-
The Journal of Urology Oct 2023Incidental adrenal masses are common and require a multidisciplinary approach to evaluation and management that includes family physicians, urologists, endocrinologists,...
PURPOSE
Incidental adrenal masses are common and require a multidisciplinary approach to evaluation and management that includes family physicians, urologists, endocrinologists, and radiologists. The purpose of this guideline is to provide an updated approach to the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of adrenal incidentalomas, with a special focus on the areas of discrepancy/controversy existing among the published guidelines from other associations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This guideline was developed by the Canadian Urological Association (CUA) through a working group comprised of urologists, endocrinologists, and radiologists and subsequently endorsed by the American Urological Association (AUA). A systematic review utilizing the GRADE approach served as the basis for evidence-based recommendations with consensus statements provided in the absence of evidence. For each guideline statement, the strength of recommendation was reported as weak or strong, and the quality of evidence was evaluated as low, medium, or high.
RESULTS
The CUA working group provided evidence- and consensus-based recommendations based on an updated systematic review and subject matter expertise. Important updates on evidence-based radiological evaluation and hormonal testing are included in the recommendations. This guideline clarifies which patients may benefit from surgery and highlights where short term surveillance is appropriate.
CONCLUSION
Incidentally detected adrenal masses require a comprehensive assessment of hormonal function and oncologic risk. This guideline provides a contemporary approach to the appropriate clinical, radiographic, and endocrine assessments required for the evaluation, management, and follow-up of patients with such lesions.
Topics: Humans; Adrenal Gland Neoplasms; Follow-Up Studies; Canada; Incidental Findings
PubMed: 37556768
DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003644 -
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology... Aug 2023Adrenal medullary hyperplasia (AMH) is a rare, incompletely described disorder of the adrenal medulla that is associated with catecholamine excess. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
CONTEXT
Adrenal medullary hyperplasia (AMH) is a rare, incompletely described disorder of the adrenal medulla that is associated with catecholamine excess.
OBJECTIVE
To increase knowledge about AMH by reviewing the reported cases of this disorder.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the genotype/phenotype relationship in all reported cases of AMH.
SETTING
Literature review and analysis.
PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS
All cases of AMH published to date.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)
Characteristics of AMH cases and genotype-phenotype relationships.
RESULTS
A total of 66 patients, median age of 48 years, were identified from 29 reports. More than one-half were male (n = 39, 59%). The majority had unilateral (73%, n = 48) disease; 71% (n = 47) were sporadic and 23% (n = 15) were associated with the MEN2. Most (91%, n = 60) displayed signs and symptoms of excess catecholamine secretion, particularly hypertension. Elevated catecholamine concentrations (86%, n = 57) and adrenal abnormalities on imaging were common (80%, n = 53). More than one-half (58%, n = 38) had concurrent tumors: pheochromocytoma (42%, n = 16/38); medullary thyroid cancer (24%, n = 9/38); and adrenocortical adenoma (29%, n = 11/38). Most (88%, n = 58) underwent adrenalectomy with 45/58 achieving symptom resolution. Adrenalectomy was less common in patients under 40 years and those with bilateral disease (both P < .05).
CONCLUSION
AMH may be sporadic or associated with MEN2, most have catecholamine excess and imaging abnormalities. Unilateral involvement is more common. Most reported patients have been treated with adrenalectomy, which is usually curative with regard to catecholamine hypersecretion.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Hyperplasia; Adrenal Gland Neoplasms; Pheochromocytoma; Adrenal Medulla; Adrenalectomy; Catecholamines
PubMed: 36896586
DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgad121 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2023Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) for advanced pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) has received increasing attention. The purpose of this article is...
OBJECTIVE
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) for advanced pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) has received increasing attention. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PRRT in patients with metastatic or inoperable PPGLs by meta-analysis.
METHODS
A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases up to November 2022. All articles on PRRT for PPGLs were searched, and appropriate data were included for analysis. The measures evaluated included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), clinical response rate, biochemical response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 16.0 and the R programming language, data were combined using a random-effects model, and the results were presented using forest plots.
RESULTS
A total of 20 studies with 330 patients were included in the analysis. The results showed that ORR and DCR were 20.0% (95% CI: 12.0%-28.0%) and 90.0% (95% CI: 85.0%-95.0%), respectively. Clinical and biochemical responses were 74.9% (95% CI: 56.3%-90.2%) and 69.5% (95%CI: 40.2%-92.9%). Median PFS and median OS were 31.79 (95% CI:21.25-42.33) months and 74.30 (95% CI: 0.75-147.84) months, respectively. Any grade of hematotoxicity and nephrotoxicity occurred in 22.3% (95% CI:12.5%-33.5%) and 4.3% (95% CI:0.2%-11.4%) patients. Grade 3-4 hemotoxicity occurred in 4.3% (95% CI:0.2%-11.4%) and grade 3-4 nephrotoxicity in 4/212 patients. Additionally, Treatment was discontinued in 9.0% (95% CI: 0.5%-23.3%) patients and one patient died as a result of a toxicity.
CONCLUSION
Patients with metastatic or inoperable PPGLs can be effectively treated with PRRT, and it has a favorable safety profile.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42022359232.
PubMed: 37483516
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1141648 -
Journal of Neuroendocrinology Dec 2023Despite advances in diagnosis and management, patients with advanced pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGL) face limited treatment options. This study aims to...
Safety and efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with advanced pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: A single-institution experience and review of the literature.
INTRODUCTION
Despite advances in diagnosis and management, patients with advanced pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGL) face limited treatment options. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in patients with advanced PPGL, based on a single-institution experience and provide a comprehensive review of the literature.
METHODS
A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with advanced pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma who received PRRT at a single institution from April 2012 to March 2022. Clinical characteristics, treatment response, adverse events, and survival outcomes were assessed. A systematic literature review was also performed.
RESULTS
A total of 15 patients with advanced PPGL were included, the majority of whom had both metastatic and functional disease. Most patients received four infusions of 177Lu-DOTATATE (73%). The median therapeutic 177Lu-DOTATATE radioactivity for each infusion was 7.4 GBq. Only one patient was treated with one infusion of 90Y-DOTATATE (4.2 GBq) in addition to three infusions of Lu-177 DOTATATE. Overall, PRRT suggests a promising efficacy with disease control rate of 63.6% by RECIST v1.1. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached and the median progression free survival (PFS) was 25.9 months. In terms of safety, PRRT was well tolerated. Review of the literature revealed consistent findings, supporting the efficacy and safety of PRRT in PPGL.
CONCLUSION
This study suggests that PRRT is a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with PPGL. Our findings align with the existing literature, providing additional evidence to support the use of PRRT in this challenging patient population.
Topics: Humans; Pheochromocytoma; Yttrium Radioisotopes; Retrospective Studies; Paraganglioma; Adrenal Gland Neoplasms; Receptors, Peptide
PubMed: 37937484
DOI: 10.1111/jne.13349 -
International Journal of Urology :... Jun 2024This work aims to assess the diagnostic value of chromogranin A (CgA) in the laboratory diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors classified as pheochromocytoma and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
This work aims to assess the diagnostic value of chromogranin A (CgA) in the laboratory diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors classified as pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL).
METHODS
A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to obtain relevant studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of CgA in patients with PPGL. The search involved studies written in English between the time of library inception and May 1, 2023. We computed the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Additionally, the receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC) were determined. The heterogeneity was assessed using the Chi-square test and the I test. The subgroup analyses were performed to investigate the origins of heterogeneity. Stata 15.1 statistical software was used in all data analyses.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis included 13 studies involving 1470 patients. CgA had a pooled diagnostic sensitivity of 0.86 (95% CI 0.81-0.91), a specificity of 0.90 (95% CI 0.81-0.95), and a DOR of 57 (95% CI 23-142). CgA had an AUC of 0.93. The studies did not reveal any threshold effect (r = -0.165; p > 0.05). The subgroup analyses revealed that the control group category and the detection method caused the overall heterogeneity.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study suggests that CgA is a helpful PPGL biomarker. However, relying solely on CgA for diagnosis is not advisable. A comprehensive approach is essential for accurate diagnosis. Future large-scale research is needed to refine CgA's clinical application.
Topics: Humans; Pheochromocytoma; Chromogranin A; Adrenal Gland Neoplasms; Paraganglioma; Biomarkers, Tumor; Sensitivity and Specificity; ROC Curve
PubMed: 38380475
DOI: 10.1111/iju.15423 -
Journal of Robotic Surgery Mar 2024To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of robot-assisted adrenalectomy (RA) and laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) for pheochromocytoma (PHEO). We conducted a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of robot-assisted adrenalectomy (RA) and laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) for pheochromocytoma (PHEO). We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase databases for studies comparing RA and LA treatment for PHEO, covering the period from database inception to January 1, 2024. Two researchers will independently screen literature and extract data, followed by meta-analysis using Review Manager 5.3 software. Six studies with 658 patients were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in operation time [MD = -8.03, 95% CI (-25.68,9.62), P > 0.05], transfusion rate [OR = 1.10, 95% CI (0.55, 2.19) , P > 0.05], conversion rate [OR = 0.31, 95% CI (0.08, 1.12), P > 0.05], complication rate [OR = 0.93, 95% CI (0.52, 1.70), P > 0.05], Intraoperative max SBP [MD = -4.08, 95% CI (-10.13,1.97), P > 0.05], Intraoperative min SBP [MD = -2.71, 95% CI (-9.60,4.18), P > 0.05] among patients undergoing RA and LA. However, compared with patients who underwent LA, patients who underwent RA had less estimated blood loss [MD = -37.72, 95% CI (-64.11,-11.33), P < 0.05], a shorter length of hospital stay [MD = -0.43, 95% CI (-0.65,-0.21) P < 0.05]. RA has higher advantages in some aspects compared to LA. RA is a feasible, safe, and comparable treatment option for PHEO.
Topics: Humans; Laparoscopy; Adrenalectomy; Pheochromocytoma; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Adrenal Gland Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38466492
DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01846-5 -
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology... Apr 2024Carriers of germline pathogenic variants (PV) in succinate dehydrogenase type B (SDHB) are at increased risk of developing pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGL)....
CONTEXT
Carriers of germline pathogenic variants (PV) in succinate dehydrogenase type B (SDHB) are at increased risk of developing pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGL). Understanding their outcomes can guide recommendations for risk assessment and early detection.
OBJECTIVE
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the following outcomes in SDHB PV carriers: age-specific risk of developing tumors, metastatic progression, second primary tumor development, and mortality.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Pubmed, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were sorted into four outcome categories: age-specific penetrance, metastatic disease, risk of second tumour and mortality. We assessed heterogeneity and performed a meta-analysis across studies using a random effects model with the DerSimonian and Laird method.
RESULTS
Penetrance of PPGL for non-proband/non-index SDHB PV carriers by age 20 was 4% (95% CI, 3%-6%), 11% (95% CI, 8%-15%) by age 40, 24% (95% CI, 19%-31%) by age 60 and 35% (95% CI, 25%-47%) by age 80. The overall risk of metastatic disease for non-proband/non-index carriers with PPGL was 9% (95% CI, 5-16%) per lifetime. In all affected cases (combining both proband/index and non-proband/non-index carriers with tumors), the risk of a second tumor was 24% (95% CI, 18-31%) and all cause 5-year mortality was 18% (95% CI 6-40%).
CONCLUSION
Penetrance for PPGL in SDHB PV carriers increases linearly with age. Affected carriers are at risk of developing and dying from metastatic disease, or of developing second tumors. Lifelong surveillance is appropriate.
PubMed: 38605204
DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgae233 -
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology May 2024The aim of this systematic review was to summarize national and international guidelines that made recommendations for monitoring patients diagnosed with low-risk...
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this systematic review was to summarize national and international guidelines that made recommendations for monitoring patients diagnosed with low-risk cancer. It appraised the quality of guidelines and determined whether the guidelines adequately identified patients for monitoring, specified which tests to use, defined monitoring intervals, and stated triggers for further intervention. It then assessed the evidence to support each recommendation.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses, we searched PubMed and Turning Research into Practice databases for national and international guidelines' that were written in English and developed or updated between 2012 and 2023. Quality of individual guidelines was assessed using the AGREE II tool.
RESULTS
Across the 41 published guidelines, 48 different recommendations were identified: 15 (31%) for prostate cancer, 11 (23%) for renal cancer, 6 (12.5%) for thyroid cancer, and 10 (21%) for blood cancer. The remaining 6 (12.5%) were for brain, gastrointestinal, oral cavity, bone and pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma cancer. When combining all guidelines, 48 (100%) stated which patients qualify for monitoring, 31 (65%) specified which tests to use, 25 (52%) provided recommendations for surveillance intervals, and 23 (48%) outlined triggers to initiate intervention. Across all cancer sites, there was a strong positive trend with higher levels of evidence being associated with an increased likelihood of a recommendation being specific (P = 0.001) and the evidence for intervals was based on expert opinion or other guidance.
CONCLUSION
With the exception of prostate cancer, the evidence base for monitoring low-risk cancer is weak and consequently recommendations in clinical guidelines are inconsistent. There is a lack of direct evidence to support monitoring recommendations in the literature making guideline developers reliant on expert opinion, alternative guidelines, or indirect or nonspecific evidence.
Topics: Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Neoplasms; Male; Female
PubMed: 38360377
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111280 -
Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials Feb 2024Paragangliomas of the urinary tract are exceptionally uncommon, and sporadic case reports of primary paraganglioma of the prostate have been reported in the literature.
BACKGROUND
Paragangliomas of the urinary tract are exceptionally uncommon, and sporadic case reports of primary paraganglioma of the prostate have been reported in the literature.
METHODS
Systematic research in PubMed/Medline and Scopus databases concerning primary prostatic paraganglioma was performed by two independent investigators.
RESULTS
This analysis included 25 adult males, with a mean age of 49.8 ± 22.4 years. 32% of included patients had a history of hypertension. Problems during urination (52%), blood loss (44%), either as hematuria or hemospermia, and catecholamine-related symptoms (36%) comprised the most frequently reported clinical manifestations. Digital rectal examination found a palpable nodule in 36% of patients, while prostatic specific antigen (PSA) was normal in all tested patients. Abdominal ultrasound (44%), computed tomography (44%) and magnetic resonance imaging (28%) helped to identify the primary lesion. 24-hour urine epinephrine, norepinephrine and vanillylmandelic acid (VMA) levels were elevated in 90%, 80% and 90% of included patients. Open surgical excision of the mass was performed in 40%, transurethral resection in 8%, open radical prostatectomy in 24%, transurethral resection of the prostate in 16% and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in 4% of included patients.
CONCLUSION
Due to atypical clinical manifestation and scarcity of prostatic paraganglioma, urologists should be aware of this extremely rare entity.
PubMed: 38549519
DOI: 10.2174/0115748871293735240209052044