-
JAMA Cardiology May 2024Among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), it remains unclear whether the treatment efficacy of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), it remains unclear whether the treatment efficacy of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) depends on the type of P2Y12 inhibitor.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the risks and benefits of ticagrelor monotherapy or clopidogrel monotherapy compared with standard DAPT after PCI.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, Embase, TCTMD, and the European Society of Cardiology website were searched from inception to September 10, 2023, without language restriction.
STUDY SELECTION
Included studies were randomized clinical trials comparing P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy with DAPT on adjudicated end points in patients without indication to oral anticoagulation undergoing PCI.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Patient-level data provided by each trial were synthesized into a pooled dataset and analyzed using a 1-step mixed-effects model. The study is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Individual Participant Data.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary objective was to determine noninferiority of ticagrelor or clopidogrel monotherapy vs DAPT on the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke in the per-protocol analysis with a 1.15 margin for the hazard ratio (HR). Key secondary end points were major bleeding and net adverse clinical events (NACE), including the primary end point and major bleeding.
RESULTS
Analyses included 6 randomized trials including 25 960 patients undergoing PCI, of whom 24 394 patients (12 403 patients receiving DAPT; 8292 patients receiving ticagrelor monotherapy; 3654 patients receiving clopidogrel monotherapy; 45 patients receiving prasugrel monotherapy) were retained in the per-protocol analysis. Trials of ticagrelor monotherapy were conducted in Asia, Europe, and North America; trials of clopidogrel monotherapy were all conducted in Asia. Ticagrelor was noninferior to DAPT for the primary end point (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.74-1.06; P for noninferiority = .004), but clopidogrel was not noninferior (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.01-1.87; P for noninferiority > .99), with this finding driven by noncardiovascular death. The risk of major bleeding was lower with both ticagrelor (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.36-0.62; P < .001) and clopidogrel monotherapy (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30-0.81; P = .006; P for interaction = 0.88). NACE were lower with ticagrelor (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.86, P < .001) but not with clopidogrel monotherapy (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.78-1.28; P = .99; P for interaction = .04).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
This systematic review and meta-analysis found that ticagrelor monotherapy was noninferior to DAPT for all-cause death, MI, or stroke and superior for major bleeding and NACE. Clopidogrel monotherapy was similarly associated with reduced bleeding but was not noninferior to DAPT for all-cause death, MI, or stroke, largely because of risk observed in 1 trial that exclusively included East Asian patients and a hazard that was driven by an excess of noncardiovascular death.
Topics: Ticagrelor; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Humans; Clopidogrel; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Hemorrhage
PubMed: 38506796
DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.0133 -
Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and... 2023Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) contains a variety of growth factors and has been widely used in maxillofacial surgery, orthopedics, plastic surgery, ophthalmology, and other... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) contains a variety of growth factors and has been widely used in maxillofacial surgery, orthopedics, plastic surgery, ophthalmology, and other fields. In recent years, with the increasing morbidity of androgenetic alopecia (AGA), the use of PRP has also increased. The objective of this article was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PRP for AGA. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, covering the databases from their earliest records until March 2022. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to explore the effects of PRP for hair density, hair count, and hair diameter in AGA. Nine trials involving 238 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that PRP for AGA increased hair density at 3 and 6 months with statistically significant differences compared with the placebo ( < .05). PRP also increased hair count and hair diameter compared with the baseline, but there was no significant difference compared with the placebo ( > .05). Two of the 7 studies reported adverse reactions. No serious adverse reactions were found. In conclusion, PRP is an effective and safe treatment for increasing the hair density in AGA. Trial registration: The systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022362432).
Topics: Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Alopecia; Hair; Platelet-Rich Plasma; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37533146
DOI: 10.1177/12034754231191461 -
Aesthetic Surgery Journal Jul 2023Alopecia affects perceptions of age, beauty, success, and adaptability. Hair loss can be caused by genetic, physiological, environmental, and immunologic factors. The... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Alopecia affects perceptions of age, beauty, success, and adaptability. Hair loss can be caused by genetic, physiological, environmental, and immunologic factors. The current treatment for alopecia is varied. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates activated platelet rich plasma (A-PRP) for alopecia treatment. The objective of this review was to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of A-PRP injections in alopecia patients. We compared the safety, limitations, and outcomes of A-PRP use with those of previous research on alopecia. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database, and Google Scholar for relevant articles. We included all primary clinical studies involving patients that evaluated A-PRP. Twenty-nine articles, which included 864 patients, met the eligibility criteria and were analyzed for qualitative review. Our review found 27 studies that indicated A-PRP was significantly effective in treating alopecia, especially for improving hair density before and after therapy (n = 184, mean difference [MD] = 46.5, I2 = 88%, 95% CI: 29.63, 63.37, P < .00001), as well as when comparison was made between treatment and control groups (n = 88, MD = 31.61, I2 = 80%, 95% CI: 6.99, 56.22, P = .01), and of terminal hair density between treatment and control groups (n = 55, MD = 26.03, I2 = 25%, 95% CI: 8.08, 43.98, P = .004); hair counts after therapy (n = 85, MD = 12.79, I2 = 83%, 95% CI: -5.53, 31.12, P = .0006); promoting hair regrowth; folliculogenesis; reducing hair loss; combining with follicular unit extraction (FUE) surgery; and initiating the hair cycle. Two studies did not report significant results. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of A-PRP as a treatment option for alopecia. A-PRP appears to be a promising and safe method for treating alopecia.
Topics: Humans; Alopecia; Hair; Treatment Outcome; Platelet-Rich Plasma
PubMed: 36943284
DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjad073 -
American Journal of Obstetrics &... Jul 2023Many studies have reported the association between platelets and preeclampsia. However, sample sizes were small, and their findings were inconsistent. We conducted a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Many studies have reported the association between platelets and preeclampsia. However, sample sizes were small, and their findings were inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association in pooled samples and in detail.
DATA SOURCES
A systematic literature search was performed using Medline, Embase, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, NICHD-DASH, LILACS, and Scopus from inception to April 22, 2022.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Observational studies comparing platelet count between women with preeclampsia and normotensive pregnant women were included.
METHODS
The mean differences with 95% confidence interval in platelet count were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using I statistics. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 and ProMeta 3 software.
RESULTS
A total of 56 studies comprising 4892 preeclamptic and 9947 normotensive pregnant women were included. Meta-analysis showed that platelet count was significantly lower in women with preeclampsia than in normotensive controls (overall: mean difference, -32.83; 95% confidence interval, -40.13 to -25.52; P<.00001; I=92%; mild preeclampsia: mean difference, -18.65; 95% confidence interval, -27.17 to -10.14; P<.00001; I=84%; severe preeclampsia: mean difference, -42.61; 95% confidence interval, -57.53 to -27.68; P<.00001; I=94%). Significantly lower platelet count was also observed in the second trimester (mean difference, -28.84; 95% confidence interval, -44.59 to -13.08; P=.0003; I=93%), third trimester (mean difference, -40.67; 95% confidence interval, -52.14 to -29.20; P<.00001; I=92%), and before the diagnosis of preeclampsia (mean difference, -18.81; 95% confidence interval, -29.98 to -7.64; P=.009; I=87%), but not in the first trimester (mean difference, -15.14; 95% confidence interval, -37.71 to 7.43; P=.19; I=71%). Overall, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of platelet count were 0.71 and 0.77, respectively. The area under the curve was 0.80.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis confirmed that platelet count was significantly lower in preeclamptic women, irrespective of severity and presence or absence of associated complications, even before the onset of preeclampsia and in the second trimester of pregnancy. Our findings suggest that platelet count may be a potential marker to identify and predict preeclampsia.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Pre-Eclampsia; Platelet Count; Blood Pressure; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Pregnancy Trimester, Third
PubMed: 37098392
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100979 -
Biomedicines Aug 2023Low back pain (LBP) has a high economic burden and is strongly related to the degenerative process of the spine, especially in the intervertebral disc and of the facet... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Low back pain (LBP) has a high economic burden and is strongly related to the degenerative process of the spine, especially in the intervertebral disc and of the facet joints. Numerous treatment modalities have been proposed for the management of LBP, and the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as an innovative therapeutic option for degenerative disease of the spine. The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy of PRP injections in managing low back pain.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations, a registered at PROSPERO Systematic Reviews Platform, under number CRD42021268491. The PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched to identify relevant articles, along with hand searching to identify gray literature articles, with no language restrictions. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs), nonrandomized trials (NRTs), and case series (CSs) with more than 10 patients were considered eligible. The quality assessment and the risk of bias of the randomized clinical trials were evaluated using the RoB II tool. An evaluation of the description of the preparation methods was performed using an adapted version of the MIBO checklist.
RESULTS
An electronic database search resulted in 2324 articles, and after the exclusion of noneligible articles, 13 RCTs and 27 NRTs or CSs were analyzed. Of the 13 RCTs, 11 found favorable results in comparison to the control group in pain and disability, one showed no superiority to the control group, and one was discontinued because of the lack of therapeutic effect at eight-week evaluation. Description of the PRP preparation techniques were found in almost all papers. The overall risk of bias was considered high in 2 papers and low in 11. An adapted MIBO checklist showed a 72.7% compliance rate in the selected areas.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review, we analyzed articles from English, Spanish and Russian language, from large databases and grey literature. PRP was in general an effective and safe treatment for degenerative LPB. Positive results were found in almost studies, a small number of adverse events were related, the risk of bias of the RCTs was low. Based on the evaluation of the included studies, we graded as level II the quality of the evidence supporting the use of PRP in LBP. Large-scale, multicenter RCTs are still needed to confirm these findings.
PubMed: 37760845
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11092404 -
European Journal of Pediatrics Aug 2023Platelet transfusions (PTx) are the principal approach for treating neonatal thrombocytopenia, a common hematological abnormality affecting neonates, particularly... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Platelet transfusions (PTx) are the principal approach for treating neonatal thrombocytopenia, a common hematological abnormality affecting neonates, particularly preterm infants. However, evidence about the outcomes associated with PTx and whether they provide clinical benefit or harm is lacking. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the association between PTx in preterm infants and mortality, major bleeding, sepsis, and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in comparison to not transfusing or using different platelet count thresholds for transfusion. A broad electronic search in three databases was performed in December 2022. We included randomized controlled trials, and cohort and case control studies of preterm infants with thrombocytopenia that (i) compared treatment with platelet transfusion vs. no platelet transfusion, (ii) assessed the platelet count threshold for PTx, or (iii) compared single to multiple PTx. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the association between PTx and mortality, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), sepsis, and NEC and, in the presence of substantial heterogeneity, leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was performed. We screened 625 abstracts and 50 full texts and identified 18 reports of 13 eligible studies. The qualitative analysis of the included studies revealed controversial results as several studies showed an association between PTx in preterm infants and a higher risk of mortality, major bleeding, sepsis, and NEC, while others did not present a significant relationship. The meta-analysis results suggest a significant association between PTx and mortality (RR 2.4, 95% CI 1.8-3.4; p < 0.0001), as well as sepsis (RR 4.5, 95% CI 3.7-5.6; p < 0.0001), after a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. There was also found a significant correlation between PTx and NEC (RR 5.2, 95% CI 3.3-8.3; p < 0.0001). As we were not able to reduce heterogeneity in the assessment of the relationship between PTx and IVH, no conclusion could be taken. Conclusion: Platelet transfusions in preterm infants are associated to a higher risk of death, sepsis, and NEC and, possibly, to a higher incidence of IVH. Further studies are needed to confirm these associations, namely between PTx and IVH, and to define the threshold from which PTx should be given with less harm effect. What is Known: • Platelet transfusions are given to preterm infants with thrombocytopenia either to treat bleeding or to prevent hemorrhage. • Lack of consensual criteria for transfusion. What is New: • A significant association between platelet transfusions and mortality, sepsis, and NEC.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Humans; Infant, Premature; Hemorrhage; Enterocolitis, Necrotizing; Thrombocytopenia; Sepsis
PubMed: 37258776
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-023-05031-y -
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Jul 2023An increasing interest in maintaining a youthful appearance has led to the development of innovative and noninvasive aesthetic procedures for the treatment of facial... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
An increasing interest in maintaining a youthful appearance has led to the development of innovative and noninvasive aesthetic procedures for the treatment of facial aging, such as the recent use of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP). This article aims to review the literature and critically appraise the available evidence regarding the efficacy of autologous activated PRP and/or nonactivated PRP injection used for facial rejuvenation.
METHODS
A systematic review regarding the clinical use of autologous activated PRP and autologous nonactivated PRP injection in facial rejuvenation against signs of aging was performed using the PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, PreMEDLINE, Ebase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Clinicaltrials.gov , Scopus, and Cochrane databases. The protocol was developed following the Preferred Reporting for Items for Systematic Reviews-Protocols guidelines. The included studies had to match predetermined criteria according to the patients, intervention, comparator, outcomes, and study design approach.
RESULTS
Eleven of the 12 studies identified, including three randomized split-face trials, showed improved results despite differences in study design and outcome measures, many of which were subjective.
CONCLUSION
Further randomized controlled trials and related systematic reviews need to be performed, as evidence-based medicine studies of level I are required to confirm PRP injection efficacy in facial rejuvenation, to consolidate the promising results of the studies identified in this systematic review.
Topics: Humans; Rejuvenation; Cosmetic Techniques; Platelet-Rich Plasma; Aging
PubMed: 36728559
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010150 -
Cureus Oct 2023Adhesive capsulitis (AC) is a common cause of shoulder pain seen in 3%-5% of the population. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is platelet-rich blood with pro-inflammatory and... (Review)
Review
Adhesive capsulitis (AC) is a common cause of shoulder pain seen in 3%-5% of the population. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is platelet-rich blood with pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory properties that has been proposed as a treatment option for patients with AC. The purpose of this study was to analyze outcomes of range of motion (ROM) and subjective outcomes, including the visual analog scale (VAS), disability of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH), and shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) scores. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched, and manuscripts were screened using defined preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) criteria. Two reviewers independently screened articles for inclusion/exclusion using PICOS criteria and extracted data regarding ROM and subjective outcome scores. Nineteen total articles were included. Eleven of the 19 studies recorded ROM as a dependent variable. All articles reported improved ROM with PRP injection when compared to baseline. When recording degrees of shoulder ROM in different planes at the latest follow-up, there were a total of 67 comparative data points for PRP vs. control. Of the 67 comparisons, 62 (93%) had a larger final ROM in the PRP group. VAS scores were reported in 16 of the 19 studies, DASH scores were reported in eight of the 19 articles, and SPADI scores were reported in seven of the 19 articles. VAS, DASH, and SPADI scores were all superior in the PRP group compared to the control. Two studies reported the same final VAS score, but the PRP groups had a larger overall improvement. Of the studies that reported objective ROM outcomes, the PRP group had greater ROM at the longest follow-up compared to control in the vast majority of comparisons. For the studies that reported subjective outcomes, all patients that received PRP had a decrease in VAS pain scores and an improvement in DASH and SPADI questionnaires.
PubMed: 37808592
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46580 -
JBJS Reviews Nov 2023The field of sports medicine presents a varied landscape of research on hamstring injuries in athletes, characterized by inconclusive and sometimes conflicting findings...
BACKGROUND
The field of sports medicine presents a varied landscape of research on hamstring injuries in athletes, characterized by inconclusive and sometimes conflicting findings on effective treatment and rehabilitation strategies. This discordance prompted the current systematic investigation.
METHODS
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed for conducting the systematic review. Multiple international bibliometric databases (Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase) were searched to identify studies evaluating any treatment option for the management of hamstring injuries in athletes. Eligible studies were appraised for quality using Joanna Briggs Institute and Risk of Bias 2 tools.
RESULTS
A total of 30 studies with 1,195 participants were included. Of the reviewed studies, treatments varied from aggressive rehabilitation, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections, manual techniques, various exercise protocols to modalities like high-power laser and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Evidence suggested benefits from treatments like extensive muscle lengthening during eccentric actions, progressive agility, and trunk stabilization. PRP injections produced mixed results regarding return to sport and reinjury rates. Stretching exercises, sometimes combined with cryotherapy, showed benefits.
CONCLUSION
Treatments for hamstring injuries exhibit varied efficacy. Although rest, ice, compression, and elevation remains essential for acute management, rehabilitation focusing on muscle strengthening and flexibility is crucial. The potential benefits of PRP injections, especially for chronic cases, require more conclusive research. A comprehensive approach, combining evidence-based practices and patient-centric factors, is vital for effective management and recovery.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Topics: Humans; Athletic Injuries; Sports; Exercise Therapy; Soft Tissue Injuries; Athletes; Leg Injuries
PubMed: 37983561
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.23.00161 -
Cureus Dec 2023Psoriasis is a chronic and recurring condition characterized by scaly red plaques. The most common variant, plaque-type psoriasis, presents distinct clinical features.... (Review)
Review
Psoriasis is a chronic and recurring condition characterized by scaly red plaques. The most common variant, plaque-type psoriasis, presents distinct clinical features. It profoundly impacts psychological and mental well-being, resulting in depression, anxiety, and suicidal thoughts. Psoriasis occurs due to disruptions in the skin's innate and adaptive immune response triggered by trauma, infection, or medications. Treatment options include topical therapies such as corticosteroids and vitamin D analogs, phototherapy, conventional systemic agents such as methotrexate (MTX), and biologics that target pro-inflammatory cytokines. There has been growing interest in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as a potential treatment option for plaque psoriasis, given its lower toxicity compared to existing approaches. However, its use is not yet widespread in clinical practice due to the limited awareness of its effectiveness. This review aims to investigate the efficacy of PRP therapy for plaque psoriasis. To conduct a comprehensive analysis, we followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, thoroughly searching PubMed, Elton Bryson Stephens Company (EBSCO), and ClinicalTrials.gov between February and July 2023. Our focus was on patients diagnosed with plaque psoriasis, and we found multiple studies that demonstrated promising results of PRP either as monotherapy or in combination with current treatments such as MTX. The clinical evidence strongly supports the effectiveness of PRP in treating plaque psoriasis. PRP significantly improves dermatological symptoms and enhances patient and physician satisfaction. Research suggests that PRP reduces the expression of interleukin (IL) 17, a pro-inflammatory mediator, explaining its mechanism of action in treating plaque psoriasis. However, additional clinical trials with larger sample sizes, including PRP as a separate treatment group and comparisons with positive and control groups, are necessary to reinforce its efficacy in plaque psoriasis patients and elucidate other potential mechanisms underlying its beneficial effects.
PubMed: 38089952
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.50356