-
Canadian Journal of Diabetes Jun 2024Current medications for diabetic neuropathy (DN) recommended by the American Diabetes Association and American Academy of Neurology do not address the pathologic process... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Ranking Alpha Lipoic Acid and Gamma Linolenic Acid in Terms of Efficacy and Safety in the Management of Adults With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVES
Current medications for diabetic neuropathy (DN) recommended by the American Diabetes Association and American Academy of Neurology do not address the pathologic process of denervation among patients with DN, because ancillary treatments, such as reactive oxygen scavengers, may be needed. The purpose of this work was to summarize the available evidence about the efficacy and safety of alpha lipoic acid (ALA) and gamma linolenic acid (GLA) in the management of DN.
METHODS
Using the search terms [(alpha lipoic acid or ALA or thioctic acid or thioctacid) or (gamma linolenic acid or GLA)] AND [(diabetes or diabetes mellitus) AND (polyneuropathy or neuropathy or sensorimotor polyneuropathy or radiculopathy)], 11 studies were included in this review and combined meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Eight of the 11 articles (73%) reported significant benefit of ALA vs placebo. In the meta-analysis, the Total Symptom Score (TSS) for ALA 600 mg/day (ALA600) was 1.05 points lower (standard mean difference [SMD] -1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.07 to -0.04, p=0.04, I=98.18%) compared with control at the end of the study. In the network meta-analysis, ALA600 (SMD -1.68, 95% CI -2.8 to -0.6) and GLA (SMD -2.39, 95% CI -4.3 to -0.5) had significantly lower TSSs compared with placebo. Moreover, GLA had the highest probability of being the best (52.7%) for improving DN symptoms. In all studies, most adverse events include gastrointestinal disturbances. In terms of tolerability, no differences were detected between ALA and control groups.
CONCLUSION
ALA and GLA appear to be safe and efficacious biofactors for improvement of DN symptoms.
Topics: Humans; Thioctic Acid; Diabetic Neuropathies; gamma-Linolenic Acid; Network Meta-Analysis; Adult; Treatment Outcome; Antioxidants
PubMed: 38295879
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2024.01.007 -
Minerva Anestesiologica May 2024Postoperative cognitive impairment is common in surgical patients, including postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Several studies... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Postoperative cognitive impairment is common in surgical patients, including postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Several studies investigating the association between peripheral nerve block and the risk of cognitive impairment after thoracic surgery showed conflicting results. Therefore, we conducted the current systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effects of peripheral nerve block on postoperative cognitive impairment in thoracic surgical patients.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
Eligible randomized controlled trials were retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Embase databases. The primary outcomes were the incidence of postoperative delirium or cognitive dysfunction and the MMSE scores. Furthermore, VAS scores, levels of TNF-α and IL-6, as well as the duration of hospitalization were analyzed as secondary outcomes.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Ten articles including 1279 participants were selected for this meta-analysis. The results showed that peripheral nerve block could lessen the incidence of postoperative delirium or cognitive dysfunction (OR=0.39, 95% CI [0.27 to 0.56]), the scores of VAS (MD=-1.35 [95% CI: -2.30 to -0.40]), the values of TNF-α (SMD=-1.13 [95% CI: -1.49 to -0.76]) and IL-6 (SMD=-1.65 [95% CI: -1.87 to -1.42]), as well as the length of hospitalization (MD=-0.70 [95% CI: -0.96 to -0.43]). In addition, peripheral nerve block was linked to a significant increase in MMSE scores (MD=2.16 [95% CI: 1.40 to 2.91]).
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis revealed positive effects of peripheral nerve block on improving postoperative cognitive impairment in patients following thoracic surgery.
Topics: Humans; Nerve Block; Thoracic Surgical Procedures; Postoperative Complications; Cognitive Dysfunction; Postoperative Cognitive Complications
PubMed: 38289296
DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.23.17669-3 -
Revista Da Associacao Medica Brasileira... 2024The Guidelines Project, which is an initiative of the Brazilian Medical Association, aims to combine information from the medical field to standardize how to conduct and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The Guidelines Project, which is an initiative of the Brazilian Medical Association, aims to combine information from the medical field to standardize how to conduct and assist in the reasoning and decision-making of doctors. The information provided by this project must be critically evaluated by the physician responsible for the conduct that will be adopted, depending on the conditions and the clinical condition of each patient.
Topics: Humans; Hypertension; Kidney; Treatment Outcome; Sympathectomy; Catheter Ablation
PubMed: 38747880
DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.2023D704 -
Pain Physician Feb 2024Chronic axial spinal pain is one of the major causes of disability. Literature shows that spending on low back and neck pain and musculoskeletal disorders continues to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Chronic axial spinal pain is one of the major causes of disability. Literature shows that spending on low back and neck pain and musculoskeletal disorders continues to escalate, not only with disability, but also with increasing costs, accounting for the highest amount of various disease categories. Based on the current literature utilizing controlled diagnostic blocks, facet joints, nerve root dura, and sacroiliac joints have been shown as potential sources of spinal pain. Therapeutic facet joint interventional modalities of axial spinal pain include radiofrequency neurotomy, therapeutic facet joint nerve blocks, and therapeutic intraarticular injections.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the effectiveness of facet joint nerve blocks as a therapeutic modality in managing chronic axial spinal pain of facet joint origin.
STUDY DESIGN
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist.
METHODS
The available literature on facet joint nerve blocks in axial spinal pain was reviewed. The quality assessment criteria utilized were the Cochrane review criteria to assess risk of bias, the Interventional Pain Management Techniques - Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment (IPM-QRB) for randomized therapeutic trials, and the Interventional Pain Management Techniques - Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment for Nonrandomized Studies (IPM-QRBNR) for nonrandomized studies. The evidence was graded according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment criteria. The level of evidence was based on best evidence synthesis with modified grading of qualitative evidence from Level I to Level V. A comprehensive literature search of multiple databases from 1966 to July 2023, including manual searches of the bibliography of known review articles was performed. Quality assessment of the included studies and best evidence synthesis were incorporated into qualitative and quantitative evidence synthesis.
OUTCOME MEASURES
The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients with significant relief and functional improvement of greater than 50% of at least 3 months. Duration of relief was categorized as short-term (less than 6 months) and long-term (greater than 6 months).
RESULTS
This assessment identified 8 high-quality and one moderate quality RCTs and 8 high quality and 4 moderate quality non-randomized studies with application of spinal facet joint nerve blocks as therapeutic modalities. However, based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) assessment, only 3 of the 21 studies showed high levels of evidence and clinical applicability, with 11 studies showing moderate levels of GRADE evidence and clinical applicability.
LIMITATIONS
Despite the availability of multiple studies, the paucity of literature is considered as the major drawback. Based on Grading of Recommendations, Assessment Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) assessment, only 3 of the 21 studies showed high levels of evidence and clinical applicability.
CONCLUSION
Based on the present systematic review and meta-analysis with 9 RCTs and 12 non-randomized studies, the evidence is Level II with moderate to strong recommendation for therapeutic facet joint nerve blocks in managing spinal facet joint pain.
Topics: Humans; Pain Management; Zygapophyseal Joint; Chronic Pain; Spine; Nerve Block
PubMed: 38324785
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Neurosurgery. Pediatrics Dec 2023Lumbosacral selective dorsal rhizotomy is a neurosurgical treatment option to reduce spasticity in the lower extremities in children with cerebral palsy. Surprisingly,...
OBJECTIVE
Lumbosacral selective dorsal rhizotomy is a neurosurgical treatment option to reduce spasticity in the lower extremities in children with cerebral palsy. Surprisingly, concomitant improvement of spasticity in the upper extremities and functionality of the hands has been sporadically reported postoperatively. In this systematic review, the authors aimed to quantify the postoperative improvement in upper-extremity spasticity and functionality, identify predictors, and discuss underlying mechanisms.
METHODS
The authors searched the MEDLINE and Embase databases for studies reporting upper-extremity outcomes in cerebral palsy patients after selective dorsal rhizotomy that reported one or more of the following clinical scales: the Ashworth Scale (AS), the Modified AS (MAS), the fine motor skills domain of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (PDMS), the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST), the self-care domain of the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM), or the self-care domain of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). The authors arbitrarily divided postoperative follow-up into short-term (< 6 months), medium-term (6-24 months), and long-term (> 24 months) follow-up. A 1-point change in MAS score has been reported as clinically significant. To assess bias, the Cochrane Collaboration's tool and ROBINS-I tool were used.
RESULTS
The authors included 24 articles describing 752 patients. Spasticity reduction of the upper extremities ranged from 0.30 to 0.55 (AS) and between 0 and 2.9 (MAS) at medium-term follow-up. This large variability may partially be attributed to a floor effect since patients with normal upper-extremity function would not be expected to have further improvement. QUEST improvement ranged from 2.7% to 4.5% at medium-term follow-up. The mean improvements in functional skills of the self-care domain of the PEDI were 4.3 at short-term and 7 at medium-term follow-ups and ranged from 10.8 to 34.7 at long-term follow-up. There are insufficient data to draw meaningful conclusions regarding the PDMS fine motor skills and the WeeFIM self-care domains.
CONCLUSIONS
The literature suggests that a pronounced postoperative spasticity reduction in the lower extremities and a moderately severe preoperative upper-extremity spasticity may positively predict postoperative reduction in upper-extremity spasticity. There are at least 5 hypotheses that may explain the postoperative reduction in upper-extremity spasticity and functionality: 1) a somatosensory cortex reorganization favoring the hand region over the leg region, 2) a decrease in abnormal electrical transmission throughout the spinal cord, 3) an indirect result of improved posture due to improved truncal and leg stability, 4) an indirect consequence of occupational/physical therapy intensification, and 5) a maturation effect. However, all remain unproven to date.
Topics: Child; Humans; Rhizotomy; Cerebral Palsy; Muscle Spasticity; Motor Skills; Hand; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37877954
DOI: 10.3171/2023.7.PEDS22526 -
International Wound Journal Apr 2024This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the impact of ultrasound-guided subsheath versus extrasheath sciatic nerve blocks on postoperative wound pain in tibial... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Evaluating the impact of ultrasound-guided subsheath versus extrasheath sciatic nerve block on postoperative wound pain in tibial and foot surgeries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the impact of ultrasound-guided subsheath versus extrasheath sciatic nerve blocks on postoperative wound pain in tibial and foot surgeries, crucial for effective pain management and patient recovery. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, this study used a PICO framework, focusing on patients undergoing tibial and foot surgeries and comparing the efficacy and safety of subsheath and extrasheath sciatic nerve blocks. The literature search spanned four databases without time restrictions, assessing various outcomes like success rate, onset time, duration of analgesia and complication rates. Quality assessment employed the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool, and statistical analyses included heterogeneity assessment, fixed-effect and random-effects models, sensitivity analysis and publication bias evaluation using funnel plots and Egger's linear regression test. From an initial pool of 1213 articles, six met the inclusion criteria. The subsheath group showed a significantly higher success rate of complete sensory blockade within 30 min compared with the extrasheath group (OR = 5.39; 95% CI: 2.82-10.28; p < 0.01). No significant differences were found in procedure duration or incidence of nerve-related complications between the two techniques. The subsheath approach also demonstrated a quicker onset time of sensory blockade (MD = -8.57; 95% CI: -11.27 to -5.88; p < 0.01). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the results, and no significant publication bias was detected. Ultrasound-guided subsheath sciatic nerve blocks are more effective than extrasheath blocks in achieving rapid and complete sensory blockade for tibial and foot surgeries, with a quicker onset time and comparable safety profile. Subsheath injections are thus recommended as a preferred method for anaesthesia and postoperative pain management in these surgical procedures, enhancing overall patient outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Sciatic Nerve; Nerve Block; Pain, Postoperative; Ultrasonography; Ultrasonography, Interventional; Anesthetics, Local
PubMed: 38155428
DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14640 -
International Wound Journal Feb 2024Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) often involves significant postoperative pain, necessitating effective analgesia. This meta-analysis compares the analgesic efficacy of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Analgesic efficacy of local infiltration anaesthesia versus femoral nerve block in alleviating postoperative wound pain following total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) often involves significant postoperative pain, necessitating effective analgesia. This meta-analysis compares the analgesic efficacy of local infiltration anaesthesia (LIA) and femoral nerve block (FNB) in managing postoperative wound pain following TKA. Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this meta-analysis was structured around the PICO framework, assessing studies that directly compared LIA and FNB in TKA patients. A comprehensive search across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library was conducted without time restrictions. Studies were included based on specific criteria such as participant demographics, study design and outcomes like pain scores and opioid consumption. Quality assessment utilized the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. The statistical approach was determined based on heterogeneity, with the choice of fixed- or random-effects models guided by the I statistic. Sensitivity analysis and evaluation of publication bias using funnel plots and Egger's linear regression test were also conducted. From an initial pool of 1275 articles, eight studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies conducted in various countries from 2007 to 2016. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference in resting and movement-related Visual Analogue Scale scores post-TKA between the LIA and FNB groups. However, LIA was associated with significantly lower opioid consumption. The quality assessment revealed a low risk of bias in most studies, and the sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of these findings. There was no significant publication bias detected. Both LIA and FNB are effective in controlling postoperative pain in TKA patients, but LIA offers the advantage of lower opioid consumption. Its simplicity, cost-effectiveness and opioid-sparing nature make LIA the recommended choice for postoperative analgesia in knee replacement surgeries.
Topics: Humans; Anesthesia, Local; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Analgesics, Opioid; Femoral Nerve; Nerve Block; Pain, Postoperative; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Local
PubMed: 38351465
DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14766 -
Foot and Ankle Surgery : Official... Jul 2024Peripheral nerve blocks may be essential elements in a multimodal pain management regime following foot and ankle surgery. We assessed the effects of ankle blocks... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Peripheral nerve blocks may be essential elements in a multimodal pain management regime following foot and ankle surgery. We assessed the effects of ankle blocks compared with no intervention/sham block or a sciatic nerve block in patients undergoing surgery of the foot or ankle.
METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, Medline, and Embase for randomised clinical trials comparing ankle block with no intervention/sham block or a sciatic nerve block for patients undergoing surgery of the foot or ankle. Our primary outcomes were duration of analgesia and cumulative 24-hour opioid consumption. We followed the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook, and performed meta-analysis, Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA), and assessed the risk of bias and certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.
RESULTS
We included five trials (362 participants) comparing ankle block with no intervention/sham block and three trials (247 participants) comparing ankle block with a sciatic nerve block. Ankle block may increase the duration of analgesia when compared with no intervention/sham block (MD 431 min; 96.7% CI 208 to 654), but the evidence was very uncertain. Duration was decreased when compared with a sciatic nerve block (MD -410 min; 96.7% CI -462 to -358). The ankle block duration was probably important in both comparisons. The effects on cumulative 24-hour opioid consumption were very uncertain in both comparisons.
CONCLUSIONS
Ankle block may increase the duration of analgesia when compared with no intervention/sham block, but the evidence was very uncertain, and decrease the duration of analgesia when compared with a sciatic nerve block. The ankle block duration was probably clinically important in both comparisons. The effects on cumulative 24-hour opioid consumption were very uncertain.
Topics: Humans; Nerve Block; Ankle; Pain, Postoperative; Foot; Orthopedic Procedures; Sciatic Nerve; Pain Management
PubMed: 38492998
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2024.02.015 -
World Neurosurgery May 2024Surgery can effectively treat Trigeminal neuralgia (TN), but postoperative pain recurrence or nonresponse are common. Repeat surgery is frequently offered but limited... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Surgery can effectively treat Trigeminal neuralgia (TN), but postoperative pain recurrence or nonresponse are common. Repeat surgery is frequently offered but limited data exist to guide the selection of salvage surgical procedures. We aimed to compare pain relief outcomes after repeat microvascular decompression (MVD), percutaneous rhizotomy (PR), or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to determine which modality was most efficacious for surgically refractory TN.
METHODS
A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis was performed, including studies of adults with classical or idiopathic TN undergoing repeat surgery. Primary outcomes included complete (CPR) and adequate (APR) pain relief at last follow-up, analyzed in a multivariate mixed-effect meta-regression of proportions. Secondary outcomes were initial pain relief and facial numbness.
RESULTS
Of 1299 records screened, 61 studies with 68 treatment arms (29 MVD, 14 PR, and 25 SRS) comprising 2165 patients were included. Combining MVD, PR, and SRS study data, 68.8% achieved initial CPR after a repeat TN procedure. On average, 49.6% of the combined sample of MVD, PR, and SRS had CPR at final follow-up, which was on average 2.99 years postoperatively. The proportion (with 95% CI) achieving CPR at final follow-up was 0.57 (0.51-0.62) for MVD, 0.60 (0.52-0.68) for PR, and 0.35 (0.30-0.41) for SRS, with a significantly lower proportion of pain relief with SRS. Estimates of initial CPR for MVD were 0.82 (0.78-0.85), 0.68 for PR (0.6-0.76), and 0.41 for SRS (0.35-0.48).
CONCLUSIONS
Across MVD, PR, and SRS, about half of TN patients maintain complete CPR at an average follow-up time of 3 years after repeat surgery. In treating refractory or recurrent TN, MVD and PR were superior to SRS in both initial pain relief and long-term pain relief at final follow-up. These findings can inform surgical decision-making in this challenging population.
Topics: Trigeminal Neuralgia; Humans; Microvascular Decompression Surgery; Reoperation; Rhizotomy; Radiosurgery; Recurrence; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38403014
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.02.097 -
Medicine Aug 2023The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is commonly used in surgical practice for postoperative analgesia in abdominal surgery. However, numerous studies have... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Transversus abdominis plane block versus local anesthetic infiltration for anesthetic effect in peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is commonly used in surgical practice for postoperative analgesia in abdominal surgery. However, numerous studies have demonstrated that TAP block is also suitable for intraoperative anesthesia of peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) insertion, although its efficacy and safety are still controversial. Local anesthetic infiltration (LAI) is currently the most general anesthesia strategy for PDC insertion. Consequently, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to identify which anesthesia strategy is better between TAP block and LAI.
METHODS
A systematic and comprehensive search was conducted on 5 databases, retrieving published and registered randomized controlled trials as of March 10, 2022, comparing the anesthesia effects of TAP block and LAI. The primary outcomes are the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score of patients at various time points in the surgery. The secondary outcomes are the VAS pain score at rest at 2 and 24 hours postoperatively, intraoperative rescue anesthesia, general anesthesia switching rate, and PD-related complications.
RESULTS
There were 9 trials with 432 patients identified. TAP block was more effective than LAI at reducing intraoperative and postoperative VAS pain scores in patients. Compared to LAI, TAP block significantly reduces the dosage of anesthetics used to rescue anesthesia during surgery, the general anesthesia switching rate, and the incidence of postoperative PD-related complications in patients.
CONCLUSIONS
Our systematic review and meta-analysis proved that TAP block could be used as the primary anesthetic technique for PDC insertion, with superior anesthetic effects to LAI.
Topics: Humans; Anesthetics, Local; Abdominal Muscles; Nerve Block; Peritoneal Dialysis; Catheters; Pain; Pain, Postoperative; Analgesics, Opioid
PubMed: 37543799
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034517