-
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders Nov 2023Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic progressive condition marked by the deterioration of myelin and impairment of neurological function. The global prevalence of MS is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic progressive condition marked by the deterioration of myelin and impairment of neurological function. The global prevalence of MS is approximately 2.2 million. Migraines are common in MS patients, with inconclusive data on their relationship. Our systematic review aimed to assess the prevalence and odds of migraine in pwMS and investigate the potential factors that may influence these associations.
METHOD
Through an extensive search and meticulous study selection, we identified pertinent literature investigating the occurrence and odds of migraines among pwMS. Additionally, we explored the comparative risk of migraines in MS patients compared to healthy controls. Data were extracted, including publication details, diagnostic criteria, and migraine prevalence in MS patients.
RESULTS
A total of 35 studies were included, involving 279,620 pwMS and 279,603 healthy controls. The overall prevalence of migraine in pwMS was 0.24 (95% CI: 0.21-0.28). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to investigate the potential impact of various factors on the relationship between migraine and MS. These factors included age, duration of MS, study design, and the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), migraine diagnosis method, study design, publication year of the study, country and continent of the study population. The results of these analyses revealed no significant influence of these factors on the relationship between migraine and MS. The meta-analysis indicated that pwMS had significantly increased odds of having migraine compared to healthy controls (OR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.20-3.20). Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of the findings.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study highlights that approximately 24% of pwMS experience migraine. The method of diagnosis significantly affects the reported prevalence, with questionnaires yielding higher rates. Furthermore, pwMS have a 1.96-fold increased odds of having migraine compared to healthy individuals. These findings emphasize the importance of further research and interventions to address the significant burden of migraine in the MS population.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Sclerosis; Migraine Disorders; Research Design; Prevalence
PubMed: 37714098
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104954 -
Neurological Sciences : Official... Sep 2023Previously, several studies investigated the effect of cladribine among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) as a treatment option. Due to the contradictory results of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Previously, several studies investigated the effect of cladribine among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) as a treatment option. Due to the contradictory results of previous studies regarding the efficacy and safety of cladribine in the MS population, we aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis by including clinical trials and observational studies in terms of having more confirmative results to make a general decision.
METHODS
The three databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were comprehensively searched in May 2022. We included the studies that investigated the efficacy and safety of cladribine in patients with MS. Eligible studies have to provide sufficient details on MS diagnosis and appropriate follow-up duration. We investigated the efficacy of cladribine with several outcomes including Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) change, progression-free survival (PFS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and MRI-free activity survival (MFAS).
RESULTS
After two-step reviewing, 23 studies were included in our qualitative and quantitative synthesis. The pooled SMD for EDSS before and after treatment was - 0.54 (95%CI: - 1.46, 0.39). Our analysis showed that the PFS after cladribine use is 79% (95%CI 71%, 86%). Also, 58% of patients with MS who received cladribine remained relapse-free (95%CI 31%, 83%). Furthermore, the MFAS after treatment was 60% (95%CI 36%, 81%). Our analysis showed that infection is the most common adverse event after cladribine treatment with a pooled prevalence of 10% (95%CI 4%, 18%). Moreover, the pooled prevalence of infusion-related adverse events was 9% (95%CI 4%, 15%). Also, the malignancies after cladribine were present in 0.4% of patients (95%CI 0.25%, 0.75%).
CONCLUSION
Our results showed acceptable safety and efficacy for cladribine for the treatment of MS except in terms of reducing EDSS. Combination of our findings with the results of previous studies which compared cladribine to other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), cladribine seems to be a safe and effective drug in achieving better treatment for relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients.
Topics: Humans; Cladribine; Multiple Sclerosis; Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting; Clinical Trials as Topic; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37062787
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-023-06794-w -
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research Apr 2024One in five individuals live with chronic pain globally, which often co-occurs with sleep problems, anxiety, depression, and substance use disorders. Although these...
One in five individuals live with chronic pain globally, which often co-occurs with sleep problems, anxiety, depression, and substance use disorders. Although these conditions are commonly managed with cannabinoid-based medicines (CBM), health care providers report lack of information on the risks, benefits, and appropriate use of CBM for therapeutic purposes. We present these clinical practice guidelines to help clinicians and patients navigate appropriate CBM use in the management of chronic pain and co-occurring conditions. We conducted a systematic review of studies investigating the use of CBM for the treatment of chronic pain. Articles were dually reviewed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Clinical recommendations were developed based on available evidence from the review. and have also been provided to support clinical application. The GRADE system was used to rate the strength of recommendations and quality of evidence. From our literature search, 70 articles met inclusion criteria and were utilized in guideline development, including 19 systematic reviews and 51 original research studies. Research typically demonstrates moderate benefit of CBM in chronic pain management. There is also evidence for efficacy of CBM in the management of comorbidities, including sleep problems, anxiety, appetite suppression, and for managing symptoms in some chronic conditions associated with pain including HIV, multiple sclerosis, fibromyalgia, and arthritis. All patients considering CBM should be educated on risks and adverse events. Patients and clinicians should work collaboratively to identify appropriate dosing, titration, and administration routes for each individual. PROSPERO no. 135886.
Topics: Humans; Cannabinoids; Cannabis; Chronic Pain; Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists; Hallucinogens; Sleep Wake Disorders
PubMed: 36971587
DOI: 10.1089/can.2021.0156 -
AIMS Neuroscience 2023Gut microbiomes play a role in developing and regulating autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS). We designed this systematic review to summarize the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Gut microbiomes play a role in developing and regulating autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS). We designed this systematic review to summarize the evidence of the effect of gut microbiota in developing pediatric-onset MS.
METHODS
PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, references of the references and conference abstracts were comprehensively searched by two independent researchers. The search was done on January 1, 2023. Data regarding the total number of patients, the name of the first author, publication year, country of origin, mean age, duration of the disease, body mass index (BMI), type of MS, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), age at disease onset and stool composition were extracted.
RESULTS
A literature search revealed 4237 published studies. After removing duplicates, we had 2045 records for evaluation. Twenty-three full texts were evaluated, and four case-control studies remained for systematic review. Three studies were conducted in the United States and one in the Netherlands. The number of participants in included studies ranged between 24 and 68. The mean age of patients at the time of study varied between 11.9 and 17.9 years, and the mean age at the onset of the disease ranged between 11.5 and 14.3 years. Most included patients were female. The results show that median richness (the number of unique taxa identified, which was provided by two studies) was higher in controls, and also Margalef index, which was reported by one study was higher in control group than the case group. The results of two studies also demonstrated that median evenness indexes (taxon distribution, Shannon, Simpson) were higher in control groups, as well as PD index (Faith's phylogenic diversity metric).
CONCLUSION
The result of this systematic review (including four studies) showed disruption of the microbiota-immune balance in pediatric-onset MS cases.
PubMed: 38188004
DOI: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2023031 -
The European Journal of Neuroscience Aug 2023Mendelian randomization (MR) is a powerful approach for assessing the causal effect of putative risk factors on an outcome, using genetic variants as instrumental...
Mendelian randomization (MR) is a powerful approach for assessing the causal effect of putative risk factors on an outcome, using genetic variants as instrumental variables. The methodology and application developed in the framework of MR have been dramatically improved, taking advantage of the many public genome-wide association study (GWAS) data. The availability of summary-level data allowed to perform numerous MR studies especially for complex diseases, pinpointing modifiable exposures causally related to increased or decreased disease risk. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex multifactorial disease whose aetiology involves both genetic and non-genetic risk factors and their interplay. Previous observational studies have revealed associations between candidate modifiable exposures and MS risk; although being prone to confounding, and reverse causation, these studies were unable to draw causal conclusions. MR analysis addresses the limitations of observational studies and allows to establish reliable and accurate causal conclusions. Here, we systematically reviewed the studies evaluating the causal effect, through MR, of genetic and non-genetic exposures on MS risk. Among 107 papers found, only 42 were eligible for final evaluation and qualitative synthesis. We found that, above all, low vitamin D levels and high adult body mass index (BMI) appear to be uncontested risk factors for increased MS risk.
Topics: Mendelian Randomization Analysis; Multiple Sclerosis; Humans; Causality; Risk Factors
PubMed: 37463755
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.16088 -
Acta Neurologica Belgica Dec 2023We aimed to synthesize all available observational studies and clinical trials of rituximab to estimate the safety and efficacy of this monoclonal antibody in people... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to synthesize all available observational studies and clinical trials of rituximab to estimate the safety and efficacy of this monoclonal antibody in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).
METHODS
The four databases including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science were comprehensively searched in April 2022. We defined PICO as follows. Problem or study population (P): patients with MS; intervention (I): Rituximab; comparison (C): none; outcome (O): efficacy and safety.
RESULTS
After two-step screening, a total of 27 studies entered into our qualitative and quantitative synthesis. Our analysis showed a significant decrease in EDSS score in all patients with MS after treatment (SMD: - 0.44, 95% CI - 0.85, - 0.03). In addition, the ARR was reduced after using rituximab compared to the pre-treatment period (SMD: - 0.65, 95% CI - 1.55, 0.24) but it was not significant. The most common side effect after rituximab with a pooled prevalence of 28.63% (95% CI 16.61%, 42.33%). Furthermore, the pooled prevalence of infection was 24% in patients with MS (95% CI 13%, 36%). In the end, the pooled prevalence of malignancies after rituximab treatment was 0.39% (95% CI 0.02%, 1.03%).
CONCLUSION
Our findings illustrated an acceptable safety for this treatment. However, further studies with randomized design, long follow-up, and large sample sizes are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of rituximab in patients with MS.
Topics: Humans; Rituximab; Multiple Sclerosis; Antibodies, Monoclonal
PubMed: 37428437
DOI: 10.1007/s13760-023-02329-4 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Sep 2023The assurance of safety and effectiveness is a significant focal point in all therapeutic approaches. Although mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been identified as a... (Review)
Review
The assurance of safety and effectiveness is a significant focal point in all therapeutic approaches. Although mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been identified as a potential novel therapeutic strategy for multiple sclerosis (MS), existing evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of this strategy remains inconclusive. Thus, the primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) was to comprehensively assess the effectiveness and safety of MSC therapy in individuals diagnosed with MS. A comprehensive search was conducted using appropriate keywords in the PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases to determine the eligible studies. The change in the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score from baseline to follow-up was used to assess MSC efficacy. The effectiveness of the therapy was assessed using a random-effects model, which calculated the combined prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for MS patients who experienced improvement, stability, or worsening of their condition. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020209671). The findings indicate that 40.4% (95% CI: 30.6-50.2) of MS patients exhibited improvements following MSC therapy, 32.8% (95% CI: 25.5-40.1) remained stable, and 18.1% (95% CI: 12.0-24.2) experienced a worsening of their condition. Although no major complications were observed, headaches 57.6 [37.9-77.3] and fever 53.1 [20.7-85.4] were commonly reported as minor adverse events. All of the results reported in this meta-analysis are consistent and credible according to the sensitivity analyses. Regardless of different individual studies, our meta-analysis provides a comprehensive overview showing the potential of MSC therapy as a possible effective treatment strategy for patients with MS.
PubMed: 37834955
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196311 -
Association of chronic periodontitis with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders Sep 2023Chronic periodontitis (CP) is a multifactorial, chronic inflammatory disease of microbial etiology that manifests as a result of the dysfunction of the immune mechanism,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Chronic periodontitis (CP) is a multifactorial, chronic inflammatory disease of microbial etiology that manifests as a result of the dysfunction of the immune mechanism, culminating in the destruction of the alveolar bone of the jaws. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disorder that affects the central nervous system (CNS), leads to demyelination and degeneration of nerve axons and often causes severe physical and/or cognitive impairment. As CP and MS involve inflammatory mechanisms and immune dysfunction, researchers have attempted to study the association between them.
AIM
To systematically review the literature on the epidemiological association between CP and MS in adults.
METHODS
PRISMA 2020 statement was used in the study protocol. The design was done according to the Cochrane methodology. A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases; a manual search and evaluation of the gray literature was also performed. The meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was defined as the effect size of the outcome. Heterogeneity was assessed by Chi-square and I. The articles evaluated were written in English, without a time limit, concern observational studies (patient-controls) and report the diagnostic criteria of the diseases. Duplicate entries were excluded. To evaluate the reliability of the results of each study, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and GRADE tools were used. Two independent reviewers did all evaluations with a resolution of discrepancies by a third.
RESULTS
Meta-analysis included three observation studies examined 3376 people. MS patients are significantly more likely to be diagnosed with CP than healthy controls (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.54-2.42, p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION
A high prevalence of CP was found among MS patients compared with healthy controls. Healthcare professionals should be aware of the association between these pathological entities to provide patients with high-quality care through an effective and holistic diagnostic and therapeutic approach.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Chronic Periodontitis; Multiple Sclerosis; Reproducibility of Results; Autoimmune Diseases; Chronic Disease
PubMed: 37478676
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104874 -
Multiple Sclerosis Journal -... 2023Comorbidity is a current area of interest in multiple sclerosis (MS) and is essential for multidisciplinary management. Although recent studies suggest that patients... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Comorbidity is a current area of interest in multiple sclerosis (MS) and is essential for multidisciplinary management. Although recent studies suggest that patients with MS have an elevated risk of developing inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the overall risk of developing ulcerative colitis (UC), specifically in patients with MS.
METHODS
In 2021, a comprehensive literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science to identify studies investigating the association between UC and MS. The selected papers were utilized to estimate the associations, risk ratios (RRs), and a 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
The analysis revealed a slightly elevated risk of UC incidence in patients with MS compared to controls, but this finding was not statistically significant (RR: 1.27 [95% CI: 0.96-1.67]). In contrast, the study found that patients with UC have a significantly higher risk of developing MS than controls (RR: 1.66 [95% CI: 1.15-2.40]).
CONCLUSION
Our findings highlight that the presence of UC increases the risk of developing MS by more than 50%, whereas the presence of MS does not increase the risk of UC occurrence. These results underscore the importance of considering the potential development of UC in the clinical management and early diagnosis of patients with MS, as it may contribute to better therapeutic outcomes.
PubMed: 37483528
DOI: 10.1177/20552173231186516 -
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders Dec 2023Persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) engage in less physical activity than the general population, and the disease manifestations and comorbidity conditions might... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) engage in less physical activity than the general population, and the disease manifestations and comorbidity conditions might further predispose them toward sedentary behavior (SB) among this population. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of studies that compared SB in persons with MS and non-MS controls, and examined factors that may moderate the difference in SB between the two groups.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic search using PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and CINAHL from inception up to August 2022, and identified studies that involved group comparison of SB outcomes between MS and non-MS controls. Effect sizes were calculated as standardized mean differences (SMDs) using Hedge's g. We generated a multilevel random-effects model for estimating an overall effect, and performed moderator analyses. Methodological quality was assessed using the Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS tool).
RESULTS
Eleven studies were included (1403 MS vs. 449 controls) and yielded 17 effects for meta-analysis. Results indicated an overall small, but significant effect (SMD [95% CI] = 0.27 [0.02, 0.53], p = 0.03) with significant heterogeneity (Q = 72.2, p < 0.01; I = 75.8%). There were larger effects when the MS sample had a higher proportion of females, or when SB was reported as percent sedentary time per day compared with other SB outcomes (p = 0.03 and 0.05, respectively). The included studies achieved fairly good quality (91.4%) using the AXIS tool.
CONCLUSIONS
The cumulative evidence supports that persons with MS engage in more SB than non-MS controls. Our findings may support the design of targeted behavioral change interventions for reducing SB and improving health and function in the MS population.
Topics: Female; Humans; Sedentary Behavior; Multiple Sclerosis; Cross-Sectional Studies; Exercise
PubMed: 37956522
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.105124