-
Archives of Oral Biology Jan 2024This study aimed to explore the characteristics of human papillomavirus (HPV) in oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC), in order to provide a new theoretical basis for the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to explore the characteristics of human papillomavirus (HPV) in oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC), in order to provide a new theoretical basis for the prevention, treatment, and management of OPC.
METHODS
The electronic databases were searched available publications relevant to HPV infection and OPC. Studies were collected until July, 2023. The effect sizes were combined using R 4.2.2 software. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity. Funnel plot and Egger's test were used to assess the publication bias.
RESULTS
Seventy-one studies were included with 10,908 OPC patients. The pooled prevalence of HPV and HR-HPV infection was 44.22% and 43.94%, respectively. The genotypes of HR-HPV were HPV16 (37.24%), HPV33 (2.44%), HPV18 (1.64%), HPV35 (1.53%), and HPV58 (0.89%). The highest HPV infection was in North America (66.87%), Oceania (43.09%), and Europe (41.49%), lowest in Africa (4.89%). Females exhibited higher HPV infection (43.18% vs 34.59% in males). Top subsites of HPV infection was tonsil (45.78%), followed by base of tongue (36.66%). Infection was higher in OPC patients aged > 60 (38.15%) than < 60 (34.73%). The prevalence of HPV infection in stage I-II of OPC patients is higher than that in stage III-IV.
CONCLUSIONS
HPV genotyping (16, 18, 33, 35, 58) is a key factor in the prevention and treatment of OPC. Identifying tonsils, base of tongue, and soft palate as common subsites to improve early detection. Elderly women with high HPV infection require attention to risk management and health education for prevention.
Topics: Male; Aged; Humans; Female; Papillomavirus Infections; Human Papillomavirus Viruses; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms
PubMed: 37924712
DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2023.105830 -
Prognostic role of lymph node micrometastasis in oral and oropharyngeal cancer: A systematic review.Oral Oncology Jul 2024An estimated 20% of patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OOSCC) have micrometastases (Mi) or isolated tumor cells (ITC) in the cervical lymph... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
An estimated 20% of patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OOSCC) have micrometastases (Mi) or isolated tumor cells (ITC) in the cervical lymph nodes that evade detection by standard histological evaluation of lymph node sections. Lymph node Mi and ITC could be one reason for regional recurrence after neck dissection. The aim of this study was to review the existing data regarding the impact of Mi on the survival of patients with OOSCC.
METHODS
PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles reporting the impact of Mi and ITC on patient survival. Two authors independently assessed the methodological quality of retrieved studies using the Downs and Black index. Data were also extracted on study type, number of included patients, mode of histological analysis, statistical analysis, and prognostic impact.
RESULTS
Sixteen articles with a total of 2064 patients were included in the review. Among the 16 included studies, eight revealed a statistically significant impact of Mi on at least one endpoint in the Kaplan-Meier and/or multivariate analysis. Three studies regarded Mi as Ma, while five studies found no impact of Mi on survival. Only one study demonstrated an impact of ITC on patient's prognosis in the univariate but not in the multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION
The majority of cases included in the review were patients with oral cancer. The findings provide low-certainty evidence that Mi negatively impacts survival. Data on ITC were scarcer, so no conclusions can be drawn about their effect on survival. The lower threshold to discriminate between Mi and ITC should be defined for OOSCC since the existing thresholds are based on data from different tumors. The histological, immunohistological, and anatomical characteristics of Mi and ITC in OOSCC as well as the effect of radiotherapy on Mi should be further investigated separately for oral and oropharyngeal carcinomas.
Topics: Humans; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms; Mouth Neoplasms; Prognosis; Neoplasm Micrometastasis; Lymphatic Metastasis; Lymph Nodes; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
PubMed: 38823172
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.106808 -
Oral Oncology Jan 2024We aim to determine if there is a survival difference between patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) 16... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
We aim to determine if there is a survival difference between patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 versus HPV-non16 subtypes.
PATIENT AND METHODS
Databases were queried for full length, peer-reviewed, English language, articles published between 01/01/1980 and 06/08/2022. Studies reporting clinical outcomes of OPSCC associated with HPV16 and HPV-non16 subtypes with at least 10 patients were included. Primary outcome was the overall survival (OS) of patients with HPV16- versus HPV-non16-associated OPSCC. Secondary outcomes were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and pooled rate of p16 positivity by immunohistochemistry (IHC).
RESULTS
A total of 9 studies met inclusion criteria and included 1,310 patients with HPV16 and 219 with HPV-non16 subtypes of OPSCC. The prevalence of HPV-non16 was 14.3 %. The pooled 5-year OS rates for patients with HPV16 and HPV-non16 were 83.4 %(95 % CI 77.8-89.0 %) and 69.3 %(95 % CI 58.5-80.1 %), respectively. OS at 5 years was significantly worse for HPV-non16 subtype, compared to HPV16 (log odds ratio [OR] -0.54, p = 0.008). There was a trend towards worse 5-year RFS with HPV-non16 compared to HPV16 (log OR -0.55, p = 0.063). Patients with HPV-non16 disease were less likely to be p16 positive by IHC (log OR -0.91, p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION
Patients with HPV-non16OPSCC may experience worse OS and were less likely to be p16 positive compared to patients with HPV16 disease. While future prospective validation is warranted, routine assessment of both p16 IHC and HPV subtype could be considered prior to pursuing treatment de-escalation for HPV-associated OPSCC.
Topics: Humans; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms; Human Papillomavirus Viruses; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Papillomavirus Infections; Human papillomavirus 16; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16; Prognosis
PubMed: 38006690
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106644 -
Cancer Medicine Sep 2023HPV infection can cause cancer, and standard treatments often result in recurrence. The extent to which liquid biopsy using HPV circulating tumor DNA (HPV ctDNA) can be... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
HPV infection can cause cancer, and standard treatments often result in recurrence. The extent to which liquid biopsy using HPV circulating tumor DNA (HPV ctDNA) can be used as a promising marker for predicting recurrence in HPV-related cancers remains to be validated. Here we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess its effectiveness in predicting treatment response.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic literature search of online databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library, up to December 2022. The goal was to identify survival studies that evaluated the potential of plasma HPV ctDNA at baseline and end-of-treatment (EoT) in predicting recurrence of related cancers. Hazard ratios were estimated directly from models or extracted from Kaplan-Meier plots.
RESULTS
The pooled effect of HPV ctDNA presence on disease recurrence was estimated to be HR = 7.97 (95% CI: [3.74, 17.01]). Subgroup analysis showed that the risk of recurrence was HR = 2.17 (95% CI: [1.07, 4.41]) for baseline-positive cases and HR = 13.21 (95% CI: [6.62, 26.36]) for EoT-positive cases. Significant associations were also observed between recurrence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HR = 12.25 (95% CI: [2.62, 57.36])) and cervical cancer (HR = 4.60 (95% CI: [2.08, 10.17])) in plasma HPV ctDNA-positive patients.
CONCLUSIONS
The study found that HPV ctDNA detection can predict the rate of relapse or recurrence after treatment, with post-treatment measurement being more effective than baseline assessment. HPV ctDNA could be used as a surrogate or incorporated with other methods for detecting residual disease.
Topics: Humans; Human Papillomavirus Viruses; Papillomavirus Infections; Circulating Tumor DNA; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Head and Neck Neoplasms
PubMed: 37492996
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6377 -
The Laryngoscope Apr 2024The immune microenvironment of HPV-associated (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCCs) (HPV+OPSCCs) differs from that of HPV-independent oropharyngeal... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The immune microenvironment of HPV-associated (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCCs) (HPV+OPSCCs) differs from that of HPV-independent oropharyngeal cancers (HPV-independent OPSCCs). The literature on the subject is very abundant, demanding an organized synthesis of this wealth of information to evaluate the hypothesis associating the favorable prognosis of HPV+OPSCC patients with a different immune microenvironment. A systematic review of the literature was conducted regarding the microenvironment of HPV+OPSCCs.
DATA SOURCE
MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases.
REVIEW METHODS
A literature search was performed following PRISMA guidelines (Moher D. PLoS Med. 2009). The PEO (Population, Exposure, and Outcome) framework is detailed as follows: P: patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas, E: human papillomavirus (HPV), and O: histological and immunological composition of the tumoral microenvironment (TME). No meta-analysis was performed.
RESULTS
From 1,202 studies that were screened, 58 studies were included (n = 6,474 patients; n = 3,581 (55%) HPV+OPSCCs and n = 2,861(45%) HPV-independent OPSCCs). The presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), CD3+ in 1,733 patients, CD4+ in 520 patients, and CD8+ (cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL)) in 3,104 patients, and high levels of PD-L1 expression in 1,222 patients is strongly correlated with an improved clinical outcome in HPV+OPSCCs.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review provides the most comprehensive information on the immune microenvironment of HPV+OPSCCs to date. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and PD-L1 expression are associated with a favorable prognosis. B, CD8+ and resident memory cells densities are higher in HPV+OPSCCs. The importance of myeloid lineages is still a matter of debate and research.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
NA Laryngoscope, 134:1507-1516, 2024.
Topics: Humans; Prognosis; B7-H1 Antigen; Human Papillomavirus Viruses; Papillomavirus Infections; Papillomaviridae; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Tumor Microenvironment
PubMed: 37642393
DOI: 10.1002/lary.31010 -
European Archives of... Oct 2023Recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are frequently managed with salvage surgery, but the impact these operations have on function and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are frequently managed with salvage surgery, but the impact these operations have on function and quality-of-life (QoL) is understudied. This review aimed to provide a quantitative and qualitative assessment of the functional and QoL effects of salvage surgical procedures.
METHODS
Systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted of studies reporting QoL and function following salvage HNSCC resections.
RESULTS
The search identified 415 articles and 34 were selected for inclusion. Pooled random effects analysis revealed long-term feeding and tracheostomy tube rates of 18% and 7%. Pooled long-term feeding tube rates in open oral and oropharyngeal, transoral robotic, total and partial laryngectomy surgeries were 41%, 25%, 11% and 4%. Eight studies used validated QoL questionnaires.
CONCLUSIONS
Functional and QoL outcomes from salvage surgery are acceptable, but appear to be worse following open procedures. Prospective studies measuring changes over time are needed to assess these procedures impact on patient well-being.
Topics: Humans; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Salvage Therapy; Quality of Life; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
PubMed: 37329358
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08056-z -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Aug 2023Surgery is a common treatment option in oral cavity cancer (and less frequently in oropharyngeal cancer) to remove the primary tumour and sometimes neck lymph nodes.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Surgery is a common treatment option in oral cavity cancer (and less frequently in oropharyngeal cancer) to remove the primary tumour and sometimes neck lymph nodes. People with early-stage disease may undergo surgery alone or surgery plus radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy/biotherapy, or a combination of these. Timing and extent of surgery varies. This is the third update of a review originally published in 2007.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the relative benefits and harms of different surgical treatment modalities for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers.
SEARCH METHODS
We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 9 February 2022.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared two or more surgical treatment modalities, or surgery versus other treatment modalities, for primary tumours of the oral cavity or oropharynx.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Our primary outcomes were overall survival, disease-free survival, locoregional recurrence, and recurrence; and our secondary outcomes were adverse effects of treatment, quality of life, direct and indirect costs to patients and health services, and participant satisfaction. We used standard Cochrane methods. We reported survival data as hazard ratios (HRs). For overall survival, we reported the HR of mortality, and for disease-free survival, we reported the combined HR of new disease, progression, and mortality; therefore, HRs below 1 indicated improvement in these outcomes. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence for each outcome.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified four new trials, bringing the total number of included trials to 15 (2820 participants randomised, 2583 participants analysed). For objective outcomes, we assessed four trials at high risk of bias, three at low risk, and eight at unclear risk. The trials evaluated nine comparisons; none compared different surgical approaches for excision of the primary tumour. Five trials evaluated elective neck dissection (ND) versus therapeutic (delayed) ND in people with oral cavity cancer and clinically negative neck nodes. Elective ND compared with therapeutic ND probably improves overall survival (HR 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50 to 0.83; I = 0%; 4 trials, 883 participants; moderate certainty) and disease-free survival (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.70; I = 12%; 5 trials, 954 participants; moderate certainty), and probably reduces locoregional recurrence (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.78; I = 0%; 4 trials, 458 participants; moderate certainty) and recurrence (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.70; I = 0%; 3 trials, 633 participants; moderate certainty). Elective ND is probably associated with more adverse events (risk ratio (RR) 1.31, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.54; I = 0%; 2 trials, 746 participants; moderate certainty). Two trials evaluated elective radical ND versus elective selective ND in people with oral cavity cancer, but we were unable to pool the data as the trials used different surgical procedures. Neither study found evidence of a difference in overall survival (pooled measure not estimable; very low certainty). We are unsure if there is a difference in effect on disease-free survival (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.11; 1 trial, 104 participants; very low certainty) or recurrence (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.63 to 2.33; 1 trial, 143 participants; very low certainty). There may be no difference between the interventions in terms of adverse events (1 trial, 148 participants; low certainty). Two trials evaluated superselective ND versus selective ND, but we were unable to use the data. One trial evaluated supraomohyoid ND versus modified radical ND in 332 participants. We were unable to use any of the primary outcome data. The evidence on adverse events was very uncertain, with more complications, pain, and poorer shoulder function in the modified radical ND group. One trial evaluated sentinel node biopsy versus elective ND in 279 participants. There may be little or no difference between the interventions in overall survival (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.11; low certainty), disease-free survival (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.07; low certainty), or locoregional recurrence (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.19; low certainty). The trial provided no usable data for recurrence, and reported no adverse events (very low certainty). One trial evaluated positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) following chemoradiotherapy (with ND only if no or incomplete response) versus planned ND (before or after chemoradiotherapy) in 564 participants. There is probably no difference between the interventions in overall survival (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.31; moderate certainty) or locoregional recurrence (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.06; moderate certainty). One trial evaluated surgery plus radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone and provided very low-certainty evidence of better overall survival in the surgery plus radiotherapy group (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.59; 35 participants). The data were unreliable because the trial stopped early and had multiple protocol violations. In terms of adverse events, subcutaneous fibrosis was more frequent in the surgery plus radiotherapy group, but there were no differences in other adverse events (very low certainty). One trial evaluated surgery versus radiotherapy alone for oropharyngeal cancer in 68 participants. There may be little or no difference between the interventions for overall survival (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.09 to 7.46; low certainty) or disease-free survival (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.27 to 4.22; low certainty). For adverse events, there were too many outcomes to draw reliable conclusions. One trial evaluated surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy versus chemotherapy. We were unable to use the data for any of the outcomes reported (very low certainty).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We found moderate-certainty evidence based on five trials that elective neck dissection of clinically negative neck nodes at the time of removal of the primary oral cavity tumour is superior to therapeutic neck dissection, with increased survival and disease-free survival, and reduced locoregional recurrence. There was moderate-certainty evidence from one trial of no difference between positron emission tomography (PET-CT) following chemoradiotherapy versus planned neck dissection in terms of overall survival or locoregional recurrence. The evidence for each of the other seven comparisons came from only one or two studies and was assessed as low or very low-certainty.
Topics: Humans; Immunotherapy; Mouth; Neck; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37650478
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006205.pub5 -
Cancer Medicine Feb 2024The aim of this systematic literature review was to provide updated information on human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence in locally and regionally advanced (LA) and... (Review)
Review
A systematic literature review of the human papillomavirus prevalence in locally and regionally advanced and recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancers through the last decade: The "ALARM" study.
AIMS
The aim of this systematic literature review was to provide updated information on human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence in locally and regionally advanced (LA) and recurrent/metastatic (RM) head and neck cancer (HNC) worldwide.
METHODS
Electronic searches were conducted on clinicaltrials.gov, MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and ASCO/ESMO journals of congresses for interventional studies (IS; Phase I-III trials) as well as MEDLINE and Embase for non-interventional studies (NIS) of LA/RM HNC published between January 01, 2010 and December 31, 2020. Criteria for study selection included: availability of HPV prevalence data for LA/RM HNC patients, patient enrollment from January 01, 2010 onward, and oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) included among HNC types. HPV prevalence per study was calculated as proportion of HPV+ over total number of enrolled patients. For overall HPV prevalence across studies, mean of reported HPV prevalence rates across studies and pooled estimate (sum of all HPV+ patients over sum of all patients enrolled) were assessed.
RESULTS
Eighty-one studies (62 IS; 19 NIS) were included, representing 9607 LA/RM HNC cases, with an overall mean (pooled) HPV prevalence of 32.6% (25.1%). HPV prevalence was 44.7% (44.0%) in LA and 24.3% (18.6%) in RM. Among 2714 LA/RM OPC patients from 52 studies with available data, mean (pooled) value was 55.8% (50.7%). The majority of data were derived from Northern America and Europe, with overall HPV prevalence of 46.0% (42.1%) and 24.7% (25.3%) across studies conducted exclusively in these geographic regions, respectively (Northern Europe: 31.9% [63.1%]). A "p16-based" assay was the most frequently reported HPV detection methodology (58.0%).
CONCLUSION
Over the last decade, at least one quarter of LA/RM HNC and half of OPC cases studied in IS and NIS were HPV+. This alarming burden is consistent with a potential implication of HPV in the pathogenesis of at least a subgroup of HNC, underscoring the relevance of HPV testing and prophylaxis to HNC prevention and management.
Topics: Humans; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Human Papillomavirus Viruses; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms; Papillomaviridae; Papillomavirus Infections; Prevalence
PubMed: 38247106
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6916 -
International Journal of Molecular... Mar 2024Elevated rates of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and anal cancer (AC) in populations like men who have sex... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Elevated rates of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and anal cancer (AC) in populations like men who have sex with men (MSM) living with HIV underscore the need for effective screening. While high-resolution anoscopy-guided biopsy is the gold standard, limited provider availability poses a challenge. This has spurred interest in identifying biomarkers for improved AC prevention. Antibodies against HPV16 oncoprotein E6, known as markers for cervical and oropharyngeal cancers, are the focus of the current study. The systematic review and meta-analysis included six studies meeting inclusion criteria, assessing HPV16 E6 seroprevalence in individuals with anal HSIL or AC. A two-step meta-analysis estimated pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for HPV16 E6 seroprevalence and HSIL or AC. Pooled prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios were also calculated. This meta-analysis revealed a 3.6-fold increased risk of HSIL for HPV16 E6 seropositive individuals, escalating to a 26.1-fold risk increase for AC. Pooled specificity and sensitivity indicated a high specificity (0.99; 95%CI: 0.99, 0.99) but lower sensitivity (0.19; 95%CI: 0.10, 0.34) for HPV16 E6 serostatus as an AC biomarker. In conclusion, while HPV16 E6 seroprevalence demonstrates specificity as a potential biomarker for HPV-related AC, its utility as a standalone screening tool may be limited. Instead, it could serve effectively as a confirmation test, particularly in high-risk populations, alongside other diagnostic methods. Further research is imperative to explore HPV16 E6 seroconversion dynamics and alternative screening algorithms.
Topics: Male; Humans; Homosexuality, Male; Human papillomavirus 16; Papillomavirus Infections; Early Detection of Cancer; Seroepidemiologic Studies; Sexual and Gender Minorities; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma in Situ; Anus Neoplasms; Papillomaviridae
PubMed: 38542409
DOI: 10.3390/ijms25063437 -
PeerJ 2024To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab instead of cisplatin in combination with downstaging radiotherapy for papillomavirus (HPV) positive oropharyngeal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Systematic evaluation and meta-analysis of the prognosis of down-staging human papillomavirus (HPV) positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma using cetuximab combined with radiotherapy instead of cisplatin combined with radiotherapy.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab instead of cisplatin in combination with downstaging radiotherapy for papillomavirus (HPV) positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV OPSCC).
DESIGN
Meta-analysis and systematic evaluation.
DATA SOURCES
The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases were searched up to June 8, 2023, as well as Clinicaltrials.gov Clinical Trials Registry, China Knowledge Network, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, and Wiprojournal.com.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES
Randomized controlled trials reporting results of standard regimens of cetuximab + radiotherapy vs cisplatin + radiotherapy in treating HPV OPSCC were included. The primary outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local regional failure rate (LRF), distant metastasis rate (DM), and adverse events (AE).
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. The HR and its 95% CI were used as the effect analysis statistic for survival analysis, while the OR and its 95% CI were used as the effect analysis statistic for dichotomous variables. These statistics were extracted by the reviewers and aggregated using a fixed-effects model to synthesise the data.
RESULTS
A total of 874 relevant papers were obtained from the initial search, and five papers that met the inclusion criteria were included; a total of 1,617 patients with HPV OPSCC were enrolled in these studies. Meta-analysis showed that OS and PFS were significantly shorter in the cetuximab + radiotherapy group of patients with HPV OPSCC compared with those in the conventional cisplatin + radiotherapy group (HR = 2.10, 95% CI [1.39-3.15], = 0.0004; HR = 1.79, 95% CI [1.40-2.29], < 0.0001); LRF and DM were significantly increased (HR = 2.22, 95% CI [1.58-3.11], < 0.0001; HR = 1.66, 95% CI [1.07-2.58], = 0.02), but there was no significant difference in overall grade 3 to 4, acute and late AE overall (OR = 0.86, 95% CI [0.65-1.13], = 0.28).
CONCLUSIONS
Cisplatin + radiotherapy remains the standard treatment for HPV OPSCC. According to the 7th edition AJCC/UICC criteria, low-risk HPV OPSCC patients with a smoking history of ≤ 10 packs/year and non-pharyngeal tumors not involved in lymphatic metastasis had similar survival outcomes with cetuximab/cisplatin + radiotherapy. However, further clinical trials are necessary to determine whether cetuximab + radiotherapy can replace cisplatin + radiotherapy for degraded treatment in individuals who meet the aforementioned characteristics, particularly those with platinum drug allergies.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42023445619.
Topics: Humans; Cetuximab; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms; Cisplatin; Chemoradiotherapy; Papillomavirus Infections; Prognosis; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Neoplasm Staging; Papillomaviridae; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Progression-Free Survival; Human Papillomavirus Viruses
PubMed: 38784388
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17391