-
Journal of Addictive Diseases Mar 2024The opioid crisis in North America has recently seen a fourth wave, which is dominated by drug-related deaths due to the combined use of illicitly manufactured fentanyl... (Review)
Review
RATIONALE
The opioid crisis in North America has recently seen a fourth wave, which is dominated by drug-related deaths due to the combined use of illicitly manufactured fentanyl [IMF] and stimulants such as cocaine and methamphetamine.
OBJECTIVES
A systematic review addressing the question why drug users combine opioids and stimulants and why the combination results in such a high overdose mortality: from specific and dangerous pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions or from accidental poisoning?
RESULTS
Motives for the combined use include a more intensive high or rush when used at the same time, and some users have the unfounded and dangerous belief that co-use of stimulants will counteract opioid-induced respiratory depression. Overdose deaths due to combined (intravenous) use of opioids and stimulants are not likely to be caused by specific pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions between the two drugs and it is unlikely that the main cause of overdose deaths is due to accidental poisoning.
CONCLUSION
The unexpectedly high overdose rates in this population could not be attributed to accidental overdosing or pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic interactions. The most likely explanation for the high rate of drug-related deaths in opioid-cocaine co-users is careless overdosing with either cocaine, opioid(s) or both, probably facilitated by the high level of preexisting impulsivity in these co-users and a further acute increase in impulsivity following cocaine use. The primary corollary is that cocaine users should avoid IMF use in the same time window. In addition, IMF users should refrain from cocaine use to avoid impulsive IMF overdosing.
PubMed: 38504419
DOI: 10.1080/10550887.2024.2331522 -
Molecular Psychiatry Nov 2023In the past two decades, over-prescription of opioids for pain management has driven a steep increase in opioid use disorder (OUD) and death by overdose, exerting a...
In the past two decades, over-prescription of opioids for pain management has driven a steep increase in opioid use disorder (OUD) and death by overdose, exerting a dramatic toll on western countries. OUD is a chronic relapsing disease associated with a lifetime struggle to control drug consumption, suggesting that opioids trigger long-lasting brain adaptations, notably through functional genomic and epigenomic mechanisms. Current understanding of these processes, however, remain scarce, and have not been previously reviewed systematically. To do so, the goal of the present work was to synthesize current knowledge on genome-wide transcriptomic and epigenetic mechanisms of opioid action, in primate and rodent species. Using a prospectively registered methodology, comprehensive literature searches were completed in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Of the 2709 articles identified, 73 met our inclusion criteria and were considered for qualitative analysis. Focusing on the 5 most studied nervous system structures (nucleus accumbens, frontal cortex, whole striatum, dorsal striatum, spinal cord; 44 articles), we also conducted a quantitative analysis of differentially expressed genes, in an effort to identify a putative core transcriptional signature of opioids. Only one gene, Cdkn1a, was consistently identified in eleven studies, and globally, our results unveil surprisingly low consistency across published work, even when considering most recent single-cell approaches. Analysis of sources of variability detected significant contributions from species, brain structure, duration of opioid exposure, strain, time-point of analysis, and batch effects, but not type of opioid. To go beyond those limitations, we leveraged threshold-free methods to illustrate how genome-wide comparisons may generate new findings and hypotheses. Finally, we discuss current methodological development in the field, and their implication for future research and, ultimately, better care.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Analgesics, Opioid; Opioid-Related Disorders; Drug Overdose; Chronic Disease; Genomics; Models, Animal
PubMed: 37723284
DOI: 10.1038/s41380-023-02238-1 -
Journal of Advanced Nursing Apr 2024To explore healthcare professionals' perceptions and experiences of take-home naloxone initiatives in acute care settings to gain an understanding of issues facilitating... (Review)
Review
AIMS
To explore healthcare professionals' perceptions and experiences of take-home naloxone initiatives in acute care settings to gain an understanding of issues facilitating or impeding dispensing.
DESIGN
Systematic literature review.
DATA SOURCES
Cochrane, MEDLINE and CINAHL were searched from 15/03/2021 to 18/03/2021, with a follow-up search performed via PubMed on 22/03/2021. The years 2011 to 2021 were included in the search.
REVIEW METHODS
A systematic literature review focused on qualitative studies and quantitative survey designs. Synthesis without meta-analysis was undertaken using a thematic analysis approach.
RESULTS
Seven articles from the United States of America (5), Australia (1) and Canada (1) with 750 participants were included in the review. Results indicate ongoing stigma towards people who use drugs with preconceived moral concerns regarding take-home naloxone. There was confusion regarding roles and responsibilities in take-home naloxone dispensing and patient education. Similarly, there was a lack of clarity over logistical and financial issues.
CONCLUSION
Take-home naloxone is a vital harm reduction initiative. However, barriers exist that prevent the optimum implementation of these initiatives.
IMPACT
What is already known: Deaths due to opioid overdose are a global health concern, with take-home naloxone emerging as a key harm reduction scheme. Globally, less than 10% of people who use drugs have access to treatment initiatives, including take-home naloxone. An optimum point of distribution of take-home naloxone is post-acute hospital care.
WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS
There is role confusion regarding responsibility for the provision of take-home naloxone and patient education. This is exacerbated by inconsistent provision of training and education for healthcare professionals. Logistical or financial concerns are common and moral issues are prevalent with some healthcare professionals questioning the ethics of providing take-home naloxone. Stigma towards people who use drugs remains evident in some acute care areas which may impact the use of this intervention. Implications for practice/policy: Further primary research should examine what training and education methods are effective in improving the distribution of take-home naloxone in acute care. Education should focus on reduction of stigma towards people who use drugs to improve the distribution of take-home naloxone. Standardized care guidelines may ensure interventions are offered equally and take-home naloxone 'champions' could drive initiatives forward, with support from harm reduction specialists.
REPORTING METHOD
This has adhered to the PRISMA reporting guidelines for systematic reviews.
PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION
No patient or public contribution.
PubMed: 38563492
DOI: 10.1111/jan.16181 -
Value in Health : the Journal of the... May 2024Overdose prevention centers (OPCs) provide a safe place where people can consume preobtained drugs under supervision so that a life-saving medical response can be... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Overdose prevention centers (OPCs) provide a safe place where people can consume preobtained drugs under supervision so that a life-saving medical response can be provided quickly in the event of an overdose. OPCs are programs that are established in Canada and have recently become legally sanctioned in only a few United States jurisdictions.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review that summarizes and identifies gaps of economic evidence on establishing OPCs in North America to guide future expansion of OPCs.
RESULTS
We included 16 final studies that were evaluated with the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards and Drummond checklists. Eight studies reported cost-effectiveness results (eg, cost per overdose avoided or cost per quality-adjusted life-year), with 6 also including cost-benefit; 5 reported only cost-benefit results, and 3 cost offsets. Health outcomes primarily included overdose mortality outcomes or HIV/hepatitis C virus infections averted. Most studies used mathematical modeling and projected OPC outcomes using the experience of a single facility in Vancouver, BC.
CONCLUSIONS
OPCs were found to be cost-saving or to have favorable cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit ratios across all studies. Future studies should incorporate the experience of OPCs established in various settings and use a greater diversity of modeling designs.
Topics: Humans; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Opiate Overdose; North America; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Canada
PubMed: 38401795
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.02.004 -
The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon Jun 2024Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been increasingly applied over recent decades to treat severe cardiogenic shock and acute lung failure and cardiac arrest...
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been increasingly applied over recent decades to treat severe cardiogenic shock and acute lung failure and cardiac arrest of various causes. Acute intoxication with therapeutic substances or other chemical substances can cause severe cardiogenic shock or even cardiac arrest. The purpose of this study was to conduct a qualitative systematic review of ECMO use in intoxication and poisoning. We searched the PubMed, Medline, and Web of Science databases from January 1971 to December 2021 and selected appropriate studies according to our inclusion and exclusion criteria to evaluate the role of ECMO in intoxication and poisoning systematically. Survival at hospital discharge was examined to describe the outcome. The search resulted in 365 publications after removing duplicates. In total, 190 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. A total of 145 articles from 1985 to 2021 were examined in our final qualitative analysis. A total of 539 (100%) patients were included (mean age: 30.9 ± 16.6 years), with a distribution of = 64 (11.9%) cases with venovenous (vv) ECMO, = 218 (40.4%) cases with venoarterial (va) ECMO, and = 257 (47.7%) cases with cardiac arrest and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Survival at hospital discharge was 61.0% for all patients, 68.8% for vaECMO, 75% for vvECMO, and 50.9% for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. When used and reported, ECMO seems to be a valid tool for adult and pediatric patients suffering intoxication from various pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical substances due to a high survival rate at hospital discharge.
Topics: Humans; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation; Drug Overdose; Treatment Outcome; Risk Factors; Adult; Male; Female; Middle Aged; Young Adult; Adolescent; Child; Child, Preschool; Time Factors; Aged; Poisoning; Shock, Cardiogenic; Risk Assessment; Recovery of Function; Infant; Heart Arrest
PubMed: 36940708
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1764160 -
Frontiers in Psychiatry 2024Fentanyl is a highly potent opioid and has, until recently, been considered an unwanted contaminant in the street drug supply among people who use drugs (PWUD). However,...
OBJECTIVES
Fentanyl is a highly potent opioid and has, until recently, been considered an unwanted contaminant in the street drug supply among people who use drugs (PWUD). However, it has become a drug of choice for an increasing number of individuals. This systematic review evaluated intentional non-medical fentanyl use among PWUD, specifically by summarizing demographic variance, reasons for use, and resulting patterns of use.
METHODS
The search strategy was developed with a combination of free text keywords and MeSH and non-MeSH keywords, and adapted with database-specific filters to Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and PsychINFO. Studies included were human studies with intentional use of non-medical fentanyl or analogues in individuals older than 13. Only peer-reviewed original articles available in English were included.
RESULTS
The search resulted in 4437 studies after de-duplication, of which 132 were selected for full-text review. Out of 41 papers included, it was found that individuals who use fentanyl intentionally were more likely to be young, male, and White. They were also more likely to have experienced overdoses, and report injection drug use. There is evidence that fentanyl seeking behaviours are motivated by greater potency, delay of withdrawal, lower cost, and greater availability.
CONCLUSIONS
Among PWUD, individuals who intentionally use fentanyl have severe substance use patterns, precarious living situations, and extensive overdose history. In response to the increasing number of individuals who use fentanyl, alternative treatment approaches need to be developed for more effective management of withdrawal and opioid use disorder.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021272111.
PubMed: 38414500
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1347678 -
Journal of Addiction MedicineThis systematic review summarizes the development, accuracy, quality, and clinical utility of predictive models to assess the risk of opioid use disorder (OUD),...
BACKGROUND
This systematic review summarizes the development, accuracy, quality, and clinical utility of predictive models to assess the risk of opioid use disorder (OUD), persistent opioid use, and opioid overdose.
METHODS
In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines, 8 electronic databases were searched for studies on predictive models and OUD, overdose, or persistent use in adults until June 25, 2023. Study selection and data extraction were completed independently by 2 reviewers. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed independently by 2 reviewers using the Prediction model Risk of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST).
RESULTS
The literature search yielded 3130 reports; after removing 199 duplicates, excluding 2685 studies after abstract review, and excluding 204 studies after full-text review, the final sample consisted of 41 studies that developed more than 160 predictive models. Primary outcomes included opioid overdose (31.6% of studies), OUD (41.4%), and persistent opioid use (17%). The most common modeling approach was regression modeling, and the most common predictors included age, sex, mental health diagnosis history, and substance use disorder history. Most studies reported model performance via the c statistic, ranging from 0.507 to 0.959; gradient boosting tree models and neural network models performed well in the context of their own study. One study deployed a model in real time. Risk of bias was predominantly high; concerns regarding applicability were predominantly low.
CONCLUSIONS
Models to predict opioid-related risks are developed using diverse data sources and predictors, with a wide and heterogenous range of accuracy metrics. There is a need for further research to improve their accuracy and implementation.
Topics: Humans; Opioid-Related Disorders; Opiate Overdose; Risk Assessment; Models, Statistical; Analgesics, Opioid
PubMed: 38591783
DOI: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001276 -
Journal of Addictions NursingIn individuals in the United States with opioid addiction, what is the effect of a medication-assisted treatment (MAT) in reducing the relapse and harm reduction when...
In individuals in the United States with opioid addiction, what is the effect of a medication-assisted treatment (MAT) in reducing the relapse and harm reduction when comparing the use of buprenorphine, methadone, and naltrexone? In 2017, it was estimated that 1.7 million individuals suffer from overuse of prescription opiates, 652,000 individuals suffer from heroin use disorder, and greater than 130 individuals die from opiate overdose daily (National Institutes of Health, 2019). Using a systematic literature review, the following results were found. Buprenorphine is currently the second most effective MAT in harm reduction and relapse prevention, can be initiated and maintained through primary care, has a low risk for overdose, but needs to be started only when moderate withdrawals have begun. Methadone is currently the gold standard in MAT and can be started in any stage of withdrawal; however, titrating to effective dose is a lengthy process, and it must be administered at a specialty clinic. Naltrexone in oral form has not been shown to be effective because of lack of adherence; however, the extended-release intramuscular injection form has been shown to reduce relapse and increase the quality of life before initiation individuals must be opioid free for 7-14 days. Choosing the proper MAT is highly individualized. It is recommended that more research be conducted in comparing all MAT options, looking at the quality of life on each MAT, researching motivations to stay on MAT and remain opioid free, and looking at the impact of external reward on adherence to the MAT program.
Topics: Humans; United States; Naltrexone; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Quality of Life; Opioid-Related Disorders; Methadone; Buprenorphine; Analgesics, Opioid; Recurrence
PubMed: 34224485
DOI: 10.1097/JAN.0000000000000392 -
The American Journal of Drug and... Jun 2024Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) reduce risks for overdose among correctional populations. Among other barriers, daily dosing requirements hinder treatment... (Review)
Review
Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) reduce risks for overdose among correctional populations. Among other barriers, daily dosing requirements hinder treatment continuity post-release. Extended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP) may therefore be beneficial. However, limited evidence exists. To conduct a systematic review examining the feasibility and effectiveness of XR-BUP among correctional populations. Searches were carried out in Pubmed, Embase, and PsychINFO in October 2023. Ten studies reporting on feasibility or effectiveness of XR-BUP were included, representing = 819 total individuals (81.6% male). Data were extracted and narratively reported under the following main outcomes: 1) Feasibility; 2) Effectiveness; and 3) Barriers and Facilitators. Studies were heterogeneous. Correctional populations were two times readier to try XR-BUP compared to non-correctional populations. XR-BUP was feasible and safe, with no diversion, overdoses, or deaths; several negative side effects were reported. Compared to other MOUD, XR-BUP significantly reduced drug use, resulted in similar or higher treatment retention rates, fewer re-incarcerations, and was cost-beneficial, with a lower overall monthly/yearly cost. Barriers to XR-BUP, such as side effects and a fear of needles, as well as facilitators, such as a lowered risk of opioid relapse, were also identified. XR-BUP appears to be a feasible and potentially effective alternative treatment option for correctional populations with OUD. XR-BUP may reduce community release-related risks, such as opioid use and overdose risk, as well as barriers to treatment retention. Efforts to expand access to and uptake of XR-BUP among correctional populations are warranted.
PubMed: 38940929
DOI: 10.1080/00952990.2024.2360984 -
The International Journal on Drug Policy Jun 2024Comorbid substance use disorders (SUDs) among people with opioid use disorder (OUD) contribute to poor clinical outcomes, including overdose and mortality. We present... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Comorbid substance use disorders (SUDs) among people with opioid use disorder (OUD) contribute to poor clinical outcomes, including overdose and mortality. We present the first systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of specific non-opioid SUDs among people with OUD.
METHODS
We searched Embase, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE from 1990 to 2022 for studies that used Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) or International Classification of Diseases (ICD) criteria to assess the prevalence of non-opioid SUDs among individuals with OUD. We used random-effects meta-analyses with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) to pool current and lifetime prevalence estimates separately. Meta-regressions and stratified meta-analyses were used to examine differences in prevalence estimates by sample characteristics and methodological factors.
RESULTS
Of the 36,971 publications identified, we included data from 194 studies and 77,212 participants with OUD. The prevalence of any comorbid SUD among people with OUD was 59.5% (95%CI 49.1-69.5%) for current non-opioid SUDs, with 72.0% (95%CI 52.5-87.9%) experiencing a comorbid SUD in their lifetime. Of the studies that examined current comorbid SUDs, cocaine use disorder (30.5%, 95%CI 23.0-38.7%) was most common, followed by alcohol (27.1%, 95%CI 24.4- 30.0%), cannabis (22.7%, 95%CI 19.0-26.6%), sedative (16.1%, 95%CI 13.1-19.3%), and methamphetamine (11.4%, 95%CI 6.8-17.1%) use disorders. Substantial heterogeneity (I>90%) across estimates was observed. Substantial heterogeneity (I2>90%) was observed across estimates, with significant variations in prevalence identified across geographic locations, recruitment settings, and other study-level factors.
CONCLUSION
Findings from this study emphasize the importance of comorbid SUD treatment access for people with OUD. Our estimates can inform the provision of treatment and harm reduction strategies for people with OUD and specific subpopulations.
Topics: Humans; Prevalence; Opioid-Related Disorders; Comorbidity; Substance-Related Disorders
PubMed: 38677160
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104434