-
European Journal of Clinical... Dec 2023Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers remain a major threat worldwide, accounting for over 30% of cancer deaths. The identification of novel prognostic biomarkers remains a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers remain a major threat worldwide, accounting for over 30% of cancer deaths. The identification of novel prognostic biomarkers remains a challenge despite significant advances in the field. The CAV1 gene, encoding the caveolin-1 protein, remains enigmatic in cancer and carcinogenesis, as it has been proposed to act as both a tumour promoter and a tumour suppressor.
METHODS
To analyse the differential role of caveolin-1 expression in both tumour cells and stroma in relation to prognosis in GI tumours, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines; PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022299148.
RESULTS
Our analysis showed that high levels of caveolin-1 in tumour cells were associated with poor prognosis and inferior overall survival (OS) in oesophageal and pancreatic cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but not in gastric and colorectal cancer. Importantly, our study showed that higher stromal caveolin-1 expression was associated with significantly longer OS and disease-free survival in colorectal cancer. Analysis of stromal caveolin-1 expression in the remaining tumours showed a similar trend, although it did not reach statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONS
The data suggest that caveolin-1 expression in the tumour cells of oesophageal, pancreatic cancer and HCC and in the stroma of colorectal cancer may be an important novel predictive biomarker for the clinical management of these diseases in a curative setting. However, the main conclusion of our analysis is that caveolin-1 expression should always be assessed separately in stroma and tumour cells.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Humans; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Caveolin 1; Colorectal Neoplasms; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Esophageal Neoplasms; Survival Rate; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Liver Neoplasms
PubMed: 37497737
DOI: 10.1111/eci.14065 -
Liver International : Official Journal... Jan 2024Obesity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are known risk factors for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. However, GI carcinogenesis in lean NAFLD patients remains... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Obesity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are known risk factors for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. However, GI carcinogenesis in lean NAFLD patients remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the association between lean NAFLD and GI cancer risk.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched (from inception date to April 2023) for cohort studies assessing GI cancers in lean (body mass index [BMI] < 25 kg/m or < 23 kg/m in Asians) and non-lean (BMI ≥25 kg/m or ≥ 23 kg/m in Asians) NAFLD individuals. Data from eligible studies were extracted, and meta-analysis was carried out using a random effects model to obtain risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses, meta-regressions and sensitivity analyses were also performed. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023420902).
RESULTS
Eight studies with 56,745 NAFLD individuals (11% were lean) and 704 cases of incident GI cancers were included. Lean NAFLD was associated with higher risk of hepatic (RR 1.77, 95% CI 1.15-2.73), pancreatic (RR 1.97, 95% CI 1.01-3.86) and colorectal cancers (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.12-2.09), compared to non-lean NAFLD. No significant differences were observed for oesophagus, gastric, biliary and small intestine cancers.
CONCLUSIONS
This study shows that lean NAFLD patients have an increased risk of liver, pancreatic and colorectal cancers compared to non-lean NAFLD patients, emphasizing the need to explore tailored cancer prevention strategies for this specific patient group. Further research is required to explore the mechanisms underlying the association between lean NAFLD and specific GI cancers.
Topics: Humans; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Risk Factors; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms
PubMed: 37833849
DOI: 10.1111/liv.15763 -
Metabolites Jul 2023Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest cancers, with five-year survival rates around 10%. The only curative option remains complete surgical... (Review)
Review
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest cancers, with five-year survival rates around 10%. The only curative option remains complete surgical resection, but due to the delay in diagnosis, less than 20% of patients are eligible for surgery. Therefore, discovering diagnostic biomarkers for early detection is crucial for improving clinical outcomes. Metabolomics has become a powerful technology for biomarker discovery, and several metabolomic-based panels have been proposed for PDAC diagnosis, but these advances have not yet been translated into the clinic. Therefore, this review focused on summarizing metabolites identified for the early diagnosis of PDAC in the last five years. Bibliographic searches were performed in the PubMed, Scopus and WOS databases, using the terms "Biomarkers, Tumor", "Pancreatic Neoplasms", "Early Diagnosis", "Metabolomics" and "Lipidome" (January 2018-March 2023), and resulted in the selection of fourteen original studies that compared PDAC patients with subjects with other pancreatic diseases. These investigations showed amino acid and lipid metabolic pathways as the most commonly altered, reflecting their potential for biomarker research. Furthermore, other relevant metabolites such as glucose and lactate were detected in the pancreas tissue and body fluids from PDAC patients. Our results suggest that the use of metabolomics remains a robust approach to improve the early diagnosis of PDAC. However, these studies showed heterogeneity with respect to the metabolomics techniques used and further studies will be needed to validate the clinical utility of these biomarkers.
PubMed: 37512579
DOI: 10.3390/metabo13070872 -
BMC Cancer Aug 2023Breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutation carriers are at an increased risk for breast, ovarian, prostate and pancreatic cancers. However, the role of BRCA is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutation carriers are at an increased risk for breast, ovarian, prostate and pancreatic cancers. However, the role of BRCA is unclear in colorectal cancer; the results regarding the association between BRCA gene mutations and colorectal cancer risk are inconsistent and even controversial. This study aimed to investigate whether BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations are associated with colorectal cancer risk.
METHODS
In this systematic review, we searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) were used to estimate the probability of Breast Cancer Type 1 Susceptibility gene (BRCA1) and Breast Cancer Type 2 Susceptibility gene (BRCA2) mutations in colorectal cancer patients. The associations were evaluated using fixed effect models.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies were included in the systematic review. Twelve studies, including seven case-control and five cohort studies, were included in the meta-analysis. A significant increase in the frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations was observed in patients with colorectal cancer [OR = 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.02-1.76, P = 0.04]. In subgroup analysis, colorectal cancer patients had an increased odds of BRCA1 (OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.10-2.01, P = 0.01) and BRCA2 (OR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.06-2.30, P = 0.02) mutations.
CONCLUSIONS
BRCA genes are one of the genes that may increase the risk of developing colorectal cancer. Thus, BRCA genes could be potential candidates that may be included in the colorectal cancer genetic testing panel.
Topics: Male; Humans; Genes, Tumor Suppressor; Genetic Testing; Mutation; Colorectal Neoplasms; Breast Neoplasms
PubMed: 37644384
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11328-w -
International Journal of Surgery... Dec 2023Diagnosing pancreatic lesions, including chronic pancreatitis, autoimmune pancreatitis, and pancreatic cancer, poses a challenge and, as a result, is time-consuming. To... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Diagnosing pancreatic lesions, including chronic pancreatitis, autoimmune pancreatitis, and pancreatic cancer, poses a challenge and, as a result, is time-consuming. To tackle this issue, artificial intelligence (AI) has been increasingly utilized over the years. AI can analyze large data sets with heightened accuracy, reduce interobserver variability, and can standardize the interpretation of radiologic and histopathologic lesions. Therefore, this study aims to review the use of AI in the detection and differentiation of pancreatic space-occupying lesions and to compare AI-assisted endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with conventional EUS in terms of their detection capabilities.
METHODS
Literature searches were conducted through PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, and Embase to identify studies eligible for inclusion. Original articles, including observational studies, randomized control trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and case series specifically focused on AI-assisted EUS in adults, were included. Data were extracted and pooled, and a meta-analysis was conducted using Meta-xl. For results exhibiting significant heterogeneity, a random-effects model was employed; otherwise, a fixed-effects model was utilized.
RESULTS
A total of 21 studies were included in the review with four studies pooled for a meta-analysis. A pooled accuracy of 93.6% (CI 90.4-96.8%) was found using the random-effects model on four studies that showed significant heterogeneity ( P <0.05) in the Cochrane's Q test. Further, a pooled sensitivity of 93.9% (CI 92.4-95.3%) was found using a fixed-effects model on seven studies that showed no significant heterogeneity in the Cochrane's Q test. When it came to pooled specificity, a fixed-effects model was utilized in six studies that showed no significant heterogeneity in the Cochrane's Q test and determined as 93.1% (CI 90.7-95.4%). The pooled positive predictive value which was done using the random-effects model on six studies that showed significant heterogeneity was 91.6% (CI 87.3-95.8%). The pooled negative predictive value which was done using the random-effects model on six studies that showed significant heterogeneity was 93.6% (CI 90.4-96.8%).
CONCLUSION
AI-assisted EUS shows a high degree of accuracy in the detection and differentiation of pancreatic space-occupying lesions over conventional EUS. Its application may promote prompt and accurate diagnosis of pancreatic pathologies.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Artificial Intelligence; Sensitivity and Specificity; Pancreas; Endosonography; Pancreatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 37800594
DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000717 -
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced... Aug 2023Gastric cancer has the third highest cancer-related mortality worldwide. There is no consensus regarding the optimal surgical technique to perform curative resection... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Gastric cancer has the third highest cancer-related mortality worldwide. There is no consensus regarding the optimal surgical technique to perform curative resection surgery. Compare laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and robotic gastrectomy (RG) regarding short-term outcomes in patients with gastric cancer. This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched the following topics: "Gastrectomy," "Laparoscopic," and "Robotic Surgical Procedures." The included studies compared short-term outcomes between LG and RG. Individual risk of bias was assessed with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) scale. There was no significant difference between RG and LG regarding conversion rate, reoperation rate, mortality, overall complications, anastomotic leakage, distal and proximal resection margin distances, and recurrence rate. However, mean blood loss (mean difference [MD] -19.43 mL, < .00001), length of hospital stay (MD -0.50 days, = .0007), time to first flatus (MD -0.52 days, < .00001), time to oral intake (MD -0.17 days, = .0001), surgical complications with a Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III (risk ratio [RR] 0.68, < .0001), and pancreatic complications (RR 0.51, = .007) were significantly lower in the RG group. Furthermore, the number of retrieved lymph nodes was significantly higher in the RG group. Nevertheless, the RG group showed a significantly higher operation time (MD 41.19 minutes, < .00001) and cost (MD 3684.27 U.S. Dollars, < .00001). This meta-analysis supports the choice of robotic surgery over laparoscopy concerning relevant surgical complications. However, longer operation time and higher cost remain crucial limitations. Randomized clinical trials are required to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of RG.
Topics: Humans; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Stomach Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Postoperative Complications; Laparoscopy; Gastrectomy; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37204324
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2023.0136 -
ANZ Journal of Surgery Dec 2023To compare the clinical outcomes and prognosis of total pancreatectomy (TP) and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Comparison of clinical outcomes and prognosis between total pancreatectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
To compare the clinical outcomes and prognosis of total pancreatectomy (TP) and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and to explore the safety and indications of TP.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases from January 1943 to March 2023 for literatures comparing TP and PD in the treatment of PDAC. The primary outcome was postoperative overall survival (OS), and secondary outcomes included surgery time, blood loss, readmission, hospital stay, perioperative mortality, and overall morbidity. Fixed-effect or random-effect models were selected based on heterogeneity, and odds ratio (OR), mean difference (MD), or hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.
RESULTS
A total of six studies involving 8396 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in OS after surgery between the two groups (HR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.91-1.27; P = 0.38). The TP group had a longer surgery time (MD = 13.66, 95% CI: 4.57-22.75; P = 0.003) and more blood loss (MD = 133.17, 95% CI: 8.00-258.33; P = 0.04) than the PD group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of hospital stay (MD = 0.09, 95% CI: -2.04 to 2.22; P = 0.93), readmission rate (OR = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.00-1.92; P = 0.05), perioperative mortality (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 0.98-1.69; P = 0.07), and overall morbidity (OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.50-1.26; P = 0.33).
CONCLUSION
The surgical process of TP is relatively complex, but there is no difference in short-term clinical outcomes and OS compared to PD, making it a safe and reliable procedure. Indications and treatment outcomes for planned TP and salvage TP may differ, and more research is needed in the future for further classification and verification.
Topics: Humans; Pancreatectomy; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Prognosis
PubMed: 37614050
DOI: 10.1111/ans.18653 -
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and... Dec 2023Sarcopenia has been considered an adverse prognostic factor in cancer patients. Intramuscular adipose tissue content, as a new marker of sarcopenia, can effectively... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Sarcopenia has been considered an adverse prognostic factor in cancer patients. Intramuscular adipose tissue content, as a new marker of sarcopenia, can effectively reflect skeletal muscle quality. The aim of this study was performed to evaluate the association between high intramuscular adipose tissue content (IMAC) and survival outcomes and postoperative complications in cancer patients. Specific databases, including the Web of Science, Embase and Web of Science, were systematically searched to identify relevant articles evaluating the prognostic value of IMAC in cancer patients. Hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were utilized for comprehensive analysis. All data analyses were performed using STATA 12.0 software. A total of 25 studies from 24 articles including 5663 patients were enrolled in the study. Meta-analysis showed that high IMAC was associated with unfavourable overall survival (OS) (HR: 2.21, 95% CI: 1.70-2.86, P < 0.001), relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.30-1.75, P < 0.001) and disease-specific survival (DSS) (HR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.19-2.28, P = 0.003). Subgroup analysis revealed that high IMAC remained an adverse prognostic factor when stratified by different country, treatment methods, cancer type or analysis type. High IMAC had better predictive value for gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) (HR: 3.50, 95% CI: 1.98-6.17, P < 0.001), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (HR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.45-2.33, P < 0.001), pancreatic cancer (PC) (HR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.67-2.66, P < 0.001) and colorectal cancer (CRC) (HR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.27-5.10, P = 0.009). High IMAC was also identified as a significant risk factor for postoperative complications (OR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.22-3.46, P = 0.007). High IMAC was associated with an adverse prognosis and an increased risk of postoperative complications in cancer patients. IMAC may be a good indicator of sarcopenia.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Sarcopenia; Liver Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Prognosis; Adipose Tissue; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 37990969
DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.13371 -
Surgical Oncology Dec 2023Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a challenging disease, with surgery being the only possible cure. However, despite surgery, the majority of patients... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Prognostic utility of preoperative and postoperative KRAS-mutated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a challenging disease, with surgery being the only possible cure. However, despite surgery, the majority of patients experience recurrence. Recent evidence suggests that perioperative KRAS-mutated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may have prognostic value. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the prognostic significance of preoperative and postoperative KRAS-mutated ctDNA testing in resected PDAC.
METHODS
We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for studies that reported the effect of preoperative and postoperative KRAS-mutated ctDNA on overall survival (OS) and/or relapse-free survival (RFS) in resected PDAC. We used a random-effects model to determine the pooled OS and RFS hazard ratios (HR) and their corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI).
RESULTS
We identified 15 studies (868 patients) eligible for analysis. In the preoperative setting, positive ctDNA correlated with worse RFS in 8 studies (HR, 2.067; 95 % CI, 1.346-3.174, P < 0.001) and worse OS in 10 studies (HR, 2.170; 95 % CI, 1.451-3.245, P < 0.001) compared to negative ctDNA. In the postoperative setting, positive ctDNA correlated with worse RFS across 9 studies (HR, 3.32; 95 % CI, 2.19-5.03, P < 0.001) and worse OS in 6 studies (HR, 6.62; 95 % CI, 2.18-20.16, P < 0.001) compared to negative ctDNA.
CONCLUSION
Our meta-analysis supports the utility of preoperative and postoperative KRAS-mutated ctDNA testing as a prognostic marker for resected PDAC. Further controlled studies are warranted to confirm these results and to investigate the potential therapeutic implications of positive KRAS-mutated ctDNA.
Topics: Humans; Prognosis; Circulating Tumor DNA; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Mutation; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Biomarkers, Tumor
PubMed: 37852124
DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2023.102007 -
Cancer Medicine Aug 2023Liver transplantation has made significant progress in recent decades. Lung cancer is one of the most frequently occurring cancers after liver transplantation. However,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Liver transplantation has made significant progress in recent decades. Lung cancer is one of the most frequently occurring cancers after liver transplantation. However, the risk of lung cancer among liver transplant patients compared with the general population is unclear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the risk of developing lung cancer after liver transplantation.
METHODS
All eligible studies published in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase from database inception to April 2022 were included. Standardized incidence ratio was used to describe the increased risk of lung cancer in liver transplant recipients as compared with the general population. The random-effects model was used for the calculations. A funnel plot and Egger test were performed to assess the potential publication bias.
RESULTS
Our meta-analysis included 15 studies, which involved 76,897 liver transplantation patients. Studies included in this review showed significant heterogeneity (I = 65.3%; p < 0.001), which required a random-effects model for effect pooling. The results indicated a significant higher risk of developing lung cancer in liver transplant patients than the general population with a pooled SIR of 2.06 (95% CI: 1.73, 2.46, p < 0.001). When stratified by region, no significant regional difference was observed. It showed a similarly doubled risk of lung cancer in Europe and North America, but an insignificantly increased risk in Asian populations. The sensitivity analysis by removal and substitution of each literature did not change the results.
CONCLUSION
Our meta-analysis suggests that liver transplant patients are twice as likely as the general population to develop lung cancer. Further research on risk factors for the development of lung cancer after liver transplantation should be conducted and appropriate surveillance protocols should be developed to reduce the risk of its occurrence.
Topics: Humans; Liver Transplantation; Incidence; Risk Factors; Lung Neoplasms; North America
PubMed: 37351559
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6265