-
Pancreatology : Official Journal of the... Nov 2023Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are a cystic precursor to pancreatic cancer. IPMNs deemed clinically to be at high-risk for malignant progression are...
BACKGROUND
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are a cystic precursor to pancreatic cancer. IPMNs deemed clinically to be at high-risk for malignant progression are frequently treated with surgical resection, and pathological examination of the pancreatectomy specimen is a key component of the clinical care of IPMN patients.
METHODS
Systematic literature reviews were conducted around eight topics of clinical relevance in the examination of pathological specimens in patients undergoing resection of IPMN.
RESULTS
This review provides updated perspectives on morphological subtyping of IPMNs, classification of intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasms, nomenclature for high-grade dysplasia, assessment of T stage, distinction of carcinoma associated or concomitant with IPMN, role of molecular assessment of IPMN tissue, role of intraoperative assessment by frozen section, and preoperative evaluation of cyst fluid cytology.
CONCLUSIONS
This analysis provides the foundation for data-driven approaches to several challenging issues in the pathology of IPMNs.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Pancreatic Intraductal Neoplasms; Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous; Retrospective Studies; Pancreatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 37604731
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2023.08.002 -
European Urology Jan 2024The diagnostic accuracy of current imaging techniques in differentiating benign from malignant neoplasms in the case of indeterminate renal masses is still suboptimal. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
CONTEXT
The diagnostic accuracy of current imaging techniques in differentiating benign from malignant neoplasms in the case of indeterminate renal masses is still suboptimal.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Tc-sestamibi (SestaMIBI) single-photon emission tomography computed tomography (SPECT)/CT in characterizing indeterminate renal masses by differentiating renal oncocytoma and hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe tumor (HOCT) from (1) all other renal lesions and (2) all malignant renal lesions. Secondary outcomes were: (1) benign versus malignant; (2) renal oncocytoma and HOCT versus clear cell (ccRCC) and papillary (pRCC) renal cell carcinoma; and (3) renal oncocytoma and HOCT versus chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC).
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
A literature search was conducted up to November 2022 using the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. Studies included were prospective and retrospective cross-sectional studies in which SestaMIBI SPECT/CT findings were compared to histology after renal mass biopsy or surgery.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Overall, eight studies involving 489 patients with 501 renal masses met our inclusion criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of SestaMIBI SPECT/CT for renal oncocytoma and HOCT versus all other renal lesions were 89% (95% confidence interval [CI] 70-97%) and 89% (95% CI 86-92%), respectively. Notably, for renal oncocytoma and HOCT versus ccRCC and pRCC, SestaMIBI SPECT/CT showed specificity of 98% (95% CI 91-100%) and similar sensitivity. Owing to the relatively high risk of bias and the presence of heterogeneity among the studies included, the level of evidence is still low.
CONCLUSIONS
SestaMIBI SPECT/CT has good sensitivity and specificity in differentiating renal oncocytoma and HOCT from all other renal lesions, and in particular from those with more aggressive oncological behavior. Although these results are promising, further studies are needed to support the use of SestaMIBI SPECT/CT outside research trials.
PATIENT SUMMARY
A scan method called SestaMIBI SPECT/CT has promise for diagnosing whether kidney tumors are malignant or not. However, it should still be limited to research trials because the level of evidence from our review is low.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Kidney Neoplasms; Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed Tomography; Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon; Radiopharmaceuticals
PubMed: 37673752
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.07.013 -
Head and Neck Pathology Jun 2024Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome (BHDS) is an autosomal dominant syndrome with different skin, lung, and renal manifestations. It is diagnosed commonly in the third decade of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome (BHDS) is an autosomal dominant syndrome with different skin, lung, and renal manifestations. It is diagnosed commonly in the third decade of life, and patients have an increased risk for pneumothorax and renal carcinomas.
METHODS
Articles published in PubMed, and Medline from 1977 to September 2023, were included in the systematic review. Inclusion criteria were applied to case reports, case series, and a retrospective cohort study, describing clinical, histopathological, and genetic findings in patients with BHDS with oral and/or parotid lesions.
RESULTS
Sixteen families/individuals with BHDS were identified for analysis. Patients ranged in age from 20 to 74 years, with an average of 49.4 years. Males were affected 52.2% of the time and females, 39.1%. Skin fibrofolliculomas were reported in 87% of cases, and oral lesions were documented in 47.8%. Parotid tumors were documented in 43.5% of patients, 30.4% of which were oncocytomas, 4.3% bilateral oncocytomas, and 4.3% "oncocytic carcinoma".
CONCLUSIONS
Because BHDS is uncommon, its spectrum of clinical manifestations may be underrecognized, especially as the disease is mostly reported at advanced stage. And some of the patients with BHDS may have oncocytic parotid tumors and oral lesions. In this regard, patients presenting these lesions and other indications of BHDS should be considered for renal screening.
Topics: Humans; Birt-Hogg-Dube Syndrome; Salivary Gland Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Adult; Male; Female; Aged; Young Adult
PubMed: 38896302
DOI: 10.1007/s12105-024-01657-y -
Cancer Cytopathology May 2024The incidence of renal tumors has steadily increased over the past decade. In this study, the authors performed a systematic review and analysis of the literature on...
BACKGROUND
The incidence of renal tumors has steadily increased over the past decade. In this study, the authors performed a systematic review and analysis of the literature on renal fine-needle aspiration (FNA) to determine its performance and explore whether a standardized classification system can be used for reporting renal FNA cytology.
METHODS
A systematic search of published articles on renal FNA was conducted. The data on FNA and histologic diagnosis were extracted and categorized, and the risk of malignancy was calculated. Different scenarios were used to estimate FNA performance statistics.
RESULTS
Of the 3766 potentially relevant studies, 23 met the inclusion criteria of the study. The 2231 FNA cases included were re-categorized according to the classification system, rendering 142 (6.36%) nondiagnostic, 270 (12.1%) nonneoplastic, 271 (12.14%) benign neoplasm, 65 (2.91%) renal neoplasm with unknown malignant potential, oncocytic type, 25 (1.12%) atypia of undetermined significance, 60 (2.68%) suspicious for malignancy, and 1398 (62.66%) malignant FNA diagnoses. The risk of malignancy in these cases was 65.4%, 18.1%, 16.6%, 16.9%, 60%, 73.3%, and 96.9%, respectively. According to the classification system, the study indicated that the accuracy of renal FNA was between 91% and 95%, the sensitivity was 90.9%-96.7%, and the specificity was 82%-92% in different scenarios.
CONCLUSIONS
There is a need for a standardized reporting in renal cytology that will improve the sensitivity and accuracy of renal cytology, reduce the rate of indeterminate diagnoses, and alter the management strategies of renal lesions. Based on the available literature, a new reporting system is proposed, including categories with an associated risk of malignancy.
PubMed: 38713617
DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22826