-
Thrombosis Research Jan 2024Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) provides an alternative for poor candidates of long-term oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy; however, anticoagulant therapy after... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) provides an alternative for poor candidates of long-term oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy; however, anticoagulant therapy after surgical procedures has limited use due to associated uncertainties. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the short-term use of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and warfarin after LAAO.
METHOD
Electronic databases such as PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to November 11, 2022. Our study compared DOAC therapy and warfarin in patients after LAAO. A meta-analysis was conducted with the Review Manager software (version 5.4).
RESULTS
The meta-analysis included 13 cohort studies with a total of 32,607 patients. Our findings indicated that the incidence of stroke/TIA/SE, peri-device leaks>5 mm, device-related thrombosis, and all-cause mortality were not significantly different between the two groups after LAAO (P > 0.05). The DOAC group had a significantly lower incidence of major bleeding (OR = 0.83, 95 % CI: 0.74-0.94, P = 0.003), any bleeding (OR = 0.34, 95 % CI: 0.23-0.51, P < 0.001), stroke/TIA/SE and major bleeding (OR = 0.57, 95 % CI: 0.34-0.95, P = 0.03), and any major adverse event (OR = 0.89, 95 % CI:0.82-0.97, P = 0.010) than the warfarin group. The subgroup analysis revealed that the rate of stroke/TIA/SE was similar in the two groups in terms of the different regions, follow-up time, study type, anticoagulant strategy, and bleeding risk. The incidence of major bleeding in the DOAC group was significantly lower than that in the warfarin group in North America, as well as at follow-up period ≤6 months, retrospective cohort, HAS-BLED average score ≥ 3. In addition, the risk of major bleeding was higher with the combination of OAC and single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) than with OAC alone. Finally, in the North American region, retrospective cohort, and HAS-BLED average score ≥ 3, the incidence of any serious adverse event in the DOAC group was still significantly lower than that in the warfarin group.
CONCLUSION
Compared to warfarin, DOAC reduced the risk of major bleeding and any serious adverse event in patients after LAAO. This advantage was particularly notable in North America and high-risk populations for bleeding. In addition, the incidence of device-related thrombosis, peri-device leaks, stroke/TIA/SE and all-cause mortality were similar in both groups. The risk of major bleeding was lower in patients taking OAC alone compared with those taking OAC plus SAPT, without increasing the risk of thrombosis.
Topics: Humans; Anticoagulants; Warfarin; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Atrial Appendage; Retrospective Studies; Atrial Fibrillation; Treatment Outcome; Stroke; Hemorrhage; Thrombosis
PubMed: 38035647
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2023.10.021 -
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Aug 2023Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are excreted by P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and some are metabolized by CYP450 enzymes such as CYP3A4. Although fewer drug... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) Versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Using P-gp and/or CYP450-Interacting Drugs: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
PURPOSE
Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are excreted by P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and some are metabolized by CYP450 enzymes such as CYP3A4. Although fewer drug interactions are present with NOACs, it is unclear whether NOACs should also be preferred over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) using pharmacokinetically interacting drugs. Therefore, the benefit-risk profile of NOACs versus VKAs was investigated in AF patients treated with P-gp and/or CYP450-interacting drugs.
METHODS
Using PubMed and Embase, randomized controlled trials and observational studies on the effectiveness and safety of NOACs versus VKAs in AF patients using P-gp and/or CYP450-interacting drugs were included. A meta-analysis was performed, calculating relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with the Mantel-Haenszel method.
RESULTS
Twelve studies were included, investigating 10,793 NOAC and 10,096 VKA users treated with P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitors, whereas no studies on P-gp and/or CYP450-inducing drugs were identified. Compared to VKAs, NOACs were associated with a borderline non-significantly lower stroke or systemic embolism (stroke/SE) risk (RR 0.85, 95%CI (0.72-1.01)), significantly lower intracranial bleeding (RR 0.47, 95%CI (0.34-0.65)) and all-cause mortality risks (RR 0.87, 95%CI (0.79-0.95), but significantly higher gastrointestinal bleeding risk (RR 1.74, 95%CI (1.06-2.86)). Among AF patients using amiodarone, NOACs were associated with significantly lower stroke/SE (RR 0.71, 95%CI (0.54-0.93)) and intracranial bleeding risks (RR 0.51, 95%CI (0.29-0.88)), but significantly higher gastrointestinal bleeding risk (RR 2.15, 95%CI (1.24-3.72)) than VKAs.
CONCLUSION
The benefit-risk profile of NOACs compared to VKAs was preserved in AF patients using P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitors, including amiodarone.
Topics: Humans; Warfarin; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Administration, Oral; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Stroke; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Embolism; Amiodarone
PubMed: 34637052
DOI: 10.1007/s10557-021-07279-8 -
Neurosurgery Jan 2024Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is one of the most disabling cerebrovascular events. Several studies have discussed oral anticoagulant (OAC)-related ICH; however, the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is one of the most disabling cerebrovascular events. Several studies have discussed oral anticoagulant (OAC)-related ICH; however, the optimal timing of resuming OAC in patients with ICH is still a dilemma. In this literature review/meta-analysis, we will summarize, discuss, and provide the results of studies pertaining to OAC resumption in patients with ICH.
METHODS
Using PubMed, Ovid Medline, and Web science, a systemic literature review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement on December 20, 2022. Inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis were all studies reporting mean, median, and standard deviation for the duration of anticoagulants resumption after ICH. Thirteen studies met the above criteria and were included in the meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Of the 271 articles found in the literature, pooled analysis was performed in 13 studies that included timing of OAC resumption after ICH. The pooled mean duration to OAC resumption after the index ICH was 31 days (95% CI: 13.7-48.3). There was significant variation among the mean duration to OAC resumption reported by the studies as observed in the heterogeneity test ( P -value ≈0).
CONCLUSION
Based on our meta-analysis, the average time of resuming OAC in patients with ICH is around 30 days. Several factors including the type of intracranial hemorrhage, the type of OAC, and the indication for OACs should be taken into consideration for future studies to try and identify the best time to resume OAC in patients with ICH.
Topics: Humans; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Patients
PubMed: 37459580
DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002625 -
Current Problems in Cardiology Mar 2024Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a known chronic condition that can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Patients who develop PH due to thromboembolic disease are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a known chronic condition that can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Patients who develop PH due to thromboembolic disease are catalogued as chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Anticoagulation remains a topic of interest in these patients. PUBMED, EMBASE and COCHRANE databases were searched by two investigators until December 2023. Information was analyzed for all-cause mortality, venous thromboembolism and major bleeding. We included a total of 10 studies in this meta-analysis. Our pooled analysis demonstrated that DOACs were non-inferior in all-cause mortality [OR 0.88, 95 % CI (0.48, 1.61)], venous thromboembolism [OR 1.00, 95 % CI (0.50, 1.98)] and major bleeding [OR 0.78, 95 % CI (0.43, 1.40)] when compared to VKAs. In conclusion, our meta-analysis supports the use of DOACs in patients with CTEPH. Further randomized trials are still needed to confirm our results in terms of safety and mortality.
Topics: Humans; Venous Thromboembolism; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Fibrinolytic Agents; Vitamin K; Administration, Oral
PubMed: 38184126
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102377 -
Medicine Oct 2023Current guidelines recommended that oral anticoagulants (OACs) should last for a minimum first 2 months after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and the long-term... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Current guidelines recommended that oral anticoagulants (OACs) should last for a minimum first 2 months after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and the long-term decision of anticoagulation after AF ablation should be based on the individual patient's risk of stroke rather than the rhythm status. There is controversy about the safety of discontinuing OACs in patients with atrial fibrillation after the blanking period due to the divergences between consensus recommendations and clinical practice.
METHODS
Electronic bibliographic sources (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) were searched until August 2023 to identify cohort studies about the safety of discontinuing OACs in patients with AF after the blanking period. The primary outcome was thromboembolism (TE). The secondary outcome was major bleeding events (MBEs). Two authors extracted articles independently using predefined data fields. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated based on a random-effects model.
RESULTS
A total of 16 studies (11 prospective cohorts and 5 retrospective cohorts) enrolling 23,942 patients (14,382 OFF-OAC and 9560 ON-OAC) were included in our analysis. No significant difference emerged in the risk of TE between OFF-OAC and ON-OAC patients following AF ablation after the banking period (OR = 0.66; 95%CI, 0.43-1.01). Similar results emerged in the patients with a high risk of TE after stratification by the risk level of TE (OR = 0.72; 95%CI, 0.25-2.08). A significant reduction in incidences of major bleeding was found in the OFF-OAC patients compared with the ON-OAC patients (OR = 0.23; 95%CI, 0.12-0.42). Subgroup analyses for TE found a reduction of incidences in the subgroups who switched to antiplatelet drugs and with a follow-up duration <3 years. Subgroup analyses for MBEs found a significant reduction of incidences in all subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study suggests it can be safe to discontinue OACs after successful AF ablation. Discontinuation of OACs may reduce the risk of MBEs while not increasing the risk of TE.
Topics: Humans; Atrial Fibrillation; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Stroke; Hemorrhage; Thromboembolism; Anticoagulants; Administration, Oral; Risk Factors
PubMed: 37861532
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035518 -
The American Journal of Cardiology Jan 2024Oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists is currently advised for a period of 3 months after surgical mitral valve repair, regardless of the rhythm status. The... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists is currently advised for a period of 3 months after surgical mitral valve repair, regardless of the rhythm status. The evidence supporting this recommendation is weak and recent studies have challenged the safety and efficacy of this recommendation. A systematic review of literature was conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Emcare, and Cochrane Library databases for original publications comparing the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists to antiplatelet treatment early after mitral valve surgery in patients with no atrial fibrillation. Study end points included thromboembolic complications, bleeding complications and survival. A total of 5 studies, including 5,093 patients, met the inclusion criteria; 2,824 patients were included in the oral anticoagulation and 2,269 in the antiplatelet treatment group. Pooled analyses demonstrated no beneficial effect of oral anticoagulation on the incidence of thromboembolic complications (risk ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 0.76 to 1.70, p = 0.53, I = 8%). Moreover, oral anticoagulation did not result in a significantly increased risk of bleeding complications (risk ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 2.44, p = 0.81, I = 87%). When combining the efficacy and safety end points, no difference was observed between groups (risk ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 1.97, p = 0.99 I = 85%). Likewise, mortality did not differ between groups (risk ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.15 to 5.23, p = 0.90 I = 71%). Our results confirmed the safety but failed to confirm the efficacy of oral anticoagulation in patients who underwent mitral valve surgery. A randomized controlled trial would provide the evidence needed to support treatment recommendations.
Topics: Humans; Mitral Valve; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Administration, Oral
PubMed: 37838070
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.10.002 -
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Feb 2024This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of different antithrombotic regimens after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of different antithrombotic regimens after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched from their inception to March 2023. Patients were divided into short-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) group and antiplatelet therapy (APT) group. The incidence of events were performed using RevMan 5.4. The events including device-related thrombus (DRT), ischemic stroke/systemic embolization (SE), major bleeding, any bleeding, any major adverse event and all-cause mortality. Subgroup analysis were based on OAC alone or OAC plus single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) in OAC group. Oral anticoagulants include warfarin and direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). Fourteen studies with 35,166 patients were included. We found that the incidence of DRT (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.36-0.66, P<0.0001) and all-cause mortality (OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.57-0.89, P = 0.002) were significantly lower in OAC group than APT group. However, there was no statistical differences in the incidence rates of ischemic stroke/SE (OR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.49-1.20, P = 0.25), major bleeding (OR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.55-1.27, P = 0.84), any bleeding (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.56-1.22, P = 0.34) and any major adverse event (OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.30-1.03, P = 0.06) in the two groups. Subgroup analysis found that the incidence of DRT, all-cause mortality and any major adverse event in OAC monotherapy were lower than that in APT group (P<0.05), but not statistically different from other outcome. The incidence of DRT, all-cause mortality, any major adverse event and any bleeding in DOAC were significantly better than APT group (P<0.05). While warfarin only has better incidence of DRT than APT (P<0.05), there was no statistical difference between the two groups in other outcome (P>0.05). The incidence of DRT was significantly lower than APT group (P<0.05), major bleeding were higher, and the rest of the outcome did not show any statistically significant differences(P>0.05) when OAC plus SAPT. Based on the existing data, short-term OAC may be favored over APT for patients who undergo LAAC. DOAC monotherapy may be favored over warfarin monotherapy or OAC plus APT, when selecting anticoagulant therapies.
Topics: Humans; Warfarin; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Left Atrial Appendage Closure; Atrial Fibrillation; Treatment Outcome; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Ischemic Stroke; Stroke; Atrial Appendage
PubMed: 38180590
DOI: 10.1007/s11239-023-02919-2 -
Catheterization and Cardiovascular... Aug 2023Pretreatment with oral P2Y12 inhibitors is a standard practice for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Pretreatment with oral P2Y12 inhibitors is a standard practice for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the efficacy and safety of P2Y12 inhibitors pretreatment remain unclear.
OBJECTIVES
We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the impact of P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment on thrombotic and hemorrhagic endpoints in STEMI patients.
METHODS
We searched multiple databases for studies that compared P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment with no pretreatment in STEMI patients and reported endpoints of interest. Random effects model was used for the meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Our meta-analysis included 3 randomized controlled trials and 14 observational studies, comprising 70,465 patients assigned to either P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment (50,328 patients) or no pretreatment (20,137 patients). Compared to no pretreatment, P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment did not result in significant reductions in all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-1.03; p = 0.07), myocardial infarction (RR 0.75; 95% CI: 0.53-1.07; p = 0.11), or major bleeding (RR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.56-1.16; p = 0.22) at 30 days. However, our subgroup analysis revealed that P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment administered in the pre-hospital setting was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of myocardial infarction compared to no pretreatment (RR 0.73; 95% CI: 0.56-0.91; p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION
Our analysis suggests that pretreatment with oral P2Y12 inhibitors before PCI in patients with STEMI was not associated with reduced all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or major bleeding. However, pretreatment with P2Y12 inhibitors in the pre-hospital setting appears to be beneficial in reducing reinfarction.
Topics: Humans; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Treatment Outcome; Myocardial Infarction; Hemorrhage; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37350287
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30750 -
Acta Clinica Belgica Oct 2023Frail patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are thought to be at a higher risk for cerebral infarction and death than patients who are not frail, making preventive... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Frail patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are thought to be at a higher risk for cerebral infarction and death than patients who are not frail, making preventive interventions important. Anticoagulants should be used in frailty patients with AF. However, there are limited data about anticoagulants in frail patients with AF. Therefore, we concucted this meta-analysis to find the best anticoagulation strategy.
METHODS
Systematic electronic searches were conducted on 4 July 2022 4 July 2022, in PubMed, Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane Library. Relevant and eligible cohort studies were included. A random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Furthermore, we performed a publication bias analysis and subgroup analysis to explore the source of heterogeneity.
RESULT
3 publications (10 cohorts, 188573 participants) met our inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis showed that ischemic strokes (HR: 0.75; 95%CI: 0.71 to 0.79; = 60.2%), systemic embolism (HR: 0.75; 95%CI: 0.64 to 0.87; = 68.6%), major bleeding(HR: 0.76; 95%CI: 0.64 to 0.89; = 97.4%), intracranial hemorrhage (HR: 0.57; 95%CI: 0.45 to 0.71; = 54.6%) and cardiovascular death(HR: 0.61; 95%CI: 0.51 to 0.70; = 83.2%) were lower in NOACs as compared with warfarin. Regarding gastrointestinal bleeding, meta-analysis showed no significant differences in the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (HR: 0.97; 95%CI: 0.69 to 1.36; = 95.9%). .
CONCLUSION
NOAC was more effective and safety than warfarin in frail patients with AF.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Warfarin; Atrial Fibrillation; Anticoagulants; Retrospective Studies; Frail Elderly; Administration, Oral; Stroke; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
PubMed: 36814097
DOI: 10.1080/17843286.2023.2179908 -
Revista Espanola de Cardiologia... Sep 2023Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy has been shown to be safe and effective in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, outcomes in AF patients with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES
Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy has been shown to be safe and effective in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, outcomes in AF patients with bioprosthetic valves are unclear, as this population has been underrepresented in clinical trials. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of DOACs in this population based on the existing published literature.
METHODS
A systematic search and review were conducted to identify randomized clinical trials and comparative observational studies published from 2017 to January 2022 that compared DOACs and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in AF patients with bioprosthetic valves. Hazard ratios (HR) were collected to compare the 2 treatments in terms of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, stroke/systemic embolism, and major bleeding. A meta-analysis combining the results was performed.
RESULTS
We included 12 studies (30 283 patients). DOACs and VKAs were compared based on HRs at the 95% confidence interval. DOAC therapy was associated with a significant 9% reduction in all-cause mortality (HR, 0.91; 95%CI, 0.85-0.97; P=.0068; I=8%), with no significant differences in the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (HR, 0.87; 95%CI, 0.67-1.14; P=.29; I=45%) or major bleeding (HR, 0.82; 95%CI, 0.67-1.00; P=.054; I=48.7%).
CONCLUSIONS
DOAC therapy in AF patients with bioprosthetic valves may be associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality, with no reduction in the efficacy of stroke/systemic embolism prevention or increase in major bleeding risk.
Topics: Humans; Atrial Fibrillation; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Stroke; Embolism; Administration, Oral; Vitamin K
PubMed: 36804556
DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2023.02.002