-
Journal of Endourology Mar 2024Assessing whether Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) levels affect perioperative outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN). This systematic review and meta-analysis were... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Assessing whether Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) levels affect perioperative outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN). This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. A systematic search of the literature published before February 1, 2023 was conducted using Pubmed, Embase, Cochran, and Web of Science libraries. We included all articles evaluating adherent perirenal fat by MAP during PN. A total of 1807 patients from 7 studies meeting the criteria were included. In the high MAP group, the operation time was longer, and the estimated blood loss and postoperative complications were increased. There was no significant difference in positive surgical margin, warm ischemia time, and hospitalization time. As a simple and easy scoring method, MAP can predict the perioperative outcome of PN patients, especially when ≥3 is the boundary. However, more cohort studies are still needed to determine the optimal cutoff point of MAP.
Topics: Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nephrectomy; Kidney; Warm Ischemia; Probability; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 38185844
DOI: 10.1089/end.2023.0419 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2023The primary aim of this present study is to undertake a comprehensive comparative analysis of the perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes associated with...
Perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus open partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
The primary aim of this present study is to undertake a comprehensive comparative analysis of the perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes associated with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) as interventions for the treatment of complex renal tumors, defined as PADUA or RENAL score ≥ 7.
METHODS
We systematically carried out an extensive search across four electronic databases, namely PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science. Our objective was to identify pertinent studies published in the English language up to December 2023, and encompassed controlled trials comparing LPN and OPN as interventions for complex renal tumors.
RESULTS
This study encompassed a total of seven comparative trials, involving 934 patients. LPN exhibited a noteworthy reduction in the length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference [WMD] -2.06 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.62, -1.50; p < 0.00001), blood loss (WMD -34.05mL, 95% CI -55.61, -12.48; p = 0.002), and overall complications (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19, 0.79; p = 0.009). However, noteworthy distinctions did not arise between LPN and OPN concerning parameters such as warm ischemia time, renal function, and oncological outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
This study reveals that LPN presents several advantages over OPN. These benefits encompass a shortened hospital stay, diminished blood loss, and a reduced incidence of complications. Importantly, LPN achieves these benefits while concurrently upholding comparable renal function and oncological outcomes.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=457716, identifier CRD42023453816.
PubMed: 38273858
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1283935 -
Journal of Robotic Surgery Apr 2024The study aims to assess the available literature and compare the perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for posterior-lateral renal... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
Comparison of the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal versus retraperitoneal partial nephrectomy for posterior-lateral renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
The study aims to assess the available literature and compare the perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for posterior-lateral renal tumors using transperitoneal (TP) and retroperitoneal (RP) approaches. Systematically searched the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases for literature. Eligible studies were those that compared TP-RAPN and RP-RAPN for posterior-lateral renal tumors. The data from the included studies were analyzed and summarized using Review Manager 5.3, which involved comparing baseline patient and tumor characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, and oncological outcomes. The analysis included five studies meeting the inclusion criteria, with a total of 1440 patients (814 undergoing RP-RAPN and 626 undergoing TP-RAPN). Both groups showed no significant differences in age, gender, BMI, R.E.N.A.L. score, and tumor size. Notably, compared to TP-RAPN, the RP-RAPN group demonstrated shorter operative time (OT) (MD: 17.25, P = 0.01), length of hospital stay (LOS) (MD: 0.37, P < 0.01), and lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (MD: 15.29, P < 0.01). However, no significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of warm ischemia time (WIT) (MD: -0.34, P = 0.69), overall complications (RR: 1.25, P = 0.09), major complications (the Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ 3) (RR: 0.97, P = 0.93), and positive surgical margin (PSM) (RR: 1.06, P = 0.87). The systematic review and meta-analysis suggests RP-RAPN may be more advantageous for posterior-lateral renal tumors in terms of OT, EBL, and LOS, but no significant differences were found in WIT, overall complications, major complications, and PSM. Both surgical approaches are safe, but a definitive advantage remains uncertain.
Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Blood Loss, Surgical; Kidney Neoplasms; Laparoscopy; Length of Stay; Nephrectomy; Operative Time; Peritoneum; Postoperative Complications; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38683492
DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01963-1 -
Journal of Robotic Surgery Apr 2024The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in obese and non-obese patients. Through... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in obese and non-obese patients. Through March 2024, we executed an exhaustive search in internationally acclaimed databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, limiting our scope to publications in English. We discarded review articles, protocols lacking empirical data, conference abstracts, and materials not pertinent to our research. Our analytical framework utilized the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method alongside a random-effects model for evaluating dichotomous variables' mean differences, expressed through odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We established statistical significance at a P value below 0.05. The comprehensive meta-analysis incorporated data from eight cohort studies, collectively assessing 3657 patients. Findings indicated that, relative to individuals of normal weight, those in the obese category had prolonged operative durations (WMD - 25.68 95% CI - 42.07 to - 9.29; P = 0.002), increased estimated blood loss (WMD - 48.55ml, 95% CI - 78.27 to - 18.83; P = 0.001), and longer warm ischemia times (WMD - 1.11, 95% CI - 2.03 to - 0.19; P = 0.02). However, no significant disparities were observed in hospital stay duration, intraoperative and total postoperative complications, severe postoperative complications, or alterations in postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Our findings conclude that robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) represents a viable and safe surgical approach for obese patients. This assertion is backed by the observation that crucial metrics, including postoperative renal function alterations, surgical complication rates, and hospitalization duration, exhibit no substantial variances when juxtaposed with counterparts of normal weight.
Topics: Humans; Body Mass Index; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Laparoscopy; Nephrectomy; Obesity; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 38598096
DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01926-6 -
International Journal of Surgery... Feb 2024This study employs a meta-analytic approach to investigate the impact of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy, with and without near-infrared fluorescence imaging... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparison of perioperative outcomes of selective arterial clipping guided by near-infrared fluorescence imaging using indocyanine green versus undergoing standard robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
This study employs a meta-analytic approach to investigate the impact of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy, with and without near-infrared fluorescence imaging (NIRF-RAPN vs S-RAPN), on patients' perioperative outcomes and postoperative changes in renal function.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The authors conducted a comprehensive and rigorous systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis of primary outcomes following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) Guidelines, and Risk-of-Bias Tool (RoB2). To ensure a thorough search, the authors systematically searched five major databases, including Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science, from databases' inception to April 2023.
RESULTS
No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of age ( P =0.19), right side ( P =0.54), BMI ( P =0.39), complexity score ( P =0.89), tumor size ( P =0.88), operating time ( P =0.39), estimated blood loss ( P =0.47), length of stay ( P =0.87), complications ( P =0.20), transfusion ( P =0.36), and positive margins ( P =0.38). However, it is noteworthy that the NIRF-RAPN group exhibited significant reductions in warm ischemia time ( P =0.001), the percentage change in estimated glomerular filtration rate at discharge ( P =0.01) compared to the S-RAPN group.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis provides evidence that the group undergoing NIRF-RAPN showed a statistically significant protective effect on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).
Topics: Humans; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Kidney Neoplasms; Indocyanine Green; Treatment Outcome; Nephrectomy; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 38000056
DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000924 -
International Urology and Nephrology Jun 2024Diabetes mellitus (DM), one of the most common comorbidities in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), was proven to be an important prognostic factor of overall... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE
Diabetes mellitus (DM), one of the most common comorbidities in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), was proven to be an important prognostic factor of overall survival for these patients. Regarding the influence on renal function after nephrectomy, evidence is still scant. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to provide a more reliable analysis of the association between DM and long-term renal functional outcomes after nephrectomy.
METHODS
The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases were searched for eligible studies from inception to January 2023. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted to evaluate the association between DM and renal functional outcomes using a random effects model. Stata 17.0 software was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS
The meta-analysis included thirteen studies consisting of 8562 RCC patients who underwent nephrectomy. Preoperative comorbidity of DM was significantly associated with poor renal functional outcomes (HR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.48-2.48, p < 0.0001), regardless of ethnicity, follow-up time, body mass index (BMI) and age. However, in the radical nephrectomy subgroup, DM was not significantly associated with renal function decline (HR = 1.91, 95% CI 0.93-3.90, p = 0.0781).
CONCLUSIONS
The aggregate evidence indicated that preexisting DM may be associated with poor renal functional outcomes in patients with RCC after nephrectomy, especially in patients receiving partial nephrectomy. Urologists should focus more on the glycemic management of these patients after nephrectomy. More high-quality studies are needed to explore the influence of DM on renal function outcomes in postoperative patients.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Nephrectomy; Kidney Neoplasms; Diabetes Mellitus; Treatment Outcome; Kidney
PubMed: 38300449
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03885-7 -
Cancers Apr 2024The Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score is a radiographic scoring system that predicts the presence of adherent perinephric fat (APF) during partial nephrectomies... (Review)
Review
The Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score is a radiographic scoring system that predicts the presence of adherent perinephric fat (APF) during partial nephrectomies (PNs). The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize the current literature on the application of the MAP score for predicting intraoperative difficulties related to APF and complications in laparoscopic PNs. Three databases, PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane, were screened, from inception to 29 October 2023, taking into consideration the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines. All the inclusion criteria were met by eight studies. The total operative time was around two hours in most studies, while the warm ischemia time was <30 min in all studies and <20 min in four studies. Positive surgical margins, conversion and transfusion rates ranged from 0% to 6.3%, from 0% to 5.0% and from 0.7% to 7.5%, respectively. Finally, the majority of the complications were classified as Grade I-II, according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification System. The MAP score is a useful tool for predicting not only the presence of APF during laparoscopic PNs but also various intraoperative and postoperative characteristics. It was found to be significantly associated with an increased operative time, estimated blood loss and intraoperative and postoperative complication rates.
PubMed: 38672537
DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081455 -
Frontiers in Pediatrics 2024Preoperative three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction using sectional imaging is increasingly used in challenging pediatric cases to aid in surgical planning. Many case... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Preoperative three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction using sectional imaging is increasingly used in challenging pediatric cases to aid in surgical planning. Many case series have described various teams' experiences, discussing feasibility and realism, while emphasizing the technological potential for children. Nonetheless, general knowledge on this topic remains limited compared to the broader research landscape. The aim of this review was to explore the current devices and new opportunities provided by preoperative Computed Tomography (CT) scans or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted to screen pediatric cases of abdominal and pelvic tumors with preoperative 3D reconstruction published between 2000 and 2023.
DISCUSSION
Surgical planning was facilitated through virtual reconstruction or 3D printing. Virtual reconstruction of complex tumors enables precise delineation of solid masses, formulation of dissection plans, and suggests dedicated vessel ligation, optimizing tissue preservation. Vascular mapping is particularly relevant for liver surgery, large neuroblastoma with imaging-defined risk factors (IDRFs), and tumors encasing major vessels, such as complex median retroperitoneal malignant masses. 3D printing can facilitate specific tissue preservation, now accessible with minimally invasive procedures like partial nephrectomy. The latest advancements enable neural plexus reconstruction to guide surgical nerve sparing, for example, hypogastric nerve modelling, typically adjacent to large pelvic tumors. New insights will soon incorporate nerve plexus images into anatomical segmentation reconstructions, facilitated by non-irradiating imaging modalities like MRI.
CONCLUSION
Although not yet published in pediatric surgical procedures, the next anticipated advancement is augmented reality, enhancing real-time intraoperative guidance: the surgeon will use a robotic console overlaying functional and anatomical data onto a magnified surgical field, enhancing robotic precision in confined spaces.
PubMed: 38863523
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1386280 -
Asian Journal of Surgery Apr 2024
Meta-Analysis
Topics: Humans; Robotics; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery; Kidney Neoplasms; Nephrectomy; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies; Laparoscopy
PubMed: 38185554
DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.12.142 -
Asian Journal of Surgery Mar 2024
Meta-Analysis
Topics: Humans; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery; Laparoscopy; Kidney Neoplasms; Nephrectomy; Length of Stay
PubMed: 38135539
DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.12.052