-
Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice... Mar 2024Previous systematic reviews have reported on the relationship between eating disorders (EDs) and birth outcomes, but there are no existing meta-analyses on this topic.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Previous systematic reviews have reported on the relationship between eating disorders (EDs) and birth outcomes, but there are no existing meta-analyses on this topic. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the association between lifetime maternal EDs, including anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), and binge-eating disorder (BED) with low birth weight (LBW), preterm birth (PTB), small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age (LGA), and miscarriage. Four databases were systematically searched for quantitative literature on maternal EDs that preceded birth outcomes. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The meta-analyses included 6 studies on miscarriage, 11 on PTB, 4 on LBW, 9 on SGA, and 4 on LGA. The Mantel-Haenszel random effects model was used to test the associations between EDs and birth outcomes. The results showed significant positive associations between AN and LBW (OR 1.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.49, 2.03), AN and SGA (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.17, 1.65), BN and PTB (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.04, 1.36), and BED and LGA (OR 1.43 95% CI 1.18, 1.72). EDs were not significantly correlated with miscarriage. These findings reveal the importance of screening for and treating EDs in pregnant women.
Topics: Pregnancy; Infant, Newborn; Female; Humans; Abortion, Spontaneous; Premature Birth; Feeding and Eating Disorders; Infant, Low Birth Weight; Infant, Small for Gestational Age
PubMed: 38032141
DOI: 10.3148/cjdpr-2023-019 -
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica... Dec 2023The association between extreme birth spacing and adverse outcomes is controversial, and available evidence is fragmented into different classifications of birth spacing. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
The association between extreme birth spacing and adverse outcomes is controversial, and available evidence is fragmented into different classifications of birth spacing.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of observational studies to evaluate the association between birth spacing (i.e., interpregnancy interval and interoutcome interval) and adverse outcomes (i.e., pregnancy complications, adverse birth outcomes). Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model, and the dose-response relationships were evaluated using generalized least squares trend estimation.
RESULTS
A total of 129 studies involving 46 874 843 pregnancies were included. In the general population, compared with an interpregnancy interval of 18-23 months, extreme intervals (<6 months and ≥ 60 months) were associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes, including preterm birth, small for gestational age, low birthweight, fetal death, birth defects, early neonatal death, and premature rupture of fetal membranes (pooled OR range: 1.08-1.56; p < 0.05). The dose-response analyses further confirmed these J-shaped relationships (p < 0.001-0.009). Long interpregnancy interval was only associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia and gestational diabetes (p < 0.005 and p < 0.001, respectively). Similar associations were observed between interoutcome interval and risk of low birthweight and preterm birth (p < 0.001). Moreover, interoutcome interval of ≥60 months was associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery (pooled OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.04-2.83). For pregnancies following preterm births, an interpregnancy interval of 9 months was not associated with an increased risk of preterm birth, according to dose-response analyses (p = 0.008). Based on limited evidence, we did not observe significant associations between interpregnancy interval or interoutcome interval after pregnancy losses and risk of small for gestational age, fetal death, miscarriage, or preeclampsia (pooled OR range: 0.76-1.21; p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Extreme birth spacing has extensive adverse effects on maternal and infant health. In the general population, interpregnancy interval of 18-23 months may be associated with potential benefits for both mothers and infants. For women with previous preterm birth, the optimal birth spacing may be 9 months.
Topics: Pregnancy; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Humans; Female; Pregnancy Outcome; Premature Birth; Birth Intervals; Pre-Eclampsia; Birth Weight; Abortion, Spontaneous; Pregnancy Complications; Fetal Growth Retardation; Mothers; Fetal Death
PubMed: 37675816
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14648 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Aug 2023Miscarriage is an inability to complete the normal process of pregnancy and childbirth and represents a major concern for pregnant women that can be an emotionally... (Review)
Review
Miscarriage is an inability to complete the normal process of pregnancy and childbirth and represents a major concern for pregnant women that can be an emotionally devastating event. While it has been suggested that engaging in strenuous physical activity might be associated with an elevated risk of miscarriage, there is a recent systematic review that suggested that prenatal exercise is not associated with fetal mortality. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis (SR + MA) was to assess the effects of physical activity during pregnancy on the likelihood of experiencing a miscarriage (Registration No.: CRD42022370629). Thirteen randomized clinical trials (3728 pregnant women) were included. Meta-analyses were conducted with the dependent variable being the miscarriage ratio in each study. The total risk ratio (RR) sum was calculated using a random effects model. The I statistic was utilized to quantify the heterogeneity observed in the results. No significant association between exercise during pregnancy and the occurrence of miscarriage was found (RR = 0.83 95% CI = 0.83 (0.49-1.41); z = 0.69, = 0.49; I = 0.00%, Heterogeneity = 0.91). Results of the present SR + MA showed no increase in miscarriage risk in those who engaged in low- to moderate-intensity exercise compared to those who did not.
PubMed: 37629435
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165393 -
Journal of Reproductive Immunology Dec 2023Recurrent miscarriage (RM) affects up to 2.5% of couples of reproductive age. Up to 10% of couples using assisted reproductive technology experience recurrent... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Recurrent miscarriage (RM) affects up to 2.5% of couples of reproductive age. Up to 10% of couples using assisted reproductive technology experience recurrent implantation failure (RIF). Immunosuppressive drugs, such as calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), has been proposed for RM and RIF management. This systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CNIs in RM and RIF treatment. We searched in the three databases. Review Manager 5.4.1 was used for statistical analysis. This review included 8 studies involving 1042 women (485 women in the CNIs group and 557 women in the control group). CNI treatment (cyclosporine [CsA] and tacrolimus [TAC]) increases live birth rate (LBR, odds ratio [OR]: 2.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.93-3.28, p < 0.00001) and clinical pregnancy rate (OR: 2.25; 95% CI: 1.54-4.40, p < 0.0001) and decreases miscarriage rate (OR: 0.45 95% CI: 0.32-0.63, p < 0.00001) when compared to the control. Side effects and obstetric and neonatal complications was similar in both groups. In conclusion, CNIs increased LBR in women with RM and RIF but there is a moderate risk of bias. Subgroup analysis revealed that CNIs improved LBR in women with RM with a low risk of bias. However, in women with RIF, with moderate to high risk of bias. The use of CsA and TAC, in low doses and for a short period, for managing reproductive failures in women seems to be safe, not causing serious side effects nor increasing the risk of obstetric and neonatal complications.
Topics: Pregnancy; Infant, Newborn; Female; Humans; Calcineurin Inhibitors; Abortion, Habitual; Pregnancy Rate; Immunosuppressive Agents; Birth Rate; Tacrolimus
PubMed: 37813069
DOI: 10.1016/j.jri.2023.104157 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Aug 2023This study aimed to describe the characteristics of fetal demise after SARS-CoV-2 infections and clarify whether it is associated with clinical severity, placental... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to describe the characteristics of fetal demise after SARS-CoV-2 infections and clarify whether it is associated with clinical severity, placental lesions, or malformations or due to actual fetal infections.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched between December 1, 2019, and April 30, 2022.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control studies and case series or case reports describing stillbirths or late miscarriages (ie, pregnancy loss occurring between 14 and 22 weeks of gestation, before and after the onset of labor) from mothers with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy (demonstrated by at least 1 positive real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction from nasopharyngeal swabs and/or SARS-CoV-2 placental infection). No language restriction was applied; cases with other causes possibly explaining the fetal demise were excluded.
METHODS
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines were followed. The quality of the case series and case reports was evaluated using the specific Mayo Clinic Evidence-Based Practice Center tool. Maternal and clinical fetal data and placental and fetal virology and histology findings were collected. Data were summarized with descriptive statistics using the World Health Organization criteria to classify disease severity and fetal-neonatal infections.
RESULTS
Data from 184 mothers and 190 fetuses were analyzed. No clear link to maternal clinical severity or fetal malformation was evident. Approximately 78% of fetal demise cases occurred during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, approximately 6 to 13 days after the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection or the onset of symptoms. Most placentas (88%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 or presented the histologic features of placentitis (massive fibrin deposition and chronic intervillositis) previously observed in transplacentally transmitted infections (85%-91%). Of note, 11 fetuses (5.8%) had a confirmed in utero transmitted SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 114 fetuses (60%) had a possible in utero transmitted SARS-CoV-2 infection.
CONCLUSION
The synthesis of available data showed that fetal demise generally occurs a few days after the infection with histologic placental inflammatory lesions associated with transplacental SARS-CoV-2 transmission and eventually causing placental insufficiency.
Topics: Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Abortion, Spontaneous; COVID-19; Cross-Sectional Studies; Fetal Death; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Placenta; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; SARS-CoV-2; Stillbirth
PubMed: 36706855
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.01.019 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023PCOS is a syndrome of ovarian dysfunction associated with recurrent pregnancy loss. Several correlating factors have been investigated that influence the risk of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
PCOS is a syndrome of ovarian dysfunction associated with recurrent pregnancy loss. Several correlating factors have been investigated that influence the risk of pregnancy loss in PCOS. However, uncertainty remains about their contribution to pregnancy loss and prognosis. This review of literature aims to identify what is known and what requires further investigation on the relationship between PCOS and recurrent pregnancy loss, to guide future research and optimize medical guidance throughout pregnancy.
STUDY DESIGN
a review of literature was performed on several search engines using the following terms; polycystic ovarian syndrome, PCOS, recurrent pregnancy loss, recurrent miscarriage, RPL, aborted fetus, abortus provocatus, miscarriage and habitual abortion.
RESULTS
37 articles were included; 3 systematic reviews, 1 meta-analysis, 2 randomized controlled trials, 6 prospective cohort studies, 22 case-control studies and 3 case series. The main objectives investigated by studies were pregnancy complications, pregnancy loss and live birth in the PCOS population.
CONCLUSION
Studies that investigated the relationship between PCOS and recurrent pregnancy loss are few and inconsistent and warrant further research. Factors apt for further investigation include the extent to which PCOS phenotypes, BMI, obesity, insulin resistance, hyperandrogenemia, SHBG, hs-CRP, CTRP6, adiponectin, plasma leptin, homocysteine, AMH and thrombophilia contribute to further risk of miscarriage. Other factors requiring further exploration in relation to risk for miscarriage in PCOS patient with RPL include sOB-R, PAI-Fx and the Factor-V-Leiden mutations.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Prospective Studies; Abortion, Habitual; Thrombophilia; Obesity
PubMed: 38027110
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1183060 -
Scandinavian Journal of Surgery : SJS :... Sep 2023Non-obstetric surgery is fairly common in pregnant women. We performed a systematic review to update data on non-obstetric surgery in pregnant women. The aim of this... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Non-obstetric surgery is fairly common in pregnant women. We performed a systematic review to update data on non-obstetric surgery in pregnant women. The aim of this review was to evaluate the effects of non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy on pregnancy, fetal and maternal outcomes.
METHODS
A systematic literature search of MEDLINE and Scopus was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The search span was from January 2000 to November 2022. Thirty-six studies matched the inclusion criteria, and 24 publications were identified through reference mining; 60 studies were included in this review. Outcome measures were miscarriage, stillbirth, preterm birth, low birth weight, low Apgar score, and infant and maternal morbidity and mortality rates.
RESULTS
We obtained data for 80,205 women who underwent non-obstetric surgery and data for 16,655,486 women who did not undergo surgery during pregnancy. Prevalence of non-obstetric surgery was between 0.23% and 0.74% (median 0.37%). Appendectomy was the most common procedure with median prevalence of 0.10%. Near half (43%) of the procedures were performed during the second trimester, 32% during the first trimester, and 25% during the third trimester. Half of surgeries were scheduled, and half were emergent. Laparoscopic and open techniques were used equally for abdominal cavity. Women who underwent non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy had increased rate of stillbirth (odds ratio (OR) 2.0) and preterm birth (OR 2.1) compared to women without surgery. Surgery during pregnancy did not increase rate of miscarriage (OR 1.1), low 5 min Apgar scores (OR 1.1), the fetus being small for gestational age (OR 1.1) or congenital anomalies (OR 1.0).
CONCLUSIONS
The prevalence of non-obstetric surgery has decreased during last decades, but still two out of 1000 pregnant women have scheduled surgery during pregnancy. Surgery during pregnancy increases the risk of stillbirth, and preterm birth. For abdominal cavity surgery, both laparoscopic and open approaches are feasible.
Topics: Infant; Pregnancy; Infant, Newborn; Female; Humans; Pregnancy Outcome; Premature Birth; Stillbirth; Abortion, Spontaneous; Fetus
PubMed: 37329286
DOI: 10.1177/14574969231175569 -
BMJ Open Jan 2024Literature surrounding the association between antidepressant use during pregnancy and miscarriage is conflicting. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Literature surrounding the association between antidepressant use during pregnancy and miscarriage is conflicting. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies among pregnant women regarding the association between exposure to antidepressants during pregnancy and the risk of miscarriage, compared with pregnant women not exposed to antidepressants.
DESIGN
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomised studies.
DATA SOURCES
We searched Medline, Embase and PsychINFO up to 6 August 2023.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND OUTCOMES
Case-control, cohort and cross-sectional study designs were selected if they compared individuals exposed to any antidepressant class during pregnancy to comparator groups of either no antidepressant use or an alternate antidepressant.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Effect estimates were extracted from selected studies and pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool, and heterogeneity assessed using the I statistic. Subgroup analyses were used to explore antidepressant classes and the impact of confounding by indication.
RESULTS
1800 records were identified from the search, of which 29 were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The total sample included 5 671 135 individuals. Antidepressant users initially appeared to have a higher risk of miscarriage compared with unexposed individuals from the general population (summary effect estimate: 1.24, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.31, I=69.2%; number of studies (n)=29). However, the summary estimate decreased when comparing against unexposed individuals with maternal depression (1.16, 1.04 to 1.31; I=58.6%; n=6), suggesting confounding by indication may be driving the association. 22 studies suffered from serious RoB, and only two of the 29 studies were deemed at moderate RoB.
CONCLUSIONS
After accounting for maternal depression, there is little evidence of any association between antidepressant use during pregnancy and miscarriage. Instead, the results indicate the biasing impact of confounding by indication.
Topics: Humans; Female; Pregnancy; Abortion, Spontaneous; Cross-Sectional Studies; Antidepressive Agents
PubMed: 38272551
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074600 -
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine Nov 2023Currently, more and more infertility couples are opting for combined acupuncture to improve success rate of in vitro fertilization (IVF). However, evidence from... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Currently, more and more infertility couples are opting for combined acupuncture to improve success rate of in vitro fertilization (IVF). However, evidence from acupuncture for improving IVF pregnancy outcomes remains a matter of debate.
OBJECTIVE
To quantitatively summarized the evidence of the efficacy of acupuncture among women undergoing IVF by means of systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
Four English (PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Register of Controlled Clinical Trials) and Four Chinese databases (Wanfang Databases, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database, and SinoMed) were searched from database inception until July 2, 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the acupuncture's effects for women undergoing IVF were included. The subgroup analysis was conducted with respect to the age of participants, different acupuncture types, type of control, acupuncture timing, geographical origin of the study, whether or not repeated IVF failure, and acupuncture sessions. Sensitivity analyses were predefifined to explore the robustness of results. The primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR), and the secondary outcomes were ongoing pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate. Random effects model with I statistics were used to quantify heterogeneity. Publication bias was estimated by funnel plots and Egger's tests.
RESULTS
A total of 58 eligible RCTs representing 10,968 women undergoing IVF for pregnant success were identifified. Pooled CPR and LBR showed a signifificant difference between acupuncture and control groups [69 comparisons, relative risk (RR) 1.19, 95% confifidence intervals (CI) 1.12 to 1.25, I=0], extremely low evidence; 23 comparisons, RR 1.11, 95%CI 1.02 to 1.21, I=14.6, low evidence, respectively). Only transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation showed a positive effect on both CPR (16 comparisons, RR 1.17, 95%CI 1.06 to 1.29; I=0, moderate evidence) and LBR (9 comparisons, RR 1.20, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.37; I=8.5, extremely low evidence). Heterogeneity across studies was found and no studies were graded as high-quality evidence.
CONCLUSION
Results showed that the convincing evidence levels on the associations between acupuncture and IVF pregnant outcomes were relatively low, and the varied methodological design and heterogeneity might inflfluence the fifindings. (Registration No. PROSPERO CRD42021232430).
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Live Birth; Fertilization in Vitro; Pregnancy Outcome; Abortion, Spontaneous; Acupuncture Therapy
PubMed: 37815728
DOI: 10.1007/s11655-023-3748-3 -
The Science of the Total Environment Jan 2024Prenatal exposure to metal mixtures is associated with adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes like low birth weight, preterm birth, and small for gestational age. However,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Prenatal exposure to metal mixtures is associated with adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes like low birth weight, preterm birth, and small for gestational age. However, prior studies have used individual metal analysis, lacking real-life exposure scenarios.
OBJECTIVES
This systematic review aims to evaluate the strength and consistency of the association between metal mixtures and pregnancy and birth outcomes, identify research gaps, and inform future studies and policies in this area.
METHODS
The review adhered to the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) checklist, along with the guidelines for conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies of etiology (COSMOS-E). Our data collection involved searching the PubMed, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS databases. We utilized inclusion criteria to identify relevant studies. These chosen studies underwent thorough screening and data extraction procedures. Methodological quality evaluations were conducted using the NOS framework for cohort and case-control studies, and the AXIS tool for cross-sectional studies.
RESULTS
The review included 34 epidemiological studies, half of which focused on birth weight, and the others investigated neonate size, preterm birth, small for gestational age, miscarriage, and placental characteristics. The findings revealed significant associations between metal mixtures (including mercury (Hg), nickel (Ni), arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), manganese (Mn), cobalt (Co), lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), barium (Ba), cesium (Cs), copper (Cu), selenium (Se), and chromium (Cr)) and adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes, demonstrating diverse effects and potential interactions.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, this review consistently establishes connections between metal exposure during pregnancy and adverse consequences for birth weight, gestational age, and other vital birth-related metrics. This review further demonstrates the need to apply mixture methods with caution but also shows that they can be superior to traditional approaches. Further research is warranted to deeper understand the underlying mechanisms and to develop effective strategies for mitigating the potential risks associated with metal mixture exposure during pregnancy.
Topics: Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Abortion, Spontaneous; Birth Weight; Cross-Sectional Studies; Fetal Growth Retardation; Mercury; Metals; Placenta; Premature Birth
PubMed: 37963536
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168380