-
International Journal of Surgery... Dec 2023Critical limb-threatening ischaemia is a life-threatening disease which often combines with infrapopliteal arterial disease. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Critical limb-threatening ischaemia is a life-threatening disease which often combines with infrapopliteal arterial disease. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is recommended as the first-line treatment for infrapopliteal arterial disease. Drug-eluting stent (DES) is another widely used option; however, its long-term therapeutic effect is controversial. The effectiveness of different DES for infrapopliteal arterial disease needs further exploration.
METHODS AND RESULTS
The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Clinical trials were systematically searched from inception to 1 February 2023. Literatures were included if the study was original, peer-reviewed, published in English or Chinese, and contained patients diagnosed with simple infrapopliteal arterial disease or with properly treated combined inflow tract lesions before or during the study procedure. A total of 953 patients, 504 in the DES group and 449 in the PTA/bare-metal stenting (BMS) group, from 12 randomised controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that DES is superior to control group for improving clinical patency, reducing the restenosis rate, and reducing the amputation rate at 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years post-treatment [at 3 years, risk ratio (RR): 1.90, 95% CI 1.23-2.93; RR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.79-0.96; RR: 0.60, 95% CI 0.36-1.00, P =0.049]. In addition, subgroup analyses suggested that DES is superior to BMS and PTA in improving clinical patency and reducing target lesion revascularisation and restenosis rates at 6-month and 1-year post-treatment. The network meta-analysis indicated that sirolimus-eluting stent was superior for improving clinical patency (at 1 year, RR: 0.23, 95% CI 0.08-0.60) and reducing the restenosis rate (at 6 months, RR: 31.58, 95% CI 4.41-307.53, at 1 year, RR: 3.80, 95% CI 1.84-8.87) significantly. However, according to the cumulative rank probabilities test, everolimus-eluting stent may have the lowest target lesion revascularisation rates and amputation rates at 1-year post-treatment (the cumulative rank probability was 77% and 49%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review and network meta-analysis showed that DES was associated with more clinical efficacy than PTA/BMS significantly. In addition, sirolimus-eluting stent and everolimus-eluting stent may have better clinical benefits.
Topics: Humans; Bayes Theorem; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Popliteal Artery; Sirolimus; Stents; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37720942
DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000736 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2024Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is the obstruction or narrowing of the large arteries of the lower limbs, which can result in impaired oxygen supply to the muscle and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is the obstruction or narrowing of the large arteries of the lower limbs, which can result in impaired oxygen supply to the muscle and other tissues during exercise, or even at rest in more severe cases. PAD is classified into five categories (Fontaine classification). It may be asymptomatic or various levels of claudication pain may be present; at a later stage, there may be ulceration or gangrene of the limb, with amputation occasionally being required. About 20% of people with PAD suffer from intermittent claudication (IC), which is muscular discomfort in the lower extremities induced by exertion and relieved by rest within 10 minutes; IC causes restriction of movement in daily life. Treatment for people with IC involves addressing lifestyle risk factors. Exercise is an important part of treatment, but supervised exercise programmes for individuals with IC have low engagement levels and high attrition rates. The use of mobile technologies has been suggested as a new way to engage people with IC in walking exercise interventions. The novelty of the intervention, low cost for the user, automation, and ease of access are some of the advantages mobile health (mhealth) technologies provide that give them the potential to be effective in boosting physical activity in adults.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the benefits and harms of mobile health (mhealth) technologies to improve walking distance in people with intermittent claudication.
SEARCH METHODS
The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist conducted systematic searches of the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL, and also searched the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) and ClinicalTrials.gov. The most recent searches were carried out on 19 December 2022.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in people aged 18 years or over with symptomatic PAD and a clinical diagnosis of IC. We included RCTs comparing mhealth interventions to improve walking distance versus usual care (no intervention or non-exercise advice), exercise advice, or supervised exercise programmes. We excluded people with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (Fontaine III and IV).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were change in absolute walking distance from baseline, change in claudication distance from baseline, amputation-free survival, revascularisation-free survival. Our secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events, major adverse limb events, above-ankle amputation, quality of life, and adverse events. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence.
MAIN RESULTS
We included four RCTs involving a total of 614 participants with a clinical diagnosis of IC. The duration of intervention of the four included RCTs ranged from 3 to 12 months. Participants were randomised to either mhealth or control (usual care or supervised exercise programme). All four studies had an unclear or high risk of bias in one or several domains. The most prevalent risk of bias was in the area of performance bias, which was rated high risk as it is not possible to blind participants and personnel in this type of trial. Based on GRADE criteria, we downgraded the certainty of the evidence to low, due to concerns about risk of bias, imprecision, and clinical inconsistency. Comparing mhealth with usual care, there was no clear evidence of an effect on absolute walking distance (mean difference 9.99 metres, 95% confidence interval (CI) -27.96 to 47.93; 2 studies, 503 participants; low-certainty evidence). None of the included studies reported on change in claudication walking distance, amputation-free survival, or revascularisation-free survival. Only one study reported on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and found no clear difference between groups (risk ratio 1.37, 95% CI 0.07 to 28.17; 1 study, 305 participants; low-certainty evidence). None of the included studies reported on major adverse limb events (MALE) or above-ankle amputations.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Mobile health technologies can be used to provide lifestyle interventions for people with chronic conditions, such as IC. We identified a limited number of studies that met our inclusion criteria. We found no clear difference between mhealth and usual care in improving absolute walking distance in people with IC; however, we judged the evidence to be low certainty. Larger, well-designed RCTs are needed to provide adequate statistical power to reliably evaluate the effects of mhealth technologies on walking distance in people with IC.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Intermittent Claudication; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Exercise Therapy; Walking; Lower Extremity; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38353263
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014717.pub2 -
Surgery For Obesity and Related... Feb 2024Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a chronic metabolic disorder that affects millions of individuals associated with an increased risk of mortality and macrovascular... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a chronic metabolic disorder that affects millions of individuals associated with an increased risk of mortality and macrovascular complications. We aimed to synthesize the benefit of metabolic surgery (MS) on macrovascular outcomes in adult patients with T2D.We included both cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated MS added to medical therapy compared with medical therapy alone in the treatment of adult patients with T2D. Studies must have evaluated the incidence of any macrovascular complication of the disease for a period of at least 6 months. We performed our search using PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and COCHRANE Central database which was performed from inception date until March 2022. The trial protocol was previously registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021243739). A total of 6338 references were screened throughout the selection process from which 16 studies involving 179,246 participants fulfilled inclusion criteria. MS reduced the risk of any cardiovascular event by 44% (relative risk .56 [95% CI, .42-.75]; P = < .001), myocardial infarction by 54% (.46 [95% CI, .26-.83]; P = .009), coronary artery disease by 40% (.60 [95% CI, .42-.85]; P = .004) and heart failure by 71% (.29 [95% CI, .14-.61]; P = .001). It also provided a risk reduction of stroke by 29% (.71 [95% CI, .51-.99]; P = .04) and 38% (.62 [95% CI, .46-.85]; P = .001) for cerebrovascular events. On mortality, MS yields a risk reduction of 55% (.45 [95% CI, .36-.57]; P <.001) in overall mortality and 69% in cardiovascular mortality (relative risk .31 [95% CI, .22-.42]; P < .001). Peripheral vascular disease risk was also reduced. MS in adult patients with T2D can reduce the risk of mortality and of any macrovascular outcomes. However, there is a need for the planning of randomized clinical trials to further analyze and confirm the results.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Bariatric Surgery; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Myocardial Infarction
PubMed: 37845131
DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2023.08.016 -
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine Jun 2024Femoral cannulated extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been associated with neurologic complications in the lower extremity ipsilateral to the cannulation.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Femoral cannulated extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been associated with neurologic complications in the lower extremity ipsilateral to the cannulation. There is uncertainty about the prevalence of these complications and their mechanisms of development.
OBJECTIVE
Aim of this systematic review was to investigate the prevalence of neurological complications after ECMO and to describe possible underlying mechanisms.
METHOD
A systematic literature search was performed in Medline-Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and PEDro until April 2021 for clinical trials in English or German language which quantified neurologic complications in the lower extremity ipsilateral to the ECMO cannulation of adults. The complications had to be delimitable to intensive care unit-acquired weakness. Methodological quality was assessed by 2 independent investigators using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
RESULTS
Eight observational studies were included in the synthesis. Study quality was good to fair in 88% of the papers. Overall, 47 of 202 patients (23.3%; ranging from 3% to 48% across studies) with femoral ECMO cannulation showed neurologic complications of the lower extremity ipsilateral to the cannulation. Peripheral ischemia and compression of nerves by the ECMO cannula are discussed as mechanisms of injury.
CONCLUSION
The occurrence of neurological complications after ECMO was common and can lead to long-term impairment. The mechanisms are largely unknown but currently there is no sufficient evidence for the involvement of ECMO. Standardized assessments are needed to systematically screen for neurological complications early after ECMO, to enable countermeasures and prevent further complications.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation; Lower Extremity; Nervous System Diseases; Observational Studies as Topic; Prevalence
PubMed: 38018080
DOI: 10.1177/08850666231217679 -
European Journal of Vascular and... Mar 2024To systematically review and meta-analyse adjusted risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) after lower limb revascularisation surgery. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review and meta-analyse adjusted risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) after lower limb revascularisation surgery.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, Embase, Evidence Based Medicine Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (inception to 28 April 2022).
REVIEW METHODS
Systematic review and meta-analysis conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. After protocol registration, databases were searched. Studies reporting adjusted risk factors for SSI in adults who underwent lower limb revascularisation surgery for peripheral artery disease were included. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using random effects models. GRADE was used to assess certainty.
RESULTS
Among 6 377 citations identified, 50 studies (n = 271 125 patients) were included. The cumulative incidence of SSI was 12 (95% confidence interval [CI] 10 - 13) per 100 patients. Studies reported 139 potential SSI risk factors adjusted for a median of 12 (range 1 - 69) potential confounding factors. Risk factors that increased the pooled adjusted odds of SSI included: female sex (pooled OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.20 - 1.64; high certainty); dependent functional status (pooled OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.03 - 1.35; low certainty); being overweight (pooled OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.29 - 2.56; moderate certainty), obese (pooled OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.44 - 3.36; high certainty), or morbidly obese (pooled OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.08 - 2.52; moderate certainty); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (pooled OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.17 - 1.71; high certainty); chronic limb threatening ischaemia (pooled OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.22 - 2.29; moderate certainty); chronic kidney disease (pooled OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.18 - 3.83; moderate certainty); intra-operative (pooled OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02 - 1.49), peri-operative (pooled OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.27 - 2.90), or post-operative (pooled OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.44 - 3.39) blood transfusion (moderate certainty for all); urgent or emergency surgery (pooled OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.22 - 3.70; moderate certainty); vein bypass and or patch instead of endarterectomy alone (pooled OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.33 - 2.59; moderate certainty); an operation lasting ≥ 3 hours (pooled OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.33 - 2.59; moderate certainty) or ≥ 5 hours (pooled OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.18 - 2.17; moderate certainty); and early or unplanned re-operation (pooled OR 4.50, 95% CI 2.18 - 9.32; low certainty).
CONCLUSION
This systematic review identified evidence informed SSI risk factors following lower limb revascularisation surgery. These may be used to develop improved SSI risk prediction tools and to identify patients who may benefit from evidence informed SSI prevention strategies.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Female; Surgical Wound Infection; Prognosis; Obesity, Morbid; Reoperation; Lower Extremity
PubMed: 37925099
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.10.038 -
Medical Decision Making : An... Feb 2024Evaluating interventions for cardiovascular disease (CVD) requires estimates of its effect on utility. We aimed to 1) systematically review utility estimates for CVDs... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Evaluating interventions for cardiovascular disease (CVD) requires estimates of its effect on utility. We aimed to 1) systematically review utility estimates for CVDs published since 2013 and 2) critically appraise UK-relevant estimates and calculate corresponding baseline utility multipliers.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE and Embase (April 22, 2021) using CVD and utility terms. We screened results for primary studies reporting utility distributions for people with experience of heart failure, myocardial infarction, peripheral arterial disease, stable angina, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or unstable angina. We extracted characteristics from studies included. For UK estimates based on the EuroQoL 5-dimension (EQ-5D) measure, we assessed risk of bias and applicability to a decision-analytic model, pooled arms/time points as appropriate, and estimated baseline utility multipliers using predicted utility for age- and sex- matched populations without CVD. We sought utility sources from directly applicable studies with low risk of bias, prioritizing plausibility of severity ordering in our base-case model and highest population ascertainment in a sensitivity analysis.
RESULTS
Most of the 403 studies identified used EQ-5D ( = 217) and most assessed Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development populations ( = 262), although measures and countries varied widely. UK studies using EQ-5D ( = 29) produced very heterogeneous baseline utility multipliers for each type of CVD, precluding meta-analysis and implying different possible severity orderings. We could find sources that provided a plausible ordering of utilities while adequately representing health states.
CONCLUSIONS
We cataloged international CVD utility estimates and calculated UK-relevant baseline utility multipliers. Modelers should consider unreported sources of heterogeneity, such as population differences, when selecting utility evidence from reviews.
HIGHLIGHTS
Published systematic reviews have summarized estimates of utility associated with cardiovascular disease published up to 2013.We 1) reviewed utility estimates for 7 types of cardiovascular disease published since 2013, 2) critically appraised UK-relevant studies, and 3) estimated the effect of each cardiovascular disease on baseline utility.Our review 1) recommends a consistent and reliable set of baseline utility multipliers for 7 types of cardiovascular disease and 2) provides systematically identified reference information for researchers seeking utility evidence for their own context.
Topics: Humans; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Heart Failure; Myocardial Infarction; United Kingdom
PubMed: 38174427
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X231214782 -
Scientific Reports Mar 2024We aimed to evaluate the association between systemic sclerosis (SSc) and major cerebrovascular/cardiovascular risks through a systematic approach. Databases were... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
We aimed to evaluate the association between systemic sclerosis (SSc) and major cerebrovascular/cardiovascular risks through a systematic approach. Databases were systematically searched from their inception to October 10, 2023 for studies comparing cerebrovascular/cardiovascular event rates between patients with SSc and controls. The primary outcome was the stroke risk in patients with SSc. Secondary outcomes included risk of myocardial infarction (MI), cardiovascular disease (CVD), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Seventeen studies with 6,642,297 participants were included. SSc was associated with a significantly increased risk of stroke (HR, 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-2.01), CVD (HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.36-3.3), MI (HR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.23-3.77), VTE (HR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.77-4.28), and PVD (HR, 5.23; 95% CI, 4.25-6.45). Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly increased stroke risk in the non-Asian group (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.26-1.9), while the Asian group displayed a higher but not statistically significant risk (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 0.97-3.55). The study found that SSc is associated with a significantly increased risk of cerebrovascular/cardiovascular events. These findings highlight the importance of vasculopathy in SSc and suggest the need for enhanced clinical monitoring and preventive measures in this high-risk population.
Topics: Humans; Cardiovascular Diseases; Venous Thromboembolism; Myocardial Infarction; Stroke; Peripheral Vascular Diseases; Scleroderma, Systemic
PubMed: 38499699
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57275-9 -
Frontiers in Neuroscience 2024Cerebral ischaemic stroke is a common disease that poses a serious threat to human health. Butyrate is an important metabolite of intestinal microorganisms. Recent...
INTRODUCTION
Cerebral ischaemic stroke is a common disease that poses a serious threat to human health. Butyrate is an important metabolite of intestinal microorganisms. Recent studies have shown that butyrate has a significant protective effect in animal models of cerebral ischaemic injury.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to evaluate the protective effect of butyrate on cerebral ischaemic stroke by meta-analysis, aiming to provide a scientific basis for the clinical application of butyrate in patients with cerebral ischaemia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic search was conducted for all relevant studies published before 23 January 2024, in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase. Methodological quality was assessed using Syrcle's risk of bias tool for animal studies. Data were analysed using Rev Man 5.3 software.
RESULTS
A total of nine studies were included, and compared with controls, butyrate significantly increased BDNF levels in the brain (SMD = 2.33, 95%CI = [1.20, 3.47], < 0.005) and P-Akt expression (SMD = 3.53, 95% CI = [0.97, 6.10], < 0.05). Butyrate also decreased IL-β levels in the brain (SMD = -2.02, 95% CI = [-3.22, -0.81], < 0.005), TNF-α levels (SMD = -0.86, 95% CI = [-1.60, -0.12], < 0.05), and peripheral vascular IL-1β levels (SMD = -2.10, 95%CI = [-3.59, -0.61], < 0.05). In addition, butyrate reduced cerebral infarct volume (MD = -11.29, 95%CI = [-17.03, -5.54], < 0.05), mNSS score (MD = -2.86, 95%CI = [-4.12, -1.60], < 0.005), foot fault score (MD = -7.59, 95%CI = [-9.83, -5, 35], < 0.005), and Morris water maze time (SMD = -2.49, 95%CI = [-4.42, -0.55], < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
The results of this study indicate that butyrate has a protective effect on cerebral ischaemic stroke in animal models, and the mechanism is related to reducing inflammation and inhibiting apoptosis. It provides an evidence-based basis for the future clinical development of butyrate in the treatment of ischaemic stroke.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, CRD42023482844.
PubMed: 38486971
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1304906 -
Catheterization and Cardiovascular... May 2024Endovascular aortic repair is an emerging novel intervention for the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms. It is crucial to compare the effectiveness of different... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparison between the outcomes of transfemoral access and transfemoral access with adjunct upper extremity access in patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair: A pilot systematic review and meta-analysis.
Endovascular aortic repair is an emerging novel intervention for the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms. It is crucial to compare the effectiveness of different access sites, such as transfemoral access (TFA) and upper extremity access (UEA). An electronic literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases. The primary endpoint was the incidence of stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), while the secondary endpoints included technical success, access-site complications, mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), spinal cord ischemia, among others. Forest plots were constructed for the pooled analysis of data using the random-effects model in Review Manager, version 5.4. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Our findings in 9403 study participants (6228 in the TFA group and 3175 in the UEA group) indicate that TFA is associated with a lower risk of stroke/TIA [RR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.40-0.75; p = 0.0002], MI [RR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.38-0.69; p < 0.0001], spinal cord ischemia [RR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.32-0.53, p < 0.00001], and shortens fluoroscopy time [SMD: -0.62; 95% CI: -1.00 to -0.24; p = 0.001]. Moreover, TFA required less contrast agent [SMD: -0.33; 95% CI: -0.61 to -0.06; p = 0.02], contributing to its appeal. However, no significant differences emerged in technical success [p = 0.23], 30-day mortality [p = 0.48], ICU stay duration [p = 0.09], or overall hospital stay length [p = 0.22]. Patients with TFA had a lower risk of stroke, MI, and spinal cord ischemia, shorter fluoroscopy time, and lower use of contrast agents. Future large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm and strengthen these findings.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Catheterization, Peripheral; Endovascular Aneurysm Repair; Femoral Artery; Pilot Projects; Punctures; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Upper Extremity
PubMed: 38584518
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.31048 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2024The prevalence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in the general population is about 12% to 14% and it increases with age. PAD increased from 164 million people in 2000...
BACKGROUND
The prevalence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in the general population is about 12% to 14% and it increases with age. PAD increased from 164 million people in 2000 to 202 million people in 2010. More than two-thirds of people with PAD are based in low- or middle-income countries. Critical limb ischaemia (CLI) occurs in 1% to 2% of people with intermittent claudication over five years. One third of people with CLI have isolated below the knee (BTK) lesions. CLI and isolated BTK lesions are associated with a higher incidence of limb loss when compared with people with multilevel arterial disease. Endovascular procedures such as angioplasty (with or without stenting) are widely used to treat isolated BTK lesions, aiming to improve blood flow and limb salvage. The technical success of any angioplasty procedure depends on the ability to cross the target lesion. Failed attempts are underestimated in the literature and failures in the real world appear to be higher than reported. People with isolated BTK lesions undergoing angioplasty by conventional femoral access present a high failure rate to cross these lesions. Retrograde distal access may provide some advantages that can lead to successful crossing of the target lesion.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the benefits and harms of retrograde distal access versus conventional femoral access for people undergoing below the knee angioplasty.
SEARCH METHODS
The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 26 September 2022.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We planned to include randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing people undergoing retrograde distal access versus people undergoing conventional femoral access (ipsilateral antegrade or contralateral retrograde) for BTK angioplasty.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed identified studies for potential inclusion in the review. We used standard methodological procedures in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Interventions. Our primary outcomes were technical success of angioplasty procedure and major procedural complications. Our secondary outcomes were mortality rate, amputation-free survival, primary patency, minor procedural complications and wound healing. We planned to use GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified no randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We identified no randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared retrograde distal access versus femoral access for BTK angioplasty. High-quality studies that compare retrograde distal access versus conventional femoral access for BTK angioplasty are needed.
Topics: Humans; Angioplasty; Femur; Knee Joint; Peripheral Arterial Disease
PubMed: 38193637
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013637.pub2