-
BMC Oral Health Aug 2023Large cavity designs and access cavities impair endodontically treated tooth fracture resistance. As the tooth's strength is known to reduce significantly after the root...
BACKGROUND
Large cavity designs and access cavities impair endodontically treated tooth fracture resistance. As the tooth's strength is known to reduce significantly after the root canal treatment, occlusal loading as a result of functions such as chewing, biting and certain parafunctional tendencies makes the endodontically treated tooth vulnerable to fracture. Hence, after endodontic treatment, it is vital to give adequate and appropriate restorative material to avoid tooth fractures. Accordingly, the choice of such restorative material should be dictated by the property of fracture resistance.
OBJECTIVE
The goal of this study was to conduct a systematic review and critical analysis of available data from in vitro studies examining the fracture resistance of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with fiber-reinforced composites.
METHODOLOGY
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRIS-MA) Statement was used to guide the reporting of this systematic review A comprehensive literature search was performed using MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and LILACS. A manual search of the reference lists of the articles was also performed. The databases provided a total of 796 studies from the electronic systematic search. The databases provided a total of 796 studies from the electronic systematic search. Two reviewers scrutinized the papers for eligibility based on inclusion/exclusion criteria and extracted data. The studies were assessed for their potential risk of bias. Based on modified JBI & CRIS (checklist for reporting in vitro studies) guidelines, along with the methodology and treatment objective, we have formulated 13 parameters specifically to assess the risk of bias. A total of 18 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included for qualitative analysis. Considering the high heterogeneity of the studies included, a meta-analysis could not be performed.
RESULTS
The majority of the included studies had a moderate or high risk of bias. When compared to traditional hybrid composites, fiber-reinforced composites showed increased fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth in the majority of investigations. On the other hand, limited evidence was found for the bulk fill composites. Moreover, moderate evidence was found for the fracture resistance of inlays and fiber posts with fiber-reinforced composites for core build-up in endodontically treated teeth. No evidence could be found comparing the fracture resistance of endo crowns and fiber-reinforced composites in endodontically treated teeth.
CONCLUSION
According to the research, using fiber-reinforced composites instead of conventional hybrid composites improves the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. However, there was a high risk of bias in the research considered. No judgments could be reached about the superiority of one material over another based-on comparisons between other core restorations.
Topics: Humans; Tooth, Nonvital; Dental Materials; Crowns; Tooth Fractures; Composite Resins; Dental Stress Analysis
PubMed: 37574536
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03217-2 -
Clinical Oral Investigations Sep 2023The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the comparative clinical success and survival of intracoronal indirect restorations using gold, lithium... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the comparative clinical success and survival of intracoronal indirect restorations using gold, lithium disilicate, leucite, and indirect composite materials.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and PRISMA guidelines. The protocol for this study was registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42021233185). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across various databases and sources, including PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and gray literature. A total of 7826 articles were screened on title and abstract. Articles were not excluded based on the vitality of teeth, the language of the study, or the observation period. The risk difference was utilized for the analyses, and a random-effects model was applied. All analyses were conducted with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The calculated risk differences were derived from the combined data on restoration survival and failures obtained from each individual article. The presence of heterogeneity was assessed using the I statistic, and if present, the heterogeneity of the data in the articles was evaluated using the non-parametric chi-squared statistic (p < 0.05).
RESULTS
A total of 12 eligible studies were selected, which included 946 restorations evaluated over a minimum observation period of 1 year and a maximum observation period of 7 years. Results of the meta-analysis indicated that intracoronal indirect resin composite restorations have an 18% higher rate of failure when compared to intracoronal gold restorations over 5-7 years of clinical service (risk difference = - 0.18 [95% CI: - 0.27, - 0.09]; p = .0002; I = 0%). The meta-analysis examining the disparity in survival rates between intracoronal gold and leucite restorations could not be carried out due to methodological differences in the studies.
CONCLUSIONS
According to the currently available evidence, medium-quality data indicates that lithium disilicate and indirect composite materials demonstrate comparable survival rates in short-term follow-up. Furthermore, intracoronal gold restorations showed significantly higher survival rates, making them a preferred option over intracoronal indirect resin-composite restorations. Besides that, the analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in survival rates between leucite and indirect composite restorations. The short observation period, limited number of eligible articles, and low sample size of the included studies were significant limitations.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Bearing in mind the limitations of the reviewed literature, this systematic review and meta-analysis help clinicians make evidence-based decisions on how to restore biomechanically compromised posterior teeth.
Topics: Dental Porcelain; Aluminum Silicates; Composite Resins; Gold
PubMed: 37597003
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05050-x -
Journal of Clinical Periodontology Nov 2023To systematically appraise the available evidence on vertical ridge augmentation (VRA) techniques and estimate a treatment-based ranking on the incidence of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Comparative evidence of different surgical techniques for the management of vertical alveolar ridge defects in terms of complications and efficacy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
AIM
To systematically appraise the available evidence on vertical ridge augmentation (VRA) techniques and estimate a treatment-based ranking on the incidence of complications as well as their clinical effectiveness.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Searches were conducted in six databases to identify randomized clinical trials comparing VRA techniques up to November 2022. The incidence of complications (primary) and of early, major, surgical and intra-operative complications, vertical bone gain (VBG), marginal bone loss, need for additional grafting, implant success/survival, and patient-reported outcome measures (secondary) were chosen as outcomes. Direct and indirect effects and treatment ranking were estimated using Bayesian pair-wise and network meta-analysis (NMA) models.
RESULTS
Thirty-two trials (761 participants and 943 defects) were included. Five NMA models involving nine treatment groups were created: onlay, inlay, dense-polytetrafluoroethylene, expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene, titanium, resorbable membranes, distraction osteogenesis, tissue expansion and short implants. Compared with short implants, statistically significant higher odds ratios of healing complications were confirmed for all groups except those with resorbable membranes (odds ratio 5.4, 95% credible interval 0.92-29.14). The latter group, however, ranked last in clinical VBG.
CONCLUSIONS
VRA techniques achieving greater VBG are also associated with higher incidence of healing complications. Guided bone regeneration techniques using non-resorbable membranes yield the most favourable results in relation to VBG and complications.
Topics: Humans; Dental Implantation, Endosseous; Bayes Theorem; Network Meta-Analysis; Alveolar Ridge Augmentation; Alveolar Process; Bone Regeneration; Polytetrafluoroethylene; Bone Transplantation; Membranes, Artificial; Dental Implants; Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal
PubMed: 37495541
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13850 -
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Sep 2023A consensus on whether a fully digital workflow can replace conventional methods of manufacturing partial-coverage restorations is lacking. (Review)
Review
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
A consensus on whether a fully digital workflow can replace conventional methods of manufacturing partial-coverage restorations is lacking.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the accuracy, fit, and clinical outcomes of inlay, onlay, overlay, and endocrown restorations obtained with both digital and conventional workflows.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This study complied with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database (CRD42021258696). Studies evaluating the accuracy, fit, and clinical outcomes of inlay, onlay, overlay, and endocrown restorations obtained with digital and conventional workflows were included from 5 databases searched in November 2022. The Checklist for Reporting Randomized Clinical Studies (ROB 2) and the Checklist for Reporting In vitro Studies (CRIS guidelines) were used to assess the risk of bias.
RESULTS
Twenty-three studies were included in this review. Sixteen studies evaluated marginal and internal fit, 5 evaluated accuracy, 3 evaluated fracture resistance, and 1 evaluated long-term clinical performance. Although most studies reported acceptable clinical outcomes for both workflows, 11 studies showed better results with the conventional workflow, 10 with the digital workflow, and 2 reported that the outcomes of the workflows were similar.
CONCLUSIONS
Clinically acceptable values have been reported for the parameters evaluated in both digital and conventional workflows, and no consensus has been reached regarding the more efficient method.
PubMed: 37716898
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.08.005 -
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related... Feb 2024The primary aim of this systematic review was to investigate and compare the outcomes of different vertical ridge augmentation (VRA) techniques in relation to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
The primary aim of this systematic review was to investigate and compare the outcomes of different vertical ridge augmentation (VRA) techniques in relation to peri-implant bone loss (PBL), after at least 12 months of functional loading.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The search was conducted to find all the studies about VRA and measurements of PBL with at least 12 months follow-up. Three pairwise meta-analysis (MA) was performed to completely evaluate the outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 42 studies were included, of which 11 were randomized clinical trials (RCTs). RCTs were available only for guided bone regeneration (GBR), onlay, and inlay techniques. The weighted mean estimate (WME) of PBL value was found to be 1.38 mm (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.10-1.66) after a mean follow-up of 41.0 ± 27.8 months. GBR, Inlay, Onlay, osteodistraction, and SBB represented in weight 32.9%, 30.6%, 25.0%, 7.6%, and 3.9%, respectively; and their WME (95% CI) were 1.06 (0.87-1.26) mm, 1.72 (1.00-2.43) mm, 1.31 (0.87-1.75) mm, 1.81 (0.87-1.75) mm, and 0.66 (0.55-0.77) mm, respectively. Among the secondary outcomes, the analysis was conducted for vertical bone gain, healing complication rate, surgical complication rate, implant survival, and success rate.
CONCLUSIONS
The primary findings of the meta-analysis, based on the changes between final and baseline values, showed that the peri-implant bone loss could be influenced by the type of intervention but there is a need to evaluate in RCTs the behavior of the peri-implant bone levels after long-term follow-up for all techniques.
Topics: Dental Implantation, Endosseous; Dental Implants; Alveolar Ridge Augmentation; Bone Transplantation; Bone Regeneration
PubMed: 38114425
DOI: 10.1111/cid.13282 -
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative... Mar 2024To assess the feasibility of producing 3D-printed intracoronal restorations, thin and ultrathin veneers, and to compare their mechanical behavior, accuracy, biological,... (Review)
Review
3D-printed intracoronal restorations, occlusal and laminate veneers: Clinical relevance, properties, and behavior compared to milled restorations; a systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the feasibility of producing 3D-printed intracoronal restorations, thin and ultrathin veneers, and to compare their mechanical behavior, accuracy, biological, and stain susceptibility to the currently applied milled restorations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The databases were comprehensively searched for relevant records up to January 2024 without language restrictions. All studies that assessed 3D-printed partial coverage restorations including inlays, onlays, laminate, and occlusal veneers were retrieved.
RESULTS
The web search yielded a total of 1142 records, with 8 additional records added from websites at a later stage. Only 17 records were ultimately included in the review. The included records compared 3D-printed; alumina-based- and zirconia ceramics, lithium disilicate ceramics, polymer infiltrated ceramics, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), resin composites, and acrylic resins to their CNC milled analogs. The pooled data indicated that it is possible to produce ultrathin restorations with a thickness of less than 0.2 mm. 3D-printed laminate veneers and intracoronal restorations exhibited superior trueness, as well as better marginal and internal fit compared to milled restorations (p < 0.05). However, it should be noted that the choice of materials and preparation design may influence these outcomes. In terms of cost, the initial investment and production expenses associated with 3D printing were significantly lower than those of CNC milling technology. Additionally, 3D printing was also shown to be more time-efficient.
CONCLUSIONS
Using additive manufacturing technology to produce restorations with a thickness ranging from 0.1 to 0.2 mm is indeed feasible. The high accuracy of these restorations, contributes to their ability to resist caries progression, surpassing the minimum clinical threshold load of failure by a significant margin and reliable adhesion. However, before 3D-printed resin restorations can be widely adopted for clinical applications, further improvements are needed, particularly in terms of reducing their susceptibility to stains.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
3D-printed intracoronal restorations and veneers are more time and cost-efficient, more accurate, and could provide a considerable alternative to the currently applied CNC milling. Some limitations still accompany the resin materials, but this could be overcome by further development of the materials and printing technology.
PubMed: 38551205
DOI: 10.1111/jerd.13228 -
Evidence-based Dentistry Mar 2024Pubmed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane library databases were used as the data sources for this systematic review. Manual search of the reference lists of...
DATA SOURCES
Pubmed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane library databases were used as the data sources for this systematic review. Manual search of the reference lists of the included studies was also conducted.
STUDY SELECTION
The aim of the systematic review was to compare a fully digital workflow to a fully conventional workflow in the fabrication of partial coverage restorations. Partial coverage restorations were defined as inlays, onlays, overlays and endocrowns. Four independent calibrated reviewers screened studies that fulfilled a predefined PICOS framework. Population was specified as an abutment tooth requiring a partial coverage restoration. The intervention was a fully digital workflow compared to a fully conventional workflow. Outcomes were accuracy, marginal and internal fit, success, survival, complication rates and patient-reported outcomes. Study design included both clinical and in vitro studies.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
A total of 23 articles were included in qualitative synthesis ranging from 2007 to 2021. Twenty-one of these were in vitro studies. Two authors independently reviewed the included articles, performed data extraction, and evaluated the risk of bias via an adapted Checklist for Reporting In Vitro studies (CRIS) for in vitro studies and Reporting Randomised Clinical studies (RoB2) for clinical studies.
RESULTS
Seventeen studies assessed the marginal and internal fit of onlay and inlay restorations, eight of which found that a conventional workflow demonstrated improved fit compared to digital, whilst the remaining nine studies found the contrary. Differing methods were utilised across the studies to assess fit, including: the silicone replica method, microcomputed tomography, microscopy and software-based measurements. Similar fracture strengths were reported between both conventional and digital workflows in three studies. One clinical study assessed survival rates of both pressed and CAD/CAM ceramic restorations and found the survival outcomes to be similar after seven years. No studies were found that investigated patient-reported outcomes or endocrowns.
CONCLUSIONS
No consensus was reached as to whether the digital or conventional workflow is better.
Topics: Humans; X-Ray Microtomography; Dental Prosthesis Design; Dental Marginal Adaptation; Ceramics; Inlays
PubMed: 38243025
DOI: 10.1038/s41432-024-00971-2 -
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative... Feb 2024Teeth prepared for mesial-occlusal-distal (MOD) restorations have a significant risk of cusp fracture. Crowns and onlays can provide cusp coverage to reinforce posterior... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Teeth prepared for mesial-occlusal-distal (MOD) restorations have a significant risk of cusp fracture. Crowns and onlays can provide cusp coverage to reinforce posterior teeth at risk. Onlays are often more conservative of tooth structure which may be an advantage for teeth with large MOD preparations. It remains uncertain how onlays and crowns compare for posterior teeth with MOD tooth structure loss. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the resistance to fracture, success rate, survival rate, and failure rate of teeth with MOD preparations restored with onlays or crowns.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
An electronic search queried Medline (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and grey literature (OpenGrey) from database inception through April 29, 2023.
RESULTS
After eliminating duplicates and irrelevant records, 32 manuscripts were assessed. Only three publications met the criteria for inclusion. Most exclusions were due to poor reporting of restorative design and the amount of tooth structure remaining, or due to combining various restorative designs. Due to the limited sample size and high heterogeneity, no meta-analysis was conducted. One study observed a better outcome for onlays and two observed no difference. All three studies reported the mode of failure for crowns as more catastrophic whereas teeth with onlays could be salvaged.
CONCLUSIONS
Onlays may be an advantageous alternative to crowns for teeth with MOD preparations, but the level of evidence is insufficient to draw meaningful conclusions.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Current evidence is insufficient to determine whether onlays or crowns are providing a different outcome when used to restore posterior teeth with MOD tooth structure loss. However, the fracture of teeth with MOD tooth structure loss restored with onlays appears to be less catastrophic than when restored with crowns.
Topics: Humans; Crowns; Inlays; Tooth
PubMed: 37497796
DOI: 10.1111/jerd.13114 -
The European Journal of Prosthodontics... Feb 2024Molar-incisor hypomineralisation (MIH) is a qualitative defect of the enamel structure. Indirect restorations may represent the most suitable therapeutic solutions for...
UNLABELLED
Molar-incisor hypomineralisation (MIH) is a qualitative defect of the enamel structure. Indirect restorations may represent the most suitable therapeutic solutions for patients presenting MIH with tooth restorative procedures. This systematic review aims to determine the feasibility of indirect restorations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic review has been performed and is reported following the PRISMA guidelines. It was performed on three databases (PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar). Ten articles were included.
RESULTS
Only two articles reported the use of CAD/CAM technologies, whereas the other eight preferred conventional registration and handmade stratification for ceramics. All indirect bonded restorations made of composite resins or ceramics had significant success rates. A temporary material was placed in most of the articles. There was no clear consensus for tissue conditioning before bonding. Depending on the authors and the articles, the follow-up period extended from 2 months to 6 years.
CONCLUSIONS
The survival rate and the non-invasive procedures of indirect restorations are two main arguments that can help dental practitioners in daily practice. Development of CAD/ CAM technologies adds new perspectives in the registration, the design and production. However, more clinical trials are needed to confirm the conclusions.
Topics: Humans; Composite Resins; Molar; Molar Hypomineralization; Dental Restoration Repair
PubMed: 37988613
DOI: 10.1922/EJPRD_2557Broutin11 -
The European Journal of Prosthodontics... Feb 2024The aim of this paper is to compare the survival and success rates of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with full veneer crowns or full cuspal coverage...
INTRODUCTION
The aim of this paper is to compare the survival and success rates of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with full veneer crowns or full cuspal coverage onlays in vivo.
METHODS
A literature search using PubMed, Medline and Embase via Ovid, and The Cochrane Library retrieved English and non-English language articles from 1946 to April 2022. Electronic searches were supplemented with the use of forward citation chaining via Google Scholar.
RESULTS
A total of eleven studies met all predetermined search criteria. Data were extracted and tabulated. Survival rates for onlays ranged from 95% to 100% at two years and 90.7% to 100% at three years with success rates ranging from 86.6% - 96.6% at two years and 86.6% to 96% at three years. Survival results for full veneer crowns were reported at 87.8% at over two years, 95.1% at three years, and 84% - 97.73% at five to ten years. Success rates have been reported at 91.11% - 92.64% at five years and 60% at six years.
CONCLUSIONS
The data suggest that the use of onlays instead of full veneer crowns in the restoration of endodontically treated posterior teeth is favourable in the short to midterm.
Topics: Humans; Crowns; Tooth, Nonvital; Inlays
PubMed: 37549135
DOI: 10.1922/EJPRD_2547Lane11