-
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases Jan 2024To develop treat-to-target (T2T) recommendations in giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR).
OBJECTIVES
To develop treat-to-target (T2T) recommendations in giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR).
METHODS
A systematic literature review was conducted to retrieve data on treatment targets and outcomes in GCA/PMR as well as to identify the evidence for the effectiveness of a T2T-based management approach in these diseases. Based on evidence and expert opinion, the task force (29 participants from 10 countries consisting of physicians, a healthcare professional and a patient) developed recommendations, with consensus obtained through voting. The final level of agreement was provided anonymously.
RESULTS
Five overarching principles and six-specific recommendations were formulated. Management of GCA and PMR should be based on shared decisions between patient and physician recognising the need for urgent treatment of GCA to avoid ischaemic complications, and it should aim at maximising health-related quality of life in both diseases. The treatment targets are achievement and maintenance of remission, as well as prevention of tissue ischaemia and vascular damage. Comorbidities need to be considered when assessing disease activity and selecting treatment.
CONCLUSION
These are the first T2T recommendations for GCA and PMR. Treatment targets, as well as strategies to assess, achieve and maintain these targets have been defined. The research agenda highlights the gaps in evidence and the need for future research.
Topics: Humans; Giant Cell Arteritis; Polymyalgia Rheumatica; Quality of Life; Comorbidity
PubMed: 36828585
DOI: 10.1136/ard-2022-223429 -
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism Dec 2023Prompt diagnosis and treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is crucial to prevent long-term complications and improve patient outcomes. However, there is currently no... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Prompt diagnosis and treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is crucial to prevent long-term complications and improve patient outcomes. However, there is currently no standardized approach to referral of suspected PMR patients to rheumatologists, leading to inconsistent management practices. The objective of this systematic review was to clarify the existing evidence regarding the following aspects of early management strategies in patients with suspected PMR: diagnostic strategies, GCA screening, glucocorticoid initiation prior to referral, value of shared care and value of fast track clinic.
METHODS
Two authors performed a systematic literature search, data extraction and risk of bias assessment independently. The literature search was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE (PubMed) and Cochrane. Studies were included if they contained cohorts of suspected PMR patients and evaluated the efficacy of different diagnostic strategies for PMR, screening for giant cell arteritis (GCA), starting glucocorticoids before referral to secondary care, shared care, or fast-track clinics.
RESULTS
From 2,437 records excluding duplicates, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 10 studies investigated the diagnostic accuracy of various diagnostic strategies with the majority evaluating different clinical approaches, but none of them showed consistently high performance. However, 4 studies on shared care and fast-track clinics showed promising results, including reduced hospitalization rates, lower starting doses of glucocorticoids, and faster PMR diagnosis.
CONCLUSION
This review emphasizes the sparse evidence of early management and referral strategies for patients with suspected PMR. Additionally, screening and diagnostic strategies for differentiating PMR from other diseases, including concurrent GCA, require clarification. Fast-track clinics may have potential to aid patients with PMR in the future, but studies will be needed to determine the appropriate pre-referral work-up.
Topics: Humans; Giant Cell Arteritis; Polymyalgia Rheumatica; Glucocorticoids; Referral and Consultation
PubMed: 37639896
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2023.152260 -
RMD Open Nov 2023We aimed to analyse the association between infections and the subsequent risk of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and/or polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) by a systematic review... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to analyse the association between infections and the subsequent risk of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and/or polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) by a systematic review and a meta-analysis of observational studies.
METHODS
Two databases (Medline and Embase) were systematically reviewed. Epidemiological studies studying the association between any prior infection and the onset of GCA/PMR were eligible. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. Outcomes and pooled statistics were reported as OR and their 95% CI.
RESULTS
Eleven studies (10 case-control studies and one cohort study) were analysed, seven of them were included in the meta-analysis. Eight were at low risk of bias. A positive and significant association was found between prior overall infections and prior (HZ) infections with pooled OR (95% CI) of 1.27 (1.18 to 1.37) and 1.20 (1.08 to 1.21), respectively. When analysed separately, hospital-treated and community-treated infections, were still significantly associated with the risk of GCA, but only when infections occurring within the year prior to diagnosis were considered (pooled OR (95% CI) 1.92 (1.67 to 2.21); 1.67 (1.54 to 1.82), respectively). This association was no longer found when infections occurring within the year prior to diagnosis were excluded.
CONCLUSION
Our study showed a positive association between the risk of GCA and prior overall infections (occurring in the year before), and prior HZ infections. Infections might be the reflect of an altered immunity of GCA patients or trigger the disease. However, reverse causation cannot be excluded.CRD42023404089.
Topics: Humans; Giant Cell Arteritis; Polymyalgia Rheumatica; Cohort Studies; Case-Control Studies
PubMed: 37949615
DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003493 -
Rheumatology (Oxford, England) Feb 2024To inform an international task force about current evidence on Treat to Target (T2T) strategies in PMR and GCA.
OBJECTIVES
To inform an international task force about current evidence on Treat to Target (T2T) strategies in PMR and GCA.
METHODS
A systematic literature research (SLR) was conducted in Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, clinicaltrials.gov from their inception date to May 2022, and in the EULAR/ACR abstract database (2019-2021). Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and non-randomised interventional studies published in English and answering at least one of the eleven PICO questions on T2T strategies, treatment targets and outcomes, framed by the taskforce, were identified. Study selection process, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently by two investigators.
RESULTS
Of 7809 screened abstracts, 397 were selected for detailed review and 76 manuscripts were finally included (31 RCTs, eight subgroup/exploratory analyses of RCTs and 37 non-randomised interventional studies). No study comparing a T2T strategy against standard of care was identified. In PMR RCTs, the most frequently applied outcomes concerned treatment (90.9% of RCTs), particularly the cumulative glucocorticoids (GC) dose and GC tapering, followed by clinical, laboratory and safety outcomes (63.3% each). Conversely, the most commonly reported outcomes in RCTs in GCA were prevention of relapses (72.2%), remission as well as treatment-related and safety outcomes (67.0% each).
CONCLUSIONS
This SLR provides evidence and highlights the knowledge gaps on T2T strategies in PMR and GCA, informing the task force developing T2T recommendations for these diseases.
Topics: Humans; Giant Cell Arteritis; Polymyalgia Rheumatica; Glucocorticoids
PubMed: 37672017
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead471 -
Zeitschrift Fur Rheumatologie Feb 2024This study aimed to update the prevalence estimates of inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) in Germany.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to update the prevalence estimates of inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) in Germany.
METHODS
A systematic literature search in PubMed and Web of Science (last search 08 November 2022) identified original articles (regional and nationwide surveys and claims data analyses for arthritides, connective tissue diseases, and vasculitides) on prevalences for the period 2014-2022. Data sources, collection period, case definition, and risk of bias are reported. Prevalences were estimated from available national data, with consideration of international data.
RESULTS
Screening by two authors yielded 263 hits, of which 18 claims data analyses and 2 surveys met the inclusion criteria. Prevalences ranged from 0.42 to 1.85% (rheumatoid arthritis), 0.32-0.5% (ankylosing spondylitis), 0.11-0.32% (psoriatic arthritis), 0.037-0.14% (systemic lupus erythematosus), 0.07-0.77% (Sjögren's disease/sicca syndrome), 0.14-0.15% (polymyalgia rheumatica, ≥ 40 years), 0.04-0.05% (giant cell arteritis, ≥ 50 years), and 0.015-0.026% (ANCA-associated vasculitis). The risk of bias was moderate in 13 and high in 7 studies. Based on the results, we estimate the prevalence of IRD in Germany to be 2.2-3.0%, which corresponds to approximately 1.5-2.1 million affected individuals. The prevalence of juvenile idiopathic arthritis was reported to be around 0.10% (0.07-0.10%) of 0-18-year-olds, corresponding to about 14,000 children and adolescents in Germany.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review shows an increase in the prevalence of IRD in Germany, which is almost exclusively based on claims data analyses. In the absence of multistage population studies, the available data are, overall, uncertain sources for prevalence estimates, with a moderate to high risk of bias.
Topics: Child; Adolescent; Humans; Prevalence; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Spondylitis, Ankylosing; Polymyalgia Rheumatica; Sjogren's Syndrome; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Rheumatic Fever; Giant Cell Arteritis; Rheumatic Diseases
PubMed: 36749363
DOI: 10.1007/s00393-022-01302-5 -
Revista Clinica Espanola Jun 2024Systematic review of current evidence to analyze the prevalence of extracranial large vessel vasculitis (LVV) using F-FDG PET/CT in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica...
OBJECTIVE
Systematic review of current evidence to analyze the prevalence of extracranial large vessel vasculitis (LVV) using F-FDG PET/CT in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) or giant cell arteritis (GCA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
PubMed and EMBASE were searched and the results were screened by two reviewers. Study quality was assessed using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the I statistic and the Q test. Further subgroup analyses were performed by disease type, study quality, and F-FDG PET/CT uptake criteria. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plot and Egger's test.
RESULTS
268 publications were identified, of which 17 met the selection criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled prevalence of extracranial LVV by F-FDG PET/CT was 54.5% [95% CI: 42.6%-66.1%]. In patients with GCA the prevalence was significantly higher than in patients with PMR (60.1% vs. 41.8%, P = 0.006). Likewise, studies with a lower risk of bias reported a higher prevalence of extracranial LVV (61.1% vs. 46.9%; P = 0.010). No publication bias was observed.
CONCLUSIONS
The F-FDG PET/CT test may be useful in the detection of extracranial LVV, both in patients with PMR or GCA. Such involvement is more frequent in patients with GCA, and may vary depending on the quality of the studies.
PubMed: 38852739
DOI: 10.1016/j.rceng.2024.06.005 -
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Jan 2024The pathogenesis of shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) is incompletely understood, but it is postulated to be an immune-mediated inflammatory... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The pathogenesis of shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) is incompletely understood, but it is postulated to be an immune-mediated inflammatory response to a vaccine antigen, leading to shoulder pain and dysfunction. The purpose of this investigation is to systematically review the literature related to SIRVA specifically after the COVID-19 vaccination by describing the diagnostic and clinical characteristics, diagnoses associated with SIRVA, and incidence between vaccine types.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed to identify level I to IV studies and case descriptions of shoulder pain occurring after COVID-19 vaccination. To confirm that no studies were missing from the systematic review, references of studies from the initial search were scanned for additional relevant studies.
RESULTS
A total of 22 studies, comprised of 81 patients, were identified meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Reports were most commonly published from countries in Asia (53.1%; n = 43/81). The most commonly described vaccines were Oxford-AstraZeneca at 37.0% (n = 30/81) and Pfizer-BioNTech at 33.3% (n = 27/81). Symptoms occurred most commonly after at least 72 hours of administration (30.9%, n = 25/81). One hundred percent of patients (n = 81/81) described pain as an associated symptom and 90.1% of patients (n = 73/81) described multiple symptoms. The diagnostic modalities utilized to identify a specific pathology consisted of magnetic resonance imaging (55.6%; n = 45/81), ultrasound (28.4; n = 23/81), radiograph (25.9%; n = 21/81), and computed tomography (4.9%; 4/81). Nearly a third of patients (32.1%; n = 26/81) were diagnosed with bursitis, while 22 (27.2%) were diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis, 17 (21.0%) with either rotator cuff tear or tendinopathy, and 14 (17.3%) with polymyalgia rheumatica or polymyalgia rheumatica-like syndrome. The 2 most common treatment options were physical therapy (34.6%; n = 28/81) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications (33.3%; 27/81). The majority of SIRVA cases (52.1%; n = 38/73) completely resolved within a few weeks to months.
CONCLUSION
Despite the limited quality and lack of large-scale studies, it is important for providers to recognize SIRVA as a potential risk factor as the number of patients receiving COVID-19 vaccinations and boosters continues to rise.
Topics: Humans; Shoulder Pain; COVID-19 Vaccines; Polymyalgia Rheumatica; COVID-19; Shoulder Injuries; Bursitis; Vaccines; Vaccination
PubMed: 37660886
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.07.040 -
Zeitschrift Fur Rheumatologie Nov 2023To update the estimated prevalence of inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) in Germany.
OBJECTIVE
To update the estimated prevalence of inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) in Germany.
METHODS
A systematic literature search in PubMed and Web of Science (last search 8 November 2022) identified original articles (regional and nationwide surveys and routine data analyses for arthritides, connective tissue diseases, and vasculitides) on the prevalence for the period 2014-2022. Data sources, collection period, case definition, and risk of bias are reported. The prevalences were estimated from available national data, with consideration of international data.
RESULTS
Screening by 2 authors yielded 263 hits, of which 18 routine data analyses and 2 surveys met the inclusion criteria. Prevalence data ranged from 0.42% to 1.85% (rheumatoid arthritis), 0.32-0.5% (ankylosing spondylitis), 0.11-0.32% (psoriatic arthritis), 0.037-0.14% (systemic lupus erythematosus), 0.07-0.77% (Sjoegren's disease/sicca syndrome), 0.14-0.15% (polymyalgia rheumatica, ≥ 40 years), 0.04-0.05% (giant cell arteritis, ≥ 50 years), and 0.015-0.026% (ANCA-associated vasculitis). The risk of bias was moderate in 13 and high in 7 studies. Based on the results, we estimate the prevalence of IRD in Germany to be 2.2-3.0%, which corresponds to approximately 1.5-2.1 million affected individuals. Prevalence data of juvenile idiopathic arthritis was reported to be around 0.10% (0.07-0.10%) of patients 0-18 years old, corresponding to about 14,000 children and adolescents in Germany.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review shows an increase in the prevalence of IRD in Germany, which is almost exclusively based on routine data analyses. In the absence of multistage population studies, the available data are overall uncertain sources for prevalence estimates at moderate to high risk of bias.
Topics: Child; Adolescent; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant; Child, Preschool; Prevalence; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Spondylitis, Ankylosing; Arthritis, Juvenile; Sjogren's Syndrome; Rheumatic Fever; Giant Cell Arteritis; Rheumatic Diseases
PubMed: 36592211
DOI: 10.1007/s00393-022-01305-2 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2024Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a systemic, inflammatory vasculitis primarily affecting people over the age of 50 years. GCA is treated as a medical emergency due to the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a systemic, inflammatory vasculitis primarily affecting people over the age of 50 years. GCA is treated as a medical emergency due to the potential for sudden, irreversible visual loss. Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is one of the five criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1990 classification, which is used to aid the diagnosis of GCA. TAB is an invasive test, and it can be slow to obtain a result due to delays in performing the procedure and the time taken for histopathologic assessment. Temporal artery ultrasonography (US) has been demonstrated to show findings in people with GCA such as the halo sign (a hypoechoic circumferential wall thickening due to oedema), stenosis or occlusion that can help to confirm a diagnosis more swiftly and less invasively, but requiring more subjective interpretation. This review will help to determine the role of these investigations in clinical practice.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the halo sign on temporal artery US, using the ACR 1990 classification as a reference standard, to investigate whether US could be used as triage for TAB. To compare the accuracy of US with TAB in the subset of paired studies that have obtained both tests on the same patients, to investigate whether it could replace TAB as one of the criteria in the ACR 1990 classification.
SEARCH METHODS
We used standard Cochrane search methods for diagnostic accuracy. The date of the search was 13 September 2022.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included all participants with clinically suspected GCA who were investigated for the presence of the halo sign on temporal artery US, using the ACR 1990 criteria as a reference standard. We included studies with participants with a prior diagnosis of polymyalgia rheumatica. We excluded studies if participants had had two or more weeks of steroid treatment prior to the investigations. We also included any comparative test accuracy studies of the halo sign on temporal artery US versus TAB, with use of the 1990 ACR diagnostic criteria as a reference standard. Although we have chosen to use this classification for the purpose of the meta-analysis, we accept that it incorporates unavoidable incorporation bias, as TAB is itself one of the five criteria. This increases the specificity of TAB, making it difficult to compare with US. We excluded case-control studies, as they overestimate accuracy, as well as case series in which all participants had a prior diagnosis of GCA, as they can only address sensitivity and not specificity.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed the studies for inclusion in the review. They extracted data using a standardised data collection form and employed the QUADAS-2 tool to assess methodological quality. As not enough studies reported data at our prespecified halo threshold of 0.3 mm, we fitted hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) models to estimate US sensitivity and also to compare US with TAB. We graded the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.
MAIN RESULTS
Temporal artery ultrasound was investigated in 15 studies (617 participants with GCA out of 1479, 41.7%), with sample sizes ranging from 20 to 381 participants (median 69). There was wide variation in sensitivity with a median value of 0.78 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.45 to 0.83; range 0.03 to 1.00), while specificity was fair to good in most studies with a median value of 0.91 (IQR 0.78 to 1.00; range 0.40 to 1.00) and four studies with a specificity of 1.00. The hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) estimate of sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI)) at the high specificity of 0.95 was 0.51 (0.21 to 0.81), and 0.84 (0.58 to 0.95) at 0.80 specificity. We considered the evidence on sensitivity and specificity as of very low certainty due to risk of bias (-1), imprecision (-1), and inconsistency (-1). Only four studies reported data at a halo cut-off > 0.3 mm, finding the following sensitivities and specificities (95% CI): 0.80 (0.56 to 0.94) and 0.94 (0.81 to 0.99) in 55 participants; 0.10 (0.00 to 0.45) and 1.00 (0.84 to 1.00) in 31 participants; 0.73 (0.54 to 0.88) and 1.00 (0.93 to 1.00) in 82 participants; 0.83 (0.63 to 0.95) and 0.72 (0.64 to 0.79) in 182 participants. Data on a direct comparison of temporal artery US with biopsy were obtained from 11 studies (808 participants; 460 with GCA, 56.9%). The sensitivity of US ranged between 0.03 and 1.00 with a median of 0.75, while that of TAB ranged between 0.33 and 0.92 with a median of 0.73. The specificity was 1.00 in four studies for US and in seven for TAB. At high specificity (0.95), the sensitivity of US and TAB were 0.50 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.76) versus 0.80 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.93), respectively, and at low specificity (0.80) they were 0.73 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.88) versus 0.92 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.98). We considered the comparative evidence on the sensitivity of US versus TAB to be of very low certainty because specificity was overestimated for TAB since it is one of the criteria used in the reference standard (-1), together with downgrade due to risk of bias (-1), imprecision (-1), and inconsistency (-1) for both sensitivity and specificity.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is limited published evidence on the accuracy of temporal artery US for detecting GCA. Ultrasound seems to be moderately sensitive when the specificity is good, but data were heterogeneous across studies and either did not use the same halo thickness threshold or did not report it. We can draw no conclusions from accuracy studies on whether US can replace TAB for diagnosing GCA given the very low certainty of the evidence. Future research could consider using the 2016 revision of the ACR criteria as a reference standard, which will limit incorporation bias of TAB into the reference standard.
Topics: Humans; Biopsy; Giant Cell Arteritis; Sensitivity and Specificity; Temporal Arteries; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 38323659
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013199.pub2