-
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology Oct 2023Topical azelaic acid (AA) is indicated for acne and rosacea, but there is some evidence for its use for other dermatological conditions. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Topical azelaic acid (AA) is indicated for acne and rosacea, but there is some evidence for its use for other dermatological conditions.
AIMS
To assess the effectiveness and safety of topical AA for acne vulgaris, rosacea, hyperpigmentation/melasma, and skin aging.
METHODS
RCTs of at least 6 weeks' treatment duration were eligible for inclusion. Databases including MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to December 2022. Two reviewers were involved in all stages of the systematic review process.
RESULTS
Forty-three RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses within 20 rosacea studies demonstrated that erythema severity, inflammatory lesion counts, overall improvement, and treatment success (achieving skin clarity) were significantly improved with AA compared with vehicle after 12 weeks. AA was more effective than metronidazole 0.75% for improved erythema severity, overall improvement, and inflammatory lesion counts. Sixteen acne studies suggest that AA is more effective than vehicle for improving global assessments and reducing acne severity. AA 20% also significantly reduced more lesions than erythromycin gel. Within seven melasma studies, AA 20% was significantly better than vehicle for both severity and global improvement. AA 20% demonstrated significantly better results compared with hydroquinone 2% for global improvement. Very few significant differences between AA and comparators were observed for commonly reported adverse events. No eligible RCTs were found that evaluated skin aging.
CONCLUSIONS
AA is more effective than vehicle for rosacea, acne and melasma. Comparisons between AA and other treatments were often equivalent. Where there is equivalence, AA may be a good option for some clinical situations. RCT evidence is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of AA on skin aging.
Topics: Humans; Skin Aging; Acne Vulgaris; Rosacea; Erythema; Treatment Outcome; Melanosis; Dermatologic Agents
PubMed: 37550898
DOI: 10.1111/jocd.15923 -
Lancet (London, England) Mar 2024Previous meta-analyses have shown reduced risks of composite adverse events with intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Previous meta-analyses have shown reduced risks of composite adverse events with intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with angiography guidance alone. However, these studies have been insufficiently powered to show whether all-cause death or all myocardial infarction are reduced with intravascular imaging guidance, and most previous intravascular imaging studies were done with intravascular ultrasound rather than optical coherence tomography (OCT), a newer imaging modality. We aimed to assess the comparative performance of intravascular imaging-guided PCI and angiography-guided PCI with drug-eluting stents.
METHODS
For this systematic review and updated meta-analysis, we searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to Aug 30, 2023, for studies that randomly assigned patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents either to intravascular ultrasound or OCT, or both, or to angiography alone to guide the intervention. The searches were done and study-level data were extracted independently by two investigators. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure, defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel-myocardial infarction (TV-MI), or target lesion revascularisation, assessed in patients randomly assigned to intravascular imaging guidance (intravascular ultrasound or OCT) versus angiography guidance. We did a standard frequentist meta-analysis to generate direct data, and a network meta-analysis to generate indirect data and overall treatment effects. Outcomes were expressed as relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs at the longest reported follow-up duration. This study was registered with the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO, number CRD42023455662).
FINDINGS
22 trials were identified in which 15 964 patients were randomised and followed for a weighted mean duration of 24·7 months (longest duration of follow-up in each study ranging from 6 to 60 months). Compared with angiography-guided PCI, intravascular imaging-guided PCI resulted in a decreased risk of target lesion failure (RR 0·71 [95% CI 0·63-0·80]; p<0·0001), driven by reductions in the risks of cardiac death (RR 0·55 [95% CI 0·41-0·75]; p=0·0001), TV-MI (RR 0·82 [95% CI 0·68-0·98]; p=0·030), and target lesion revascularisation (RR 0·72 [95% CI 0·60-0·86]; p=0·0002). Intravascular imaging guidance also reduced the risks of stent thrombosis (RR 0·52 [95% CI 0·34-0·81]; p=0·0036), all myocardial infarction (RR 0·83 [95% CI 0·71-0·99]; p=0·033), and all-cause death (RR 0·75 [95% CI 0·60-0·93]; p=0·0091). Outcomes were similar for OCT-guided and intravascular ultrasound-guided PCI.
INTERPRETATION
Compared with angiography guidance, intravascular imaging guidance of coronary stent implantation with OCT or intravascular ultrasound enhances both the safety and effectiveness of PCI, reducing the risks of death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularisation, and stent thrombosis.
FUNDING
Abbott.
Topics: Humans; Angiography; Drug-Eluting Stents; Erythema Multiforme; Myocardial Infarction; Network Meta-Analysis; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thrombosis
PubMed: 38401549
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02454-6 -
Archives of Dermatological Research Dec 2023There is increasing demand for natural and sustainable products for the treatment of dermatologic conditions. This systematic review aims to critically analyze published... (Review)
Review
There is increasing demand for natural and sustainable products for the treatment of dermatologic conditions. This systematic review aims to critically analyze published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and provide evidence-based recommendations on the therapeutic use of curcumin for a variety of dermatological diseases. A systematic search of published literature was performed on July 18, 2023 using PRISMA guidelines for turmeric or curcumin for the treatment of skin diseases. Clinical recommendations were made based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine guidelines. We identified 18 original randomized controlled trials for use of turmeric or curcumin for psoriasis, radiation dermatitis, oral lichen planus, pruritis, vitiligo, tinea capitis, facial erythema, and scarring. Psoriasis, cesarean section scar, and pruritus received grade of recommendation B. Radiation dermatitis, oral lichen planus, vitiligo, tinea capitis, and facial redness received grade of recommendation C or D. Curcumin was demonstrated to have an excellent safety profile in all clinical trials analyzed. Further research is required to determine optimal dosing and treatment parameters of turmeric. Additional, larger, RCTs and non-RCTs should be conducted to further investigate the safety and efficacy of curcumin as a treatment option for dermatological diseases.
Topics: Humans; Curcumin; Lichen Planus, Oral; Vitiligo; Psoriasis; Tinea Capitis; Dermatitis
PubMed: 38085369
DOI: 10.1007/s00403-023-02754-8 -
Cureus Dec 2023The off-label use of botulinum toxin type-A (BoNT-A) in treating rosacea seems encouraging, but the evidence is still lacking regarding its efficacy and safety. This... (Review)
Review
The off-label use of botulinum toxin type-A (BoNT-A) in treating rosacea seems encouraging, but the evidence is still lacking regarding its efficacy and safety. This study was conducted to summarize the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of BoNT-A in the treatment of rosacea patients. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in several databases, and 17 studies were included. Before-after and split-face comparisons showed that BoNT-A significantly alleviated the symptoms of facial erythema and flushing and improved the patient's quality of life/satisfaction. However, the symptoms recurred three to six months post-injection, requiring repeated treatments in some patients. The pooled rates of post-injection localized erythema, ecchymosis, and facial muscle affection represented 24.6%, 5.1%, and 4.3%, respectively. BoNT-A seems to be effective in alleviating the symptoms of rosacea with a low rate of adverse events. However, the recurrence of the symptoms a few months after the injection requires repeated sessions, which may raise cost-effectiveness issues. Large-scale clinical trials are required to confirm the effectiveness and define the optimal dosing regimen and the rate of recurrence. Future studies should allow for an adequate follow-up after the treatment, with repeated measurements of the outcomes.
PubMed: 38288198
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.51304 -
Lasers in Medical Science Sep 2023Laser therapies have been well-established in ameliorating skin-aging consequences. This systematic review aims to determine the efficacy, safety profile, and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Laser therapies have been well-established in ameliorating skin-aging consequences. This systematic review aims to determine the efficacy, safety profile, and satisfaction rates of laser combination therapies on skin rejuvenation resurfacing. A systematic search was performed in four major databases up to September 2022. Skin rejuvenation studies were eligible comprising at least one laser combination arm, inclusive of all laser types (ablative or non-ablatives), and one monotherapy arm selected from one of the combined modalities. Studies combining one laser modality with radiofrequency (RF) or intense pulse light (IPL) were also assessed. Trials that did not encompass a monotherapy control arm were evaluated independently as single-arm studies. Eighteen clinical trials recruiting 448 cases were included after screening. A total of 532 nm KTP + 1064 nm Nd:YAG and 2940 nm Er:YAG + Nd:YAG were the two most utilized laser combinations and exerted higher improvements and milder adverse events, compared to their monotherapy in most studies. Combining CO with rhodamine-IPL or gallium arsenide laser increased efficacy and satisfaction and brings about faster skin recovery time. Augmenting CO + RF did not increase improvement vs CO laser alone but prolonged skin erythema. Our meta-analysis revealed the pooled prevalence of quartile improvement rates as 0%, 28%, 40%, 27% in laser combination group, and 0%, 9%, 31%, 17% in laser monotherapy group, respectively. The satisfaction within each quartile category was 39%, 25%, 15%, 7% in laser combination and 20%, 25%, 16%, 17% in laser monotherapy, respectively, suggestive of the higher efficacy and satisfaction of laser combination group. The pain scores were lower in laser combination group than monotherapy (4.8 ± 1.18 vs 7.18 ± 0.7, converted on a scale of 0 to 10). Post-laser skin erythema lasted less longer in the combination group (12.8 vs 15.24 days). Laser combination therapies were discovered to be superior to their monotherapies in terms of clinical improvement rates, diminished adverse events such as pain and erythema and patients satisfaction rates. Due to paucity of high-quality reportings, additional trials are warranted to corroborate these results.
Topics: Humans; Rejuvenation; Carbon Dioxide; Laser Therapy; Erythema; Lasers, Gas; Skin Aging; Pain; Lasers, Solid-State; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37776370
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-023-03856-5 -
JMIR Dermatology Nov 2023Atopic dermatitis (AD), also known as eczema, is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that presents with symptoms of intense pruritus, dryness, and erythema.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Atopic dermatitis (AD), also known as eczema, is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that presents with symptoms of intense pruritus, dryness, and erythema. Dissatisfaction with first-line therapies for AD, the desire to avoid steroids, and the extreme cost of effective biologics have created a demand for alternative treatment options such as oral vitamins and nutritional supplements.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this review was to assess the effectiveness of oral nutritional supplements, pre- and probiotics, and vitamin deficiencies and supplements on AD symptomology and clinical course.
METHODS
We searched Scopus, PubMed, and MEDLINE (Ovid interface) for English-language articles published between 1993 and 2023. The final search was conducted on June 22, 2023. The search terms comprised the following: "(Atopic Dermatitis or Atopic Eczema) AND (supplement OR vitamin OR mineral OR micronutrients OR Fish Oil OR Omega Fatty Acid OR Probiotics OR Prebiotics OR apple cider vinegar OR collagen OR herbal OR fiber)."
RESULTS
A total of 18 studies-3 (17%) evaluating vitamins, 4 (22%) evaluating herbal medicine compounds, 2 (11%) evaluating single-ingredient nutritional supplements, and 9 (50%) evaluating pre- and probiotics-involving 881 patients were included in this review.
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, there is weak evidence to support any one nutritional supplement intervention for the alleviation of AD symptoms. Multiple trials (4/18, 22%) showed promise for supplements such as Zemaphyte, kefir, and freeze-dried whey with Cuscuta campestris Yuncker extract. The most evidence was found on the effectiveness of probiotics on the clinical course of AD. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Ligilactobacillus salivarius, and Lactobacillus acidophilus specifically showed evidence of efficacy and safety across multiple studies (6/18, 33%). However, larger, more extensive randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the true effectiveness of these supplements on the broader population.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42023470596; https://tinyurl.com/4a9477u7.
PubMed: 38019566
DOI: 10.2196/40857 -
Archives of Dermatological Research Oct 2023Morbihan disease (MD) is considered a rare complication of rosacea, which is difficult to diagnose and challenging to treat. Here, we performed a systematic review of...
Morbihan disease (MD) is considered a rare complication of rosacea, which is difficult to diagnose and challenging to treat. Here, we performed a systematic review of available case reports and case series to summarize key clinical and pathologic features of and successful treatment regimens for MD. We conducted a search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane electronic databases from their inception to the date of search on March 6, 2023. We found that MD affects patients in the fifth decade of life on average, more commonly reported in male than female (69% vs 31%). Clinically, MD affects the eyelids, cheeks, and forehead most commonly, presenting as non-pitting, erythematous edema or an edematous plaque. On biopsy, the pathologic features, such as dermal edema, sebaceous hyperplasia, perivascular and periadnexal inflammatory infiltrate, and granulomatous reaction, are frequently reported. Out of 55 patients who were able to achieve complete response without recurrence, 35% of patients were treated with isotretinoin and 22% were treated with tetracycline antibiotics with a daily dosage range of 20-80 mg and 40-200 mg, respectively. Out of those 55 patients, 22% and 7% were treated successfully with surgical intervention and intralesional injection of steroids, respectively. Additionally, lymphatic drainage has been shown to be an effective adjunctive therapeutic tool. More studies are necessary to understand the disease mechanism to improve the diagnosis of and develop evidence-based therapies for MD.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Rosacea; Erythema; Isotretinoin; Edema; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37062777
DOI: 10.1007/s00403-023-02621-6 -
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Feb 2024Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a multisystem disease impacting various body systems including musculoskeletal, ocular, skin, hepatobiliary, pulmonary, cardiac, and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a multisystem disease impacting various body systems including musculoskeletal, ocular, skin, hepatobiliary, pulmonary, cardiac, and haematological systems. The extraintestinal manifestations of IBD are frequent, common in both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), and impact the morbidity and mortality of patients.
METHODS
The Embase, Embase classic, and PubMed databases were searched between January 1979 and December 2021. A random effects model was performed to find the pooled prevalence of joint, ocular, and skin extraintestinal manifestations of UC and CD.
RESULTS
Fifty-two studies were included that reported on 352 454 patients. The prevalence of at least 1 joint, ocular, or skin extraintestinal manifestation in all IBD, UC, and CD was 24%, 27%, and 35% respectively. The prevalence between UC and CD were similar for pyoderma gangrenosum and axial joint manifestations. Ocular manifestations were found to be more common in CD than in UC. Peripheral joint manifestations and erythema nodosum were found to be more common in CD than UC.
DISCUSSION
To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis that reports on the prevalence of at least 1 joint, ocular, or skin extraintestinal manifestation in IBD. Our results are largely consistent with figures and statements quoted in the literature. However, our findings are based on significantly larger cohort sizes. Thus, our results have the potential to better power studies and more accurately counsel patients.
Topics: Humans; Prevalence; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Pyoderma Gangrenosum
PubMed: 37042969
DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izad061 -
Lasers in Medical Science Feb 2024Melasma is a common acquired skin pigmentation disorder. The treatment is urgent but challenging. Ablative fractional laser (AFL) can improve pigmentation, but the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Melasma is a common acquired skin pigmentation disorder. The treatment is urgent but challenging. Ablative fractional laser (AFL) can improve pigmentation, but the efficacy and potential side effects are still debatable. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ablative fractional lasers in the treatment of melasma. A comprehensive systematic search of literature published before June 20, 2023, was conducted on online databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The data obtained were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 software. Fourteen randomized controlled trials, comprising 527 patients, were included. Compared to the drug alone, the combination of AFL and the drug showed improved therapeutic efficacy in the melasma area and severity index (MASI) (MD = 1.54, 95% CI [0.16, 2.92], P = 0.03) and physician global assessment (RR = 1.61, 95% CI [1.08, 2.41], P = 0.02). However, no statistically significant results were found in patient self-assessment (RR = 1.56, 95% CI [0.88, 2.76], P = 0.12). As an individual therapy, AFL is not superior to any other lasers in terms of MASI (MD = 2.66, 95% CI [-1.32, 6.64], P = 0.19) or melanin index (MD = -7.06, 95% CI [-45.09, 30.97], P = 0.72). Common adverse events included transient erythema, burning, edema, and superficial crusting. Only a few patients experienced reversible post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, herpes labialis, and acne breakouts. These results support the application of AFL as a viable treatment option for melasma, particularly in refractory and severe cases. Rational parameterization or combination therapy may lead to significant clinical improvement with fewer complications.
Topics: Humans; Treatment Outcome; Melanosis; Acne Vulgaris; Erythema; Hyperpigmentation; Lasers, Solid-State
PubMed: 38379033
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-024-03972-w -
International Immunopharmacology Sep 2023Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP), a chronic, recurrent pustular dermatosis associated with erythema, scales, and sterile pustules on the palms and soles, is commonly... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP), a chronic, recurrent pustular dermatosis associated with erythema, scales, and sterile pustules on the palms and soles, is commonly encountered in dermatology clinics. Whether PPP is a variant of psoriasis or a distinct condition is still debated. Although biological agents have been successfully used to treat moderate-to-severe psoriasis, existing literature on PPP is limited to case reports or small case series. The lack of well-documented clinical studies makes it difficult to select the ideal treatment for this condition. This review aims to discuss the efficacy and safety of biological agents in PPP treatment based on randomized controlled trials with the hope of inspiring dermatologist clinicians to propose new therapeutic approaches.
OBJECTIVES
This review aims to obtain high-level evidence to assess the efficacy and safety of biological agents in the treatment of patients with PPP.
METHODS
We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to May 18, 2023, for high-quality randomized controlled trials that reported at least one adverse event after PPP treatment with biological agents in patients > 18 years of age. RevMan 5.3 software was used for the meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Nine trials involving 799 participants were included in the analysis. We used ppPASI 75 as the primary efficacy measure. Anti-IL-23 and anti-IL-17A agents afforded 4.14-fold and 1.95-fold better outcomes than placebo treatment at weeks 16 and 12, respectively (P-value = 0.009, RR = 4.14, 95% confidence interval [CI; 1.43-11.98]; P-value = 0.02, RR = 1.95, 95% CI [1.11-3.42]). Moreover, anti-IL-23 agents at a dose of 100 mg were more effective than at 200 mg, indicating that 100 mg may be the best dose for anti-IL-23 agents. Next, we investigated the safety of biological agents for PPP treatment. The incidence of total adverse events (AEs) was 1.25 times higher for biological agents than for controls, indicating a good safety profile (RR = 1.25, P-value < 0.00001, 95% CI [1.13, 1.37]). Additionally, we divided the common AEs into 16 categories and found that anti-IL-23 agents were more likely to induce infections. In conclusion, we evaluated safety and efficacy in a comprehensive comparison and found that anti-IL-23 agents conferred good clinical efficacy with a low incidence of AEs and could be recommended with caution.
LIMITATIONS
Only a few relevant, high-quality, randomized controlled trials were included in the study.
CONCLUSION
This study showed that biological agents can be used to treat patients with PPP with good efficacy; however, AEs cannot be ignored. Multi-center, high-quality clinical studies with large sample sizes are needed to further evaluate the effects and safety of biological agents in PPP treatment.
Topics: Humans; Biological Factors; Psoriasis; Acute Disease; Chronic Disease; Databases, Factual; Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37480749
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110553