-
Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and... Jun 2024Endometriosis is a prevalent condition in women that causes pelvic pain and fertility issues due to the growth of endometrial tissue outside the uterus during menstrual...
Endometriosis is a prevalent condition in women that causes pelvic pain and fertility issues due to the growth of endometrial tissue outside the uterus during menstrual cycles. Steroid hormones play a crucial role in the development and growth of endometriosis lesions; therefore, researchers have investigated several effective drugs that target hormones for treating this disease. One such drug is bazedoxifene, but despite several animal studies, there has yet to be a comprehensive evaluation of their combined results. A systematic search was conducted across several databases (Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Sciences) to identify studies investigating the effectiveness of bazedoxifene in animal models of endometriosis. Meta-analysis was performed using the size of endometriosis implants before and after drug administration in the case and control groups, along with the p-value of the associations. Begg's and Egger's tests were used to assess publication bias. This study included four eligible studies consisting of 45 endometrial animal models and 35 control subjects. The meta-analysis showed that bazedoxifene significantly reduced the size of endometriosis implants in animal models compared with the control group (odds ratio: 0.122, 95% confidence interval: 0.050-0.298, p<0.001). Detailed investigation determined that there was no significant heterogeneity between the studies (I2=38.81, and p-value of the Q test=0.179). However, according to Egger's test, the study showed publication bias (p=0.035). This study found that bazedoxifene is a promising treatment option for endometriosis in animal models. However, more research on animals and humans is required to confirm these results.
PubMed: 38853494
DOI: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2024.82610 -
Medical Science Monitor : International... Apr 2024Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare but potentially dangerous condition that occurs when an embryo implants and develops within the scar tissue from a previous...
Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare but potentially dangerous condition that occurs when an embryo implants and develops within the scar tissue from a previous cesarean section. Treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy depends on several factors, including the gestational age of the pregnancy, the presence of complications, and the individual patient's circumstances. We performed a systematic review of the published literature on management of cesarean scar pregnancy and the outcomes, complications, and effects on fertility. A systematic review of recent scientific literature published up to April 2023 in the databases PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. We used the search keywords "cesarean scar pregnancy," "methotrexate," "systemic," "chemoembolization," and "uterine artery embolization." The baseline search resulted in 413 articles. After the exclusion of 342 irrelevant articles, the abstracts and titles of the remaining 71 articles were read for potential inclusion, resulting in exclusion of a further 16 articles. Therefore, the full texts of 55 articles were investigated. Finally, 42 papers were included in the study. The main finding was that chemoembolization is more successful than systemic methotrexate therapy, and is associated with less blood loss and shorter hospital stay. Transarterial chemoembolization appears to be safe and effective method of treatment in patients with CSP and should thus be considered during multidisciplinary evaluation of these patients.
Topics: Pregnancy; Humans; Female; Methotrexate; Cicatrix; Fertility Preservation; Cesarean Section; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoembolization, Therapeutic; Liver Neoplasms; Pregnancy, Ectopic; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38566372
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.943550 -
Otology & Neurotology : Official... Jul 2024To compare the rate of device failure for those cochlear implants (CIs) involved in the 2020 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) voluntary field corrective action (VFCA). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To compare the rate of device failure for those cochlear implants (CIs) involved in the 2020 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) voluntary field corrective action (VFCA).
DATABASES REVIEWED
Medline, Embase, and Scopus.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Publications reporting institutional experiences with implants affected by the VFCA were included. Outcomes assessed included etiology of, rate of, and time to failure and pre-/post-device failure speech perception testing. All outcomes reported in at least two independent studies were included in a meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Six studies met criteria for analysis. The overall pooled failure rate was 23.7% (95% CI, 11.6-38.4%). The pooled device, inconclusive, and medical failure rates were 21.5%, 0.2%, and 0.7%, respectively. Pediatric failure rates were higher than those of adults (46.9% [95% CI, 11.2-84.5%] versus 32.6% [95% CI, 8.2-63.7%]). WRS declined with primary implant failure (55.1% [95% CI, 48.0-62.1%] to 34.1% [95% CI, 30.2-38.0%]) but improved after reimplantation (34.1% [95% CI, 30.2-38.0%] to 50.1% [95% CI, 45.2-55.1%]).
CONCLUSIONS
The rate of pooled reported failure for CIs falling under the 2020 VFCA in the literature thus far is 23.7%. The overwhelming majority of these failures were device related, the rates of which were higher in children. Speech perception improved significantly after reimplantation.
Topics: Humans; Cochlear Implants; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Prosthesis Failure; Cochlear Implantation; Speech Perception
PubMed: 38865719
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004224 -
Graefe's Archive For Clinical and... Apr 2024The effectiveness of mitomycin C (MMC) in trabeculectomy has long been established. The aim of this review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive agents in...
PURPOSE
The effectiveness of mitomycin C (MMC) in trabeculectomy has long been established. The aim of this review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive agents in tube shunt drainage device surgery for glaucoma or ocular hypertension, since controversy still exists regarding their benefit.
METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and BASE for RCTs, which have used adjuvant antimetabolites-either MMC or 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)-and/or anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF) agents. The main outcome was IOP reduction at 12 months.
RESULTS
Ten studies met our inclusion criteria. Nine used the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve (AGV) implant, while the double-plate Molteno implant was used in one study. Four studies used MMC. The remaining six studies used an anti-VEGF drug - either bevacizumab, ranibizumab or conbercept. Only one MMC-study reported a significant difference in the IOP reduction between groups at 12 months, favouring the MMC group (55% and 51%; p < 0.01). A significant difference was also reported by two out of five bevacizumab-studies, both favouring the bevacizumab group (55% and 51%, p < 0.05; 58% and 27%, p < 0.05), with the highest benefit seen in neovascular glaucoma cases, especially when panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) was also used. Neither ranibizumab nor conbercept were found to produce significant differences between groups regarding IOP reduction.
CONCLUSION
There is no high-quality evidence to support the use of MMC in tube shunt surgery. As for anti-VEGF agents, specifically bevacizumab, significant benefit seems to exist in neovascular glaucoma patients, especially if combined with PRP.
PubMed: 38656422
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-024-06476-z -
JPMA. the Journal of the Pakistan... Jan 2024Proton pump inhibitors are one of the most frequently prescribed medicines primarily for reducing the production of gastric acid. Every medicine has some adverse effects...
Proton pump inhibitors are one of the most frequently prescribed medicines primarily for reducing the production of gastric acid. Every medicine has some adverse effects associated with it, including effects on the bone tissues. Dental implant is one of the most preferred options for teeth replacement. The current literature review was planned to evaluate the association between intake of proton pump inhibitors and its impact on the bone around the dental implant. Literature review entailed search on Google Scholar, Web of Science and PubMed databases using a range of search terms. Chronic intake of proton pump inhibitors has been associated with decrease in the density of bone, which eventually leads to increased risk of dental implant failure. However, since limited studies have been carried out, further research is required, especially clinical trials, to evaluate the relationship between the intake of proton pump inhibitors and the failure of dental implants.
Topics: Humans; Bone and Bones; Databases, Factual; Dental Implantation, Endosseous; Dental Implants; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Proton Pump Inhibitors
PubMed: 38219175
DOI: 10.47391/JPMA.9537