-
Journal of Dentistry Jun 2024To investigate the effectiveness of different adjunctive local treatments combined with non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT) to reduce pocket depth (PD), gain... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To investigate the effectiveness of different adjunctive local treatments combined with non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT) to reduce pocket depth (PD), gain clinical attachment level (CAL), and/or reduce glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in individuals with both type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and periodontitis in a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
Publications were searched in Cochrane databases, EMBASE, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, PubMed, opengrey.eu, and www.
CLINICALTRIALS
gov up to May 29, 2024 with no language restriction.
STUDY SELECTION
Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Network meta-analysis utilized frequentist models.
DATA
The network meta-analysis of 30 RCTs involving 1224 patients revealed that, in short-term (2-3 months) and medium-term (4-6 months), adjunctive local treatment involving statins or metformin significantly outperformed scaling and root planning (SRP) with/without additional interventions such as photodynamic and laser therapies (PDT/LT), phytotherapy, doxycycline, bisphosphonates, antibiotics, antiseptics, or placebo for reducing PD and/or gaining CAL. In the long-term (>6 months), statins yielded the most significant additional PD reduction and CAL gain, followed by antibiotics, compared to SRP with antiseptics or placebo. Only PDT/LT demonstrated significantly greater HbA1c reduction in the short term compared to SRP with/without statins, antiseptics, or placebo.
CONCLUSION
This study moderately supports that adding metformin or statins locally to NSPT may enhance PD reduction and CAL gain compared to SRP with/without placebo.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Clinicians are guided to optimize adjunctive therapies, enhancing the health of patients with type 2 diabetes and periodontitis. A strategic approach is proposed to tackle systemic and oral health challenges simultaneously.
PubMed: 38936456
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105212 -
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Oct 2023When treating intrabony defects to regenerate periodontal structure, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) alone or in conjunction with various grafting materials, enamel matrix...
When treating intrabony defects to regenerate periodontal structure, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) alone or in conjunction with various grafting materials, enamel matrix proteins, and barrier membranes have shown promising results. This evidence-based review aimed to systematically appraise the efficacy of xenograft in combination with PRP in the surgical treatment of periodontal intrabony defects in comparison to xenograft alone in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes in adults with periodontitis. Electronic and manual data were searched exhaustively by 2 reviewers, including PubMed-Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase and Scopus from the earliest available date till January 31, 2023 without restriction on language. Randomized controlled clinical trials of either parallel or a split-mouth design and studies where xenograft and PRP were in the intervention group or as a comparator was included. After screening the articles, 3 studies were included. The current systematic review reveals that PRP used as an adjunct with a xenograft resulted in a significant reduction in pocket depth and greater clinical attachment level gain in comparison to xenograft alone. The analysis of the present review concludes that PRP in conjunction with xenograft for the treatment of intrabony defects shows promising outcomes. However, owing to the short follow-up time and heterogeneity of included studies, caution should be followed while using this material clinically.
PubMed: 37602471
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009612 -
European Review For Medical and... Mar 2024This systematic review examines the effectiveness of Lactobacillus reuteri as an adjunct to scaling and root planing in the treatment of chronic periodontitis.
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review examines the effectiveness of Lactobacillus reuteri as an adjunct to scaling and root planing in the treatment of chronic periodontitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria in October 2022. Randomized control trials that evaluated the effects of Lactobacillus reuteri in patients with periodontitis were included. The primary outcome was pocket depth and clinical attachment levels, while the secondary outcome considered was bleeding on probing, microbial levels, and gingival index score. Study quality was assessed based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the ROB2 tool.
RESULTS
A total of eleven studies that examined 369 subjects were included in the review. Adults in the age group of 18-70 years of age suffering from chronic periodontitis were evaluated. Eight out of the eleven studies reported statistically significant improvement in the intergroup pocket depths, whereas seven studies showed a statistically significant reduction in the clinical attachment levels in the probiotic group. Three studies showed no significant improvement in the pocket depth levels in the probiotic group as compared to the controls. Four studies showed no significant reduction in clinical attachment levels between the two groups. The overall risk of bias was high in four studies, while seven studies reported some concerns about the risk of bias.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the limited evidence available, the adjunctive use of Lactobacillus reuteri to scaling and root planing may provide some additional benefit in improving periodontal parameters.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Humans; Middle Aged; Young Adult; Chronic Periodontitis; Databases, Factual; Limosilactobacillus reuteri; Probiotics
PubMed: 38497853
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202403_35584 -
Brazilian Oral Research 2024This review aimed to determine the prevalence of species of yellow, purple and green microbial complexes in root canals (RC) and periodontal pockets (PP) of teeth with...
This review aimed to determine the prevalence of species of yellow, purple and green microbial complexes in root canals (RC) and periodontal pockets (PP) of teeth with endodontic-periodontal lesions. For this purpose, two reviewers searched the literature up to January 2022. Studies reporting the prevalence of species of the yellow, purple and green microbial complexes in teeth diagnosed with endodontic-periodontal lesions were included. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the 14 criteria from the NIH Quality Assessment Tool. Of 1,611 references identified in the initial search, only four studies were eligible and included in the qualitative analysis. The profile and prevalence rates of bacterial species in RC and PP varied among the included studies: levels of Agregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (12% RC, 58% PP), Capnocytophaga granulosa (10% RC, 35% PP), Capnocytophaga sputigena (15-70% RC, 0-30% PP), Streptococcus mitis (30% RC, 35% PP), Streptococcus sanguinis (30% RC, 35% PP), and Veillonella parvula (70% RC, 50% PP) were identified. The high methodological heterogeneity prevented grouping and quantitative analysis of data. The risk of bias was considered 'moderate' for all studies. The included studies identified the presence of seven bacterial species belonging to the yellow, purple, and green microbial complexes in RC and PP, but with different prevalence rates. Future clinical studies are encouraged to investigate the presence and role of these species in the occurrence and development of endodontic-periodontal lesions.
Topics: Humans; Dental Pulp Cavity; Prevalence; Periodontal Pocket
PubMed: 38922208
DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0048 -
International Orthodontics Mar 2024The main objective of this review was to evaluate the effects of orthodontic intrusion on patients with reduced periodontium. Additionally, this review aims to explore...
OBJECTIVE
The main objective of this review was to evaluate the effects of orthodontic intrusion on patients with reduced periodontium. Additionally, this review aims to explore the potential for attachment gain and tissue regeneration in these patients and identify optimal therapeutic conditions to mitigate any negative effects of intrusion.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 statement. Duplicate electronic searches of the PubMed, Cochrane, EMC Premium, and Science Direct databases were performed by two independent reviewers. Data extraction and quality assessments, including risk of bias evaluation using the Cochrane and ROBINS-I tools were conducted.
RESULTS
From an initial pool of 418 articles, 29 were selected after title and abstract screening for full-text review. Following thorough full-text reading, 15 studies were ultimately included in the analysis. The total number of patients included in the studies is 528, who underwent orthodontic intrusion on reduced periodontium. Studies indicated a decrease in periodontal pocket depth and an increase in clinical attachment with ortho-periodontal treatment. Alveolar bone level outcomes varied, showing both increases and losses. Authors generally observed improved papillary regeneration and reduced gingival recessions.
CONCLUSION
Clinical studies involving combined ortho-periodontal treatment showed that orthodontic intrusion on a reduced but healthy periodontium can be considered a beneficial treatment for the periodontium, provided that potential adverse effects are carefully monitored.
Topics: Humans; Periodontium; Periodontal Ligament; Periodontal Pocket; Gingival Recession
PubMed: 38215683
DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100841