-
JCPP Advances Sep 2023Adolescence is characterized by an increase in the rate of sleep problems, which might be even more pronounced in adolescents with ADHD. This systematic review with...
BACKGROUND
Adolescence is characterized by an increase in the rate of sleep problems, which might be even more pronounced in adolescents with ADHD. This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to compare sleep in adolescents with and without ADHD, including sleep parameters, both subjectively and objectively measured, sleep problems and sleep hygiene.
METHODS
Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, ERIC, Web of Science, and PubMed databases were searched for studies with case-control designs (published between 1980 and 2022) directly comparing sleep in adolescents (12-25 years) with ADHD to typically developing controls. Standardized mean differences were calculated and a random-effects model was implemented using RevMan.
RESULTS
Overall, 6974 titles/abstracts and 205 full texts were screened, resulting in 13 eligible studies. The sample sizes range from 35 to 9846 with in total 2465 adolescents with ADHD and 18,417 controls. The data suggests that adolescents with ADHD report significantly more disturbed subjective sleep parameters (e.g., total sleep time; = 7, SMD = 0.47, < .001) and experience more sleep problems compared to typically developing peers (e.g., daytime sleepiness; = 5, SMD = 0.54, = .01). Only few studies objectively measured sleep and no significant differences were found between both groups ( = 3) in any parameter. Differences in sleep hygiene could not be examined due to a limited number of studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Adolescents with ADHD report significantly worsened subjectively sleep parameters and more sleep problems compared to controls. These findings are still preliminary as a limited number of studies was identified. Nevertheless, it is advised to routinely include sleep assessment in the ADHD diagnostic process. More research is needed with a focus on objective measurement and sleep hygiene in ADHD.
PubMed: 37720581
DOI: 10.1002/jcv2.12151 -
Journal of Sleep Research May 2024Obstructive sleep apnea is the most common sleep disorder. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of respiratory muscle training in the treatment of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Obstructive sleep apnea is the most common sleep disorder. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of respiratory muscle training in the treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnea. The study protocol was registered in Prospero Platform (CRD42018096980). We performed searches in the main databases: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) via Pubmed; Excerpta Medica dataBASE (Embase) via Elsevier; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via Cochrane Library; Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS) through the Portal of the Virtual Health Library and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) for all randomised-controlled trials published before July 2022. The randomised-controlled trials were assessed for risk of bias and certainty of evidence. Thirteen randomised-controlled trials were included. All studies had an overall high risk of bias. Inspiratory muscle training probably improves systolic blood pressure and sleepiness when compared with sham. However, inspiratory muscle training probably does not improve diastolic blood pressure and maximum expiratory pressure, and may not be superior to sham for apnea-hypopnea index, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, forced vital capacity, sleep quality and quality of life. In addition, it is uncertain whether there is any effect of inspiratory muscle training on maximum inspiratory pressure and physical capacity. Inspiratory muscle training may also improve maximum inspiratory pressure and maximum expiratory pressure compared with oropharyngeal exercises. However, it may not be superior for apnea-hypopnea index, sleep quality, sleepiness, quality of life and functional capacity. When associated with physical exercise, inspiratory muscle training may not be superior to physical exercise alone for maximum inspiratory pressure, maximum expiratory pressure, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and functional capacity. At the same time, when associated with cardiac rehabilitation exercises, inspiratory muscle training may reduce apnea-hypopnea index, improve inspiratory muscle strength, sleepiness and sleep quality compared with cardiac rehabilitation alone. However, it may not be superior for improving quality of life. Regarding expiratory muscle training, it may improve expiratory muscle strength and sleep quality, but not sleepiness when compared with sham. The evidence on the effects of expiratory muscle training in apnea-hypopnea index is very uncertain.
Topics: Humans; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Breathing Exercises; Respiratory Muscles; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37258418
DOI: 10.1111/jsr.13941 -
Sleep Medicine Reviews Oct 2023Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is prevalent in patients with neurodegenerative diseases and is associated with worse outcomes. Positive airway pressure therapy has the... (Review)
Review
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is prevalent in patients with neurodegenerative diseases and is associated with worse outcomes. Positive airway pressure therapy has the potential to benefit these patients but can be challenging in this population. Our primary aim was to describe positive pressure therapy adherence. Secondarily, we aimed at identifying identify predictors of adherence to treatment in adults with neurodegenerative diseases and OSA, and report the effect of PAP adherence on outcomes such as cognitive function, quality of life and patient/caregiver satisfaction. We performed a systematic review of the literature and identified seventeen studies, eight reporting on adults with obstructive sleep apnea and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and/or Alzheimer's disease (AD), 6 with Parkinson's disease (PD), and 3 with multiple system atrophy (MSA). Meta-analyses were not performed due to lack of systematic and standardized reporting of the primary outcome. Study duration ranged from 6 weeks to an average of 3.3 years. PAP adherence definition was widely variable between studies. Attrition rates ranged from 12% to 75%. In MCI/AD, adherence rates ranged from 28% to 61% (study duration range: 3 weeks to 3.3 years). Younger age, race (white) and better CPAP confidence scores at 1 week were associated with more CPAP use while APOE4 positive and unmarried individuals were more likely to abandon CPAP. In most studies, adherent patients had improvement in excessive daytime sleepiness, depressive symptoms, sleep quality, ability to manage daily activities and certain aspects of cognition (composite score or global cognition, psychomotor speed, executive function), as well as less cognitive decline over time. Caregiver satisfaction was also better in PAP adherent patients in one study. In PD, 15-25% of individuals refused treatment with PAP upfront, and attrition ranged from 8 to 75%. Adherent patients used their device for an average of 3h27 to 5h12 per night (study duration range: 6 weeks to 12 months). Longer disease duration, worse motor symptoms or sleep quality and lower % of REM sleep were identified as predictors of lower PAP adherence in a preliminary study, while race (non-white) and sex (women) were linked to lower adherence in a large retrospective study. In the study reporting the highest attrition rate (75%), individuals had lower educational levels. PAP adherence improved daytime sleepiness, anxiety symptoms, sleep architecture and quality and global non-motor symptoms. However, in one short-term (3 weeks) study, there was no improvement in neuropsychological testing composite score. Three studies on MSA patients suffering from sleep-disordered breathing showed that most patients are accepting of PAP (69-72%) with an average nightly use of 4h42 to 6h18. Floppy epiglottis was more frequently seen in patients discontinuing PAP in one study. In one study, four adults with MSA and long-term PAP use reported better sleep and improved vigilance. Survival time was no different between treated and untreated individuals. In conclusion, PAP therapy is challenging in patients with OSA and NDD, as evidenced by the considerable attrition and low adherence rates reported in this systematic review. There is emerging evidence proposing OSA a treatable target to prevent clinical and functional deterioration in patients with neurodegenerative diseases and addressing potential barriers to PAP adherence is paramount to maximize adherence. Our systematic review outlines several of these potential barriers, underscoring the need for future studies to standardize the definition of and explore long-term adherence to PAP therapy and assess interventions that can optimize adherence in this patient population.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Female; Infant, Newborn; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Parkinson Disease; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Patient Compliance
PubMed: 37586145
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2023.101836 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2023Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a debilitating condition characterized by uncomfortable sensations in the legs, typically occurring during periods of rest or sleep. It...
INTRODUCTION
Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a debilitating condition characterized by uncomfortable sensations in the legs, typically occurring during periods of rest or sleep. It is more prevalent during pregnancy and is linked to sleep disturbances, diminished quality of life, and pregnancy complications. However, previous studies yielded inconsistent findings among pregnant women in middle-income countries. Consequently, this systematic review and meta-analysis sought to determine the pooled prevalence of restless legs syndrome and its associated factors in these populations.
METHOD
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted on published studies from middle-income countries until May 2023. The review strictly adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant search terms were used to search for studies in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Data extraction was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool for prevalence studies. The meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 17 software, and heterogeneity was assessed using the test, while publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test. Forest plots were also used to present the pooled prevalence and odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model.
RESULT
This review included 22 studies from nine countries with a total of 17, 580 study participants. The overall pooled prevalence of RLS among pregnant women in middle-income countries was 13.82% (95% CI: 13.31, 14.32), and having low hemoglobin level (AOR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.29, 2.18), history of RLS (AOR: 7.54, 95% CI: 3.02, 18.79), muscle cramps (AOR: 3.58, 95% CI: 1.21, 10.61), excessive day time sleepiness (AOR: 4.02, 95% CI: 1.34, 12.04), preeclampsia (AOR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.28, 3.30), and taking prophylactic iron supplementation (AOR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.50, 0.69) were the identified factors associated with it.
CONCLUSION
Generally, nearly one in every eight pregnant women in middle-income countries develop restless legs syndrome during pregnancy. Having low hemoglobin level, a history of RLS, muscle cramps, excessive daytime sleepiness, preeclampsia, and taking prophylactic iron supplementation were the identified factors associated with it. These findings underscore the importance of addressing the identified factors associated with RLS in order to effectively mitigate its occurrence among pregnant women.
PubMed: 38188334
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1326337 -
European Journal of Neurology Feb 2024Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) frequently occurs in Parkinson Disease (PD), probably caused by upper airway dysfunctions or shared pathogenetic mechanisms. OSA may... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) frequently occurs in Parkinson Disease (PD), probably caused by upper airway dysfunctions or shared pathogenetic mechanisms. OSA may precede PD diagnosis or worsen throughout its course, but its relationship with clinical features and dopaminergic medication remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to provide a reliable estimate of OSA prevalence in the PD population (PD-OSA) and to clarify its clinical associated factors to help clinicians in understanding the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed up to April 2023 using the PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO databases. Articles were included if they provided data on PD patients with and without OSA. Pooled prevalence for PD-OSA was calculated using the proportions of PD participants diagnosed with OSA. Demographic and clinical features associated with PD-OSA were explored by comparing PD patients with and without OSA.
RESULTS
Seventeen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled OSA prevalence was 45% of a total sample of 1448 PD patients and was associated with older age, male sex, higher body mass index (BMI), more severe motor disturbances and periodic limb movements, reduced risk of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, intake of dopamine agonists, and worse excessive daytime sleepiness. No relationship emerged with cognitive functioning and neuropsychiatric manifestations.
CONCLUSIONS
OSA affects nearly half of PD patients as a secondary outcome of predisposing factors such as older age and higher BMI in addition to PD-related motor impairment. Future studies should focus on determining the impact of both clinical features and dopaminergic medication on the development of PD-OSA.
Topics: Humans; Male; Parkinson Disease; Polysomnography; Prevalence; REM Sleep Behavior Disorder; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
PubMed: 37922498
DOI: 10.1111/ene.16109 -
Current Problems in Cardiology Jan 2024The association between untreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) is well known. In this literature review, we aim to review the existing... (Review)
Review
The association between untreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) is well known. In this literature review, we aim to review the existing literature on treatment effects of OSA and its impact on CVD morbidity and mortality, stratified by gender. We systematically reviewed PubMed, Medline, and Scopus per PRISMA guidelines and included 25 studies in the final review. Primary outcomes were CVD-associated morbidity and mortality. Out of 25 studies, 10 were meta-analysis, 8 observational, and 7 randomized controlled trials. The treatment modality was continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in 23 studies, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, and oral appliance therapy in 2. Secondary prevention of CVD was the endpoint in 23 studies. A total of 165,775 participants between 45 and 75 years of age, 60%-90% males, and the average Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score was 5-9. CV outcomes included myocardial infarction, angina, heart failure (HF), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), coronary artery disease (CAD), ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation (AF), and hypertension. In 4 studies, CPAP was associated with a reduction in CVD mortality, and 10 studies showed improvement in morbidity. Our review of literature did not show consistent benefits in CV outcomes in OSA patients. We identified many potential research areas, especially the lack of studies demonstrating dose-dependent effect of OSA treatment on CV outcomes, especially when stratified by severity of OSA and gender. Larger prospective studies with longer follow-up will be helpful to study these parameters.
Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Artery Disease; Morbidity; Prospective Studies; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
PubMed: 37863463
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.102139 -
Otolaryngology--head and Neck Surgery :... May 2024Oral appliances (OA) are the recommended first-line option for mild-to-moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)-hypopnea. However, there is a lack of evidence to compare... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Oral appliances (OA) are the recommended first-line option for mild-to-moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)-hypopnea. However, there is a lack of evidence to compare the effectiveness of OA in different severities of OSA. The purpose of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effects of preferred OA (tongue retention devices [TRD] and mandibular advancement device [MAD]) in different severities of OSA.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed/MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science.
REVIEW METHODS
Concentrating on the efficacy of OA, 2 authors searched 3 databases up to November 10, 2022, independently and systematically, following the requirements and steps of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.
RESULTS
Ultimately, 42 studies with 2265 patients met the criteria for inclusion in OA. Overall, the apnea-hypopnea index improved by 48% (5.6), 67% (14.92), and 62% (32.1) in mild, moderate, and severe OSA, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed a significant difference between MAD and TRD efficacy in mild OSA (58% vs 21%). However, no significant difference was seen between MAD and TRD efficacy in moderate (67% vs 66%) and severe OSA (66% vs 51%). There was no significant difference across groups in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, oxygen desaturation index (ODI), and lowest oxygen saturation (LSAT).
CONCLUSION
Overall, both TRD and MAD are effective treatments for moderate and severe OSA. MAD is efficacious in mild OSA, while TRD requires further validation. Furthermore, mild-moderate and severe OSA received similar improvements in sleepiness, ODI, and LSAT. This study complements the evidence for the efficacy of OA.
Topics: Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Humans; Severity of Illness Index; Mandibular Advancement; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38363016
DOI: 10.1002/ohn.676 -
International Journal of Medical... Aug 2023This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of telemedicine-based follow-up management on adults with obstructive sleep apnea. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of telemedicine-based follow-up management on adults with obstructive sleep apnea.
METHODS
Publications were searched in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase. Studies were selected according to the predefined screening criteria, and their qualities were assessed by the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The statistical analyses were performed using Stata12.0 software. It was registered in PROSPERO with the number: CRD42021276414.
RESULTS
A total of 33 articles with 8,689 participants were included. Telemedicine-based follow-up management improved average daily continuous positive airway pressure usage by 36 min (weighted mean difference:0.61;95% confidence interval: 0.39 to 0.83), and the percentage of days with continuous positive airway pressure usage more than four hours by 10.67% in obstructive sleep apnea patients. The meta-analysis of good continuous positive airway pressure compliance showed telemedicine-based follow-up management did not lead to good continuous positive airway pressure compliance (odds ratio: 1.13;95% confidence interval: 0.72 to 1.76). The pooled mean difference of sleep quality was 0.15 (standardized mean difference:0.15; 95% confidence interval: -0.03 to 0.32), and daytime sleepiness was -0.26 (weighted mean difference: -0.26;95% confidence interval: -0.79 to 0.28). The pooled mean difference of apnea hypopnea index was -0.53 (95% confidence interval: -3.58 to 2.51). As for the overall quality of life, the pooled mean difference was -0.25 (standardized mean difference: -0.25;95% confidence interval: -0.25 to 0.76).
CONCLUSION
Telemedicine-based follow-up management was beneficial for continuous positive airway pressure compliance of obstructive sleep apnea patients within six months. However, it could not improve sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, the severity of obstructive sleep apnea, and quality of life in obstructive sleep apnea patients compared with traditional follow-up. Moreover, it was more cost-effective, but there was no consensus on whether it would increase the workload of medical staff.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Follow-Up Studies; Quality of Life; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Telemedicine; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence
PubMed: 37269609
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105108 -
Clinical Otolaryngology : Official... Jun 2024Tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy are common surgical procedures that cause persistent pain, bleeding, and functional limitations. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy are common surgical procedures that cause persistent pain, bleeding, and functional limitations. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of celecoxib compared with a placebo for managing post-tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy pain and other adverse events.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic literature search in the PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases from inception until July 2023. Dichotomous outcomes have been reported as risk ratios (RR) while continuous outcomes were reported using mean differences (MD). A funnel plot was drawn to investigate publication bias.
RESULTS
From 1394 records identified, 6 randomised double-blind trials comprising 591 participants undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy were eligible for inclusion. A high dose (400 mg) of celecoxib was effective in decreasing the pain score for 'worst pain' after the procedure (MD: -10.98, [95% CI: -11.53, -10.42], p < .01, I = 0%) while a low dose (200 mg) was not significantly effective (p = 0.31). For managing other outcomes such as vomiting (RR: 1.37 [95% CI: 0.69, 2.68], p = 0.37, I = 67%), diarrhoea (RR: 1.41, [95% CI: 0.75, 2.64], p = .29, I = 42%), dizziness/drowsiness (RR: 0.90, [95% CI: 0.71, 1.15], p = .48, I = 0%), functional recovery time (p = .74), and headache (p = .91), there was no significant difference between the group on celecoxib and the placebo group regardless of dosage. Finally, there was no significant difference (RR: 1.02, [95% CI: 0.91, 1.15], p = .69, I = 0%) in the effect of the intervention on minimum bleeding, moderate bleeding, and profuse bleeding.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis provides robust evidence pooled from high-quality trials and raises questions about the efficacy of celecoxib for tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy, challenging existing perceptions.
PubMed: 38877737
DOI: 10.1111/coa.14177 -
Sleep Health Oct 2023Breast cancer is a common cancer in which patients are highly susceptible to different sleep disturbances. However, current evidence lacked consistency in methodologies... (Review)
Review
Breast cancer is a common cancer in which patients are highly susceptible to different sleep disturbances. However, current evidence lacked consistency in methodologies in investigating the prevalence of sleep disturbances among breast cancer survivors. The review aims to (1) investigate the global prevalence of sleep disturbances among breast cancer survivors; and (2) investigate the factors influencing the prevalence estimates. A comprehensive search was conducted in 8 databases using a 3-step approach, up to January 2022. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane risk of bias tool were used to evaluate the quality of individual studies. Meta-analysis, meta-regression, and subgroup analysis were performed using R software. Certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations criteria. A total of 51 studies were selected involving 28,036 breast cancer survivors across 17 countries. The global prevalence of poor sleep quality was 62%, different severities of insomnia were 3%-32%, and excessive daytime sleepiness was 24%. Subgroup analyses showed that a significantly higher prevalence of poor sleep quality was found in breast cancer survivors during treatment compared with pre- or post-treatment. No significant covariates were found in a series of meta-regression analyses. The majority (73.5%) of individual studies were high quality but the certainty of the evidence was low or very low according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations criteria. More than half of breast cancer survivors have sleep disturbances, so developing a strategic intervention is warranted. Given the low or very low certainty of the evidence, a robust design for large-scale research is crucial in the future.
PubMed: 37453906
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleh.2023.04.004