-
Ageing Research Reviews Jun 2024Parkinson's disease (PD) is estimated to impact up to 1% of the global population aged 60 years and older. Among the non-motor manifestations of idiopathic PD, radicular... (Review)
Review
Parkinson's disease (PD) is estimated to impact up to 1% of the global population aged 60 years and older. Among the non-motor manifestations of idiopathic PD, radicular neuropathic pain emerges as a noteworthy concern due to its potential for debility in affected individuals. In, this systematic review and meta-analysis we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of radicular neuropathic pain and thus provide evidence of how this painful symptom affects the lives of patients with idiopathic PD. We registered the research protocol for this study in PROSPERO (CRD42022327220). We searched the Embase, Scopus, and PubMed platforms for studies on PD and neuropathic pain until April 2023. The search yielded 36 articles considered to have a low risk of bias. The prevalence of radicular neuropathic pain in patients with PD was 12.7%, without a difference when we consider the duration of diagnosis (cut-off < 7 years) or levodopa dosage (cut-off <600mg/dL). Moreover, there was no variation in the prevalence of radicular neuropathic pain regarding a Hoehn and Yahr stage cut-off of <2.5 or >2.5. Of note, a limited number of patients received pain treatment (21.5%). We also found that the source of publication bias is the use of the Ford criteria (FC), suggesting that this type of diagnostic criteria may contribute to an underdiagnosis of radicular neuropathic pain in patients with PD. This study underlines the necessity for a more discerning and comprehensive approach to the diagnosis and management of radicular neuropathic pain in patients with idiopathic PD.
PubMed: 38936433
DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102374 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Oct 2023We question whether bradyphrenia, slowing of cognitive processing not explained by depression or a global cognitive assessment, is a nosological entity in idiopathic...
We question whether bradyphrenia, slowing of cognitive processing not explained by depression or a global cognitive assessment, is a nosological entity in idiopathic parkinsonism (IP). The time taken to break contact of an index finger with a touch-sensitive plate was measured, with and without a warning in the alerting signal as to which side the imperative would indicate, in 77 people diagnosed with IP and in 124 people without an IP diagnosis. The ability to utilise a warning, measured by the difference between log-transformed reaction times (unwarned minus warned), was termed 'cognitive efficiency'. It was approximately normally distributed. A questionnaire on self- and partner perception of proband's bradyphrenia was applied. A multivariable model showed that those prescribed levodopa were less cognitively efficient (mean -5.2 (CI -9.5, -1.0)% per 300 mg/day, = 0.02), but those prescribed the anti-muscarinic trihexyphenidyl were more efficient (14.7 (0.2, 31.3)% per 4 mg/day, < 0.05) and those prescribed monoamine oxidase-B inhibitor (MAOBI) tended to be more efficient (8.3 (0.0, 17.4)%, = 0.07). The variance in efficiency was greater within IP (F-test, = 0.01 adjusted for any demographic covariates: coefficient of variation, with and without IP, 0.68 and 0.46, respectively), but not so after adjustment for anti-parkinsonian medication ( = 0.13: coefficient of variation 0.62). The within-participant follow-up time, a median of 4.8 (interquartile range 3.1, 5.5) years (101 participants), did not influence efficiency, irrespective of IP status. Perception of bradyphrenia did not usefully predict efficiency. We conclude that both bradyphrenia and 'tachyphrenia' in IP appear to have iatrogenic components, of clinically important size, related to the dose of antiparkinsonian medication. Levodopa is the most commonly prescribed first-line medication: co-prescribing a MAOBI may circumvent its associated bradyphrenia. The previously reported greater efficiency associated with (low-dose) anti-muscarinic was confirmed.
PubMed: 37892637
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12206499 -
Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery 2024Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established surgical therapy for patients with Parkinsons' Disease (PD). Traditionally, DBS surgery for PD is performed under... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
INTRODUCTION
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established surgical therapy for patients with Parkinsons' Disease (PD). Traditionally, DBS surgery for PD is performed under local anesthesia, whereby the patient is awake to facilitate intraoperative neurophysiological confirmation of the intended target using microelectrode recordings. General anesthesia allows for improved patient comfort without sacrificing anatomic precision and clinical outcomes.
METHODS
We performed a systemic review and meta-analysis on patients undergoing DBS for PD. Published randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective studies, and case series which compared asleep and awake techniques for patients undergoing DBS for PD were included. A total of 19 studies and 1,900 patients were included in the analysis.
RESULTS
We analyzed the (i) clinical effectiveness - postoperative UPDRS III score, levodopa equivalent daily doses and DBS stimulation requirements. (ii) Surgical and anesthesia related complications, number of lead insertions and operative time (iii) patient's quality of life, mood and cognitive measures using PDQ-39, MDRS, and MMSE scores. There was no significant difference in results between the awake and asleep groups, other than for operative time, for which there was significant heterogeneity.
CONCLUSION
With the advent of newer technology, there is likely to have narrowing differences in outcomes between awake or asleep DBS. What would therefore be more important would be to consider the patient's comfort and clinical status as well as the operative team's familiarity with the procedure to ensure seamless transition and care.
Topics: Deep Brain Stimulation; Humans; Parkinson Disease; Wakefulness; Anesthesia, General; Treatment Outcome; Anesthesia
PubMed: 38636468
DOI: 10.1159/000536310 -
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 2024This meta-analysis aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for Parkinson's disease(PD).
OBJECTIVE
This meta-analysis aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for Parkinson's disease(PD).
METHODS
Four databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science and CENTRAL) were searched from establishment of database to 23 March 2024, for articles studying robot-assisted DBS in patients diagnosed with PD. Meta-analyses of vector error, complication rate, levodopa-equivalent daily dose (LEDD), Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), UPDRS II, UPDRS III, and UPDRS IV were performed.
RESULTS
A total of 15 studies were included in this meta-analysis, comprising 732 patients with PD who received robot-assisted DBS. The pooled results revealed that the vector error was measured at 1.09 mm (95% CI: 0.87 to 1.30) in patients with Parkinson's disease who received robot-assisted DBS. The complication rate was 0.12 (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.24). The reduction in LEDD was 422.31 mg (95% CI: 68.69 to 775.94). The improvement in UPDRS, UPDRS III, and UPDRS IV was 27.36 (95% CI: 8.57 to 46.15), 14.09 (95% CI: 4.67 to 23.52), and 3.54 (95% CI: -2.35 to 9.43), respectively.
CONCLUSION
Robot-assisted DBS is a reliable and safe approach for treating PD. Robot-assisted DBS provides enhanced accuracy in contrast to conventional frame-based stereotactic techniques. Nevertheless, further investigation is necessary to validate the advantages of robot-assisted DBS in terms of enhancing motor function and decreasing the need for antiparkinsonian medications, in comparison to traditional frame-based stereotactic techniques.: PROSPERO(CRD42024529976).
PubMed: 38882524
DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1419152 -
Journal of Parkinson's Disease May 2024Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive disease, which is associated with the loss of activities of daily living independency. Several rehabilitation options have been...
BACKGROUND
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive disease, which is associated with the loss of activities of daily living independency. Several rehabilitation options have been studied during the last years, to improve mobility and independency.
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review will focus on inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation (MR) in people with Parkinson's disease (PwPD), based on recent studies from 2020 onwards.
METHODS
Search strategy in three databases included: multidisciplinary rehabilitation, Parkinson's Disease, inpatient rehabilitation, motor-, functional- and cognitive performance, cost-effectiveness, Quality of Life, and medication changes/Levodopa equivalent daily doses.
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies were included, consisting of 13 studies dealing with inpatient MR and 9 studies on inpatient non-MR interventions. Inpatient PD multidisciplinary rehabilitation proved to be effective, as well as non-MR rehabilitation.
CONCLUSIONS
This review confirms the efficacy of inpatient MR and non-MR in PD, but is skeptical about the past and current study designs. New study designs, including new physical training methods, more attention to medication and costs, new biomarkers, artificial intelligence, and the use of wearables, will hopefully change rehabilitation trials in PwPD in the future.
PubMed: 38788087
DOI: 10.3233/JPD-230271 -
Medicine Apr 2024Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is a viable therapeutic for advanced Parkinson's disease. However, the efficacy and safety of STN-DBS under local... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is a viable therapeutic for advanced Parkinson's disease. However, the efficacy and safety of STN-DBS under local anesthesia (LA) versus general anesthesia (GA) remain controversial. This meta-analysis aims to compare them using an expanded sample size.
METHODS
The databases of Embase, Cochrane Library and Medline were systematically searched for eligible cohort studies published between 1967 and 2023. Clinical efficacy was assessed using either Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) section III scores or levodopa equivalent dosage requirements. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess complications (adverse effects related to stimulation, general neurological and surgical complications, and hardware-related complications).
RESULTS
Fifteen studies, comprising of 13 retrospective cohort studies and 2 prospective cohort studies, involving a total of 943 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results indicate that there were no significant differences between the 2 groups with regards to improvement in UPDRS III score or postoperative levodopa equivalent dosage requirement. However, subgroup analysis revealed that patients who underwent GA with intraoperative imaging had higher UPDRS III score improvement compared to those who received LA with microelectrode recording (MER) (P = .03). No significant difference was found in the improvement of UPDRS III scores between the GA group and LA group with MER. Additionally, there were no notable differences in the incidence rates of complications between these 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analysis indicates that STN-DBS performed under GA or LA have similar clinical outcomes and complications. Therefore, GA may be a suitable option for patients with severe symptoms who cannot tolerate the procedure under LA. Additionally, the GA group with intraoperative imaging showed better clinical outcomes than the LA group with MER. A more compelling conclusion would require larger prospective cohort studies with a substantial patient population and extended long follow-up to validate.
Topics: Humans; Deep Brain Stimulation; Parkinson Disease; Anesthesia, General; Subthalamic Nucleus; Anesthesia, Local; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38669414
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037955