-
Lasers in Surgery and Medicine Sep 2023Incidental treatment of melanocytic nevi during laser hair removal (LHR) has been noted to cause clinical and dermoscopic changes that may appear similar to findings... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Incidental treatment of melanocytic nevi during laser hair removal (LHR) has been noted to cause clinical and dermoscopic changes that may appear similar to findings seen in atypical or neoplastic melanocytic lesions. The rate and characteristics of these changes has not been well-studied.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this review article is to assess the literature for reported changes in melanocytic nevi following LHR to guide clinical practice.
METHODS
PubMed was searched December 5, 2022 for articles evaluating changes in melanocytic nevi after LHR treatment using the following search terms: "nevi laser hair removal," "nevi diode," "nevi long pulse alexandrite," "nevi long pulse neodymium doped yttrium aluminum garnet," and "melanoma laser hair removal." All English language patient-based reports discussing incidental treatment of melanocytic nevi while undergoing LHR with a laser were eligible for inclusion, while reports of changes following hair removal with non-laser devices such as intense pulsed light were excluded. Studies evaluating non-melanocytic nevi such as Becker's nevus or nevus of Ota were excluded as were those evaluating the intentional ablation or removal of melanocytic lesions.
RESULTS
Ten relevant studies were included, consisting of seven case reports or series and three observational trials, two of which were prospective and one retrospective. Among the seven case reports or series there were a total of 11 patients, six of which had multiple affected nevi. Clinical and dermoscopic changes to nevi following LHR appear to be common in clinical practice, though not well studied. Clinical and dermoscopic changes have been noted to present as early as 15 days after treatment and persist to the maximum time of follow up at 3 years. Commonly reported changes include regression, decreased size, laser induced asymmetry, bleaching, darkening, and altered pattern on dermoscopy. Histologic changes include mild atypia, thermal damage, scar formation, and regression. Although some of the clinical and dermoscopic alterations may be concerning for malignancy, to our knowledge, there are no documented cases of malignant transformation of nevi following treatment with LHR.
LIMITATIONS
This study is limited by the low number of relevant reports and their generally small sample size, many of which is limited to single cases. Additionally, comparison of available data was limited by variable reporting of treatment regimens and outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
Changes to nevi treated during LHR are not uncommon. Modifications to nevi may occur and look similar to changes seen in dysplastic or neoplastic melanocytic lesions. Notably, despite the widespread use of LHR since the first device was Food and Drug Administration approved in 1995, a time span of nearly three decades, there have been no reported cases of melanoma or severe dysplastic changes within treated nevi. However, dermatologists should be aware that morphologic and dermoscopic alterations can occur after LHR to prevent unnecessary surgical procedures. Although melanoma has not been reported to occur in nevi treated with LHR nor with any other laser exposures, further long-term data is needed to fully elucidate this concern. Optimally, nevi should be examined by a dermatologist before LHR to determine a baseline clinical and dermoscopic morphology. If there is concern for potential atypia, laser should be avoided over such nevi to avoid confusion at future follow up visits.
Topics: Humans; Hair Removal; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Nevus, Pigmented; Skin Neoplasms; Melanoma; Nevus; Dermoscopy
PubMed: 37493510
DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23712 -
Archivos de La Sociedad Espanola de... Jan 2024The treatment of dark circles is one of the most common request from the patients attending to the esthetics clinic. A tired, sad or aged appearance is perceived by our... (Review)
Review
The treatment of dark circles is one of the most common request from the patients attending to the esthetics clinic. A tired, sad or aged appearance is perceived by our patients. Moreover, it is a multifactorial problem and we could treat it with a wide range of treatments. With this systematic review, we want to check the best available evidence regarding the treatment of periorbital hyperpigmentation using light devices. We have reviewed 208 papers, including 14 of them for full consideration. Several light sources have demonstrated to be effective treating pigmented dark circles. The best results have been reported using intense pulsed light and rubi laser together with depigmenting substances. If we want to treat periocular hyperpigmentation, soft wrinkles, rhytides and skin density we should use carbo dioxide laser or Erbium:Yttrium Scandium Gallium Garnet. The Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet, alexandrite and diode lasers were the ones giving the worst outcome regarding pigmentation treatment. The concomitant use of depigmenting treatment may help getting better results and reducing the rate of post inflammatory hyperpigmentation. A better standardization and measuring of the obtained results is needed regarding pigmentation changes. We must keep on investigating on this topic with new clinical trials measuring objective results and combining different light devices for a multifactorial treatment of the dark circles.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Hyperpigmentation; Skin; Treatment Outcome; Skin Aging; Yttrium
PubMed: 37661041
DOI: 10.1016/j.oftale.2023.08.010 -
Wound Repair and Regeneration :... 2023Across scar studies, there is a lack of dark-skinned individuals, who have a predisposition for keloid formation, altered pigmentation and poorer quality of life (QOL).... (Review)
Review
Across scar studies, there is a lack of dark-skinned individuals, who have a predisposition for keloid formation, altered pigmentation and poorer quality of life (QOL). There is a need for patients of colour to be included in scar scale development and validation. In this study, we evaluate the racial diversity of patients included in the validation of scar assessment scales. A systematic review was conducted for articles reporting on the validation of a scar assessment tool. Racial, ethnic and Fitzpatrick skin type (FST) data were extracted. Fifteen scar scale validation studies were included. Nine of the studies did not mention FST, race or ethnicity of the patients. Two of the studies that reported FST or race information only included White patients or included no FST V/VI patients: mapping assessment of scars (MAPS) and University of North Carolina '4P'. Only four studies included non-White patients or dark-skinned patients in the validation of their scar scale: the modified Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), modified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), acne QOL and SCAR-Q scales. The patients included in the modified VSS validation were 7% and 13% FST V/VI, 14% African in the modified POSAS and 4.5% FST V/VI in the SCAR-Q. We highlight the severe lack of diversity in scar scale validation, with only 4 out of 15 studies including dark-skinned patients. Given the susceptibility of darker-skinned individuals to have poorer scarring outcomes, it is critical to include patients of colour in the very assessment tools that determine their scar prognosis. Inclusion of patients of colour in scar scale development will improve scar assessment and clinical decision-making.
Topics: Humans; Cicatrix; Quality of Life; Skin Pigmentation; Wound Healing; Skin
PubMed: 37768279
DOI: 10.1111/wrr.13120 -
Journal of Personalized Medicine May 2024Acral amelanotic melanomas (AAMs), a rare subset of melanomas located on acral sites such as the palms, soles, and subungual areas, are diagnostically challenging due to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Acral amelanotic melanomas (AAMs), a rare subset of melanomas located on acral sites such as the palms, soles, and subungual areas, are diagnostically challenging due to their lack of typical pigmentation and often benign clinical appearance. Misdiagnosis is common, leading to delays in treatment and potentially worse outcomes. This systematic review aims to synthesise evidence on cases of AAM initially misdiagnosed as other conditions, to better understand their clinical and epidemiological characteristics, diagnostic pitfalls, and management strategies.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases was conducted up to March 2024. Case reports and small case series of AAMs initially misdiagnosed as other conditions were included. Data on patient demographics, clinical presentation, and diagnostic methods were collected and analyzed.
RESULTS
Of the 152 records identified, 26 cases from 23 articles met the inclusion criteria. A demographic analysis revealed that the gender distribution appears to be perfectly balanced, with an age range of 38 to 91 years. Misdiagnoses included non-healing ulcers or traumatic lesions (37.5%), benign proliferative lesions (29.2%) and infectious lesions (20.8%). The foot was the most affected site (53.8%). Notably, a histological evaluation was performed in 50% of cases involving the upper extremities, in contrast to only 7.1% of cases involving the foot and 0% of cases of the heel. This discrepancy suggests a reluctance to perform biopsies in the lower extremities, which may contribute to a higher misdiagnosis rate in these areas.
CONCLUSIONS
The underutilization of biopsy in the diagnosis of lower extremity lesions contributes significantly to the misdiagnosis and delay in treatment of AAMs. Especially when the clinical assessment and dermoscopy are inconclusive, biopsies of suspicious lesions are essential. Immunohistochemistry and markers such as PRAME are critical in differentiating melanoma from other malignancies such as clear cell sarcoma. This review highlights the need for increased vigilance and a proactive diagnostic approach to increase early detection rates and improve prognostic outcomes.
PubMed: 38793100
DOI: 10.3390/jpm14050518 -
Cureus Jul 2023Melasma, a commonly acquired hyperpigmentation skin condition, is usually treated with topical agents as the first line of management. This systematic review and... (Review)
Review
Melasma, a commonly acquired hyperpigmentation skin condition, is usually treated with topical agents as the first line of management. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of azelaic acid versus hydroquinone in treating melasma patients. We conducted a comprehensive search across four online databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) from the time of their creation until May 28, 2023. We considered randomized controlled studies comparing hydroquinone with azelaic acid for the treatment of melasma patients. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2 to evaluate the risk of bias. The mean difference (MD) for continuous variables and the risk ratio (RR) for categorical variables, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled. Six studies were included, with a total of 673 patients with melasma. The azelaic acid had a lower mean change in melasma area severity index (MASI) than the hydroquinone group [MD= -1.23, 95% CI (-2.05, -0.40), P=0.004]. No difference was observed regarding the improvement via the objective response scale, the reduction in pigmentation, or the adverse events reported. However, despite not being statistically significantly different, there was a trend towards having more good responses in the azelaic acid group. Azelaic acid may be better than hydroquinone in reducing melasma severity (measured by MASI). However, larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed to validate these findings.
PubMed: 37457606
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41796 -
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy =... Nov 2023Humans rely on vision as their most important sense. This is accomplished by photoreceptors (PRs) in the retina that detect light but cannot function without the support... (Review)
Review
Humans rely on vision as their most important sense. This is accomplished by photoreceptors (PRs) in the retina that detect light but cannot function without the support and maintenance of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). In subretinal hemorrhage (SRH), blood accumulates between the neurosensory retina and the RPE or between the RPE and the choroid. Blood breakdown products subsequently damage PRs and the RPE and lead to poor vision and blindness. Hence, there is a high need for options to preserve the retina and visual functions. We conducted a systematic review of the literature in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to identify the cell death mechanisms in RPE and PRs after SRH to deepen our understanding of the pathways involved. After screening 736 publications published until November 8, 2022, we identified 19 records that assessed cell death in PRs and/or RPE in experimental models of SRH. Among the different cell death mechanisms, apoptosis was the most widely investigated mechanism (11 records), followed by ferroptosis (4), whereas necroptosis, pyroptosis, and lysosome-dependent cell death were only assessed in one study each. We discuss different therapeutic options that were assessed in these studies, including the removal of the hematoma/iron chelation, cytoprotection, anti-inflammatory agents, and antioxidants. Further systematic investigations will be necessary to determine the exact cell death mechanisms after SRH with respect to different blood breakdown components, cell types, and time courses. This will form the basis for the development of novel treatment options for SRH.
Topics: Humans; Retinal Pigment Epithelium; Retina; Cell Death; Photoreceptor Cells; Hemorrhage
PubMed: 37742603
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115572 -
BMC Ophthalmology Nov 2023To evaluate the efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in treatment of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with retinal pigment epithelial... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparative efficacy of aflibercept and ranibizumab in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration with retinal pigment epithelial detachment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in treatment of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with retinal pigment epithelial detachment (PED).
METHODS
Systematic review identifying studies comparing intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR), intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) and intravitreal conbercept (IVC) published before Mar 2022.
RESULTS
One randomized controlled trial and 6 observational studies were selected for meta-analysis (1,069 patients). The change of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in IVA 2.0 mg group was better than IVR 0.5 mg (average difference 0.07) and IVR 2.0 mg (average difference 0.10), the differences were statistically significant. The change of the height of PED in IVA 2.0 group was better than IVR 0.5 group (average difference 45.30), the difference was statistically significant. The proportion of patients without PED at last visit in IVA 2.0 group were better than those in IVR 2.0 group (hazard ratio 1.91), the difference was statistically significant. There was no significant difference compared with IVR 0.5 group (hazard ratio 1.45). IVA required fewer injections than IVR, with a mean difference of -1.58.
CONCLUSIONS
IVA appears to be superior to IVR in improvement of BCVA, height decrease of PED and regression of PED with less injections in nAMD with PED.
Topics: Humans; Ranibizumab; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Retinal Detachment; Network Meta-Analysis; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Retinal Pigment Epithelium; Retrospective Studies; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Intravitreal Injections; Macular Degeneration
PubMed: 37990182
DOI: 10.1186/s12886-023-03214-7 -
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery May 2024Laser therapy has emerged as a promising treatment modality for improving the appearance and symptoms associated with hypertrophic and keloid scars. In this network... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Laser therapy has emerged as a promising treatment modality for improving the appearance and symptoms associated with hypertrophic and keloid scars. In this network meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different laser types in treating hypertrophic and keloid scars.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of four databases was conducted to identify relevant studies published up until July 2023. Data were extracted from eligible studies and pooled as mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data in a network meta-analysis (NMA) model, using R software.
RESULTS
A total of 18 studies, comprising 550 patients, were included in the analysis. Pooling our data showed that fractional carbon dioxide (FCO2) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was superior to control in terms of Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), pliability score, and thickness; [MD = - 5.97; 95% CI (- 7.30; - 4.65)], [MD = - 2.68; 95% CI (- 4.03; - 1.33)], [MD = - 2.22; 95% CI (- 3.13; - 1.31)], respectively. However, insignificant difference was observed among FCO2 plus 5-FU compared to control group in terms of erythema, vascularity, redness and perfusion, and pigmentation [MD = - 0.71; 95% CI (- 2.72; 1.30)], [MD = - 0.44; 95% CI (- 1.26; 0.38)], respectively.
CONCLUSION
Our NMA found that the FCO2 plus 5-FU was the most effective intervention in decreasing the VSS and thickness, while FCO2 plus CO2 was the most effective intervention in decreasing the pliability score. Further research is needed to determine the optimal laser parameters and long-term efficacy of laser therapy in hypertrophic and keloid scars.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
PubMed: 38760539
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-04027-9 -
Dermatology and Therapy Feb 2024Dermatoscopy is a non-invasive and cost-efficient imaging technique augmenting clinical examination in neoplastic and non-neoplastic dermatoses. Recently, novel... (Review)
Review
Dermatoscopy is a non-invasive and cost-efficient imaging technique augmenting clinical examination in neoplastic and non-neoplastic dermatoses. Recently, novel dermatoscopic techniques based on principles of reflectance/absorption and excited fluorescence have been developed. However, comprehensive data on their applications are sparse, and terminology is inconsistent. In this systematic review, we addressed the principles of ultraviolet (UV) imaging and proposed categorization based on spectral characteristics and signal acquisition, as well as discussed documented and potential clinical applications, safety measures during examination, and limitations associated with reflectance and fluorescence dermatoscopy. A literature search was conducted in the PubMed medical database until 2 December 2023 according to PRISMA guidelines, and 28 papers fit the scope of this review, whereas additional relevant articles were included to provide broader context regarding the chosen terminology, chromophores described, safety of sub-UV/UV, and regulations for light-emitting devices. UV and sub-UV dermatoscopy, categorized into different methods on the basis of the emitted wavelength and signal acquisition process (reflectance versus fluorescence), augment conventional dermatoscopy by optimizing safety margins in melanoma, facilitating early detection of tumor recurrence, and enhancing visualization in non-neoplastic conditions, including pigmentation disorders, intertrigo, papulo-desquamative dermatoses, and beyond. The review highlights the limitations of these techniques, including difficulty in differentiating melanin from hemoglobin, challenges in evaluating uneven surfaces, and artifacts. Although UV dermatoscopy complements conventional dermatoscopy, clinicians should be aware of their peculiarities, artifacts, limitations, and safety concerns to optimize their diagnostic accuracy and ensure patient's safety.
PubMed: 38358617
DOI: 10.1007/s13555-024-01104-4 -
Eye (London, England) Aug 2023The aim of this systematic literature review is twofold, (1) detail the impact of retinal biomarkers identifiable via optical coherence tomography (OCT) on disease... (Review)
Review
UNLABELLED
The aim of this systematic literature review is twofold, (1) detail the impact of retinal biomarkers identifiable via optical coherence tomography (OCT) on disease progression and response to treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and (2) establish which biomarkers are currently identifiable by artificial intelligence (AI) models and the utilisation of this technology. Following the PRISMA guidelines, PubMed was searched for peer-reviewed publications dated between January 2016 and January 2022.
POPULATION
Patients diagnosed with nAMD with OCT imaging.
SETTINGS
Comparable settings to NHS hospitals.
STUDY DESIGNS
Randomised controlled trials, prospective/retrospective cohort studies and review articles. From 228 articles, 130 were full-text reviewed, 50 were removed for falling outside the scope of this review with 10 added from the author's inventory, resulting in the inclusion of 90 articles. From 9 biomarkers identified; intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid, pigment epithelial detachment, subretinal hyperreflective material (SHRM), retinal pigmental epithelial (RPE) atrophy, drusen, outer retinal tabulation (ORT), hyperreflective foci (HF) and retinal thickness, 5 are considered pertinent to nAMD disease progression; IRF, SHRM, drusen, ORT and HF. A number of these biomarkers can be classified using current AI models. Significant retinal biomarkers pertinent to disease activity and progression in nAMD are identifiable via OCT; IRF being the most important in terms of the significant impact on visual outcome. Incorporating AI into ophthalmology practice is a promising advancement towards automated and reproducible analyses of OCT data with the ability to diagnose disease and predict future disease conversion.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
This review has been registered with PROSPERO (registration ID: CRD42021233200).
Topics: Humans; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Artificial Intelligence; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Fluorescein Angiography; Biomarkers; Macular Degeneration; Disease Progression; Wet Macular Degeneration; Angiogenesis Inhibitors
PubMed: 36526863
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-022-02360-4