between the autograft and hybrid graft groups. Comparing the autograft and hybrid graft groups that used non-irradiated allografts, no differences in the failure rates and subjective IKDC scores were also noted. Meanwhile, in the groups that used irradiated allograft, the autograft group demonstrated higher Lysholm knee scores and reduced anterior laxity than the hybrid graft group.
DISCUSSION
Overall, ACL reconstruction using hybrid grafts may not reduce failure rates compared to reconstructions using hamstring autografts, although hybrid grafts with irradiation may decrease functional outcomes.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
III; systematic review of level II and III studies.
Topics: Humans; Autografts; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Transplantation, Autologous; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Hamstring Tendons; Allografts; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36462633
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103499