-
Systemic antibiotic treatment for meibomian gland dysfunction-A systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta Ophthalmologica Feb 2024To review the efficacy and safety of oral doxycycline antibiotics versus macrolides in the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To review the efficacy and safety of oral doxycycline antibiotics versus macrolides in the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
We performed a systematic search of electronic databases for all peer-reviewed published studies which included clinical outcomes of oral antibiotic MGD treatment. Individual study data were extracted and evaluated in a weighted pooled analysis, including total sign and symptom scores, meibomian gland secretion score, tear break-up time (TBUT), fluorescein staining score and rate of complications.
RESULTS
Two thousand nine hundred and thirty-three studies were found, of which 54 were eligible for the systematic review, and six prospective studies were ultimately included for analysis, reporting on 563 cases from three countries. Age of affected patients ranged between 12 and 90 years. Overall, both treatment methods induced improvement in MGD signs and symptoms. In pooled analysis, macrolides were significantly superior in the total signs score (pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.99 to -0.03), meibomian gland secretion score (pooled SMD -0.25, 95%CI: [-0.48, -0.03]), TBUT (SMD -0.31, 95%CI: [-0.50, -0.13]) and fluorescein staining score (SMD -1.01, 95%CI: [-1.72, -0.29]). Moreover, while no severe complications were reported for both treatments, the macrolide group exhibited significantly less adverse events (pooled odds ratio 0.24 with a 95% CI of 0.16 to 0.34).
CONCLUSIONS
Both macrolides and tetracyclines are effective treatments for MGD. In this study, macrolides exhibited better efficacy and safety profile compared to tetracyclines.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Child; Humans; Middle Aged; Young Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Doxycycline; Dry Eye Syndromes; Eyelid Diseases; Fluoresceins; Macrolides; Meibomian Gland Dysfunction; Meibomian Glands; Prospective Studies; Tears
PubMed: 37139848
DOI: 10.1111/aos.15681 -
BMC Ophthalmology Jan 2024Dry eye is one of the most common ophthalmic conditions and can significantly impact quality of life. Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is a major cause of evaporative... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Dry eye is one of the most common ophthalmic conditions and can significantly impact quality of life. Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is a major cause of evaporative dry eye. We sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence and incidence of dry eye and MGD in Central and South America and to identify factors associated with disease burden.
METHODS
Data sources Ovid MEDLINE and Embase.
STUDY SELECTION
A search conducted on August 16, 2021, identified studies published between January 1, 2010, and August 16, 2021, with no restrictions regarding participant age or language of publication. Case reports, case series, case-control studies, and interventional studies were excluded.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
The review was based on a protocol registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021256934). Risk of bias was assessed in duplicate using a risk of bias tool designed for the purposes of descriptive epidemiological studies. Data were extracted by one investigator and verified by another for accuracy. Prevalence of dry eye and MGD were grouped based on study participant characteristics.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Prevalence and incidence of dry eye and MGD in Central and South America. Summary estimates from meta-analysis with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
RESULTS
Fourteen studies (11,594 total participants) were included. The population prevalence of dry eye was 13% (95% CI, 12%-14%) in Brazil and 41% (95% CI, 39%-44%) in Mexico based on one study each. Meta-analyses suggested that dry eye prevalence was 70% among indoor workers (95% CI, 56%-80%; I, 82%; 3 studies), 71% among students (95% CI, 65%-77%; I, 92%; 3 studies), and 83% in general ophthalmology clinics (95% CI, 77%-88%; I, 88%; 2 studies). MGD prevalence ranged from 23% among indoor workers (95% CI, 16%-31%; 1 study) to 68% in general ophthalmology clinics (95% CI, 62%-72%; 1 study). No studies reported incidence of dry eye or MGD.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated considerable variation in the published prevalence of dry eye and MGD among the general population and subpopulations in Central and South America. Local and subpopulation estimates of dry eye disease burden may be valuable to assist needs assessments and implementation of measures to mitigate the condition.
Topics: Humans; Meibomian Gland Dysfunction; Prevalence; Quality of Life; Dry Eye Syndromes; Brazil; Meibomian Glands; Tears
PubMed: 38297204
DOI: 10.1186/s12886-023-03249-w -
Contact Lens & Anterior Eye : the... Apr 2024To compare the effectiveness of meibomian gland expression (MGX) combined with home-based therapy versus home-based therapy alone for the treatment of dry eye disease... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
To compare the effectiveness of meibomian gland expression (MGX) combined with home-based therapy versus home-based therapy alone for the treatment of dry eye disease (DED) caused by meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).
METHODS
A systematic review of randomized controlled studies (RCTs), reporting the effects of MGX combined with home-based therapy in 2 databases, PubMed and Web of Science, was performed according to the PRISMA statement. The search period was until August 20, 2023. According to the heterogeneity, a random or fixed effects model was performed in the meta-analysis. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated to analyze dry eye symptoms (DES) score, tear film break-up time (TBUT), total corneal fluorescein staining (tCFS) and meibomian glands expressibility (MGE). All analyses were performed by RevMan Web, version 5.7. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to analyze the quality of the studies selected.
RESULTS
Two RCTs with a total of 99 patients were included. The studies reported that MGX combined with home-based therapy improves DES score, TBUT, tCFS and MGE compared to the home-based therapy. However, the meta-analysis indicated that MGX combined with home-based therapy only seems to be beneficial in reducing DES score (SMD -0.49; 95 % CI: -0.89 to -0.08; P = 0.02; I = 0 %). In addition, although TBUT, tCFS and MGE reported a slight trend in favor of MGX combined with home-based therapy, it was non-significant.
CONCLUSIONS
While MGX combined with home-based therapy seem to show some evidence of alleviating dry eye symptoms, there is insufficient evidence to conclude the effects of this treatment definitively particularly in improving dry eye signs caused by MGD, such as TBUT, tCFS and MGE. Therefore, further RCTs are needed to elucidate these results.
Topics: Humans; Meibomian Glands; Dry Eye Syndromes; Meibomian Gland Dysfunction; Phototherapy; Tears
PubMed: 38135593
DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2023.102107