-
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Sep 2023
Meta-Analysis
Comment on "A systematic review and meta-analysis of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in specific patient subgroups with advanced gastro-oesophageal junction and gastric adenocarcinoma".
Topics: Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Stomach Neoplasms; Adenocarcinoma
PubMed: 37487968
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104069 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) in patients with advanced, recurrent, or metastatic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) in patients with advanced, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer (ARMCC) and identify the population that may benefit the most.
METHODS
We conducted a search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Collaboration Library from their inception to September 2023. We extracted and analyzed the results related to the efficacy and safety of PD-1 in patients with ARMCC. The primary endpoints included the overall objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs), while the secondary endpoints encompassed the 1-year overall survival (OS) rate, 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate, as well as OS and PFS. We used a random effects model to conduct a meta-analysis on single-group rates, and the Mantel-Haenszel method was utilized to compare the ORR and the incidence of AEs.
RESULTS
Our study included a total of 21 trials involving 2,097 patients. The ORR of the combination of PD-1 inhibitors with chemotherapy was 56.36%, the combination of PD-1 inhibitors with anti-angiogenic agents was 38.72%, the combination of PD-1 inhibitors with Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 inhibitors was 25.60%, and PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy was 15.99%. The subgroup analysis showed that the group of patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) exhibited a significantly higher ORR compared to the non-SCC group in patients who received PD-1 inhibitors combined with other anti-tumor drugs (Odds Ratio =2.43, P=0.002). Additionally, the group of patients with a programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive score (PD-L1 CPS) ≥1 exhibited a significantly higher ORR compared to the PD-L1 CPS <1 group in patients who received PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy (OR=4.14, P=0.02). PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy or PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy did not significantly increase the incidence of all grades of adverse events (Relative Risk=0.99, p=0.788) or the incidence of serious adverse events (RR=0.99, p=0.788) compared to chemotherapy alone.
CONCLUSION
PD-1 inhibitors demonstrate outstanding efficacy in the treatment of patients with ARMCC. Patients with SCC may benefit more from treatments including PD-1 inhibitors in combination with other anti-tumor drugs, and PD-L1 CPS ≥1 can be considered a favorable indicator of immune therapy response. Importantly, the use of PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy or PD-1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy did not lead to an increased incidence of AEs compared with chemotherapy alone, indicting safety during treatment.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO (CRD42023457945).
Topics: Humans; Female; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; B7-H1 Antigen; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Antineoplastic Agents; Lung Neoplasms
PubMed: 38327524
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1305810 -
Schizophrenia Research Feb 2024Increasing evidence suggests an association between schizophrenia and atherosclerosis. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of cell adhesion molecules,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Increasing evidence suggests an association between schizophrenia and atherosclerosis. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of cell adhesion molecules, critically involved in early atherosclerosis, in schizophrenia.
METHODS
We searched electronic databases from inception to 11 November 2023 for case-control studies assessing vascular cell, VCAM-1, intercellular, ICAM-1, platelet endothelial cell, PECAM-1, neural cell, NCAM, and Down syndrome cell, DSCAM, adhesion molecules, selectins (E-, L-, and P-selectin), integrins, and cadherins in patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the JBI checklist and GRADE, respectively.
RESULTS
In 19 eligible studies, there were non-significant between-group differences in the concentrations of cell adhesion molecules, barring higher P-selectin in patients with schizophrenia (standard mean difference, SMD = 2.05, 95 % CI 0.72 to 3.38, p = 0.003; I = 97.2 %, p<0.001; very low certainty of evidence). Limited or no information was available regarding PECAM-1, DSCAM, ESAM, integrins, and cadherins. In meta-regression and subgroup analysis, there were significant associations between the SMD of ICAM-1 and matrix used (plasma or serum) and pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia, and between the SMD of VCAM-1 and pharmacological treatment, but not with other study and patient characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of our systematic review and meta-analysis do not support a significant role of immunoglobulin-like adhesion molecules, selectins, integrins, or cadherins in mediating the associations between schizophrenia, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular disease. Further studies are warranted to investigate these associations in patients with different cardiovascular risk and the effects of antipsychotic treatments on cell adhesion molecules and surrogate markers of atherosclerosis (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023463916).
Topics: Humans; Atherosclerosis; Cadherins; Cell Adhesion Molecules; E-Selectin; Integrins; Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1; P-Selectin; Platelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1; Schizophrenia; Selectins; Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1
PubMed: 38150848
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2023.12.025 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024The objective of this study was to investigate the risk of cardiovascular toxicities related to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in solid tumors. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
The objective of this study was to investigate the risk of cardiovascular toxicities related to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in solid tumors.
METHODS
A literature search was performed following the participants, interventions, comparisons, outcomes, and study design (PICOS) principles, and the study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data analysis was conducted using Review Manager version 5.4.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis included 69 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) divided into five groups based on the treatment regimens: PD-1/PD-L1 + chemotherapy versus chemotherapy, PD-1/PD-L1 versus chemotherapy, PD-1/PD-L1 versus placebo, PD-1/PD-L1 + CTLA-4 versus PD-1/PD-L1 and PD-1/PD-L1 + CTLA-4 versus chemotherapy. Compared to chemotherapy treatment alone, PD-1/PD-L1 +chemotherapy significantly increased the risk of hypertension [all-grade (OR = 1.27, 95% CI [1.05, 1.53], p = 0.01); grade 3-5 (OR = 1.36, 95% CI [1.04, 1.79], p = 0.03)], hypotension [all-grade (OR = 2.03, 95% CI [1.19, 3.45], p = 0.009); grade 3-5 (OR = 3.60, 95% CI [1.22, 10.60], p = 0.02)], arrhythmia [all-grade (OR = 1.53, 95% CI [1.02, 2.30], p = 0.04); grade 3-5 (OR = 2.91, 95% CI [1.33, 6.39], p = 0.008)] and myocarditis [all-grade (OR = 2.42, 95% CI [1.06, 5.54], p = 0.04)]. The risk of all-grade hypotension (OR = 2.87, 95% CI [1.26, 6.55], p = 0.01) and all-grade arrhythmia (OR = 2.03, 95% CI [1.13, 3.64], p = 0.02) significantly increased when treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors compared to the placebo. The risks of cardiovascular toxicities are significantly higher with PD-1+CTLA-4 compared to PD-1 alone (OR = 2.02, 95% CI [1.12, 3.66], p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION
PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor leads to an increased risk of cardiovascular toxicities, especially hypertension, hypotension, arrhythmia, and myocarditis.
Topics: Humans; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; B7-H1 Antigen; CTLA-4 Antigen; Hypertension; Hypotension; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Myocarditis; Neoplasms; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
PubMed: 38318172
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1255825 -
Nucleosides, Nucleotides & Nucleic Acids 2024The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compile the data examining the association between the + 49 A/G polymorphism and the risk for HCC.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compile the data examining the association between the + 49 A/G polymorphism and the risk for HCC. Multiple databases were systematically searched for eligible studies and the pooled odds ratios (ORs) were generated using five genetic models. Pooled data from 11 studies with 3,055 HCC patients and 3,450 controls found no statistically significant association between the polymorphism and HCC risk, both overall and in subgroup analyses. In conclusion, the current meta-analysis shows that the + 49 A/G polymorphism is not significantly associated with the risk of developing HCC.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Liver Neoplasms; CTLA-4 Antigen; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Genetic Predisposition to Disease
PubMed: 37679967
DOI: 10.1080/15257770.2023.2255626 -
Clinical Oncology (Royal College of... Jan 2024The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoint... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Efficacy and Safety of Programmed Death-1 (PD-1)/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
AIMS
The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library until 1 July 2022 for mCRPC trials testing PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors. We measured the efficacy and safety using overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rates (ORR), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate or treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). When possible, data were meta-analysed.
RESULTS
Thirteen studies involving 2533 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.42-1.20, I = 80.3%, P<0.001) and for PFS was 0.65 (95% confidence interval 0.38-0.92, I = 72.2%, P = 0.013). Furthermore, better ORR (relative risk = 2.77, 95% confidence interval 1.25-6.13, I = 0%, P = 0.699) was found in PD-L1-expressing tumours. However, no statistical trends between PD-L1 status on PSA response rate (relative risk = 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.5-1.25, I = 0%, P = 0.953) and tumour mutational burden on ORR (relative risk = 2.53, 95% confidence interval 0.49-13.12, I = 74.5%, P = 0.02) were observed. The pooled proportions of TRAEs and ≥ grade 3 TRAEs were 85.1% (95% confidence interval = 71.7-98.5%) and 31.6% (95% confidence interval = 18.9-44.4%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis showed that among selected populations of men with mCRPC, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 combination treatment may significantly increase the PFS benefits. However, overall survival in mCRPC warrants further testing.
Topics: Male; Humans; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; B7-H1 Antigen; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Ligands; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
PubMed: 37993317
DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.11.034 -
Oncology 2024The objective of this study was to reclassify published germline CDH1 variants identified in gastric cancer (GC) in accordance with the latest ClinVar definition and to...
INTRODUCTION
The objective of this study was to reclassify published germline CDH1 variants identified in gastric cancer (GC) in accordance with the latest ClinVar definition and to correlate their pathogenicity with the established international clinical criteria for genetic testing.
METHODS
The relevant literature dating from 1998 to 2019 was systematically searched for data on CDH1 germline mutations in accord with PRISMA guidelines. The collected variants were classified according to the latest ClinVar definition into the following classes: benign (B), likely benign (LB), pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), and variant of unknown significance (VUS). The McNemar test was used to compare the adequacy of current versus previous International GC Linkage Consortium (IGCLC) criteria.
RESULTS
We reclassified a total of 247 CDH1 variants, and we identified that about 70% of B/LB variant carriers were not fulfilling the defined clinical criteria. Instead, all P/LP variants (100%) were associated with the hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) phenotype fulfilling the 2020 ILGCC criteria, with a significant improvement (p = 0.025) compared to previous version.
CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that germline CDH1 genetic testing is indicated only in families meeting the clinical criteria for the HDGC syndrome. This observation suggests that clinical phenotypes that do not clearly fulfill these criteria should not be considered for CDH1 genetic testing.
Topics: Humans; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Stomach Neoplasms; Pedigree; Genetic Testing; Germ-Line Mutation; Cadherins; Adenocarcinoma; Antigens, CD
PubMed: 37725907
DOI: 10.1159/000533774 -
Medicine Aug 2023Programmed death protein-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/L1) inhibitors have widely used in the treatment of lung cancer. Some literatures indicated that different gender might not... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Programmed death protein-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/L1) inhibitors have widely used in the treatment of lung cancer. Some literatures indicated that different gender might not have equal immune response, but no agreement have reached on the issue. Hence, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis that examine the effect of gender on the clinical outcome of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor in advanced lung cancer patients.
METHODS
Related database and conferences were searched. Studies that reported the relationship between gender and the overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) of PD-1/L1 inhibitor were included. Meta-analysis was conducted to obtain pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CI.
RESULTS
We included 34 studies with 11,883 lung cancer patients. Meta-analysis showed that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly prolonged the OS (males: HR 0.71, 95%CI 0.66-0.77; females: HR 0.72, 95%CI 0.63-0.82) and PFS (males: HR 0.60, 95%CI 0.55-0.66; females: HR 0.72, 95%CI 0.62-0.84) versus chemotherapy. The clinical benefit (OS HR: 0.99; PFS HR: 0.83) was not statistically significant between males and females. In patients treated with cemiplimab, male patients had a better OS (0.53, 95%CI 0.42-0.66) and PFS (OS 1.51, 95%CI 0.80-2.82) compared with female patients, but the small number of female patients precludes us from drawing any firm conclusions in female subpopulations.
CONCLUSION
The clinical benefit of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors was not statistically significant between males and females during the treatment of lung cancer. In the future, researchers who are designing new immunotherapy studies should ensure a larger inclusion of women in trials, to avoid erroneously extending to women results that are obtained mainly in male patients.
Topics: Humans; Female; Male; B7-H1 Antigen; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Databases, Factual; Lung Neoplasms
PubMed: 37653772
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034849 -
Drug Safety Dec 2023Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown efficacy in tumor therapy. However, the risk of pulmonary toxicity from ICI-based treatment regimens remains unknown. We...
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown efficacy in tumor therapy. However, the risk of pulmonary toxicity from ICI-based treatment regimens remains unknown. We searched multiple databases and clinical trial websites from January 2015 to December 2021 and summarized the pulmonary toxicity profile and risk ranking of ICI-based treatments in cancer patients. We included a Phase III randomized clinical trial (RCT) in which the treatment group received at least one ICI and experienced pulmonary adverse events (PAEs). Our study, which included 104 RCTs, found the highest incidence of grades 1-2 and 3-5 treatment-associated PAEs (Tr-PAEs) in programmed death 1 (PD-1)+ chemotherapy and PD-1+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), respectively. The first incidence rates of grades 1-2 and 3-5 immune-mediated PAEs (Im-PAEs) were PD1+CTLA-4+ chemotherapy and PD-L1 + CTLA4, respectively. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 + chemotherapy regimen and PD-L1+ targeted therapy drug (TTD)+ chemotherapy regimen had the highest risk of developing grades 1-2 and 3-5 Tr-PAEs. Programmed death-L1+ CTLA-4 has a higher risk of grade 3-5 Tr-PAEs than PD-L1. The risk of grade 1-2 pulmonary toxicity was significantly different in the high-dose and low-dose groups of nivolumab and atezolizumab. Nivolumab and atezolizumab induced dose-dependent grade 1-2 pulmonary toxicity. Among single-agent regimens, PD-1 showed the greatest grade 1-2 pulmonary toxicity. Programmed death-L1+ TTD+ chemotherapy showed the greatest grade 3-5 pulmonary toxicity in combination therapy. PD-L1+ TTD+ chemotherapy was associated with a higher risk of grade 3-5 Tr-PAEs and a lower risk of Im-PAEs. We recommend a targeted approach to managing PAE.
Topics: Humans; Nivolumab; CTLA-4 Antigen; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; B7-H1 Antigen; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
PubMed: 37934397
DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01357-6 -
Journal of Geriatric Oncology May 2024The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has significantly transformed the treatment landscape for advanced malignancies. These inhibitors bolster the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has significantly transformed the treatment landscape for advanced malignancies. These inhibitors bolster the immune system's capacity to detect and destroy cancer cells. ICIs used in cancer immunotherapy are primarily categorized into two groups: anti-PD-1/L1 and anti-CTLA-4. The application of combination ICI therapy (ICI doublets) in older patients prompts questions about their relative efficacy compared to standard therapies, particularly in comparison to younger patient cohorts.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study involved an extensive review of literature from databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. Our primary aim was to assess overall survival (OS) outcomes in a cohort of older patients, specifically those aged 65 and above, undergoing treatment for advanced cancers. The treatment modalities considered included ICI doublets, ICI monotherapy (alone or in combination with non-ICI drugs), and non-ICI therapies. The study aimed to compare the OS outcomes across these different therapeutic approaches.
RESULTS
The analysis incorporated data from 18 trials, indicating that patients treated with ICI doublets exhibited a statistically significant improvement in OS compared to the control group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.96; P < 0.01). The addition of CTLA-4 inhibitors did not show significant advantages over anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy (HR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.83-1.02; P = 0.13). When compared to non-ICI therapies, such as chemotherapy alone, ICI doublets demonstrated improved OS outcomes (HR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.97; P < 0.01).
DISCUSSION
Our findings suggest that ICI doublets may offer a modest improvement in the outcomes of older cancer patients compared to non-ICI-based treatments. Consequently, the use of ICI doublets in older patients should be considered on an individual basis, prioritizing cases where there are clear advantages over conventional therapy. This study underscores the importance of developing personalized treatment strategies for older patients, necessitating a cautious and individualized approach in medication selection.
Topics: Aged; Humans; Age Factors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; CTLA-4 Antigen; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Immunotherapy; Neoplasms; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; B7-H1 Antigen
PubMed: 38462434
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101741