-
Respiratory Medicine Nov 2023New tools such as cryobiopsy of mediastinal lymph nodes (cryoEBUS) have been described to improve the diagnostic usefulness of endobronchial ultrasound-guided... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Is the diagnostic yield of mediastinal lymph node cryobiopsy (cryoEBUS) better for diagnosing mediastinal node involvement compared to endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA)? A systematic review.
INTRODUCTION
New tools such as cryobiopsy of mediastinal lymph nodes (cryoEBUS) have been described to improve the diagnostic usefulness of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). The literature suggests that this novel procedure could be associated with greater diagnostic usefulness than conventional EBUS-TBNA.
METHODS
To develop a systematic analysis and meta-analysis on the diagnostic diagnostic yield and safety of cryobiopsy of hilar and mediastinal adenopathies compared to EBUS-TBNA.
RESULTS
Seven studies that had included a total of 555 patients were considered in this review, with 365 (65.7%) of these patients having an etiology of malignant lymph node involvement. The overall diagnostic usefulness of cryoEBUS was higher compared to EBUS-TBNA (92% vs. 80%). However, when the results were analysed according to the specific aetiologies of the adenopathies, cryoEBUS was especially useful in cases of lymphomas or non-pulmonary carcinomas (83% vs. 42%) and in cases that were benign (87% vs. 60.1%), with no significant differences being found in specific cases of lung cancer. For lymphoma, cryoEBUS was diagnostic in 87% of cases compared to 12% for EBUS-TBNA and in addition, also allowed the characterisation of every lymphoma subtype. Genetic studies and immunohistochemical determination of PD-L1 was possible in almost all (97%) of the samples obtained by cryoEBUS, while this was only possible in 79% of those obtained by EBUS-TBNA. The most frequent complication was light bleeding, which was described in up to 85% of cases in some series.
CONCLUSION
CryoEBUS could represent a promising technique in the diagnostic algorithm used for mediastinal and hilar involvement. Although cryoEBUS did not significantly improve the diagnosis of lung cancer compared to EBUS-TBNA, the results were significantly better in patients with benign pathologies and other tumour types, including lymphomas. In addition, it seems that the samples obtained by cryoEBUS better defined the histological subtypes of lymphoma and allowed complete molecular characterisation in cases of lung cancer. The technique has proven to be safe and no serious complications were described after the procedure.
Topics: Humans; Bronchoscopy; Mediastinum; Lymph Nodes; Lung Neoplasms; Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration; Lymphadenopathy; Lymphoma; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37579981
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107389 -
A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediastinoscopy-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy (MATHE).Surgical Oncology Apr 2024Transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) avoids thoracotomy but sacrifices mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Mediastinoscopy-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy (MATHE) allows for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) avoids thoracotomy but sacrifices mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Mediastinoscopy-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy (MATHE) allows for visualisation and en-bloc dissection of mediastinal lymph nodes while retaining the benefits of THE. However, given its novel inception, there is a paucity of literature. This study aimed to conduct the first meta-analysis to explore the efficacy of MATHE and clarify its role in the future of esophagectomy.
METHODS
Four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to May 1, 2023. Studies were included if they reported outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer who underwent MATHE. Meta-analyses of proportions and pooled means were performed for the outcomes of intraoperative blood loss, lymph node (LN) harvest, mean hospital length of stay (LOS), mean operative time, R0 resection, conversion rates, 30-day mortality rate, 5-year OS, and surgical complications (anastomotic leak, cardiovascular [CVS] and pulmonary complications, chyle leak and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy [RLN]). Sensitivity analyses were performed for outcomes with substantial statistical heterogeneity.
RESULTS
The search yielded 223 articles; 28 studies and 1128 patients were included in our analysis. Meta-analyses of proportions yielded proportion rates: 30-day mortality (0 %, 95 %CI 0-0), 5-year OS (60.5 %, 95 %CI 47.6-72.7), R0 resection (100 %, 95 %CI 99.3-100), conversion rate (0.1 %, 95 %CI 0-1.2). Among surgical complications, RLN palsy (14.6 %, 95 %CI 9.5-20.4) were most observed, followed by pulmonary complications (11.3 %, 95 %CI 7-16.2), anastomotic leak (9.7 %, 95 %CI 6.8-12.8), CVS complications (2.3 %, 95 %CI 0.9-4.1) and chyle leak (0.02 %, 95 %CI 0-0.8). Meta-analysis of pooled means yielded means: LN harvest (18.6, 95 %CI 14.3-22.9), intraoperative blood loss (247.1 ml, 95 %CI 173.6-320.6), hospital LOS (18.1 days, 95 %CI 14.4-21.8), and operative time (301.5 min, 95 %CI 238.4-364.6). There was moderate-to-high statistical heterogeneity. Findings were robust to sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSION
MATHE is associated with encouraging post-operative mortality and complication rates, while allowing for radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy with reasonable lymph node harvest.
Topics: Humans; Mediastinoscopy; Blood Loss, Surgical; Esophagectomy; Anastomotic Leak; Treatment Outcome; Lymph Node Excision; Esophageal Neoplasms; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 38330804
DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102042 -
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Mar 2024Esophagectomy is the primary surgical treatment for esophageal cancer, although other treatment approaches are often incorporated, including preoperative chemotherapy... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Esophagectomy is the primary surgical treatment for esophageal cancer, although other treatment approaches are often incorporated, including preoperative chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy. The two major routes of esophageal reconstruction after esophagectomy are the anterior mediastinal (retrosternal, heterotopic) and posterior mediastinal (prevertebral, orthotopic) routes. However, which of these two routes of reconstruction is the most appropriate remains controversial. This systematic review aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of anterior mediastinal reconstruction with those of posterior mediastinal reconstruction after esophagectomy in esophageal cancer.
METHODS
In January 2022, a literature search of the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases was conducted to identify all published and unpublished randomized controlled trials, regardless of language. Eight studies were included for quantitative synthesis.
RESULTS
Postoperative death (9/129 and 4/125, risk ratio [RR]: 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-6.64) and incidence of anastomotic leak (24/208 and 26/208, RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.56-1.62) were not significantly different between the two mediastinal reconstructions. We could not perform a meta-analysis for quality of life, loss of body weight, or postoperative hospital stay due to data limitations.
CONCLUSION
Overall, there was low-quality evidence to suggest that the outcomes of the anterior and posterior mediastinal routes of reconstruction are not significantly different in patients with esophageal cancer.
Topics: Humans; Esophagectomy; Quality of Life; Esophageal Neoplasms; Anastomotic Leak; Plastic Surgery Procedures
PubMed: 38456948
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03279-y -
Journal of Robotic Surgery Jun 2024A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to investigate the efficacy of the AirSeal Valveless Trocar Needle Insufflation System in robot-assisted partial... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study Review
A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to investigate the efficacy of the AirSeal Valveless Trocar Needle Insufflation System in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). The study compared the differences in perioperative outcomes between the AirSeal insufflation group (AIS) and the conventional insufflation group (CIS). A systematic search of databases such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of science was performed to identify studies reporting perioperative outcomes between the AirSeal insufflation group (AIS) and the conventional insufflation group (CIS) in RAPN. The study protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024524335). The primary outcome was to compare the incidence of subcutaneous emphysema (SCE) and postoperative pain scores between the two approaches. The review included four studies with 379 patients, 194 in the AIS group and 185 in the CIS group. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar in all outcomes. SCE was significantly lower in the AIS group than in the CIS group [(OR) 0.30 (0.16, 0.54), p < 0.001]. Postoperative 12-h pain scores were also significantly lower in the AIS group compared to the CIS group [(WMD) - 0.93 (- 1.67, - 1.09), p = 0.014]. Both groups showed a significant reduction in length of hospitalization [(WMD) - 0.12 (- 0.84, 0.60), p = 0.746], thermal ischemia time [(WMD) 4.72 (- 5.71, 15.15), p = 0.375], amount of lost hemoglobin [(WMD) - 0.19 (- 0.53, 0.15), p = 0.284], pneumothorax [(OR) 0.13 (0.02,1.10), p = 0.062], mediastinal emphysema [(OR) 0.55 (0.20, 1.46), p = 0.230], and 4-h pain score [(WMD) - 0.25 (- 1.16, 0.65), p = 0.584]; no significant differences were observed. The incidence of subcutaneous emphysema SCE and 12-h pain scores were significantly lower in the AIS group compared to the CIS group. The AirSeal system demonstrated similar efficacy and a higher safety profile than the conventional insufflation system in robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy; however, due to the lack of a randomized study on the topic, further data are needed.
Topics: Robotic Surgical Procedures; Humans; Nephrectomy; Insufflation; Pain, Postoperative; Subcutaneous Emphysema; Treatment Outcome; Postoperative Complications; Kidney Neoplasms
PubMed: 38922386
DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02023-4 -
Endocrine Nov 2023Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a rare syndrome that combines endocrine and non-endocrine tumors. Thymic neuroendocrine tumors are uncommon components that...
BACKGROUND
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a rare syndrome that combines endocrine and non-endocrine tumors. Thymic neuroendocrine tumors are uncommon components that predict poor prognosis in patients with MEN1. We aimed to summarize the clinical characteristics of thymoma in MEN1 by reviewing the current reports from the literature.
METHODS
A patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (parathyroid hyperplasia, pituitary adenoma, and insulinoma) was found to have a 2 × 1.5 cm thymic mass during long-term follow-up. Thoracoscope surgery was performed, and a histopathology examination revealed WHO Type B3 thymoma. A pathogenic mutation of c.783 + 1G > A in the MEN1 gene was identified. We further searched PubMed and EMBASE for thymoma in association with MEN1.
RESULTS
A comprehensive overview of the literature concerning characteristics of MEN1-related thymoma was summarized. Clinical characteristics and differences between thymoma and thymic carcinoid are highlighted.
CONCLUSIONS
Besides carcinoid, other tumors, including thymoma, need to be identified for thymic space-occupying lesions in MEN1 patients. The impact of thymoma on the long-term prognosis of MEN1 patients needs further investigation.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1; Thymoma; Thymus Neoplasms; Carcinoid Tumor; Pancreatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 37668926
DOI: 10.1007/s12020-023-03440-5