-
Journal of Infection and Public Health Oct 2023Dengue is caused by the dengue virus (DENVs) infection and clinical manifestations include dengue fever (DF), dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF), or dengue shock syndrome...
Dengue is caused by the dengue virus (DENVs) infection and clinical manifestations include dengue fever (DF), dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF), or dengue shock syndrome (DSS). Due to a lack of antiviral drugs and effective vaccines, several therapeutic and control strategies have been proposed. A systemic literature review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines to select proper references to give an overview of DENV infection. Results indicate that understanding the virus characteristics and epidemiology are essential to gain the basic and clinical knowledge as well as dengue disseminated pattern and status. Different factors and mechanisms are thought to be involved in the presentation of DHF and DSS, including antibody-dependent enhancement, immune dysregulation, viral virulence, host genetic susceptibility, and preexisting dengue antibodies. This study suggests that dissecting pathogenesis and risk factors as well as developing different types of therapeutic and control strategies against DENV infection are urgently needed.
Topics: Humans; Antiviral Agents; Dengue; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Risk Factors; Virulence
PubMed: 37595484
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2023.08.001 -
Public Health Nov 2023Dengue is the most important human vector-borne disease in terms of disease burden. A first dengue vaccine has recently been licenced, and others are in advanced stages... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Dengue is the most important human vector-borne disease in terms of disease burden. A first dengue vaccine has recently been licenced, and others are in advanced stages of development. However, to date, none of these vaccines has achieved balanced efficacy and safety for all dengue serotypes. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the global acceptance and willingness to pay for unspecified dengue vaccines.
METHODS
This systematic review and meta-analysis included cross-sectional and cohort studies that reported values for vaccine acceptance (percentage) and willingness to pay for currently available or hypothetical vaccines. These values were pooled using random-effects models for the acceptance, while weighted linear regression was chosen for willingness to pay. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using prediction intervals (PIs), and a domain-based tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed where appropriate. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021255784).
RESULTS
We included 19 studies from the Americas and Asia in the quantitative meta-analysis. The risk of bias was mainly related to the selection of participants and to the assumptions about the safety and efficacy of the vaccines. The percentage of vaccine acceptance was 88.3% (95% CI: 81.0%-93.0%), with some heterogeneity between studies (80% PI: 52.9%-98.1%). Willingness to pay was US$ 46.7 (95% CI: 25.9-67.5) per vaccine recipient. There were differences between continents, with higher acceptance in the Americas.
CONCLUSIONS
We were able to obtain global estimates of vaccine acceptance and willingness to pay and identify the associated factors that influence these values. This knowledge is relevant for the planning of future vaccination strategies.
Topics: Humans; Dengue Vaccines; Dengue; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Vaccination Hesitancy
PubMed: 37741155
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.08.022 -
Journal of Travel Medicine Nov 2023Dengue is currently a global concern. The range of dengue vectors is expanding with climate change, yet United States of America (USA) studies on dengue epidemiology and...
BACKGROUND
Dengue is currently a global concern. The range of dengue vectors is expanding with climate change, yet United States of America (USA) studies on dengue epidemiology and burden are limited. This systematic review sought to characterize the epidemiology and disease burden of dengue within the USA.
METHODS
Studies evaluating travel-related and endemic dengue in US states and territories were identified and qualitatively summarized. Commentaries and studies on ex-US cases were excluded. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Latin American and Caribbean Center of Health Sciences Information, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched through January 2022.
RESULTS
116 studies were included. In US states, dengue incidence was generally low, with spikes occurring in recent years in 2013-16 (0.17-0.31 cases/100,000) and peaking in 2019 (0.35 cases/100,000). Most cases (94%, n = 7895, 2010-21) were travel related. Dengue was more common in Puerto Rico (cumulative average: 200 cases/100,000, 1980-2015); in 2010-21, 99.9% of cases were locally acquired. There were <50 severe cases in US states (2010-17); fatal cases were even rarer. Severe cases in Puerto Rico peaked in 1998 (n = 173) and 2021 (n = 76). Besides lower income, risk factors in US states included having birds in residence, suggesting unspecified environmental characteristics favourable to dengue vectors. Commonly reported symptoms included fever, headache and rash; median disease duration was 3.5-11 days. Hospitalization rates increased following 2009 World Health Organization disease classification changes (pre-2009: 0-54%; post-2009: 14-75%); median length of stay was 2.7-8 days (Puerto Rico) and 2-3 days (US states). Hospitalization costs/case (2010 USD) were$14 350 (US states),$1764-$5497 (Puerto Rico) and$4207 (US Virgin Islands). In Puerto Rico, average days missed were 0.2-5.3 (work) and 2.5 (school).
CONCLUSIONS
Though dengue risk is ongoing, treatments are limited, and dengue's economic burden is high. There is an urgent need for additional preventive and therapeutic interventions.
Topics: United States; Humans; Travel; Travel-Related Illness; Caribbean Region; Climate Change; Dengue
PubMed: 37792822
DOI: 10.1093/jtm/taad127 -
Journal of Infection and Public Health Nov 2023Dengue fever is a zoonotic viral infection that raises a global alarm in the tropics and subtropics, with the potentially escalating into newer geographical regions....
BACKGROUND
Dengue fever is a zoonotic viral infection that raises a global alarm in the tropics and subtropics, with the potentially escalating into newer geographical regions. Severe dengue may be associated with fatal complications such as myocarditis. There is a paucity of available data on the prevalence of dengue-associated myocarditis. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the global prevalence of dengue-associated myocarditis.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted utilizing the Cochrane library, PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, Web of Science, and Preprint servers such as arXiv, medRxiv, bioRxiv, BioRN, ChiRN, ChiRxiv, and SSRN as of November 25, 2022. All primary studies (case series, cross-sectional, retrospective, and prospective) that reported confirmed cases of dengue myocarditis were included. The I statistic test assessed the heterogenic characteristics and publication bias was evaluated using Doi plot and Egger regression tests.
RESULTS
A total of 12 studies conducted between 2007 and 2022 with 2795 laboratory-confirmed dengue patients were included. Of the included cases, 502 were positive for myocarditis, with a prevalence of 2.4-78%. The pooled prevalence of dengue-induced myocarditis in the studied population was 21.0% (95% CI, 9 - 38%). The prediction interval was estimated to be 0.00 - 0.81.
CONCLUSION
Myocarditis in dengue patients is a significant and understudied complication in many aspects. To prevent dengue-associated myocarditis, appropriate measures such as early detection of cases and signs, symptoms-based diagnosis via electrocardiography and echocardiography, as well as relevant vector control policies must be implemented.
PubMed: 37738692
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2023.08.005 -
International Journal of Infectious... Sep 2023The burden of asymptomatic dengue infections is understudied. Therefore, we systematically reviewed the literature to estimate the global prevalence of asymptomatic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
The burden of asymptomatic dengue infections is understudied. Therefore, we systematically reviewed the literature to estimate the global prevalence of asymptomatic dengue infections.
METHODS
We searched cross-sectional studies reporting the prevalence of asymptomatic dengue infections from PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Prevalence of asymptomatic dengue infections was pooled and reported as proportions with a 95% confidence interval (CI). This systematic review protocol was a priori registered in The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (Reg: No. CRD42020218446).
RESULTS
We included 41 studies with 131,953 cases in our analysis. The overall pooled prevalence of asymptomatic dengue infections was 59.26% (95% CI: 43.76-74.75, I = 99.93%), with 65.52% (95% CI: 38.73-92.32, I = 99.95%) during outbreaks and 30.78% (95% CI: 21.39-40.16, I = 98.78%) during non-outbreak periods. The pooled prevalence among the acutely infected individuals was 54.52% (95% CI: 17.73-46.76, I = 99.91%), whereas, among primary and secondary asymptomatic dengue infections, it was 65.36% (95% CI: 45.76-84.96, I = 98.82) and 48.99% (95% CI: 27.85-70.13, I = 99.08%) respectively.
CONCLUSION
The majority of dengue cases are asymptomatic and may play a significant role in disease transmission. Public health strategies aimed at dengue outbreak response and mitigation of disease burden should include early detection of asymptomatic cases.
Topics: Humans; Prevalence; Cross-Sectional Studies; Asymptomatic Infections; Coinfection; Dengue
PubMed: 37463631
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.07.010 -
BMC Infectious Diseases Jul 2023Severe dengue often leads to poor clinical outcomes and high mortality; as a result, it is of vital importance to find prognostic factors associated with the severe form... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Severe dengue often leads to poor clinical outcomes and high mortality; as a result, it is of vital importance to find prognostic factors associated with the severe form of dengue. Obesity is known to deteriorate many infectious diseases due to impaired immune responses. Several studies have suggested that obese patients with dengue infection tend to have more severe manifestations with poorer prognosis. However, a firm conclusion could not be drawn due to the varied results of these studies. Here, we aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the association between obesity and dengue severity.
METHODS
A literature search for relevant studies was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Ovid Medline and Cochrane from inception to September 9, 2022. The two main keywords were "dengue" and "obesity". Mantel-Haenszel method and random effects model was used to analyze the pooled odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS
A total of 15 article involving a total of 6,508 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Included patients in most studies were hospitalized pediatric patients. Only one study included adulthood data. Three cohort studies, four case-control studies, and one cross-sectional studies found a significant association between obesity and dengue severity. In contrast, three cohort studies, three case-control studies, and one cross-sectional study reported no significant relationship between obesity and dengue severity. Our analysis results showed that patient with obesity is 50% (OR = 1.50; 95%CI: 1.15-1.97) more likely to develop severe manifestation of dengue.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis revealed that overweight could be a clinical predictor for severe disease for pediatric patients with dengue infection.
Topics: Humans; Child; Adult; Cross-Sectional Studies; Obesity; Severe Dengue; Odds Ratio; Case-Control Studies
PubMed: 37525106
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-023-08481-9 -
Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) Feb 2024About half of the world's population is at risk of dengue infection. Epidemics of dengue fever have caused an increased risk of morbidity and mortality in recent years,... (Review)
Review
About half of the world's population is at risk of dengue infection. Epidemics of dengue fever have caused an increased risk of morbidity and mortality in recent years, which led to the exploration of vaccines as a preventive measure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy, immune response, and safety of dengue vaccines in children by analyzing clinical trials. The review followed standard procedures for data extraction using PRISMA guidelines and searching multiple databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, Medline, Health Source, Science Direct, and Academic Search Premiere. Eligible studies involved children (0-17 years old). Quality assessment was analyzed using the Cochrane Collaboration criteria, while data synthesis was conducted using thematic analysis and meta-analysis. Among the 38 selected studies, dengue vaccines showed varying efficacy against all four serotypes. The CYD-TDV (Dengvaxia) and Tekade (TAK-003) vaccines showed strong protection against severe dengue, but their long-term efficacy varied. Vaccines triggered satisfactory immune responses, notably in those previously exposed to dengue. Safety profiles were mostly favorable, noting mild adverse events post-vaccination. Meta-analysis supported vaccine efficacy and immune response, but safety concerns warrant further exploration. In conclusion, dengue vaccines showed promising efficacy and immune response, particularly against severe manifestations.
PubMed: 38391779
DOI: 10.3390/diseases12020032 -
Reviews in Medical Virology Mar 2024Dengue, Zika and chikungunya outbreaks pose a significant public health risk to Pacific Island communities. Differential diagnosis is challenging due to overlapping... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Dengue, Zika and chikungunya outbreaks pose a significant public health risk to Pacific Island communities. Differential diagnosis is challenging due to overlapping clinical features and limited availability of laboratory diagnostic facilities. There is also insufficient information regarding the complications of these arboviruses, particularly for Zika and chikungunya. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to calculate pooled prevalence estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the clinical manifestations of dengue, Zika and chikungunya in the Pacific Islands. Based on pooled prevalence estimates, clinical features that may help to differentiate between the arboviruses include headache, haemorrhage and hepatomegaly in dengue; rash, conjunctivitis and peripheral oedema in Zika; and the combination of fever and arthralgia in chikungunya infections. We estimated that the hospitalisation and mortality rates in dengue were 9.90% (95% CI 7.67-12.37) and 0.23% (95% CI 0.16-0.31), respectively. Severe forms of dengue occurred in 1.92% (95% CI 0.72-3.63) of reported cases and 23.23% (95% CI 13.58-34.53) of hospitalised patients. Complications associated with Zika virus included Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), estimated to occur in 14.08 (95% CI 11.71-16.66) per 10,000 reported cases, and congenital brain malformations such as microcephaly, particularly with first trimester maternal infection. For chikungunya, the hospitalisation rate was 2.57% (95% CI 1.30-4.25) and the risk of GBS was estimated at 1.70 (95% CI 1.06-2.48) per 10,000 reported cases. Whilst ongoing research is required, this systematic review enhances existing knowledge on the clinical manifestations of dengue, Zika and chikungunya infections and will assist Pacific Island clinicians during future arbovirus outbreaks.
Topics: Humans; Chikungunya Fever; Zika Virus; Pacific Islands; Dengue; Zika Virus Infection; Arboviruses
PubMed: 38340071
DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2521 -
Current Problems in Cardiology Feb 2024Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and dengue are both significant global health concerns, and their intersection presents a growing clinical challenge. Emerging evidence... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and dengue are both significant global health concerns, and their intersection presents a growing clinical challenge. Emerging evidence suggests that individuals with pre-existing CVD may face an elevated risk of severe dengue outcomes. The present study aims to perform a systematic review to assess the relationship between CVD and the severity of dengue.
METHODS
We conducted a literature search across multiple databases from inception to November 25, 2023. Primary studies reporting the number of dengue patients with CVD in severe dengue and non-severe dengue groups were included. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and a meta-analysis was conducted using R software version 4.2 to determine the pooled Relative Risk (RR). The study protocol has been registered in PROSPERO.
RESULTS
Based on data from 5 studies involving 274,576 dengue patients, our meta-analysis revealed a significant association between CVD and an increased risk of severe dengue, with a calculated RR of 2.71 (95 % CI: 1.03 to 7.10). However, substantial heterogeneity was observed among the included studies (I = 79 %).
CONCLUSION
The current evidence suggests an association between CVD and severe dengue, emphasizing the importance of closely monitoring individuals with pre-existing cardiovascular disease and providing them with targeted interventions upon dengue diagnosis to mitigate the risk of severe outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Cardiovascular Diseases; Risk Factors; Severe Dengue; Stroke
PubMed: 38103821
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.102346 -
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics Dec 2024Insect vector-borne diseases (VBDs) pose significant global health challenges, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions. The WHO has launched the "Global Vector...
Insect vector-borne diseases (VBDs) pose significant global health challenges, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions. The WHO has launched the "Global Vector Control Response (GVCR) 2017-2030" to address these diseases, emphasizing a comprehensive approach to vector control. This systematic review investigates the potential of malaria and dengue vaccines in controlling mosquito-borne VBDs, aiming to alleviate disease burdens and enhance public health. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, the review incorporated 39 new studies out of 934 identified records. It encompasses various studies assessing malaria and dengue vaccines, emphasizing the significance of vaccination as a preventive measure. The findings indicate variations in vaccine efficacy, duration of protection, and safety considerations for each disease, influencing public health strategies. The review underscores the urgent need for vaccines to combat the increasing burden of VBDs like malaria and dengue, advocating for ongoing research and investment in vaccine development.
Topics: Animals; Dengue; Dengue Vaccines; Malaria; Mosquito-Borne Diseases; Public Health; Humans
PubMed: 38602074
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2337985