-
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrinopathy in women of reproductive age and remains widely underdiagnosed leading to significant morbidity....
INTRODUCTION
Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrinopathy in women of reproductive age and remains widely underdiagnosed leading to significant morbidity. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) hold promise in improving diagnostics. Thus, we performed a systematic review of literature to identify the utility of AI/ML in the diagnosis or classification of PCOS.
METHODS
We applied a search strategy using the following databases MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Web of Science, and the IEEE Xplore Digital Library using relevant keywords. Eligible studies were identified, and results were extracted for their synthesis from inception until January 1, 2022.
RESULTS
135 studies were screened and ultimately, 31 studies were included in this study. Data sources used by the AI/ML interventions included clinical data, electronic health records, and genetic and proteomic data. Ten studies (32%) employed standardized criteria (NIH, Rotterdam, or Revised International PCOS classification), while 17 (55%) used clinical information with/without imaging. The most common AI techniques employed were support vector machine (42% studies), K-nearest neighbor (26%), and regression models (23%) were the commonest AI/ML. Receiver operating curves (ROC) were employed to compare AI/ML with clinical diagnosis. Area under the ROC ranged from 73% to 100% (n=7 studies), diagnostic accuracy from 89% to 100% (n=4 studies), sensitivity from 41% to 100% (n=10 studies), specificity from 75% to 100% (n=10 studies), positive predictive value (PPV) from 68% to 95% (n=4 studies), and negative predictive value (NPV) from 94% to 99% (n=2 studies).
CONCLUSION
Artificial intelligence and machine learning provide a high diagnostic and classification performance in detecting PCOS, thereby providing an avenue for early diagnosis of this disorder. However, AI-based studies should use standardized PCOS diagnostic criteria to enhance the clinical applicability of AI/ML in PCOS and improve adherence to methodological and reporting guidelines for maximum diagnostic utility.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022295287.
Topics: Female; Humans; Artificial Intelligence; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Proteomics; Machine Learning; Cluster Analysis
PubMed: 37790605
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1106625 -
International Journal of Medical... Dec 2023Identifying patient safety events using electronic health records (EHRs) and automated machine learning-based detection methods can help improve the efficiency and... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Identifying patient safety events using electronic health records (EHRs) and automated machine learning-based detection methods can help improve the efficiency and quality of healthcare service provision.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to systematically review machine learning-based methods and techniques, as well as their results for patient safety event management using EHRs.
METHODS
We reviewed the studies that focused on machine learning techniques, including automatic prediction and detection of patient safety events and medical errors through EHR analysis to manage patient safety events. The data were collected by searching Scopus, PubMed (Medline), Web of Science, EMBASE, and IEEE Xplore databases.
RESULTS
After screening, 41 papers were reviewed. Support vector machine (SVM), random forest, conditional random field (CRF), and bidirectional long short-term memory with conditional random field (BiLSTM-CRF) algorithms were mostly applied to predict, identify, and classify patient safety events using EHRs; however, they had different performances. BiLSTM-CRF was employed in most of the studies to extract and identify concepts, e.g., adverse drug events (ADEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs), as well as relationships between drug and severity, drug and ADEs, drug and ADRs. Recurrent neural networks (RNN) and BiLSTM-CRF had the best results in detecting ADEs compared to other patient safety events. Linear classifiers and Naive Bayes (NB) had the highest performance for ADR detection. Logistic regression had the best results in detecting surgical site infections. According to the findings, the quality of articles has non-significantly improved in recent years, but they had low average scores.
CONCLUSIONS
Machine learning can be useful in automatic detection and prediction of patient safety events. However, most of these algorithms have not yet been externally validated or prospectively tested. Therefore, further studies are required to improve the performance of these automated systems.
Topics: Humans; Electronic Health Records; Bayes Theorem; Patient Safety; Machine Learning; Algorithms
PubMed: 37837710
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105246 -
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy Oct 2023Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is often considered an early stage of dementia, with estimated rates of progression to dementia up to 80-90% after approximately 6 years... (Review)
Review
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is often considered an early stage of dementia, with estimated rates of progression to dementia up to 80-90% after approximately 6 years from the initial diagnosis. Diagnosis of cognitive impairment in dementia is typically based on clinical evaluation, neuropsychological assessments, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, and neuroimaging. The main goal of diagnosing MCI is to determine its cause, particularly whether it is due to Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, only a limited percentage of the population has access to etiological confirmation, which has led to the emergence of peripheral fluid biomarkers as a diagnostic tool for dementias, including MCI due to AD. Recent advances in biofluid assays have enabled the use of sophisticated statistical models and multimodal machine learning (ML) algorithms for the diagnosis of MCI based on fluid biomarkers from CSF, peripheral blood, and saliva, among others. This approach has shown promise for identifying specific causes of MCI, including AD. After a PRISMA analysis, 29 articles revealed a trend towards using multimodal algorithms that incorporate additional biomarkers such as neuroimaging, neuropsychological tests, and genetic information. Particularly, neuroimaging is commonly used in conjunction with fluid biomarkers for both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Our systematic review suggests that cost-effective longitudinal multimodal monitoring data, representative of diverse cultural populations and utilizing white-box ML algorithms, could be a valuable contribution to the development of diagnostic models for AD due to MCI. Clinical assessment and biomarkers, together with ML techniques, could prove pivotal in improving diagnostic tools for MCI due to AD.
Topics: Humans; Alzheimer Disease; Cross-Sectional Studies; Disease Progression; Cognitive Dysfunction; Biomarkers; Machine Learning; Amyloid beta-Peptides; tau Proteins
PubMed: 37838690
DOI: 10.1186/s13195-023-01304-8 -
BMC Pulmonary Medicine Jul 2023Asthma exacerbations reduce the patient's quality of life and are also responsible for significant disease burdens and economic costs. Machine learning (ML)-based... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Asthma exacerbations reduce the patient's quality of life and are also responsible for significant disease burdens and economic costs. Machine learning (ML)-based prediction models have been increasingly developed to predict asthma exacerbations in recent years. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify the prediction performance of ML-based prediction models for asthma exacerbations and address the uncertainty of whether modern ML methods could become an alternative option to predict asthma exacerbations.
METHODS
PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched for studies published up to December 15, 2022. Studies that applied ML methods to develop prediction models for asthma exacerbations among asthmatic patients older than five years and were published in English were eligible. The prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST) was utilized to estimate the risk of bias and the applicability of included studies. Stata software (version 15.0) was used for the random effects meta-analysis of performance measures. Subgroup analyses stratified by ML methods, sample size, age groups, and outcome definitions were conducted.
RESULTS
Eleven studies, including 23 prediction models, were identified. Most of the studies were published in recent three years. Logistic regression, boosting, and random forest were the most used ML methods. The most common important predictors were systemic steroid use, short-acting beta2-agonists, emergency department visit, age, and exacerbation history. The overall pooled area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) of 11 studies (23 prediction models) was 0.80 (95% CI 0.77-0.83). Subgroup analysis based on different ML models showed that boosting method achieved the best performance, with an overall pooled AUROC of 0.84 (95% CI 0.81-0.87).
CONCLUSION
This study identified that ML was the potential tool to achieve great performance in predicting asthma exacerbations. However, the methodology within these models was heterogeneous. Future studies should focus on improving the generalization ability and practicability, thus driving the application of these models in clinical practice.
Topics: Humans; Quality of Life; Asthma; Steroids; Machine Learning; Cost of Illness
PubMed: 37507662
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-023-02570-w -
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Oct 2023Machine learning provides many powerful and effective techniques for analysing heterogeneous electronic health records (EHR). Administrative Health Records (AHR) are a... (Review)
Review
Machine learning provides many powerful and effective techniques for analysing heterogeneous electronic health records (EHR). Administrative Health Records (AHR) are a subset of EHR collected for administrative purposes, and the use of machine learning on AHRs is a growing subfield of EHR analytics. Existing reviews of EHR analytics emphasise that the data-modality of the EHR limits the breadth of suitable machine learning techniques, and pursuable healthcare applications. Despite emphasising the importance of data modality, the literature fails to analyse which techniques and applications are relevant to AHRs. AHRs contain uniquely well-structured, categorically encoded records which are distinct from other data-modalities captured by EHRs, and they can provide valuable information pertaining to how patients interact with the healthcare system. This paper systematically reviews AHR-based research, analysing 70 relevant studies and spanning multiple databases. We identify and analyse which machine learning techniques are applied to AHRs and which health informatics applications are pursued in AHR-based research. We also analyse how these techniques are applied in pursuit of each application, and identify the limitations of these approaches. We find that while AHR-based studies are disconnected from each other, the use of AHRs in health informatics research is substantial and accelerating. Our synthesis of these studies highlights the utility of AHRs for pursuing increasingly complex and diverse research objectives despite a number of pervading data- and technique-based limitations. Finally, through our findings, we propose a set of future research directions that can enhance the utility of AHR data and machine learning techniques for health informatics research.
Topics: Humans; Machine Learning; Electronic Health Records; Medical Informatics; Databases, Factual; Delivery of Health Care
PubMed: 37783537
DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102642 -
Biomedical Engineering Online Jul 2023Osteoporosis is a significant health problem in the skeletal system, associated with bone tissue changes and its strength. Machine Learning (ML), on the other hand, has... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Osteoporosis is a significant health problem in the skeletal system, associated with bone tissue changes and its strength. Machine Learning (ML), on the other hand, has been accompanied by improvements in recent years and has been in the spotlight. This study is designed to investigate the Diagnostic Test Accuracy (DTA) of ML to detect osteoporosis through the hip dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images.
METHODS
The ISI Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, IEEE Xplore Digital Library, CINAHL, Science Direct, PROSPERO, and EMBASE were systematically searched until June 2023 for studies that tested the diagnostic precision of ML model-assisted for predicting an osteoporosis diagnosis.
RESULTS
The pooled sensitivity of univariate analysis of seven studies was 0.844 (95% CI 0.791 to 0.885, I = 94% for 7 studies). The pooled specificity of univariate analysis was 0.781 (95% CI 0.732 to 0.824, I = 98% for 7 studies). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 18.91 (95% CI 14.22 to 25.14, I = 93% for 7 studies). The pooled mean positive likelihood ratio (LR) and the negative likelihood ratio (LR) were 3.7 and 0.22, respectively. Also, the summary receiver operating characteristics (sROC) of the bivariate model has an AUC of 0.878.
CONCLUSION
Osteoporosis can be diagnosed by ML with acceptable accuracy, and hip fracture prediction was improved via training in an Architecture Learning Network (ALN).
Topics: Humans; Pelvic Bones; Osteoporosis; Algorithms; Hip Fractures; Machine Learning
PubMed: 37430259
DOI: 10.1186/s12938-023-01132-9 -
Advances in Therapy Aug 2023Several studies have emphasized the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) and its subfields, such as machine learning (ML), as emerging and feasible approaches to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Several studies have emphasized the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) and its subfields, such as machine learning (ML), as emerging and feasible approaches to optimize patient care in oncology. As a result, clinicians and decision-makers are faced with a plethora of reviews regarding the state of the art of applications of AI for head and neck cancer (HNC) management. This article provides an analysis of systematic reviews on the current status, and of the limitations of the application of AI/ML as adjunctive decision-making tools in HNC management.
METHODS
Electronic databases (PubMed, Medline via Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched from inception until November 30, 2022. The study selection, searching and screening processes, inclusion, and exclusion criteria followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A risk of bias assessment was conducted using a tailored and modified version of the Assessment of Systematic Review (AMSTAR-2) tool and quality assessment using the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews (ROBIS) guidelines.
RESULTS
Of the 137 search hits retrieved, 17 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. This analysis of systematic reviews revealed that the application of AI/ML as a decision aid in HNC management can be thematized as follows: (1) detection of precancerous and cancerous lesions within histopathologic slides; (2) prediction of the histopathologic nature of a given lesion from various sources of medical imaging; (3) prognostication; (4) extraction of pathological findings from imaging; and (5) different applications in radiation oncology. In addition, the challenges in implementation of AI/ML models for clinical evaluations include the lack of standardized methodological guidelines for the collection of clinical images, development of these models, reporting of their performance, external validation procedures, and regulatory frameworks.
CONCLUSION
At present, there is a paucity of evidence to suggest the adoption of these models in clinical practice due to the aforementioned limitations. Therefore, this manuscript highlights the need for development of standardized guidelines to facilitate the adoption and implementation of these models in the daily clinical practice. In addition, adequately powered, prospective, randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to further assess the potential of AI/ML models in real-world clinical settings for the management of HNC.
Topics: Humans; Artificial Intelligence; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Machine Learning; Prospective Studies; Research Design
PubMed: 37291378
DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02527-9 -
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical... Sep 2023Recurrence of breast cancer leads to a high lifetime risk and a low 5 year survival rate. Researchers have used machine learning to predict the risk of recurrence in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Recurrence of breast cancer leads to a high lifetime risk and a low 5 year survival rate. Researchers have used machine learning to predict the risk of recurrence in patients with breast cancer, but the predictive performance of machine learning remains controversial. Hence, this study aimed to explore the accuracy of machine learning in predicting breast cancer recurrence risk and aggregate predictive variables to provide guidance for the development of subsequent risk scoring systems.
METHODS
We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science. The risk of bias in the included studies was evaluated using prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST). Meta-regression was adopted to explore whether there was a significant difference in the recurrence time by machine learning.
RESULTS
Thirty-four studies involving 67,560 subjects were included, among whom 8695 experienced breast cancer recurrence. The c-index of prediction models was 0.814 (95%CI 0.802-0.826) and 0.770 (95%CI 0.737-0.803) in the training and validation sets, respectively; the sensitivity and specificity were 0.69 (95% CI 0.64-0.74), 0.89 (95% CI 0.86-0.92) in the training, and 0.64 (95% CI 0.58-0.70), 0.88 (95% CI 0.82-0.92) in the validation, respectively. Age, histological grading, and lymph node status are the most commonly used variables in model construction. Attention should be paid to unhealthy lifestyles such as drinking, smoking and BMI as modeling variables. Risk prediction models based on machine learning have long-term monitoring value for breast cancer population, and subsequent studies should consider using large-sample and multi-center data to establish risk equations for verification.
CONCLUSION
Machine learning may be used as a predictive tool for breast cancer recurrence. Currently, there is a lack of effective and universally applicable machine learning models in clinical practice. We expect to incorporate multi-center studies in the future and attempt to develop tools for predicting breast cancer recurrence risk, so as to effectively identify populations at high risk of recurrence and develop personalized follow-up strategies and prognostic interventions to reduce the risk of recurrence.
Topics: Humans; Female; Breast Neoplasms; Breast; Prognosis; Sensitivity and Specificity; Machine Learning
PubMed: 37302114
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04967-w -
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision... Jul 2023Esophageal cancer (EC) is a significant global health problem, with an estimated 7th highest incidence and 6th highest mortality rate. Timely diagnosis and treatment are...
INTRODUCTION
Esophageal cancer (EC) is a significant global health problem, with an estimated 7th highest incidence and 6th highest mortality rate. Timely diagnosis and treatment are critical for improving patients' outcomes, as over 40% of patients with EC are diagnosed after metastasis. Recent advances in machine learning (ML) techniques, particularly in computer vision, have demonstrated promising applications in medical image processing, assisting clinicians in making more accurate and faster diagnostic decisions. Given the significance of early detection of EC, this systematic review aims to summarize and discuss the current state of research on ML-based methods for the early detection of EC.
METHODS
We conducted a comprehensive systematic search of five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Wiley, and IEEE) using search terms such as "ML", "Deep Learning (DL (", "Neural Networks (NN)", "Esophagus", "EC" and "Early Detection". After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 31 articles were retained for full review.
RESULTS
The results of this review highlight the potential of ML-based methods in the early detection of EC. The average accuracy of the reviewed methods in the analysis of endoscopic and computed tomography (CT (images of the esophagus was over 89%, indicating a high impact on early detection of EC. Additionally, the highest percentage of clinical images used in the early detection of EC with the use of ML was related to white light imaging (WLI) images. Among all ML techniques, methods based on convolutional neural networks (CNN) achieved higher accuracy and sensitivity in the early detection of EC compared to other methods.
CONCLUSION
Our findings suggest that ML methods may improve accuracy in the early detection of EC, potentially supporting radiologists, endoscopists, and pathologists in diagnosis and treatment planning. However, the current literature is limited, and more studies are needed to investigate the clinical applications of these methods in early detection of EC. Furthermore, many studies suffer from class imbalance and biases, highlighting the need for validation of detection algorithms across organizations in longitudinal studies.
Topics: Humans; Deep Learning; Early Detection of Cancer; Machine Learning; Neural Networks, Computer; Esophageal Neoplasms
PubMed: 37460991
DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02235-y -
International Journal of Gynecological... Sep 2023To review the literature on machine learning in endometrial cancer, report the most commonly used algorithms, and compare performance with traditional prediction models.
OBJECTIVE
To review the literature on machine learning in endometrial cancer, report the most commonly used algorithms, and compare performance with traditional prediction models.
METHODS
This is a systematic review of the literature from January 1985 to March 2021 on the use of machine learning in endometrial cancer. An extensive search of electronic databases was conducted. Four independent reviewers screened studies initially by title then full text. Quality was assessed using the MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies) criteria. P values were derived using the Pearson's Χ test in JMP 15.0.
RESULTS
Among 4295 articles screened, 30 studies on machine learning in endometrial cancer were included. The most frequent applications were in patient datasets (33.3%, n=10), pre-operative diagnostics (30%, n=9), genomics (23.3%, n=7), and serum biomarkers (13.3%, n=4). The most commonly used models were neural networks (n=10, 33.3%) and support vector machine (n=6, 20%).The number of publications on machine learning in endometrial cancer increased from 1 in 2010 to 29 in 2021.Eight studies compared machine learning with traditional statistics. Among patient dataset studies, two machine learning models (20%) performed similarly to logistic regression (accuracy: 0.85 vs 0.82, p=0.16). Machine learning algorithms performed similarly to detect endometrial cancer based on MRI (accuracy: 0.87 vs 0.82, p=0.24) while outperforming traditional methods in predicting extra-uterine disease in one serum biomarker study (accuracy: 0.81 vs 0.61). For survival outcomes, one study compared machine learning with Kaplan-Meier and reported no difference in concordance index (83.8% vs 83.1%).
CONCLUSION
Although machine learning is an innovative and emerging technology, performance is similar to that of traditional regression models in endometrial cancer. More studies are needed to assess its role in endometrial cancer.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42021269565.
Topics: Humans; Female; Endometrial Neoplasms; Algorithms; Databases, Factual; Genomics; Machine Learning
PubMed: 37666535
DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004622